The use of the Pinkham-Pearson index for the comparison of community structure in Biosim2 to identify statistically-valid sectors of taxa By Carlos Pinkham.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Watershed Watch Protocols Level I. Goals for this module Understand how biomonitoring is used to evaluate the health of a stream Understand how biomonitoring.
Advertisements

Biological Response of Two North Central PA Streams After Flood of September 2011 Fred Rogers CWI, Supervisor Dr. Mel Zimmerman Introduction: Within Pennsylvania,
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
CALCULATING DAILY PARTICULATE PHOSPHORUS LOADS FROM DISCRETE SAMPLES AND DAILY FLOW DATA METHODS RESULTS * y= (flow) – 2.247; * 1 Y= 0.052(flow)^0.1947;
Effects of Land Use and Associated Factors On Biological Communities of Small Streams in the Illinois River Basin of Arkansas by James C. Petersen, Billy.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
The Impact of Hurricane Sandy on the Abundance of Coliforms in Tyler Run Michelle Greaver Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania.
Ground Beetles and Butterflies of Corn and Old Field Areas Along a NE Iowa Trout Stream Before Riparian Habitat Reconstruction Kirk J. Larsen Department.
Chris Nagai Nick Foster Christen Dschankilic Streams of Science.
Conclusion -Velocity affects the temperature, pH and DO of a stream; the greater the velocity, the greater the water quality -The positive correlation.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
34 th Annual Meeting New England Association of Environmental Biologists 31st Annual Meeting Hotel Viking Newport, RI March 19,
Biomonitoring and Bioassessment Chapter 11. Biomonitoring Biomonitoring – use of a biological systems for the evaluation of the current status of an ecosystem.
Community Ordination and Gamma Diversity Techniques James A. Danoff-Burg Dept. Ecol., Evol., & Envir. Biol. Columbia University.
Metric (Family Level) Standard Best Value (95 th or 5 th percentile) Worst Possible Value Expected Response to Degradation Total Taxa180 EPT Taxa120 %EPT91.90.
Native Bees Along Elevation Gradients as Bioindicators of Climate Change Scott Daniels 1, Dave Smith 2, Neil Cobb 3 1. Cesar Chavez High School, Laveen,
Chapter 17 Community Structure A community has attributes that differ from those of its components –Number of species –Relative abundance of species –Nature.
Improvement of Meadow Stream Health due to Livestock Distribution Efforts K.W. Tate, T.A. Becchetii, C. Battaglia, N.K. McDougald, D.F. Lile, H.A. George,
Basic concepts in ordination
Diversity of bacteria associated with Montastraea spp. across sea water quality gradient in the United States Virgin Islands S. Arora, M.E. Brandt, N.
From: McCune, B. & J. B. Grace Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Demonstration of the Java version of the Pinkham-Pearson index for the comparison of community structure By Pinkham, C. F. A.,* J. Gareth Pearson,** Brian.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Benthic Community Assessment Tool Development Ananda Ranasinghe (Ana) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Sediment.
Species diversity Species diversity: variation in types of organisms present in a community Components of species diversity species richness: number of.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Stream macroinvertebrate responses to landscape variables; an evaluation of rapid bioassessment techniques using a statistical modeling approach. Declan.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
WATER QUALITY, SPECIES DIVERSITY, AND QUANTITY IN A STREAM HABITAT Jason R. L. Holcomb Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee Introduction.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
CWWUC Presentation April 8, 2009 Application of the Integrated Impact Analysis Tool.
KathiJo Jankowski, VT EPSCoR Declan McCabe, St. Michael’s College The VT EPScoR Streams Project: Involving students and the community in water research.
Results I) Regional Survey Rarefaction curves leveled off across sites, suggesting that the sample effort was sufficient to capture differences between.
Impact of Native Tree Species Foliage on Aquatic Invertebrate Communities Branden Birth Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania.
Species richness The number of species is an important biological variable that scientists try to quantify.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
ISEMP Data Management System. Support entire workflow Based on required functions Based on understanding of the data ISEMP Data Management System.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
BPS - 5th Ed. Chapter 221 Two Categorical Variables: The Chi-Square Test.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
C.4: Conservation of biodiversity
Comparison of Odonata Populations in Natural and Constructed Emergent Wetlands in the Bluegrass Region of Kentucky Introduction Wetlands provide valuable.
Week 9: IB Biology Monday: G.4.: Conservation of Biodiversity ‘Explain the use of biotic indices and indicator species in monitoring environmental change’
Macroinvertebrate responses to flow and thermal variability associated with impoundments James. C. White 1, Paul. J. Wood 1, David. M. Hannah 2 and Andy.
Table 3. Merits and Demerits of Selected Water Quality Indices Shweta Tyagi et al. Water Quality Assessment in Terms of Water Quality Index. American Journal.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Objective Two classic theories attempt to explain how natural communities assemble: Gleason’s Individualistic model and Clements’ Organismic model. To.
COMPARING BIOINDICATORS TO MEASURE THE EFFICACY OF RESTORATION IN MIDDLE FORK JOHN DAY RIVER, OR Robin M. Henderson & James R. Pratt.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
THE USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE TRAITS TO ASSESS CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSES AND VULNERABILITIES Anna Hamilton (Tetra Tech), Britta Bierwagen (US EPA),
Watershed Health Indicators
Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources
Biodiversity Variety of life
Biodiversity Variety of life
J. M. C. K Jayawardhana1, W. D. T. M Gunawardhana 1, E. P
Effective water quality management through the use of algal indices as water quality indicator
Community Structure & Function
2.3 Measuring Biotic Components of the system
a Biological Study of Macroinvertebrates in the Leibert Creek
Butternut Creek Biomonitoring
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
IBI’s: An Introduction
A Comparison of Total Suspended Solids and Land Usage
Species Diversity.
Presentation transcript:

The use of the Pinkham-Pearson index for the comparison of community structure in Biosim2 to identify statistically-valid sectors of taxa By Carlos Pinkham Biology Department & Darlene Olsen Mathematics Department Norwich University Northfield, VT & J. Gareth Pearson Brian Reid EPA, Retired Dartmouth Medical School Las Vegas, NV Dartmouth, NH

Using the Pinkham-Pearson index in Biosim2 to identify statistically-valid sectors of community structure and other aspects of the Streams Project Study Outline Origin of Pinkham-Pearson Index of Biotic Similarity Introduction –Pinkham-Pearson Index –Biosim2 –Sectors VTDEC Ambient Biomonitoring Program Results –Macroinvertebrate % Composition Data –Statistically Valid Sectors Conclusions

Community Structure (Species Composition) Species occurrence and abundance (that is, both the kinds and numbers of species present) Measures of Community Structure Being Used in Pollution Surveys in 1970s Gleason's Richness Index Shannon's Diversity Index Simpson's Index of Dominance Brillouin's Index Menhinik's Richness Index Pielou's Evenness Index McIntosh's Index

Where These Fall Short

Pinkham-Pearson Index of Biotic Similarity Barbour et al. (1992) in a systematic comparison of the metrics proposed in EPA's rapid bioassessment protocol (Pfalkin et al., 1989), concluded that B "may be the most appropriate metric to serve as a measure of community similarity."

Index of Biotic Similarity (Pinkham-Pearson Index) Original data matrix

Matrix of B’s Between 11 Habitat Parameters

Figure 1. Opening Screen of BioSim2.

What is a Sector? original data matrix, rows coded sites/taxaABCDEFG CPR CPR CPR CCR CCR CCR

Figure 1. Opening Screen of BioSim2.

Row Dendrogram What is a Sector?

original data matrix Original data matrix rearranged in order of the row dendrogram sites/taxaABCDEFG CPR CPR CPR CCR CCR CCR sites/taxaABCDEFG CCR CCR CCR CPR CPR CPR

What is a Sector? sites/taxaABCDEFG CCR CCR CCR CPR CPR CPR Original data matrix rearranged in order of the row dendrogram, taxa coded

Figure 1. Opening Screen of BioSim2.

Taxa Dendrogram What is a Sector?

Rearranging original data matrix in double-dendrogram order sites/taxaABCDEFG CCR CCR CCR CPR CPR CPR FCGDEBA CCR CCR CCR CPR CPR CPR Original data matrix rearranged in order of the row dendrogram, taxa coded What is a Sector?

Taxa Dendrogram Identifying environmentally reasonable sectors What is a Sector?

Establishing environmentally reasonable sectors What is a Sector?

VTDEC Ambient Biomonitoring Program The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VTDEC) is charged with assessing the biological integrity of wadable stream sites throughout Vermont. Specific data are being collected to better refine the biological expectation of very small (<1-15 km 2 ), low elevation ( ft), eurythermal, wadable streams of moderate gradient in Vermont. These data will be used to evaluate the response of these streams to current agricultural and storm-water management practices, within their watersheds.

Small, Moderate Gradient (Wadable) Streams From this Program 27 streams were selected, 26 in the Champlain Valley, One in the Connecticut Valley One stream was sampled in 2 successive years to provide a reference for the technique. One stream was sampled at two points Thus data from “29” streams were used in this study.

Macroinvertebrate Results 170 taxa collected at 29 “Sites” Compressed to 91 taxa at 29 Sites by eliminating – taxa which appeared in only one site with a % composition < 1.25% (38) – taxa which appeared in only two sites with a maximum % comp < 1.2% (23) –taxa which appeared in only three sites with a maximum % comp < 1.1% (11) –taxa which appeared in only four sites with a maximum % comp < 1% (7)

Zero’s Present Zero’s Removed

Statistical Analysis Assumptions –The measurements in each site are independent –The relative abundances of taxa follow a normal distribution Independent

Statistical Analysis Calculations i = 1, …, k

Statistical Analysis Calculations H o : There is a not a significant difference between the relative abundance of taxa in Sector 1 and Sector 2 sites. H a : There is a significant difference between the relative abundance of taxa in Sector 1 and Sector 2 sites. Given H o is true then The p-value is calculated using the chi-square distribution.

S S D D S S D D D S D D D D D S D D S: There is a not a significant difference in the % compositions of this group of taxa between the two groups of sites (between the two sectors). D: There is a significant difference in the % compositions of this group of taxa between the two groups of sites (between the two sectors).

A quick example will show you how BioSim2 works

Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank: The EPSCoR Baccalaureate College Summer Research Program under NSF Grant Number, EPS for funding The Norwich University Faculty Development Program for funding The Vermont DEC for permission to use their data in this presentation

Questions? For more information, go to: