J/psi trigger status Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009 CBM Collaboration meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
PHENIX Decadal Plan o Midterm upgrades until 2015 o Long term evolution after 2015 Dynamical origins of spin- dependent interactions New probes of longitudinal.
High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.
Report of the Oscillation Working Group and status of Charm study 1 F. Juget – D. Duchesneau Ankara, April 1rst 2009.
MC Study on B°  S (Status Report) Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 05/25/01.
Topological D-meson Reconstruction with STAR Using the Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University SVT review, BNL, July 7 th /8.
Feasibility Studies of Low-mass Mesons Identification for the CBM Project Radosław Karabowicz Hot Matter Physics Department, Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian.
Open Charm Everard CORDIER (Heidelberg) Grako meeting HD, April 28, 2006Everard Cordier.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Vector meson study for the CBM experiment at FAIR/GSI Anna Kiseleva GSI Germany, PNPI Russia   Motivation   The muon detection system of CBM   Vector.
JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII
Simulation activities in India: students working on various topics.. Partha(VECC), Hemen (GU) : Trigger, SIS100, physics simulation Bipasha (CU): dynamic.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
C B M Di-electron background studies and first results using compact RICH CBM Collaboration Meeting, 27 September 2007, Dresden Di-electron background.
Di-electron pair reconstruction CBM Collaboration Meeting, 28 February 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Di-electron pair reconstruction Tetyana Galatyuk GSI-Darmstadt.
CALORIMETER system for the CBM detector Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) CBM Collaboration meeting, October 2004.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Status of Reconstruction in CBM
Muon simulation for p+A system Preliminary studies with HSD Partha Pratim Bhaduri Subhasis Chattopadhyay VECC, Kolkata.
Simulations for CBM CBM-India Meeting, Jammu, 12 February 2008 V. Friese
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
LCWS14, Belgrade, October M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Ring Recognition and Electron Identification in the RICH detector of the CBM Experiment at FAIR Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt, Germany and LIT JINR, Dubna,
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
Prospects in ALICE for  mesons Daniel Tapia Takaki (Birmingham, UK) for the ALICE Collaboration International Conference on STRANGENESS IN QUARK MATTER.
1 Correlations between J/ψ and charged hadrons Chun Zhang / Jiangyong Jia.
Feasibility of J/ψ studies by MPD detector Alla Maevskaya, Alexei Kurepin INR RAS Moscow NICA Roundtable Workshop 11 September 2009.
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Muon detection in the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Anna Kiseleva 3 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für.
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 The model: Input Charge generation The charge of the cluster is taken by random sampling of the experimental distribution.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
JPS/DNPY. Akiba Single Electron Spectra from Au+Au collisions at RHIC Y. Akiba (KEK) for PHENIX Collaboration.
Feasibility study of Heavy Flavor tagging with charged kaons in Au-Au Collisions at √s=200 GeV triggered by High Transverse Momentum Electrons. E.Kistenev,
Compact RICH detector Claudia Höhne, GSI Darmstadt.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
January 13, 2004A. Cherlin1 Preliminary results from the 2000 run of CERES on low-mass e + e - pair production in Pb-Au collisions at 158 A GeV A. Cherlin.
2008 Oct. Tsukuba 1 Misaki Ouchida Hiroshima University For the PHENIX Collaboration ω ω ω e+e+ eーeー γ γ π+π+ π0π0 γ πーπー π0π0 γ γ Low mass vector.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
Neutron Identification with ECAL  Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow, for the ECAL group  Motivation  Input info  Signal parameters  Preshower – 1 GeV/c.
Parallel Implementation of the KFParticle Vertexing Package for the CBM and ALICE Experiments Ivan Kisel 1,2,3, Igor Kulakov 1,4, Maksym Zyzak 1,4 1 –
Simulations on the Event-by-event Fluctuations of the Particle Yield Ratios D. Kresan, V. Friese GSI, Darmstadt, Germany Correlations and Fluctuations.
LIT participation LIT participation Ivanov V.V. Laboratory of Information Technologies Meeting on proposal of the setup preparation for external beams.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
Overview TRD Physics objectives Design considerations
A heavy-ion experiment at the future facility at GSI
I. Vassiliev, V. Akishina, I.Kisel and
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
“Hard” & “Soft” Interactions in Proton + Proton 200GeV
High-pT Identified Charged Hadrons in √sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions
Identified Charged Hadron Production at High pT
Perspectives on strangeness physics with the CBM experiment at FAIR
Aneela Amin, Haris Rashid, Talab Hussain
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
Presentation transcript:

