John Riley Hill, Ph.D. Office of Family Services - Acting Administrator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Advertisements

Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
Working Together to Prepare Illinois School Leaders Initiative School Leader Advisory Council March 27, 2009.
Incident Referral Forms Office of Family Services.
Budget Preparation and Development Sierra Unified School District Director of Fiscal Services – Janelle Utheim.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Guiding and Evaluating Positive Behavioral Support Implementation Shawn Fleming.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Have you ever been a part of this team?
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
S USTAINING PBIS IN U RBAN C ORE S CHOOLS E XAMPLES FROM M ILWAUKEE AND W ASHINGTON, DC Wayne Sailor University of Kansas Bernard Terry Munachiso Onuha.
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
Welcome to the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) Top 10 Strategies for Ensuring a Successful Start November 3, 2008.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.
TEACHING AND REINFORCEMENT SYSTEMS Lessons learned from a large, urban school district in second year of PBIS implementation T. Joan Fecteau PBIS External.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support District Planning Louisiana Positive Behavior Support Project.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Boston Public Schools Elementary Math Plan: District-Wide Reform in Math Teaching and Learning Presented by: Linda Ruiz Davenport, Director of Elementary.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
Urban Implementation of PBIS John Riley Hill, Ph.D. Curriculum and Instruction Keona Jones, Principal Thurston Woods Campus 2012 and 2013 Wisconsin PBIS.
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Administrator Institute August 5, 2014 Michelle Coconate, RtI Facilitator Academic & Behavioral Response to Intervention (RtI)
1 Building Faculty Involvement. 2 Objectives Understand why staff need to be committed to decreasing problem behaviors and increasing academic behaviors.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL OUR STORY… RTI Success in a REAL Comprehensive High School John Jorgensen, Curriculum Director Karinne Tharaldson Jones, Principal.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Update Cambrian School District March 8, 2012.
NOW HEADED PBIS: Where Are We NOW? Where Are We HEADED ? Emily Hill Kelly McCrohan Edgewood Elementary PBIS Coaches.
PBIS and Student Discipline Report to the BOE January 5, 2010 Donald Owen Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
Starting/Sustaining Universal Team Milt McKenna, Co-Coordinator, PBIS MD Maryland State Department of Education
B. Faculty Commitment. Core FeaturePBIS Implementation Goal B. Faculty Commitment 4. Faculty are aware of behavior problems across campus through regular.
SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March Congratulations – your work has made a difference Cohort 8.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Positive Behavior Intervention Supports PBIS Cambrian School District April 2011.
Spartan Expectations Be Responsible  Return promptly from breaks  Be an active participant  Use the law of two feet Be Respectful  Maintain cell phone.
Quality Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents Qualitative State Research Team Kristin Gansle Louisiana State University and A&M College Value-Added.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
School PBIS Leadership Team Roles and Responsibilities
1 Building Faculty Involvement. 2 Objectives Understand why staff need to be committed to decreasing problem behaviors and increasing academic behaviors.
West Sioux Elementary Iowa Department of Education March 7, 2013.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Positive Behaviour for Success (PBS) Universals Pre-Training Session 2012 Positive Behaviour for Success Illawarra South East Region.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
District Collaboration Grant Requirements November 17, 2015.
Supporting District Structures & Teams through a State-Level Plan Susan Barrett, Implementer Partner Center on PBIS Brenda Melcher Central Region Coordinator.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Northern Middle School "The Northern Way" One Middle School's Journey with Schoolwide PBIS.
Framework for Enhancing Student Learning School District 63 (Saanich)
Diversity, Prevention & Intervention Department Broward County Public Schools Data-based Problem Solving in a RtI:B Team Meeting 3.0.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
PBIS DATA. Critical Features of PBIS SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior Supporting Culturally Relevant Evidence-based.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Welcome to the DE-PBS Cadre Meeting
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
District Responsibilities
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Presentation transcript:

John Riley Hill, Ph.D. Office of Family Services - Acting Administrator

Council of Great City Schools “The discipline process within the Milwaukee Public Schools is oriented toward setting forth punitive consequences, rather than toward reinforcing positive behavior. No district-wide framework exists for a research-based program to encourage positive behavior; nor is there a consistent program of interventions designed to build positive behavior.” (p. 5, 2008)

MPS Data for The Council of Great City Schools examined the data listed below: – During the course of the year, 94,349 students attended MPS. – Staff wrote 161,981 incident referrals. Administrators issued 87,051 suspensions. – That resulted in 148,737 days of suspension served by MPS students.

