All Hands Meeting 2004 Intellectual Property Task Force Anders Dale, Jeff Grethe, Amarnath Gupta, Ron Kikinis, John Lauriello, Steve Pieper, Gary Glover.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intellectual Property Policy and Procedures
Advertisements

NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing National Alliance for Medical Image Computing: NAMIC Ron Kikinis, M.D.
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Contracting & Research Services (CRS)
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Intellectual Property (Contracts Officer- WMS)
OPEN ACCESS PUBLICATION ISSUES FOR NSF OPP Advisory Committee May 30, /24/111 |
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Intellectual Property and CRDs February 19, 2015.
CS CS 5150: Software Engineering Lecture 5 Legal Aspects of Software Engineering 1.
What we ask in a ROI What it is? Is it related to another invention? Who contributed to making the invention? Who paid for the research? When invention.
Intellectual Property in the Digital Age Series “Don’t I Own My Own Work?” Negotiating to Keep Your Copyright Intellectual Property in the Digital Age:
1 SPS Primer Policy Considerations Ken Packman Michael Lenetsky.
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
Seminar Series Foundation and Other Non-Profit Agreements: Grants with Special Conditions Caroline Jones, Senior Contract and Grant Officer Catalina Verdu-Cano,
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Introduction Ron Kikinis, M.D.
Introduction to IP & TLC Tony von Sadovszky Software Commercialization Manager February 6, 2009.
A Basic Primer on Intellectual Property Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Intellectual Property and Industry Relations Associate Vice Chancellor.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing The NA-MIC Kit National Alliance for Medical Image Computing.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
After completing this lesson, participants will be able to:  Identify ethical, legal, and policy issues for managing research data  Define copyrights,
Surgical Planning Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, Massachusetts USA a teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School Overview Ron Kikinis,
OK Ewan?. COORDINATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL MOUSE INFORMATICS RESOURCES WORKPACKAGE 6: Data acquisition, curation and ownership Nadia Rosenthal.
Government Funded Inventions Mark L. Rohrbaugh, Ph.D., J.D. Acting Director Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes of Health.
THE ROLE OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND AGREEMENTS IN DETERMINING OWNERSHIP OF COPYRIGHT AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN FACULTY CREATED WORKS. Faculty Created.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
April 13 BEC Meeting BIRN Data Sharing Implementation From the BIRN DSTF Randy L. Gollub, Chair.
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
William Schroeder, Ph.D. §, Andy Cedilnik §, Sebastien Barré, Ph.D. §, William Lorensen ‡, James Miller, Ph.D. ‡, Daniel Blezek, Ph.D. ‡ § Kitware Inc.,
ESRIN Earth Observation Program Ground Segment Department 26/09/2015 CEOS-WGISS-40 - Olivier BaroisSlide 1 Open Source Practices.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing The NA-MIC Kit: ITK, VTK, Pipelines, Grids and 3D Slicer as An Open Platform for.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Licensing in NAMIC 3 requirements from NCBC RFA (paraphrased)
Responsible Data Use: Copyright and Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Version 1.0 Review Date.
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
Copyright and Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Section: Responsible Data Use Version 1.0 October 2012 Copyright 2012 Matthew.
Your rights to your published work: a workshop addressing these questions: 1. “Can I post my publications in full text on… my web site my departmental.
Technology Transfer in The United States Paul Zielinski Director, Technology Partnerships Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology Chair,
All Hands Meeting 2003 Intellectual Property, Authorship, and Publishing – Session Notes Name of Leader: Gary Glover Presenters: Gary Glover, David Schetter.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD / BIRN Coordinating Center NAMIC Group Site PI: Mark H. Ellisman Site Project.
ARL 1 NIH Public Access Policy: Background for Campus Implementation Strategies Karla Hahn ARL Office of Scholarly Communication Coalition for Networked.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Thomas Gutberlet HZB User Coordination NMI3-II Neutron scattering and Muon spectroscopy Integrated Initiative WP5 Integrated User Access.
Intellectual Property and Computer Science By Daniel Bray COSC 480.
Lecture 11. Intellectual Property SPRING 2016 GE105 Introduction to Engineering Design College of Engineering King Saud University.
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
Biomedical Informatics Research Network BIRN as a Shared Infrastructure: An Overview of Policies & Procedures Mark James, Phil Papadopoulos October 9,
Technology Transfer Office
Intellectual Property
The Basics of Intellectual Property Reporting
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
Partnering with Business and Industry
NAMIC Software Development Workshop
Open Access and Compliance with NIH Public Access Policy
Ron Kikinis, MD Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
BILAT USA 4.0 Presented by NCURA Global Claire Chen
U.S. Army Technology Transfer Mechanisms
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
Presentation transcript:

