The scope of this project is to design a portal prototype using Health Sciences 20 (or Environmental Science 20) using materials that have already been collected and stored on a Google drive. The project will likely require some or all of the following: · an assessment of the new curriculum (outcomes and indicators) for the target course, current resources; · correlation of instructional materials, assessment strategies, and outcomes and indicators; · the development of standard templates, standard filenames, standard file hierarchies; · recommended workflow (establishment of procedures for users, administrators, and other possible stakeholders); · an assessment/selection of suitable platforms (technology); · recommendations regarding sustainability (i.e., necessary resources to maintain or extend the pilot/portal). MOU of January 28, 2015

Project Management Ted Elash Sarah Stack Instructional Design Marilyn Black Jordan Reynaud Technical Ian Hecht Jonathan Scott Usability Testing Elenna Nickel Randy Skurdal

Front End Analysis and Copyright ID Committee Jordan Reynaud & Marilyn Black

Needs Assessment Report ○Need ○Client ○Primary Goal ○Secondary Goal ** Client Wants & Needs were also taken into consideration and included in chart format

Learner Analysis ○Target Audience ○Motivation and Interest ○Anxiety ○*Please refer to Appendix A for a more detailed learner analysis

Interference Factors Some of the Interference Factors taken into consideration include: ○Availability of a Viable Platform ○Time constraint ○Google Drive ○Social Networking

Factors Contributing to Success ○ Background knowledge: Teachers currently have experience using resource portals with login procedures and passwords ○ Social networking sites: Many teachers have used these sites and are familiar with navigation procedures

Technology Committee

The Selection

Usability Testing Committee Elenna Nickel Randy Skurdal

Pre-Survey ●Survey - with Question Rationale ●Appendix E - Pre-Survey ●Question influenced by: “The strongest predictors of behavioral intention to use the portal are attitude...and perceived usefulness” [1] “The more positive teachers’ attitudes towards the portal and the higher their perceptions of control; the more likely they will upload information.” [2]

Usability Testing ●Script o Introduction o Debrief ●Task list ●Observation Comment Sheet usabilitytestdsc_14461.jpg

Feedback Form ●User comments/suggestions/feedback ●Users likes/dislikes ●Problems for the user ●Would they use it

Software ●Morae by Techsmith ●User Testing ●Camtasia by Techsmith ●Bb Flashback

Bonus Deliverables ●Copyright Documentation ●Interim Recommendations content/uploads/2013/09/bonus_icon_big.png

Copyright Report Fair Dealing Overview: ○Act now “technologically-neutral” ○Copyright materials may be displayed in class ○User-generated ○Noncommercial

New Exception Internet Material Guidelines : Citation No digital locks circumvented Used in best public interest Student use /

Cinematographic Works ○Instructors may perform live materials ○Show works in class without the need for a public performance licence

Posting Material Online Fair Dealing Guidelines: ○Research ○Private study ○Education Citation

Posting Online, continued ○Provide links if using an open website ○May reproduce any legitimately posted works ○Respect any digital locks ○Respect any copyright symbols, “Terms of Use” or “Legal Notices”

Bill C-11 Copyright Changes Applicable to Education ○Free web services can be shown in the classroom as long as they are not copyright (ie. Netflix) ○Recording and transmissions of content for the purposes of distance education

Interim Recommendation A searchable Google Drive? ●“Tag” file names ●Interview HP2 HP2a HP2c.docx Drive-icon.png

Conclusion ●Addresses needs ●Includes wants ●Limitations: o tag search vs document search o social functions

Next Steps Research Design Implement Testing LIVE