Announcements Read Chapters 11 and 12 (sections 12.1 to 12.3)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECE 530 – Analysis Techniques for Large-Scale Electrical Systems
Advertisements

EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Announcements Be reading Chapter 6. HW 3 is due now.
Chapter 4 Synchronous Generators
Two-pole,3-phase,wye-connected,salient-pole synchronous machine
Announcements Be reading Chapter 6, also Chapter 2.4 (Network Equations). HW 5 is 2.38, 6.9, 6.18, 6.30, 6.34, 6.38; do by October 6 but does not need.
ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 333 Renewable Energy Systems Lecture 13: Per Unit, Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois.
Synchronous Generator
Announcements Be reading Chapter 11 and Chapter 12 thru 12.3
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 530 – Analysis Techniques for Large-Scale Electrical Systems
Announcements For lectures 8 to 10 please be reading Chapter 3
Announcements Please read Chapter 3 H4 is 4.34, 4.41, 5.2, 5.7, 5.16
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Announcements Please read Chapter 3; start on Chapter 6
Announcements Homework #4 is due now Homework 5 is due on Oct 4
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 Lecture 26: Modal Analysis,
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 11: Ybus, Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
Lecture 13 Newton-Raphson Power Flow Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 22: System Protection, Transient Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University.
Lecture 11 Power Flow Professor Tom Overbye Special Guest Appearance by Professor Sauer! Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 12: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Announcements Read Chapters 11 and 12 (sections 12.1 to 12.3)
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 18: LMP Markets, Symmetrical Faults and Components Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Lecture 24 Transient Stability Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 13: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 Lecture 23: Small Signal.
Announcements Please read Chapters 11 and 12
Announcements Design Project has firm due date of Dec 4
Announcements Please read Chapters 12 and 14
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
ECE 476 Power System Analysis
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 POWER SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STABILITY
ECEN 667 Power System Stability
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
ECEN 667 Power System Stability
ECEN 667 Power System Stability
Presentation transcript:

ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 24: Transient Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign overbye@illinois.edu Special Guest Lecturer: TA Won Jang

Announcements Read Chapters 11 and 12 (sections 12.1 to 12.3) Homework 10 is due today (no quiz) Homework 11 is 11.19, 11.25, 12.3, 12.11, 14.15; it should be done before the final but is not to be turned in Design project due date is Tuesday, December 8 Final exam is Wednesday Dec 16, 7 to 10pm, room 1013; comprehensive, closed book, closed notes with three note sheets and standard calculators allowed

Euler’s Method 2

Second Order Runge-Kutta Method Runge-Kutta methods improve on Euler's method by evaluating f(x) at selected points over the time step Simplest method is the second order method in which That is, k1 is what we get from Euler's; k2 improves on this by reevaluating at the estimated end of the time step 3

RK2 Versus Euler's RK2 requires twice the function evaluations per iteration, but gives much better results With RK2 the error tends to vary with the cube of the step size, compared with the square of the step size for Euler's The smaller error allows for larger step sizes compared to Eulers 4

Transient Stability Example A 60 Hz generator is supplying 550 MW to an infinite bus (with 1.0 per unit voltage) through two parallel transmission lines. Determine initial angle change for a fault midway down one of the lines. H = 20 seconds, D = 0.1. Use Dt=0.01 second. Ea 5

Transient Stability Example, cont'd 6

Transient Stability Example, cont'd 7

Transient Stability Example, cont'd 8

Transient Stability Example, cont'd 9

Equal Area Criteria The goal of the equal area criteria is to try to determine whether a system is stable or not without having to completely integrate the system response. System will be stable after the fault if the Decel Area is greater than the Accel. Area 10

Example 11.4: Undamped 11

Example 11.4: Damped 12

Two-Axis Synchronous Machine Model Classical model is appropriate only for the most basic studies; no longer widely used in practice More realistic models are required to couple in other devices such as exciters and governors A more realistic synchronous machine model requires that the machine be expressed in a reference frame that rotates at rotor speed Standard approach is d-q reference frame, in which the major (direct or d-axis) is aligned with the rotor poles and the quadrature (q-axis) leads the direct axis by 90 13

Synchronous Machine Modeling 3 bal. windings (a,b,c) – stator Field winding (fd) on rotor Damper in “d” axis (1d) on rotor 2 dampers in “q” axis (1q, 2q) on rotor

D-q Reference Frame Machine voltage and current are “transformed” into the d-q reference frame using the rotor angle,  Terminal voltage in network (power flow) reference frame are VT = Vr - Vi

Two-Axis Model Equations Numerous models exist for synchronous machines. The following is a relatively simple model that represents the field winding and one damper winding; it also includes the generator swing eq. 16