Referral Reasons

Timeline of PBIS Implementation January 2008: Research Begins August 2008: Presentation to Principals November 2008: Planning Begins February 2009: Media Site March 2009: In-Depth Presentation May 2009: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 August 2009: Coaches Hired January 2010: Media Site and Newsletter September 2010 : Cohort 2/ Tier 1 August 2009: Office Referral Form February 2010: Cohort 2/ Tier 1 May 2011: Cohort 3/ Tier 1 September 2010: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 & 2 September 2011: PBIS Across the District February 2011: State Budget June 2011: Staff Cuts May 2009: PBIS Portal Page November 2009: Supervisors Hired

Researching PBIS Contacted other school districts and asked questions. Attended the APBS Conference. Brought Nancy Franklin from LAUSD to Milwaukee to present to different stakeholders. A team of district administrators, principals, teachers, and union officials to another school district to learn about PBIS.

Timeline of PBIS Implementation January 2008: Research Begins August 2008: Presentation to Principals November 2008: Planning Begins February 2009: Media Site March 2009: In-Depth Presentation May 2009: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 August 2009: Coaches Hired January 2010: Media Site and Newsletter September 2010 : Cohort 2/ Tier 1 August 2009: Office Referral Form February 2010: Cohort 2/ Tier 1 May 2011: Cohort 3/ Tier 1 September 2010: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 & 2 September 2011: PBIS Across the District February 2011: State Budget June 2011: Staff Cuts May 2009: PBIS Portal Page November 2009: Supervisors Hired

Bottom-Up/Top-Down Worked with the Milwaukee Teachers’ Education Association (MTEA) to plan how we would roll-out PBIS to the district. – Spent a year working together – Used an existing joint Safety and Discipline Labor Management Committee Collaboration is not always easy – Starts and Stops – Desire to be included in the research and planning

Laying the Ground Work Presented to Principals/School Leaders at the annual weeklong Leadership Institute prior to the start of the school year. – Could not reference PBIS – Did include all of the basic elements of PBIS Tier 1 School-wide Expectations Behavior Matrix Teaching Expectations Acknowledgements Using Data (data quality)

Timeline of PBIS Implementation January 2008: Research Begins August 2008: Presentation to Principals November 2008: Planning Begins February 2009: Media Site March 2009: In-Depth Presentation May 2009: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 August 2009: Coaches Hired January 2010: Media Site and Newsletter September 2010 : Cohort 2/ Tier 1 August 2009: Office Referral Form February 2010: Cohort 2/ Tier 1 May 2011: Cohort 3/ Tier 1 September 2010: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 & 2 September 2011: PBIS Across the District February 2011: State Budget June 2011: Staff Cuts May 2009: PBIS Portal Page November 2009: Supervisors Hired

Joint MTEA & MPS Mediasite presentation on PBIS was done in February, 2009 – All schools were required to watch the Mediasite presentation – Presentation gave an overview of the critical data around discipline in MPS and what PBIS is – The presentation served as an “infomercial” on PBIS to peak interest among school staff members – Unique approach to rolling out a district-wide initiative – Schools decided whether or not to send an exploratory team to in-depth presentation =404a129142d5486b956ec3b7c3ab4bcb1d

Team personnel/positions of the exploratory team were agreed upon by union and administration In-depth presentation for school teams by Dr. Lucille Eber, Director of Illinois PBIS Network on March 16, 2009 Over 100 schools signed up to attend the In- depth presentation

