Christine Vollinger, Erk Jensen Material characterization for the 18 MHz to 40 MHz sweep-tuneable RF system Measurement support by Fritz Caspers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kit Building Class Lesson 4Page 1 R and X in Series Inductors and capacitors resist the flow of AC. This property is called reactance. Resistance also.
Advertisements

Chapter 13 Transmission Lines
D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg, July 2012 Simulation of fields around spring and cathode for photogun D. Lipka, MDI, DESY Hamburg.
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS
McGraw-Hill Ryerson Copyright © 2011 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. Adapted by Peter Au, George Brown College.
PhD project: Development of a Ferrite-Loaded Accelerating Cavity CERN Supervisor: Dr.-Ing. Christine Völlinger TEMF Supervisor: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Klingbeil.
Noise near peak field is increased Peak width narrow Peak is symmetric Purpose: Resonate nuclei to prevent polarization. Matching the resonant frequencies.
Characterization of Optical Devices Using Magnitude and Group Delay Measurement Haiqiao Lin, Undergraduate Student Dr. Christi Madsen, Professor Department.
Max V Min V 1/e * (Max V – Min V) RF pickup signal (200 ps/pt averaged over 100 pts), 7.5 µs beam τTime (µs) Pickup voltage (V)
Chapter 16 CMOS Amplifiers
Problem Solving Part 2 Resonance.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
RF Cavity of CIS Xiaoying Pang Mar. 12 th, 2007 IUCF.
Microwave Amplifier Design Blog by Ben (Uram) Han and Nemuel Magno Group 14 ENEL 434 – Electronics 2 Assignment
Power Electronics and Drives (Version ) Dr. Zainal Salam, UTM-JB 1 Chapter 3 DC to DC CONVERTER (CHOPPER) General Buck converter Boost converter.
Microwave Amplifier Design Blog by Ben (Uram) Han and Nemuel Magno Group 14 ENEL 434 – Electronics 2 Assignment
ECE 546 – Jose Schutt-Aine 1 ECE 546 Lecture -04 Transmission Lines Spring 2014 Jose E. Schutt-Aine Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Illinois.
WG8 N 1673 Late DIN comment to FCD Ballot ISO/IEC /FPDAM8 = WG8 N 1638 (SC17 N 3836) Source:
Proton precession in magnetic fields
Ferromagnetic Resonance study of Cobalt Nanowires for Magnetic Storage By Kevin Jagdipsingh Dr. John Flowers (MEC) Dr. Steve Greenbaum (Hunter College)
Success depends upon the ability to measure performance. Rule #1:A process is only as good as the ability to reliably measure.
Fermilab I. Terechkine1 RF Phase Shifter R&D Proton Driver Review March 15, 2005 T. Barrak, B. Foster, I. Gonin, M. Huening, V. Kashikhin, T. Khabiboulinne,
03-June-20131Christine Vollinger BE/RF The “Flat-Sample-Holder” (Flats) Method for Material Measurement Material parameters as relative permeability µ.
Network Analyzers From Small Signal To Large Signal Measurements
Measurement Techniques and Application of Combined Parallel/Orthogonal Magnetic Bias on a Ferrite Tuned Resonator in Low Frequency Range (3-10 MHz) G.
Continued… Obj: draw Box-and-whisker plots representing a set of data Do now: use your calculator to find the mean for 85, 18, 87, 100, 27, 34, 93, 52,
ICIS2015,Aug , 2015, New York, USA Further improvement of RIKEN 28GHz SC-ECRIS for production of highly charged U ion beam T. Nakagawa (RIKEN, Nishina.
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
Very preliminary! E. Jensen, 29-May-08.  Present PS 10 MHz system:  10+1 cavities, 2 gaps/cavity, 10 kV/gap  2.7 … 10 MHz tuning range  longitudinal.
PHYS 1442 – Section 004 Lecture #16 Weednesday March 19, 2014 Dr. Andrew Brandt Chapter 22 Maxwell and the c.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
2 nd harmonic RF perpendicular biased cavity update C.Y. Tan, W. Pellico, G. Romanov, R. Madrak, and D. Wildman 02 Apr 2014.
1 Al Moretti, APC, Fermilab MAP- Winter Meeting February 28 - March 4, 2011 TJNAF Newport News, VA.
Physics 102: Lecture 14, Slide 1 Electromagnetic Waves Physics 102: Lecture 14.
M. Ueda, T. Yamasaki, and S. Maegawa Kyoto University Magnetic resonance of Fe8 at low temperatures in the transverse field.
Physics 102: Lecture 14, Slide 1 Resonance Electromagnetic Waves Physics 102: Lecture 14.
Box Plots March 20, th grade. What is a box plot? Box plots are used to represent data that is measured and divided into four equal parts. These.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
Senior Project Poster Day 2006, CIS Dept. University of Pennsylvania One if by land… Yosef Weiner, David Charles Pollack Faculty Advisor: C.J. Taylor,
1 Update on the impedance of the SPS kickers E. Métral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, C. Zannini SPS impedance meeting - Oct. 16 th 2009 Acknowledgments: F. Caspers,
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
SPL waveguide distribution system Components, configurations, potential problems D. Valuch, E. Ciapala, O. Brunner CERN AB/RF SPL collaboration meeting.
Physics 102: Lecture 14, Slide 1 Exam 2 next Monday! Lecture material –Magnetism (Lect. 8) – AC circuits (Lect. 13) –Plus little bit on resonance today.
Physics 102: Lecture 14, Slide 1 Resonance Electromagnetic Waves Today’s lecture will cover Textbook Sections 21.6, 22.1, 4-5, 9 Physics 102: Lecture.
Status of work on the HOM coupler. 2 nd Harmonic cavity Meeting 11/II-2016 Thermal analyses with shims (Y.Terechkine). Gennady Romanov On behalf of Y.Terechkine.
Thermal losses with the latest Al800 data. Gennady Romanov 2 nd Harmonic cavity Meeting 4/VI-2015.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
THE MAFF IH-RFQ TEST STAND AT THE IAP FRANKFURT A. Bechtold, J. Fischbach, D. Habs, O. Kester, M. Pasini, U. Ratzinger, J. Rehberg, M. Reichwein, A. Schempp,
Magnet and ferrites tests Luciano Elementi Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. A schematic design of the all-dielectric polymer waveguide E-field sensor (a).
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
PhD project: Development of a Ferrite-Loaded Accelerating Cavity CERN Supervisor: Dr.-Ing. Christine Völlinger TEMF Supervisor: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Klingbeil.
Experience with the ferrite tuner for LEB ( ) Slava Yakovlev 15/04/2016.
Material Measurement of TT2-111R 16-Oct-20121Christine Vollinger & Fritz Caspers Measurements provided by TT.
ESS Phase Reference Signal Distribution
MICE RF Cavity Simulations and Multipactor
THE HIE-ISOLDE SUPERCONDUCTING CAVITIES:
Follow up on SPS transverse impedance
Design Fabrication and Processing Group H. Padamsee
Dipole Antennas Driven at High Voltages in the Plasmasphere
Load-Pull Measurements
Simulation with Particle Studio
Ferrite cores for transmitting chokes (baluns)
Passive harmonic cavities for bunch shortening
C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, V.G. Vaccaro
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Number Summaries and Box Plots.
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
Presentation transcript:

