Outflows from YSOs and Angular Momentum Transfer National Astronomical Observatory (NAOJ) Kohji Tomisaka
Angular Momentum Fragmentation ( binary formation) is much affected by the amount of angular momentum in rotation supported disk cr. Angular Momentum Problem: j * << j cl Specific angular momentum of a new-born star: is much smaller than that of parent cloud:
Angular Momentum Transfer Magnetic Braking Alfven Speed Ambient density Column density Free-fall time in ambient matter >1: For super- critical clouds Longer than dynamical time B-Fields do not play a role in angular momentum transfer in a contracting cloud?
Angular Momentum Redistribution in Dynamical Collapse In outflows driven by magnetic fields: –The angular momentum is transferred effectively from the disk to the outflow. –If 10 % of inflowing mass is outflowed with having 99.9% of angular momentum, j * would be reduced to j cl. Outflo w Disk B-Fields Outflow Mass Inflow star Outflow Ang.Mom.
Shu’s Inside-out Solution Larson-Penston Solution Outflow What we have done. Dynamical contraction of slowly rotating magnetized clouds is studied by ideal MHD numerical simulations with cylindrical symmetry. Evolution is as follows: Run-away Collapse Increase in Central Density Formation of Adiabatic Core Accretion Phase
Numerical Method Ideal MHD + Self- Gravity + Cylindrical Symmetry Collapse: nonhomologous Large Dynamic Range is attained by Nested Grid Method. –Coarse Grids: Global Structure –Fine Grids: Small-Scale Structure Near the Core L0 L23 1 1/2 1/4
Initial Condition Cylindrical Isothermal Clouds –Magnetohydrostatic balance in r-direction –uniform in z-direction B-Fields Slowly rotating (~ rigid-body rotation) Added perturbation with of the gravitationally most unstable mode MGR. MGR parameters
t=0 0.6Myr 1Myr Run-away Collapse Phase
Accretion Phase High-density gas becomes adiabatic. –The central core becomes optically thick for thermal radiation from dusts. –Critical density = An adiabatic core is formed. To simulate, a double polytrope is applied –isothermal –adaiabatic
Accretion Phase (II) Collapse time-scale in the adiabatic core becomes much longer than the infall time. Inflowing gas accretes on to the nearly static core, which grows to a star. Outflow emerges in this phase. Outflow
Core + Contracting Disk Pseudo- Disk Accretion Phase B 0, Adiabatic (the first) Core
A Ring Supported by Centrifugal Force Run-away Collapse Stage Accretion Stage Accretion Phase 0, B=0
Accretion Phase B 0, 0 Run-away Collapse Stage 1000yr L10 300AU
Why Does the Outflow Begin in the Accretion Stage? B 0, 0 Accretion Phase Blandford & Peyne 82 Mass Accretion RateMagneto-Centrifugal Wind
Angular Momentum Distribution (1) Mass measured from the center (2) Angular momentum in (3) Specific Angular momentum distribution Angular Momentum Problem
Core Formation 7000 yr after Core Formation Mass Specific Angular Momentum Initial High-density region is formed by gases with small j. Run-away Collapse Magnetic torque brings the angular momentum from the disk to the outflow. Outflow brings the angular momentum. Accretion Stage Angular Momentum Problem
Magnetic Torque, Angular Momentum Inflow/Outflow Rate Mass Initial Torque Inflow Outflow Accretion Phase Inflow Torque Core Formation Inflow Torque
In weakly ionized plasma, neutral molecules have only indirect coupling with the B-fields through ionized ions. Neutral-ion collision time When, ambipolar diffusion is important. Assuming (on core formation), rotation period of centrifugal radius: Ambipolar Diffusion?
Edge of Hole made by Molecular Outflow Molecular OutflowOptical Jets L1551 IRS5 Optical Jets
Flow velocity: faster than molecular outflow. The width is much smaller. These indicate ‘Optical jets are made and ejected from compact objects.’ The first outflow is ejected just outside the adiabatic (first) core. Jets and Outflows
Optical jets are formed just outside the second core? Temperature-Density RelationJets and Outflows Temperature-Density Relation adiabatic H 2 Dissoc. isothermal 1st Core 2nd Core Log T Log Outflows Jets? Log n Tohline 1982
Outflow Jets Jets and Outflows s =10 4 H 2 cm -3 =1, L8 L16 10AU 10R c = H 2 cm -3 c =10 19 H 2 cm -3 c = H 2 cm -3 H 2 Dissoc. 10R 2nd Runaway Collapse X256
Summary In dynamically collapsing clouds, the outflow emerges just after the core formation ( yr). In the accretion phase, the centrifugal wind mechanism & magnetic pressure force work efficiently. In 7000 yr ( ), the outflow reaches 2000 AU. Maximum speed reaches
Summary(2) In the process, the angular momentum is transferred from the disk to the outflow and the outflow brings the excess j. This solves the angular momentum problem of new-born stars. The 2nd outflow outside the 2nd (atomic) core explains optical jets.
Runaway CollapseAccretion-associated Collapse Density increases infinitely Inside-out CollapseHydrostatic Core Larson 1969, Penston 1969, Hunter 1977, Whitworth & Summers 1985 Shu 1977 Dynamical Collapse
Parameters Angular Rotation Speed Magnetic to thermal pressure ratio
Nest (Self-Similar) Structure L5 L12 z Run-away Collapse Phase Along z-axis
Run-away Collapse Evolution characterized as self-similar
Magnetocentrifugal Wind Model: Blandford & Peyne 1982 Consider a particle rotating with rotation speed = Kepler velocity and assume is conserved moving along the B-fields. Along field lines with deg the particle is accelerated. For deg decelerated. Effective potential for a particle rotating with
Momentum Flux (Observation) Low-Mass YSOs (Bontemps et al.1996) Luminosity Momentum
Angular Momentum (1) Mass measured from the center (2) Angular momentum in (3) Specific Angular momentum distribution Angular Momentum Problem
Effective Outflow Speed
Outflow Driving Mechanism Rotating Disk + Twisted Magnetic Fields –Centrifugal Wind + Pudritz & Norman 1983; Uchida & Shibata 1985; Shu et al.1994; Ouyed & Pudritz 1997; Kudoh & Shibata 1997 Contraction vs Outflow? When outflow begins? Condition? Outflow Disk B-Fields Outflow Inflow
Accretion/Outflow Rate Inflow Rate is Much Larger than Shu’s Rate (1977). LP Solution: Outflow/Inflow Mass Ratio is Large ~ 50 %. Source Point of Outflow Moves Outward. 6000yr2000yr4000yr
Momentum Driving Rate Molecular Outflows (Class 0&1 Objects) show Momentum Outflow Rate (Bontemps et al.1996) 6000yr2000yr4000yr
Weak Magnetic Fields ( =0.1, ) 0 yr 2000 yr 4000 yr B 0, 0 Accretion Phase
Effect of B-Field Strength In small model, toroidal B-fields become dominant against the poloidal ones. Poloidal B-fields are winding. Small and slow rotation lead less effective acceleration. B 0, 0 Accretion Phase
Angular Momentum Problem Typical specific angular momentum of T Tauri stars Angular momentum of typical molecular cores Centrifugal Radius Angular Momentum Problem
Molecular Outflow Saito, Kawabe, Kitamura&Sunada 1996 L1551 IRS5 Optical Jets Snell, Loren, &Plambeck 1980