1 JARC Grant: Study on Transportation Gaps for Low-Income Populations in the National Capital Region.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (TMA) GREATER IRVING-LAS COLINAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AUGUST 25, 2009.
Advertisements

SECTIONS 5310, 5316 AND 5317 PROGRAM GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS The Governor of South Carolina has designated the South Carolina Department of Transportations.
Libraries Building Communities Report 3 Bridging the Gaps.
1 Discussion of JARC Priorities For 2009 Solicitation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Access for All Committee July 24, 2008.
The Economic Impact of BRAC on the 11 Member Counties: Bridging the Gap for Economically Disadvantaged Populations Mr. Floyd Shorter, PI Dr. Assad Tavakoli,
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
Conducted by: William M. Rohe Spencer Cowan Daniel Rodriguez Conducted for: The North Carolina Association of Community Development Corporations in cooperation.
Review and Revision of Draft Round 7.0 Growth Forecasts Paul DesJardin Department of Human Services, Planning and Public Safety and Robert Griffiths Department.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Workforce in Iowa’s Creative Corridor Iowa’s Creative Corridor Regional Workforce Development Plan.
Overview of JARC & New Freedom Projects, FY 2013 HSTC Task Force Meeting February 20,2014 Lynn Winchell-Mendy Transportation Planner National Capital Region.
New York Region Job Access & Reverse Commute Transportation Plan Study Regional Plan Association  Abeles Phillips Preiss & Shapiro  Cambridge Systematics,
Overview of Plan Outline and Strategies and Actions Human Service Transportation Coordinated Plan Task Force Meeting January 11, 2007.
The contribution of ACFE for a more inclusive Australia Rowena Allen Chairperson Adult Community and Further Education (ACFE) Board.
Multimodal Concurrency: Response to 2005 Legislative Session Briefing for House Local Government Committee November 30, 2006 King Cushman Puget Sound Regional.
Transportation Development How do we get rubber on the road? …..and other burning questions.
The Planning Perspective Presented by Joel Eisenfeld – KFH Group.
NWT Labour Supply Bureau of Statistics July 5, 2006.
6.03 Exemplify why there is a global war for talent, and why companies outsource parts of the value chain.
Office of Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Baltimore Sustainable Communities Initiative CSSC September 18, 2012.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Cape Elizabeth Senior Citizens Advisory Commission Preliminary Observations A report to the Cape Elizabeth Town Council November 6, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
Transportation & Aging Senior and Disabled Riders Transportation Summit December 6, 2013.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
HSTP PLAN DEVELOPMENT Skagit-Island Human Services Transportation Plan July 10, 2014.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #3 August 6, 2014.
Clean, Green, and on the Same Team! How Economic and Workforce Development are Partnering to Serve an Emerging Regional Industry.
May 30, 2008 Community Integration Commission 1 DRPT Initiatives on Transportation Services For Older Adults, People With Disabilities.
Economic Development, Planning & Tourism 1 General Description General Description Past Effort Past Effort Current Effort Current Effort Next Steps Next.
Transit Strategy Tualatin City Council Work Session February 25,
National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Presented by Connie Soper, Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates October 14, 2011 NATIONAL CAPITAL.
Sullivan County Coordinated Transportation Plan Proposed Coordinated Transportation Plan.
Seminar "Imovinski standard", 29. i 30. lipnja Spatial Planning in Ireland Farannán Tannam, MRICS, Dip.A&F.
1 Approval of Project Recommendations For Funding Under Job Access Reverse Commute and New Freedom Programs National Capital Region Transportation Planning.
Highway 53 Relocation: Economic Impact Study Economic Impact Analysis Study Findings and Conclusions November 7, 2013.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
The Geography of Welfare Reform in Southeast Florida South Florida Regional Planning Council.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Additional Findings by Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
VALUES WORKSHOP Anne Arundel County | April 26, 2010.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
4.0 Understanding the Local Economy Exploring the Human Resources/Economic Development Connection Community Choices: Public Policy Education Program 8.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.
Colby Brown, Citilabs Dennis Farmer, Metropolitan Council
TPB Access for All (AFA) Advisory Committee Presentation of the 2003 Report to the TPB Kathy Porter, AFA Chair April 21, 2004.
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
Human Service Transportation Coordination: The Metropolitan Washington Experience Beth Newman Transportation Planner AMPO Annual Conference October 3,
2030 Transit-Oriented Development Scenario: Travel Model Results
IBH Exemplify why there is a global war for talent, and why companies outsource parts of the value chain.
Who Rides the Bus? Connecting Transit Demographics and Transit Service.
Understanding Local Economies Goals To present export base theory as a model of the way a local economy works. To relate general export base theory to.
Patricia M. Steed Executive Director Central Florida Regional Planning Council Linking Regional Visions In Polk County.
Analysis of Travel Behavior Using the ACS J.G. Berman, Siim S öö t and Susumu Kudo Urban Transportation Center, UIC.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
Forecasting the labor market needs of workforce skills Budapest 26 February 2014.
MAZOWSZE 2007 – 2013 Operational Program Human Capital Regional Component Ministry of Regional Development.
Transportation for Everyone Community Transportation for the Contoocook River Valley February 2007 Posted 2/14/07.
Ministry of Transport Viet Nam
Technical Committee Item # 9
Edinburgh Economy Strategy
LITHUANIAN EU PRESIDENCY PRIORITIES
Model Work Trips Appropriately Based on Travel Behavior and Change Pattern Differences 2016HTS Characteristics and Changes vs. 2006HTS 16th TRB National.
Shenandoah County Public Transit Feasibility Study
Presentation transcript:

1 JARC Grant: Study on Transportation Gaps for Low-Income Populations in the National Capital Region

2 Outline I.Project Overview II.Background III.Implementation Plan IV.Participation

3 I. Project Overview The proposed study aims to: – Identify aspects preventing low-income individuals to access jobs – Measure their accessibility to private and public transportation. – Propose recommendations for improving their transportation options based on the empirical analysis.

4 III. Draft of the implementation plan The implementation plan is based on the following tasks : – Task 1: Analysis of the aspects preventing job access. – Task 2: Where are the jobs and where jobs are expected to grow ? – Task 3: Determine level of accessibility to Private and Public Transportation (origin). – Task 4: Determine accessibility level to jobs and services (destination). – Task 5: Trip chaining analysis. – Task 6: Findings and Recommendations.

5 III.1. Task 1: Analysis of the aspects preventing job access. Premise: – Low-income population is concentrated in the central and eastern portions of the region, and along transportation corridors (Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, 2004). Tasks: – A detailed qualitative analysis concerning the aspects that prevent access to jobs (education, training, housing locations) will be undertaken using the 2009 US census data and possibly other data sources (i.e. TANF).

6 III.2. Task 2: Where are the jobs and where jobs are expected to grow ? Premise: ₋Geographic distance between poor neighborhoods and the location of entry-level jobs results in limited work experience and greater incidence of unemployment among low-income workers. Tasks: ₋The scope of this section is to provide a comprehensive overview about the actual employment in the region, and about expected growth and development. The analysis by category (entry level, retail, service) will be based on data prepared and made available by the Cooperative Forecasting program.

7 III.3. Task 3: Accessibility to private and public transportation Premise: – Modal shares for low-income individuals differ from those of the general population. Low-income individuals are more likely to commute by public transportation (especially bus), to carpool and to walk to work. Tasks: – Accessibility to public transportation will be carefully examined. The effects of compact development around stations (Smart Growth) on low-income population will be also part of our analysis.

8 III.4. Task 4: Accessibility to jobs and services Premise: – This analysis will specifically seek ways to help develop the available work force for Washington area employers as well as improve access opportunities for potential employees and for in training individuals. Tasks: – Analysis of jobs and services locations on the Washington Metropolitan Area, with a focus on the regions that are expected to grow in terms of jobs zones.

9 III.5. Task 5: Trip Chaining Analysis Premise: – Low-wage workers often have multiple jobs, each for a few hours per day, leading them to travel to multiple destinations. In addition, those jobs can come with unpredictable or inflexible schedules. Tasks: – An activity-based analysis of the Baltimore- Washington household travel survey is proposed. The analysis will include all trips undertaken by all household members over all times of day. From this, a pattern of behavior (activity chain) can be obtained.

10 III.6. Task6: Findings and Recommendations In particular, the research will provide insight on: – Trends in socio-demographic factors that characterize disadvantaged population. – Jobs locations and measure of accessibility to jobs and services. – Innovative transportation services (carpool, vanpool, guaranteed ride home service para-transit…). – Priorities to be set for enhancing existing services. – Plans for new services in response to new needs (transportation and other)

11 IV. Participation is encouraged… From your perspective, what is the most significant barrier for persons with low-incomes in finding employment? We welcome participants to the steering committee. We are organizing a focus group; please help us identify possible interested parties. Thank you.