All Hands Meeting 2004 Intellectual Property Task Force Anders Dale, Jeff Grethe, Amarnath Gupta, Ron Kikinis, John Lauriello, Steve Pieper, Gary Glover

IP Task Force Mission  Develop policies for publication of experimental results by BIRN members and those who use BIRN data/technology  Develop policies for dissemination of BIRN technology within BIRN and to outside investigators, e.g. image analysis algorithms, software, paradigms, protocols  Develop policies for dissemination of BIRN data to outside investigators

This Presentation  Background on Issues Authorship Inventions NIH Policies for Proposals Technology (Software) Licenses and Examples  Open Discussion

Harvard Authorship Policies (Motivation)  Authorship Substantial and Direct Intellectual Contributions Intellectual Responsibility Review and Approve Final Manuscript  Acknowledgement All Other Significant Contributions (Funding, Lab Space, etc.) 

BIRN Authorship Policies  Vary by Testbed Consortium as (Senior) Author  FIRST BIRN most consistent, Some Cross-Testbed Examples  Grethe JS, Jovicich J, Martone ME, Pieper S, Brown GG, Ellisman MH, Gollub RL, Brain Morphometry BIRN, Mouse BIRN, FIRST BIRN, BIRN Coordinating Center (2003) The Biomedical Informatics Research Network: Educational and Teaching Resources. Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting, New Orleans, USA.  Acknowledge BIRN and Individual Grants Example  The authors would like to thank all the past and current Slicer developers. Special thanks to David Gering, Lauren O’Donnell and Nicole Aucoin for significant design and engineering contributions. This investigation was supported by NIH grant P41 RR13218 and the Biomedical Informatics Research Network ( Question: Should ALL Site’s Grants be Acknowledged?

Invention Policies (Patents)  Partners / BHW Corporate Sponsored Research and Licensing No Up-Front Agreement on Patents Intellectual Property Law Provides Ample Precedent to Determine Inventorship Wait Until Something Worth Patenting is Invented, then Determine who Invented it and to what Extent. Each Inventor’s Interests may be Governed by Prior Agreements with their Institutions  NSF ERC Consortium as Example Much Time can be Spent Defining Rules which Don’t Apply in Practice

NIH Policies and BIRN Proposals  Morphometry BIRN Letter of Intent to Share Signed by Each Applicant Site NIH Requirement: The applicant and all Investigators, with their business officials, must provide assurances of their intention to share promptly and widely with the broad research community, as appropriate: data; tools, including software and databases; and scientific and technologic best practices and processes developed in the test bed, including those in collaboration with other BIRN test beds and the Coordinating Center. NIH Requirement: The applicant must agree to develop, with the other test beds and the Coordinating Center, policies and procedures that facilitate access by the scientific community to the BIRN infrastructure and test bed resources.  Some Issues: Does not Specify License Type or Cost of License

Software Licenses  Open Source Gnu Public License (  “Copyleft”, must distribute source code, must distribute modifications  E.g. Linux “Berkeley” Style or “MIT” or “X” License  No Copyleft, preferred to enable commercialization Non-Commercial Licenses  Common for research packages Non-Clinical Licenses  Limit liability, e.g. Slicer  Binary Only Licenses

Copyright  Reflects Ownership and Control Happens Automatically with Creation Should be Noted on Creation (e.g. This Talk is Copyright 2004 Steve Pieper, All Rights Reserved!) Can be Registered with Trademark Office  Can Be Transferred or Retained E.g. Many Bug Fixes to Linux Become Copyright Linus Torvalds, other Modules Retain Author Copyright Contributions to VTK Become Copyright Ken Martin, Will Schroeder, Bill Lorensen NLM ITK Project Established the Insight Consortium as Copyright Holder

Example: Morphometry BIRN Tools  Freely Available For Research Use ToolPurposeSource Code Restrictions on Use Web Site 3D SlicerVisualization, Protocol Neutral Segmentation, Query Atlas YesNon-clinical use only FreesurferProtocol-Specific Segmentation NoNon-clinical, non- commercial research only LDDMMMorphometric and DTI Shape Analysis NoMust be accessed through JHU or BIRN Portal LONI PipelineGrid Enabled Processing Environment NoNon-clinical, non- commercial research only oftware/Pipeline.html Duke/UNC ToolsProtocol Neutral and DTI processing YesResearch Use only html

Discussion Issues  Jointly Developed Software BIRN ID Generator Example Non-Software IP: paradigms, schemata, derived data…  Pre-Existing / Contributed IP From other Grants / Agencies / Companies… Ongoing Coopetition  Use by Other Entities Commercialization, Citation, Copyleft? What is Our Process for Approving  And More….

Slide Title  Slide Text (level 1) Slide Text (level 2)  Slide Text (level3)