Christine Vollinger, Erk Jensen Material characterization for the 18 MHz to 40 MHz sweep-tuneable RF system Measurement support by Fritz Caspers

RF tuning cavity with magnetic bias Example for perpendicular bias (from Friedrichs, 1991) Example for parallel bias (from Gardner, 1991) 2

From Talk of Erk in PS2 Review: Parallel plus perpendicular biasing possible? Smythe suggested in 1983 to use – transverse bias to get into saturation (lower losses) – add’l. parallel bias for tuning (less bias). Could this work? (I’d like to try!) 3

Leads to two primary goals: 1.Characterization of ferrite samples with different saturation and line widths under different bias conditions in the required f- range. (This required a dedicated test set-up, since supplier data does not exist – PART 1). 2.Verification of Smythe’s claims (PART 2). 3.First requirement for an f-range of MHz is a  -range of approx. 5 (since f  1 / Sqrt[  ] ). 4.Ratio of maximum to minimum f is given by Sqrt[  max /  min ];  max is the value at minimum bias field. 4

Measurement Set-up Problematic: samples are available in sizes 1” x 1” (or smaller); Small sample size led to strip-line set-up on ferrite; 1-port frequency swept measurement with NWA chosen to obtain s11. From s11, the DUT impedance is determined and the µ can be calculated; Measurement taken with magnetic bias field applied perpendicular to signal propagation; Carries the assumption that the magnetic RF-field left/right of the strip-line can be neglected (there the bias field would be parallel). Hbias Coaxial connection Ferrite Strip-line 5

μ’ for Material #1 (Y36) μ’-ratio: μ’(20 MHz,300 G)/μ’(40 MHz, 1005 G)=4.0 μ’-ratio: μ’(20 MHz,145 G)/μ’(40 MHz, 1005 G)=11.1 6

μ’’ for Material #1 (Y36) μ’’-values: μ’’(20 MHz,145 G)= 6.3 μ’’(20 MHz,300 G)= 0.2 μ’’(40 MHz,1005 G)=