J/psi trigger status Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009 CBM Collaboration meeting

Outline Motivation of trigger studies Motivation of trigger studies Environment for trigger studies Environment for trigger studies J/ψ trigger wih MC PID J/ψ trigger wih MC PID J/ψ trigger wih real PID J/ψ trigger wih real PID J/ψ efficiency J/ψ efficiency Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009

Motivation J/ψ and Ψ’ multiplicity is very low for J/ψ and Ψ’for CBM energies Ψ’ for CBM energies Measurements will be performed with the highest available interaction rates available interaction rates Fast and efficient event selection based on J/ψ trigger signatureis necessary to reduce the data volume signature is necessary to reduce the data volume For 10Mhz iteration rate and storage rate – 25khz trigger with suppressed factor at least 400 for mbias events ( or 40 for central) needed. Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009

Background: for target 250mkm for target 250mkm GRID MC production with cbmroot DEC08 for target 25mkm for target 25mkm central events with cbmroot DEC08 STS & compact RICH & segmented TRD & TOF STS & compact RICH & segmented TRD & TOF L1 fast tracking in STS L1 fast tracking in STS L1 tracking in TRD L1 tracking in TRD TRD PID TRD PIDSignal: J/ψ electrons from PLUTO J/ψ electrons from PLUTO embedded in central UrQMD pure signal: 2 electrons per event Simulation environment: Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009

J/ψ trigger efficiency with MC PID All reconstructed TRD tracks with Pt>1GeV/c was collected All reconstructed TRD tracks with Pt>1GeV/c was collected momentum reconstruction of these tracks by STS in fast mode momentum reconstruction of these tracks by STS in fast mode MC PID MC PID No vertex constraint No vertex constraint J/ψ event candidate: J/ψ event candidate: Events with 2 and more electrons any charge with Pt>1GeV/c Statistically chosen hadrons according different hadron suppression factor Hadron rejection factor Full/selected target 250mkm Full/selected target 25mkm Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009

J/ψ trigger efficiency with real TRD PID TRD PID by ANN and likelihood 99% electrons efficiency J/ψ event candidate: events with 2 tracks identified as electrons with Pt>1GeV/c any sign were selected Ratio of full number of events to events with 2 “J/ψ electron candidates” MC PID Like>0.4Ann>0.5 Target 250μ Target 25μ Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009

J/ψ efficiency after trigger j/ ψ decayed by Pluto for 2 electrons this 2 electrons per event and embedded in central UrQMD events were transported throughfull CBM set-up TRD PID by ANN and likelihood Reconstructed J/ψ in selected events (with 2 tracks identified as electrons with Pt>1GeV/c any sign any origin) ‏ MC PID LikeAnn S + B 15%16%19% Pure signal Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009

TRD tracks with Pt>1GeV/c in central AuAu 25AGeV UrQMD events Number of tracks per event Momentum distribution Particles PDG code p K+K+K+K+ π+π+π+π+ π-π-π-π- K-K-K-K- e μ Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009

Conclusion necessary suppression factor is easily reached by selecting events with 2 electrons at Pt > 1 GeV/c any sign any origin necessary suppression factor is easily reached by selecting events with 2 electrons at Pt > 1 GeV/c any sign any origin very soft thresholds for electron identification methods keeping 99% of j/psi electrons in TRD is enough to achieve needed for data recording very soft thresholds for electron identification methods keeping 99% of j/psi electrons in TRD is enough to achieve needed for data recording Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009