Module One: Governance for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Advertisements

Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
PORTFOLIO.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Contextualized Goals Setting: How to operationalize ISLLC standards for school improvement Dawn Shannon Assistant Superintendent, Broome-Tioga BOCES
School Improvement Planning Assessing Teacher Learning Needs.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Module 1: System Overview, Expectations, and Goal Setting.
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Technology Leadership
Slide 1 TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy implications ESD 112 March 12, 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
HQS 2 School Leadership Glenna Heinlein and Kathy Hypes October 1, 2013.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Northern Humboldt Union High School District Performance-Based Compensation William J. Slotnik Executive Director Community Training and Assistance Center.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Module Two: Culture for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Module Three: Instructional Leadership for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
+ The continuum Summative assessment Next steps. Gallery Walk – the Bigger Picture Take one post it of each of the 3 colours. Walk around a look at the.
Session Materials  Wiki
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
AN INTRODUCTION TO RESILIENCY July 2008 Office of Youth Development Integrated Service Center.
Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Learning4Life or Lifelong learning? Warren Goetzel, PhD GaETC – CTO Clinic Atlanta, GA 2013.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Have you downloaded WSSDA 2014? Search for the app in iTunes or Google Play Store and join the conversation. WELCOME. 1.Tap Agenda 2.Locate this session.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Office of Service Quality
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
DATA TEAM SIX STEP PROCESS. GOAL: IMPROVED TEACHING AND STUDENT LEARNING Analyze student performance in context with school, district and state performance.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
ASH EDU 647 Week 5 DQ 2 Contextual Instruction Check this A+ tutorial guideline at contextual-instruction.
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Principles that Promote a Culture For Learning Understanding the WHY and the WHAT Chuck Salina Ph.D. Suzann Girtz Ph.D. Gonzaga University.
Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Administrators Leadership and Vision.
Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Module One: Governance for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs

2 Governance for Learning The following topics are research-based: o Setting Goals o Effective Planning o Effective Policies and Practices o Monitoring o Effective Leadership

3 Setting Goals  The school has not employed a shared goal setting process.  Individual preferences drive any goals for the school.  The district has not developed non-negotiable goals for achievement and instruction.  The school has begun a shared goal setting process.  The goals are shared by a limited number of stakeholders.  The district has not developed non-negotiable goals for achievement and instruction.  The school has a shared goal setting process in place.  The goals are shared by most stakeholders. District and school goals are aligned.  The district has developed non- negotiable goals for achievement and instruction.  Goal setting is integral to the culture of the school.  Transparent goals are shared by stakeholders.  The district has developed non- negotiable goals for achievement and instruction. Rubric Level: Evidence: ComponentLevel ILevel IILevel IIILevel IVRating/Evidence Governance Rubric Effective Planning  The school has not employed a systematic planning process.  The school has begun to employ a systematic planning process.  The school has a systematic planning process in place.  Effective planning is integral to the culture of the school. Rubric Level: Evidence:

4 ComponentLevel ILevel IILevel IIILevel IVRating/Evidence Governance Rubric Effective Policies And Practices  The school has not developed policies that directly support improved student achievement.  The school has begun the process of developing policies that directly support improved student achievement.  The school has developed policies that directly support improved student achievement.  The school has developed policies that result in improved student achievement. Rubric Level: Evidence: Monitoring  The school has not employed a system to consistently monitor goals.  The school has begun the process of monitoring goals.  Results are incomplete and provide limited data.  The school has employed a process of monitoring goals.  Results are complete and provide data about goal attainment.  The school regularly monitors all goals.  Data provide timely feedback about goal attainment. Rubric Level: Evidence: Effective Leadership  Collaborative decision making is absent.  The school is characterized by individual actors pursuing individual goals.  The school lacks instructional leadership.  Collaborative decision making exists in the school.  The school has limited staff involved in pursuing common goals.  Instructional leadership addresses practices affecting student learning.  Collaborative decision making exists and is used effectively in the school.  A majority of the staff are involved in pursuing common goals.  Instructional leadership addresses practices affecting student and adult learning.  Collaborative decision making is integral to the culture of the school.  The school has a learning culture in which all actors are pursuing common goals.  Instructional leadership is effective in the improvement of learning for students and adults. Rubric Level: Evidence:

5 Governance for Learning Gallery Walk Activity o Provide research-based information about the topics o Pose critical questions o Provide an opportunity for application through sharing and conversation

6 Governance for Learning A Gallery Walk: 1. Form a topic group. 2. At your topic station, read the research summaries provided. 3. Respond to the critical questions through sharing and conversation. 4. Summarize points discussed by your group on the chart provided. 5. Determine a potential rubric rating. 6. When time is called, move to the next topic station and repeat steps 2-4.

7 Governance for Learning Gallery Walk Summary Report-Outs When groups have completed the Gallery Walk, someone at each station will summarize the responses to the critical questions for each topic that are posted on the charts: o Setting Goals o Effective Planning o Effective Policies and Practices o Monitoring o Effective Leadership

Governance for Learning Critical Questions – Goal Setting o Describe the processes used for setting goals in your school district. o Who participates in this process? o How effective is your goal setting process? o Where would you put your school on the Governance for Learning Rubric? 8

9 Governance for Learning Critical Questions – Effective Planning o What resources are needed for effective planning processes? o Who is involved in the planning processes in your district? o Can you describe an example of the link between effective planning and improved student achievement in your district? o Where would you put your school on the Governance for Learning Rubric?

10 Governance for Learning Critical Questions – Effective Policies and Practices o Who are the policy makers in your district? o How does your district address student achievement from a policy standpoint? o What are some examples of practices in your district that support effective policies? o Where would you put your school on the Governance for Learning Rubric?

11 Governance for Learning Critical Questions – Monitoring o Describe how your district monitors student learning and provides feedback to students, parents, and other stakeholders. o Is your monitoring process effective? o How might it be improved? o Where would you put your school on the Governance for Learning Rubric?

12 Governance for Learning Critical Questions – Effective Leadership o What examples from your experiences would support the findings of the research on the relationship between effective leadership and improving student achievement? o Where would you put your school on the Governance for Learning Rubric?

13 Discussion and Wrap-Up o What are the implications for leadership? o What are the implications for change?

14 Thank You! o We hope that this session will be meaningful for your schools and students.