ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2007-2011 -- Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/2012 5 Year Crashes ATP 2 7,072.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speed Limits 25 Speed Limits 35 Speed Limits 50 Speed Limits 55 Speed Limits 65.
Advertisements

County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
Project Development – High Priority Segments 1/24/2011 Rumble StripE Lane Width? Rumble Strip 2 ft. shoulder paving* (up to 6 miles/year**) + rumble stripE.
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/ Year Crashes Carver.
9-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise C – Session #9.
Red-Light Running. 2 Traffic Signals Red-Light Running 3 Intersection Fatalities There were 8,657 intersection fatalities in 2007.
City of Evansville and Vanderburgh County Intersection Crash Analysis.
Partial Lesson first 20 out 65 slides 4 Lane Strategies and Rules of the Road.
TRAFFIC SIGN BY kru Somjai Triratsuk Warning Signs School Signs Slipper Road Turn left Curve Right.
13 th Street and Dayton Avenue – Ames, IA Intersection Study ByungOck Kim Greg Karssen.
8-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #8.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting 1 Metro June 21, 2012.
IDAHO’S CRASH PROBLEM & PROGRAMS. Mission - Zero traffic deaths on Idaho roads Fewer than 200 annual traffic deaths by 2012 Goals.
Chapter 15 Driving in Rural Areas.
Project Development – High Priority Segments -- ATP 2 10/29/2012 Road Surface? Paved Gravel Segment received Stars for Lane Departure Crash Density & Critical.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
1 Ramsey County Review Meeting 1 June 21, Metro* County Crash Data Overview 2 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury.
1 Washington County Review Meeting 1 June 21, 2012.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting #1 - ATP 2 June 25, 2012.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
By Tanya Bankston.  Current Version of the manual was prepared by Neel-Schaffer in 2002  The Traffic Signal Manual is currently being updated by DOTD.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Watonwan County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Name Agency Date, Year Understanding Younger Drivers.
DEFENSIVE DRIVER TRAINING. ACCIDENT Tour bus hit a parked 18-wheeler on the shoulder. 5 died at the scene and 3 others died at area hospitals. The rig.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Polk County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes Polk.
1 Marshall County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
Peachtree Road Transformation Project: Operations and Safety Analysis P.I Fulton County August 25, 2015 Buckhead CID 1.
1 Hospital Charges For Patients Involved in Motor Vehicle Crashes in Nebraska Ming Qu Prabhakar Dhungana.
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
2011 National Association of County Engineers Conference Mn/DOT County Roadway Safety Plans April 20, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Traffic Signs Part Two. What do these 2 signs tell you?
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
Test Site Spirio Rd Left Turn #1 Scored Right Turn #1 Scored Right Turn #2 Scored Right Turn #3 at Stop Light, Scored.
1 Faribault County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Polk County Review Meeting 1 June 25, ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious.
1 St. Louis County Review Meeting 1 August 29, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
New Findings on Crash Avoidance Technology
District 6 – Safety Applications
INTERSECTIONS CHAPTER 10.
Intersection Crash Analysis in the State of Oregon
Crash Analysis of Lincoln Way and Dakota Ave. Ames, IA
CTDOT Traffic Safety Engineering
'. \s\s I. '.. '... · \ \ \,, I.
What factors lead to older drivers’ crashes?
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
Current and Upcoming Features
Chapter 15: Driving in Rural Areas
Minnesota Driver’s Manual – Chapter 3
D R I V E R S E D G E USA Curriculum Use mouse to advance slides.