Generator Torque and Initial Conditions The generator electrical torque is given by Recall pe = Tep.u (sometimes p.u is assumed=1.0) Solving the differential equations requires determining d; it is determined by noting that in steady-state Then d is the angle of 17

Example 11.10 Determine the initial conditions for the Example 11.3 case with the classical generator replaced by a two-axis model with H = 3.0 per unit-seconds, D = 0, Xd = 2.1, Xq = 2.0, X’d = 0.3, X’q = 0.5, all per unit using the 100 MVA system base First determine the current out of the generator from the initial conditions, then the terminal voltage 18

Example 11.10, cont. We can then get the initial angle, and initial d and q values 19

Example 11.10, cont. The initial state variable are determined by solving with the differential equations equal to zero. The transient stability solution is then solved by numerically integrating the differential equations, coupled with solving the algebraic equations 20

PowerWorld Solution of 11.10 21

Generator Exciters and Governors The two-axis synchronous model takes as an input the field voltage and the mechanical power. The next section discusses how these values are controlled 22

Generator Exciters The purpose of the exciter is to maintain the generator terminal voltage (or other close by voltage) at a specified value. Input is the sensed voltage Output is the field voltage to the machine, Efd Physically several technologies are used. Older generators used dc machines with brushes transferring the power With the newer brushless (or static) exciters power is obtained from an “inverted” synchronous generator whose field voltage is on the stator and armature windings are on rotor; output is rectified to create dc. 23

Exciter Block Diagrams Block diagrams are used to setup the transient stability models. The common IEEE Type 1 exciter is shown below (neglecting saturation); this is a dc type exciter. Initial state values are determined by knowing Efd and the terminal voltage Vt. 24

Exciter Block Diagram Example Consider again the Example 11.10 case, with an IEEE T1 exciter with Tr = 0, Ka = 100, Ta = 0.05, Vrmax = 5, Vrmin = -5, Ke = 1, Te = 0.26, Kf = 0.01 and Tf = 1.0. Determine the initial states. Initial value of Efd = 2.9135 and Vt = 1.0946 25

PowerWorld Example 12.1 Solution 26

Generator Governors The other key generator control system is the governor, which changes the mechanical power into the generator to maintain a desired speed and hence frequency. Historically centrifugal “flyball” governors have been used to regulate the speed of devices such as steam engines The centrifugal force varies with speed, opening or closing the throttle valve Photo source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_governor 27

Isochronous Governors Ideally we would like the governor to maintain the frequency at a constant value of 60 Hz (in North America) This can be accomplished using an isochronous governor. A flyball governor is not an isochronous governor since the control action is proportional to the speed error An isochronous governor requires an integration of the speed error Isochronous governors are used on stand alone generators but cannot be used on interconnected generators because of “hunting” 28

Generator “Hunting” Control system “hunting” is oscillation around an equilibrium point Trying to interconnect multiple isochronous generators will cause hunting because the frequency setpoints of the two generators are never exactly equal One will be accumulating a frequency error trying to speed up the system, whereas the other will be trying to slow it down The generators will NOT share the power load proportionally. 29

Droop Control The solution is to use what is known as droop control, in which the desired set point frequency is dependent upon the generator’s output R is known as the regulation constant or droop; a typical value is 4 or 5%. 30

Governor Block Diagrams The block diagram for a simple stream unit, the TGOV1 model, is shown below. The T1 block models the governor delays, whereas the second block models the turbine response. 31

Example 12.4 System Response 32

Problem 12.11 33

Restoring Frequency to 60 Hz In an interconnected power system the governors to not automatically restore the frequency to 60 Hz Rather this is done via the ACE (area control area calculation). Previously we defined ACE as the difference between the actual real power exports from an area and the scheduled exports. But it has an additional term ACE = Pactual - Psched – 10b(freqact - freqsched) b is the balancing authority frequency bias in MW/0.1 Hz with a negative sign. It is about 0.8% of peak load/generation 34

2600 MW Loss Frequency Recovery Frequency recovers in about ten minutes

2007 CWLP Dallman Accident In 2007 there was an explosion at the CWLP 86 MW Dallman 1 generator. The explosion was eventually determined to be caused by a sticky valve that prevented the cutoff of steam into the turbine when the generator went off line. So the generator turbine continued to accelerate up to over 6000 rpm (3600 normal). High speed caused parts of the generator to shoot out Hydrogen escaped from the cooling system, and eventually escaped causing the explosion Repairs took about 18 months, costing more than $52 million 36

Dallman After the Accident 37

Outside of Dallman 38