μ’ for Material #2 (G300) μ’-ratio: μ’(20 MHz,145 G)/μ’(40 MHz, 1005 G)=9.0 μ’-ratio: μ’(20 MHz,300 G)/μ’(40 MHz, 1005 G)=2.8 8

μ’’ for Material #2 (G300) μ’’-values: μ’’(20 MHz,145 G)= 10.1 μ’’(20 MHz,300 G)= 0.12 μ’’(40 MHz,1005 G)=

μ’ for Material #3 (G810) μ’-ratio: μ’(20 MHz,558 G)/μ’(40 MHz, 1008 G)= 5.8 μ’-ratio: μ’(20 MHz,153 G)/μ’(40 MHz, 1008 G)=

μ’’ for Material #3 (G810) μ’’-values: μ’’(20 MHz,153 G)= 11.9 μ’’(20 MHz,558 G)= 1.2 μ’’(40 MHz,1008 G)=

μ’ for Material #4 (RG3) μ’-ratio: μ’(20 MHz,145 G)/μ’(40 MHz, 1004 G)= 12.5 μ’-ratio: μ’(20 MHz,349 G)/μ’(40 MHz, 1004 G)=

μ’’ for Material #4 (RG3) μ’’-values: μ’’(20 MHz,145 G)= μ’’(20 MHz,349 G)= 0.1 μ’’(40 MHz,1004 G)=

Summary (1/3) Four ferrite samples have been ordered from industry and measured in an external magnetic bias field. This allowed the determination of their available  -range and the corresponding values of  ’ as a function of frequency and Bias-field. Requirement for an f-range of 2.2 from MHz is a  ’-ratio of approx. 5. Y36G300G810RG3  ’-ratio, [145 – 1005 Gauss] 11.1 (  ’’,145 G = 6.3) (  ’’,1005 G = 0.074) 9.0 (  ’’,145 G = 10.1) (  ’’,1005 G = 0.076) 8.5 (  ’’,153 G = 11.9) (  ’’,1005 G = 0.03) 12.5 (  ’’,145 G = 17.01) (  ’’,1005 G = 0.05)  ’-ratio, [300 – 1005 Gauss] 4.0 (  ’’,300 G = 0.2) (  ’’,1005 G = 0.074) 2.8 (  ’’,300 G = 0.12) (  ’’,1005 G = 0.076) --  ’-ratio, [558 – 1008 Gauss] (  ’’,558 G = 1.2) (  ’’,1005 G = 0.03) --  ’-ratio, [349– 1004 Gauss] (  ’’,349 G = 0.1) (  ’’,1004 G = 0.05) 14

Summary (2/3) Measurement set-up is found that appears robust and stable (1-port-measurement with NWA). More ferrite samples from different suppliers are already ordered for measurement. Next step will be to investigate potential non-linearity of the materials, if exposed to moderate power (IP3 measurement). 15

Leads to two primary goals: 1.Characterization of ferrite samples with different saturation and line widths under different bias conditions in the required f- range. (This required a dedicated test set-up, since supplier data does not exist – PART 1). 2.Verification of Smythe’s claims (PART 2). 16

Verification of Smythe’s Claims (PART 2) Smythe suggested in 1983 to use – transverse bias to get close to saturation (reduces losses) – additional parallel bias for tuning (less bias required for same μ-range). 17

H applied Measurement Set-up H applied H tune H bias

μ’ for Material #2 (G300) in 2-Directional Magnetic Bias Change of 55 G (parallel) with 200 G perpendicular -> μ’-ratio > 6 μ’-ratio with Hperp=200G: μ’(20 MHz,HparBias=18 G)/μ’(40 MHz, HparBias=200 G)=

μ’’ for Material #2 (G300) in 2-Directional Magnetic Bias μ’’-values with Hperp=200G : μ’’(20 MHz, H par =18 G) = 1.23 μ’’(20 MHz, H par =73 G)= μ’’(40 MHz, H par =200 G)=

Contour-plots “Smythe” and G300 Material RF field direction H par /4  M s H perp /4  M s Plot of SmytheMeasured Data 21

Summary (3/3) 22 The idea of Smythe to use a 2-directional magnetic bias field appeared in 1983, but (to my knowledge) has never been used or further investigated. Smythe had no measurement data to support his claims. From the measurement done on the G300 sample, it appears as if the method is promising and could work; we will continue further tests with other samples and higher parallel bias fields. G300 with perpendicular bias G300 with 2-directional bias  ’-ratio, [300 – 1005 Gauss] 4.0 (  ’’,300 G = 0.2) (  ’’,1005 G = 0.074) --  ’-ratio, [ 200 Gauss perpendicular] & [18 – 200 Gauss parallel] (  ’’,18 G = 1.23) (  ’’,200 G = 0.105)

23 I would like to thank Fritz Caspers for his strong and unfailing support with all kind of measurement problems!