2018 Summit of the National Association of State Motorcycle Safety
' '· \ ·' ,,,,
Crash Severity for Lane Departures Crashes
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Please listen closely because there is a quiz at the end
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Contributing Factors for Focus Crash Types and Facility Types Raghavan Srinivasan University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center (UNC HSRC)
Presentation transcript:

ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes ATP 2 7, Year Crashes ATP 2 7, State System 3,761 – 53% 128 – 43% State System 3,761 – 53% 128 – 43% CSAH/CR 1,571 – 22% 136 – 46% CSAH/CR 1,571 – 22% 136 – 46% Rural 1,245 – 79% 127 – 93% Rural 1,245 – 79% 127 – 93% Urban 326 – 21% 9 – 7% Urban 326 – 21% 9 – 7% All Way Stop 2 – 2% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 2 – 2% 0 – 0% Run off Road 414 – 64% 45 – 62% Run off Road 414 – 64% 45 – 62% On Curve 134 – 32% 18 – 40% On Curve 134 – 32% 18 – 40% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 36 (47%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 9 (12%), 1 (50%) Rear End – 7 (9%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 6 (8%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 36 (47%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 9 (12%), 1 (50%) Rear End – 7 (9%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 6 (8%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 76 – 59% 2 – 100% Thru-Stop 76 – 59% 2 – 100% Rear End – 12 (28%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 9 (21%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 8 (19%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 4 (9%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 12 (28%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 9 (21%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 8 (19%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 4 (9%), 0 (0%) Signalized 8 – 6% 0 – 0% Signalized 8 – 6% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 292 – 27% 38 – 31% Inters-Related 292 – 27% 38 – 31% City, Twnshp, Other 1,740 – 25% 31 – 11% City, Twnshp, Other 1,740 – 25% 31 – 11% Inters-Related 129 – 40% 2 – 25% Inters-Related 129 – 40% 2 – 25% Not Inters-Related 117 – 36% 5 – 62% Not Inters-Related 117 – 36% 5 – 62% Run Off Road – 34 (29%), 3 (60%) Rear End – 29 (25%), 1 (20%) SS Opp. – 7 (6%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 11 (9%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 34 (29%), 3 (60%) Rear End – 29 (25%), 1 (20%) SS Opp. – 7 (6%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 11 (9%), 0 (0%) Animal 181 – 15% 6 – 5% Animal 181 – 15% 6 – 5% Not Inters-Related 644 – 61% 73 – 60% Not Inters-Related 644 – 61% 73 – 60% Head On, SS Opp 45 – 7% 11 – 15% Head On, SS Opp 45 – 7% 11 – 15% On Curve 11 – 24% 3 – 27% On Curve 11 – 24% 3 – 27% Unknown/Other 78 – 24% 1 – 13% Unknown/Other 78 – 24% 1 – 13% Unknown/Other 128 – 12% 10 – 8% Unknown/Other 128 – 12% 10 – 8% Other/Unknown 43 – 33% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 43 – 33% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 43 (30%), 15 (56%) “Other” – 37 (26%), 8 (30%) Rear End – 16 (11%), 1 (4%) Right Angle – 43 (30%), 15 (56%) “Other” – 37 (26%), 8 (30%) Rear End – 16 (11%), 1 (4%) Thru-Stop 141 – 48% 27 – 71% Thru-Stop 141 – 48% 27 – 71% Run Off Road – 46 (33%), 5 (45%) Head On/SS Opp – 9 (6%), 2 (18%) Right Angle – 9 (6%), 2 (18%) Rear End – 20 (14%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 46 (33%), 5 (45%) Head On/SS Opp – 9 (6%), 2 (18%) Right Angle – 9 (6%), 2 (18%) Rear End – 20 (14%), 0 (0%) Other/Unknown 141 – 48% 11 – 29% Other/Unknown 141 – 48% 11 – 29% Not Animal 1,064 – 85% 121 – 95% Not Animal 1,064 – 85% 121 – 95% All Way Stop 4 – 1% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 4 – 1% 0 – 0% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0% Ped/Bike 2 – 1% 1 – 12% Ped/Bike 2 – 1% 1 – 12% Non Ped/Bike 324 – 99% 8 – 88% Non Ped/Bike 324 – 99% 8 – 88%

ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 4/11/ Year Crashes ATP 2 7, Year Crashes ATP 2 7, State System 3,963 – 53% 128 – 43% State System 3,963 – 53% 128 – 43% CSAH/CR 1,705 – 23% 139 – 46% CSAH/CR 1,705 – 23% 139 – 46% Rural 1,353 – 79% 131 – % Rural 1,353 – 79% 131 – % Urban 352 – 21% 8 – 6% Urban 352 – 21% 8 – 6% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% On Curve 153 – 33% 23 – 45% On Curve 153 – 33% 23 – 45% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 42 (48%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 8 (9%), 1 (50%) Left Turn – 12 (14%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 6 (7%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 42 (48%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 8 (9%), 1 (50%) Left Turn – 12 (14%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 6 (7%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 88 – 60% 2 – 100% Thru-Stop 88 – 60% 2 – 100% Rear End – 12 (25%), 0 (0%) Ran Off Road – 9 (19%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 8 (17%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 12 (25%), 0 (0%) Ran Off Road – 9 (19%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 8 (17%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Signalized 8 – 5% 0 – 0% Signalized 8 – 5% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 317 –28% 41 – 33% Inters-Related 317 –28% 41 – 33% City, Twnshp, Other 1,837 – 24% 34 – 11% City, Twnshp, Other 1,837 – 24% 34 – 11% Inters-Related 147 – 42% 2 – 25% Inters-Related 147 – 42% 2 – 25% Not Inters-Related 126 – 36% 5 – 63% Not Inters-Related 126 – 36% 5 – 63% Run Off Road – 32 (25%), 2 (40%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (8%), 2 (40%) Rear End – 33 (26%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 10 (8%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 32 (25%), 2 (40%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (8%), 2 (40%) Rear End – 33 (26%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 10 (8%), 0 (0%) Animal 204 – 15% 7 – 5% Animal 204 – 15% 7 – 5% Not Inters-Related 692 – 60% 79 – 64% Not Inters-Related 692 – 60% 79 – 64% Head On, SS Opp 47 – 7% 13 – 16% Head On, SS Opp 47 – 7% 13 – 16% On Curve 16 – 34% 4 – 31% On Curve 16 – 34% 4 – 31% Unknown/Other 79 – 22% 1 – 12% Unknown/Other 79 – 22% 1 – 12% Unknown/Other 140 – 12% 4 – 3% Unknown/Other 140 – 12% 4 – 3% Other/Unknown 48 – 33% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 48 – 33% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 50 (31%), 17 (55%) “Other” – 39 (24%), 8 (26%) Rear End – 20 (12%), 2 (6%) Run Off Road – 16 (10%), 1 (3%) Right Angle – 50 (31%), 17 (55%) “Other” – 39 (24%), 8 (26%) Rear End – 20 (12%), 2 (6%) Run Off Road – 16 (10%), 1 (3%) Thru-Stop 161 – 51% 31 – 76% Thru-Stop 161 – 51% 31 – 76% Run Off Road – 49 (34%), 5 (56%) Right Angle – 14 (10%), 2 (22%) “Other” – 29 (20%), 1 (11%) “Not Coded” – 1 (1%), 1 (11%) Run Off Road – 49 (34%), 5 (56%) Right Angle – 14 (10%), 2 (22%) “Other” – 29 (20%), 1 (11%) “Not Coded” – 1 (1%), 1 (11%) Other/Unknown 143 – 45% 9 –22% Other/Unknown 143 – 45% 9 –22% Not Animal 1,149 – 85% 124 – 95% Not Animal 1,149 – 85% 124 – 95% All Way Stop 7 – 2% 1 – 2% All Way Stop 7 – 2% 1 – 2% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0% Run off Road 461 – 67% 51 – 65% Run off Road 461 – 67% 51 – 65%

Animal, ACCTYPE=08,09 Rear End, DIAG=01 Left Turn, DIAG=03 Right Angle, DIAG=05 Run off Road, DIAG=04, 07 (Road departure) Head On, SS Opp, DIAG=08, 09 (Lane departure) Curve-Related, ROAD CHAR=05-08 State, SYS=01, 02, 03 CSAH/CR, SYS=04, 07 City, Twnshp, Other, SYS=NOT 01-03, 04 or 07 Urban, City coded Rural, City not coded (0000) Intersection-Related, JUNC=2-7, Not Intersection-Related, JUNC=1, 8-11 Other/Unknown, JUNC=90, 98, 99, 00 Signalized, TCD=01 All-Way Stop, TCD=02, 03 Thru-Stop/Yield, TCD=04, 05 Other/Unknown, TCD=>06 and 00 Code Guide 4/11/2012