STUDENT GROWTH & JOB RETENTION SB7 AND PERA. COMMITTEE MEMBERS Jennifer Kowaczek (Committee Leader) Cyndee Fralick (ETA Board Member) Graciela AlbaveraSandy.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Developing Common Assessments. What Do Students Know… Frequent monitoring of each students learning is an essential element of effective teaching; no.

Advertisements

And PERA. 1) School Climate Survey 2) School Board Member Training 3) Certification Action – Incompetency 4) Filling of vacant positions 5) Tenure 6)

Performance Evaluation Legislation Illinois Audrey Soglin Illinois Education Association May 4, 2010 Great Lakes TURN.

Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.

Illinois State Board of Education

Transforming Educator Evaluations in Illinois

Why were PERA and SB7 passed? What will be the consequences? Dr. Richard Voltz, Associate Director Illinois Association of School Administrators.

Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT MIDLAND HIGH SCHOOL.

Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.

ESEA Flexibility Waiver Request

District Determined Measures aka: DDMs What is a DDM? Think of a DDM as an assessment tool similar to MCAS. It is a measure of student learning, growth,

Overall PERA Requirements for Principal Evaluation

OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’

Dr. David Grace Dr. Nick Osborne Dr. John Dively Dr. Marleis Trover February 12, 2014.

Peaster Elementary. STAAR – What is it? State’s student testing program for Mathematics, Reading, Writing, and Science Emphasizes “readiness” standards,

October 9 th, 2013 Curriculum Presentation: State Assessments Grades 3-8.

Understanding and Addressing Achievement Gaps 2014 Title 1 Directors Conference This work was originally produced in whole or in part by American Institutes.

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.

Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.

TPSS Leader & Teacher SLTs School Year.

Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50

JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)

SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.

November 7, 2014 WILLMAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORLD’S BEST WORKFORCE SUMMARY.

Teacher Quality Initiative Evaluating Current Practice, SB 6, and the 2011 initiative 1.

Student Learning Objectives SLOs TST BOCES January 6, 2012.

LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.

DDMs for School Counselors RTTT Final Summit April 7, 2014 Craig Waterman & Kate Ducharme.

Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.

Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.

Factoring Growth Models Into Administrator and Teacher Performance Evaluations -- a presentation for -- Henderson, Mercer, and Warren Counties Regional.

E VALUATION C HANGES SB290 R EQUIREMENTS January 17, 2013.

NECESSITY TO IMPLEMENT CCE SCHEME As per G.O. Ms. No. 17, the Director of SCERT as taken up curricular reforms in a big way based on National Curriculum.

Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.

Education Data Services & Educator Evaluation Team Reporting Educator Evaluation Information in EPIMS for RTTT Districts April – May, 2013 Robert Curtin.

Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.

Statutory Groupings Who is where and what rights are attached.

Module 2: Joint Committee Decisions Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Dr. David Grace Dr. Nick Osborne Dr. John Dively Dr. Marleis Trover February 12, 2014.

Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.

Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.

September 2014 Information Provided by Misty L. Slavic, Director of Curriculum & Instruction.

Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.

Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.

Sparta High School Continuous School Improvement Plan.

UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.

State Testing Program Update Sharon Nobis CHHS Assistant Principal Grapevine-Colleyville ISD November 7, 2011.

STUDENT GROWTH UPDATE VILLA PARK DISTRICT 45 SCHAFER SCHOOL MAY 5, 2015 MAY 7, 2015.

Created for Ball-Chatham Teachers by Jill Larson, Assistant Superintendent.

Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,

TEACHER EVALUATION AND THE INCLUSION OF STUDENT GROWTH PRESENTED BY: THE PERA JOINT COMMITTEE DATES: APRIL 6, 2016 APRIL 7, 2016.

Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.

Illinois State Board of Education

Growth Models Oklahoma

Student Growth Administrator’s Academy Retraining

Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”

What we know as of … February 21, 2011

Classroom and Benchmark Assessment Items

Recommendation to the Board of Directors: New District Assessments

Presentation transcript:

STUDENT GROWTH & JOB RETENTION SB7 AND PERA

COMMITTEE MEMBERS Jennifer Kowaczek (Committee Leader) Cyndee Fralick (ETA Board Member) Graciela AlbaveraSandy Kulikowski Jane BeschAudrey Leaver Kathy CebulskiTami Proberts Lillian FigueroaJeff Schultz Kathy JonesRyan Sims Lynne KuhnJennifer Williamson

PERA REQUIREMENTS FOR TEACHER EVALUATIONS “Measureable change in a students’ learning between two or more points in time” Need data from at least 2 assessments: -At least 1 Type III Assessment -And at least 1 Type I or II assessment (NOT ISAT or PSAE) -OR 2 Type III assessments if no type 1 or Type 2 are available Must comprise at least 30% of final rating Can be as much as 50% of final rating

PERA ASSESSMENTS Type IType IIType III An assessment that measures a certain group of students in the same manner with the same potential assessment items, is scored by a non-district entity, and is widely administered beyond Illinois. An assessment developed or adopted and approved by the school district and used on a district-wide basis that is given by all teachers in a given grade or subject area. An assessment that is rigorous, aligned with the course’s curriculum, and that the evaluator and teacher determine measures student learning. Examples: Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) MAP tests, Scantron Performance Series Examples: Collaboratively developed common assessments, curriculum tests, assessments designed by textbook publishers Examples: Teacher- created assessments, assessments of student performance

STUDENT GROWTH & JOB RETENTION STATUTORY GROUPINGS FOR RIF Group I Unsatisfactory Group II Needs Improvement Group III Satisfactory/ Proficient Group IV Excellent/ Distinguished Dismissed at the discretion of the district. Any non- tenured teachers without summative evaluation rating. Grouped by performance averages. Lowest averages are first on list. Within averaged groups are RIF’d by inverse seniority. One group – no averages. RIF’d by inverse seniority.

NEXT STEPS  Meeting with district assessment office  Meeting with CEC  Taking a look at what other districts are doing, both within Illinois and other states