Exploratory teams brought back information to school staffs during the months of March and April – Schools determined if they wished to apply to be in the first cohort of 30 schools 65 Schools applied to participate in the rollout

Timeline of PBIS Implementation January 2008: Research Begins August 2008: Presentation to Principals November 2008: Planning Begins February 2009: Media Site March 2009: In-Depth Presentation May 2009: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 August 2009: Coaches Hired January 2010: Media Site and Newsletter September 2010 : Cohort 2/ Tier 1 August 2009: Office Referral Form February 2010: Cohort 2/ Tier 1 May 2011: Cohort 3/ Tier 1 September 2010: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 & 2 September 2011: PBIS Across the District February 2011: State Budget June 2011: Staff Cuts May 2009: PBIS Portal Page November 2009: Supervisors Hired

April, 2009 – Schools were selected to be part of the first cohort. Schools were selected on a holistic approach in order to have representation of all the following: School structures Student demographics Academic and discipline performance Traditional calendar and year-round calendar Non-charter, charter, and partnership Expanding schools Administrative experience (retirements, APIC’s, etc.) Variety of programs at the schools (SS/HS, RJ, L&L, etc.)

Timeline of PBIS Implementation January 2008: Research Begins August 2008: Presentation to Principals November 2008: Planning Begins February 2009: Media Site March 2009: In-Depth Presentation May 2009: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 August 2009: Coaches Hired January 2010: Media Site and Newsletter September 2010 : Cohort 2/ Tier 1 August 2009: Office Referral Form February 2010: Cohort 2/ Tier 1 May 2011: Cohort 3/ Tier 1 September 2010: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 & 2 September 2011: PBIS Across the District February 2011: State Budget June 2011: Staff Cuts May 2009: PBIS Portal Page November 2009: Supervisors Hired

Revised the MPS Incident Referral Form for improved data collection – Uniform referral form used by all schools across the district – Input from schools, administrators, and teachers’ union – Aligned district code of conduct, referral form, and data entry into student database Technology developed specific PBIS data reports (modeled after SWIS) Creating Infrastructure

Referral Form

Average Referrals per Day per Month

Referrals by Time

Referrals by Location

Referrals by Behavior

Referrals by Student

Staffing PBIS Only had two individuals working on PBIS up through August, External Coaches were hired to support schools implementing PBIS. – Positions were reallocated from the district’s Problem Solving group. 2 Supervisors were hired to oversee the External Coaches and support PBIS across the district.

Timeline of PBIS Implementation January 2008: Research Begins August 2008: Presentation to Principals November 2008: Planning Begins February 2009: Media Site March 2009: In-Depth Presentation May 2009: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 August 2009: Coaches Hired January 2010: Media Site and Newsletter September 2010 : Cohort 2/ Tier 1 August 2009: Office Referral Form February 2010: Cohort 2/ Tier 1 May 2011: Cohort 3/ Tier 1 September 2010: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 & 2 September 2011: PBIS Across the District February 2011: State Budget June 2011: Staff Cuts May 2009: PBIS Portal Page November 2009: Supervisors Hired

PBIS Newsletter

Cohort 2 January, 2010 – All schools required to watch PBIS video on Mediasite. – Schools could decide to apply for the second cohort of PBIS – all schools were accepted – Schools that applied to be part of the first cohort and were not accepted did not have to reapply – Schools that applied to be part of the first cohort and were not accepted could opt out if they decided to – Corrective Action identified schools to be included as well – Over 80 schools were added =d5602c8df65f4dc5a13c5e872b97b2e51d

Timeline of PBIS Implementation January 2008: Research Begins August 2008: Presentation to Principals November 2008: Planning Begins February 2009: Media Site March 2009: In-Depth Presentation May 2009: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 August 2009: Coaches Hired January 2010: Media Site and Newsletter September 2010 : Cohort 2/ Tier 1 August 2009: Office Referral Form February 2010: Cohort 2/ Tier 1 May 2011: Cohort 3/ Tier 1 September 2010: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 & 2 September 2011: PBIS Across the District February 2011: State Budget June 2011: Staff Cuts May 2009: PBIS Portal Page November 2009: Supervisors Hired

