Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
1 Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November 16, 2010 Michael Gillespie, Principal.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Oxford Preparatory Academy Chino Valley Unified School District Chino Valley, South Orange County & Oceanside A Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade Program.
1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard Status: Approaching (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets (2011)
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Data Analysis of Sweetwater High School Presented by: LeLycia Henderson & Zorayda Delgado.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
2010 CST DATA ANALYSIS 4 th Grade. 4 TH Grade Across the years- ELA.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
James A. Farley School Report Card Presentation May 19, 2008 High Achieving School.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
SANGER HIGH SCHOOL CALIFORNIA DISTINGUISHED SCHOOL CALSTAT LEADERSHIP SITE FOR COLLABORATION
Ross Valley School District STAR, API and AYP Summary Toni Beal, Director of Student Services September 27, 2011.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
CAASPP Results Kern County.
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Daniel Melendez

School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276)  Gender  Special Needs  14% (110)  Ethnic Groups  Caucasian = 53.88% (425); Hispanic/Latino = 38.85% (306); Asian = 2.13% (16)

Targets  Participation Rate  ELA Target = 95% Met criteria? Yes  Math Target = 95% Met criteria? Yes  100% participation  Percent Proficient – Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)  ELA Target = 67.6% Met criteria? No  Math Target = 68.5% Met criteria? No

ELA Proficiency GROUPSVALID SCORES # AT OR ABOVE PROFICIENCY % AT OR ABOVE PROFICIENCY Met 2011 AYP Criteria School wide NO Hispanic or Latino NO Caucasian NO Socioeconomi cally Disadvantaged NO Students w/ Disabilities NO

Math Proficiency GROUPSVALID SCORES # AT OR ABOVE PROFICIENCY % AT OR ABOVE PROFICIENCY Met 2011 AYP Criteria School wide YES (SH) Hispanic or Latino NO White YES (SH) Socioeconomi cally Disadvantages NO Students w/ Disabilities NO

Academic Performance Index (API) – Additional Indicator for AYP 2010 Base API 2011 Growth API Growth Met 2011 API Criteria Alternative Method YES

Comparisons NISDistrictCountyState 09 / 10 / 11 Languag e Arts 53 / 63 / 5956 / 60 / 6149 / 52 / 5550 / 52 / 54 Math 32 / 34 / 3845 / 48 / 5046 / 58 / 5046 / 48 / 50 Science 60 / 65 / 6753 / 59 / 6554 / 59 / 6450 / 54 / 57 Social Science 41 / 51 / 5744 / 49 / 5041 / 46 / 5141 / 44 / 48

% of Students Proficient or > CNUSD NIS ALL MaleFemale Language Arts Math Science Social Science

Statewide & Similar School Rankings Statewide Rank 766 Similar School Rank 544

Program Improvement Information  Norco Intermediate NOT IN PI  CNUSD is in PI   Year 2  7 schools in PI = 14% of schools in district

Resources  California Department of Education  Norco Intermediate SARC