Monitored 4 categories: attendance, total suspensions, suspension rate, and suspensions due to learning environment violations – 93% improved or stayed the same in one or more categories – 63% improved or stayed the same in two or more categories – 46% improved or stayed the same in three or more categories – 21% improved or stayed the same in all four categories Results of Year 1

Additional schools are added to second cohort, all high schools in the Metro Region will begin implementing PBIS during the school year – 110 schools implementing PBIS 24 schools implementing both Tier 1 and Tier 2 86 schools implementing Tier 1 Year 2 of Implementation

Tier 2 District purchased Exceed/RtI Software for progress monitoring Tier 2 interventions in both academics and behavior – PBIS was first to use software with Check-In/ Check-Out progress monitoring Cohort 1 schools begin implementing Tier 2 interventions Cohort 2 schools begin training on Tier 2 interventions

Timeline of PBIS Implementation January 2008: Research Begins August 2008: Presentation to Principals November 2008: Planning Begins February 2009: Media Site March 2009: In-Depth Presentation May 2009: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 August 2009: Coaches Hired January 2010: Media Site and Newsletter September 2010 : Cohort 2/ Tier 1 August 2009: Office Referral Form February 2010: Cohort 2/ Tier 1 May 2011: Cohort 3/ Tier 1 September 2010: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 & 2 September 2011: PBIS Across the District February 2011: State Budget June 2011: Staff Cuts May 2009: PBIS Portal Page November 2009: Supervisors Hired

Declining Resources February 2011, the Governor and State Legislature make significant cuts to the funding of public schools in Wisconsin. – Voucher and Open Enrollment Caps lifted MPS projects cutting 989 positions – Layoffs and not replacing retirements PBIS cuts 50% or 5 External Coaching positions – Recover one position through a grant

Cohort 3 Contains schools that did not want or think they need PBIS PBIS will be across the entire district

Results of Year 2 The percent of suspensions due to Learning Environment Violations decreased from 61% to 46% when compared to the previous school year. The suspension rate for the district decreased by approximately five percentage points from the year before. There was a 37% reduction in total suspensions when comparing the data to the suspensions

Results of Year 2 There were 26,385 fewer suspensions in MPS during the school year compared to the school year. The district recovered the following number of days from the previous school year: – 293 teacher days lost to writing referrals for suspensions – 2,472 administrator days lost to issuing suspensions – 2,827 student days lost to the process of being suspended and 37,487 days lost serving suspensions for a total of 40,317 student days.

Results of Year 2 School-level Implementation of PBIS Reduction in Suspension Rates at PBIS Schools

Timeline of PBIS Implementation January 2008: Research Begins August 2008: Presentation to Principals November 2008: Planning Begins February 2009: Media Site March 2009: In-Depth Presentation May 2009: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 August 2009: Coaches Hired January 2010: Media Site and Newsletter September 2010 : Cohort 2/ Tier 1 August 2009: Office Referral Form February 2010: Cohort 2/ Tier 1 May 2011: Cohort 3/ Tier 1 September 2010: Cohort 1/ Tier 1 & 2 September 2011: PBIS Across the District February 2011: State Budget June 2011: Staff Cuts May 2009: PBIS Portal Page November 2009: Supervisors Hired

Year 3 Goals Include PBIS in Board Policy for MPS (DONE) Begin Tier 3 in Cohort 1 Schools Improve documentation of meetings Complete Tier 2 training to all of Cohort 2 and Cohort 3 Increase the use of the progress monitoring system for Tier 2 interventions Special training for clinicians Develop video modules for in-school PD (started) Support the entire district with 2 Supervisors and 6 External Coaches (started)

Lessons Learned Be strategic Like implementing PBIS in a school, it is important to take the time to plan in the beginning Learn from others Stay true to the training and the tools Keep it simple and organized Share the success stories and results early

Contact information: John Riley Hill, Ph.D. Milwaukee Public Schools Office of Family Services Contact Information