RESONANCES AND GRAVITY FIELD OF THE EARTH J. Klokočník, J. Kostelecký LECTURE AT NRIAG HELWAN EGYPT November 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Satellite geodesy, Fall C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
Advertisements

GN/MAE155B1 Orbital Mechanics Overview 2 MAE 155B G. Nacouzi.
Gravitation Ch 5: Thornton & Marion. Introduction Newton, 1666 Published in Principia, 1687 (needed to develop calculus to prove his assumptions) Newton’s.
Jake Griffiths & Jim Ray NOAA/National Geodetic Survey Acknowledgement: Kevin Choi SUBDAILY ALIAS AND DRACONITIC ERRORS IN THE IGS ORBITS Harmonics of.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
Movement in Space Moon Phases SeasonsEclipsesTides
What is a “TIDE”? TIDES are daily changes in ocean water.
Motion of the Ocean. Tides are created by the moon’s gravitational pull For any location on Earth, there are 2 high tides and 2 low tides per day The.
ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF EARTH GRAVITY FIELD MODELS BY MEANS OF INDEPENDENT SATELLITE CROSSOVER ALTIMETRY J. Klokočník, J. Kostelecký, C.A. Wagner Presented.
Prepared by: MORE Team MORE Relativity Meeting February 16-17, 2009 Rome Simulation of the solar conjunction experiment with BepiColombo.
Some 3 body problems Kozai resonance 2 planets in mean motion resonance Lee, M. H
Rome MORE meeting Feb 16-17, Strong Equivalence Principle Violation in Coplanar 3-Body Systems Neil Ashby University of Colorado Boulder, CO USA.
Solar System Physics Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 6.
CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January
Louis J. Rubbo, Neil J. Cornish, and Olivier Poujade Support for this project was provided by the NASA EPSCoR program.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB Improved Orbit Estimation Using GPS Measurements for Conjunction Analysis Gabriel Hugh Elkaim, Assistant Professor.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © This research is based on the estimation of the spherical harmonic geopotential.
Goal: To understand angular motions Objectives: 1)To learn about angles 2)To learn about angular velocity 3)To learn about angular acceleration 4)To learn.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
1 Swarm ACC data: physical signal and temperature dependence Swarm 4th DATA QUALITY WORKSHOP, GFZ Potsdam, 2–5 December 2014 Aleš Bezděk Josef Sebera Jaroslav.
AGI An Analysis of State Vector Propagation Using Differing Flight Dynamics Programs David A Vallado Analytical Graphics Inc. Center for Space Standards.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
Resonances and GOCE orbit selection J. Kloko č ník (1), A. Bezd ě k (1), J. Kostelecký (2), R. Floberghagen (3), Ch. Gruber (1) (1)Astron. Inst. Czech.
Generalization of Farrell's loading theory for applications to mass flux measurement using geodetic techniques J. Y. Guo (1,2), C.K. Shum (1) (1) Laboratory.
Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences Ondřejov Observatory, Czech Republic & Geodetic Observatory, Research Inst. for Geodesy, Topography and Cartography,
1 Resolvability of gravity field parameters in a repeat orbit: degree/order limit J. Klokočník 1, J. Kostelecký 2, C. A. Wagner 3, A. Bezděk 1 1 Astronomical.
IPPW-9, Toulouse 2012A. Sánchez Hernández, UPC D YNAMICAL STUDY OF THE AEROBRAKING TECHNIQUE IN THE ATMOSPHERE OF M ARS Alberto Sánchez Hernández ETSEIAT.
An Iterative General Planetary Theory P. K. Seidelmann University of Virginia.
NKG Working Group for Geodynamics Copenhagen, 23 –24 April, Tasks of a new Working Group on Absolute Gravimetry Herbert Wilmes Federal Agency for.
CAPRI Mathematical programming and exercises Torbjörn Jansson* *Corresponding author Department for Economic and Agricultural.
1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.
“Good Practices” for long term orbit propagation and associated criteria verification in the frame of the French Space Act Presentation.
Water storage variations from time-variable gravity data Andreas Güntner Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section.
Our Planet Earth Seasons, Moon Phases and Ocean Tides The Earth, Moon and Sun System.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION ASEN 5070 LECTURE 11 9/16,18/09.
1 GNSS-R concept extended by a fine orbit tuning Jaroslav KLOKOČNÍK a, Aleš BEZDĚK a, Jan KOSTELECKÝ b,c a Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences.
GRACE Mascons and Hydrological Data for the Continents: GRACE ACCESS D. Rowlands (1), F. Lemoine (1), S. Luthcke (1), S. Klosko (2), D. Chinn (2), K. Akoumany.
Gravitation Ch 5: Thornton & Marion. Integral for of Gauss’ Law For spherically symmetric cases, g is in the radial direction, and so is n-hat.
The Earth’s Tides Page 63.
1 Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Applications E. Schrama.
2 nd GRAS-SAF USER WORKSHOP Assimilation of GPS radio occultation measurements at DAO (soon GMAO) P. Poli 1,2 and J. Joiner 3 Data Assimilation Office.
AOSS 401, Fall 2007 Lecture 21 October 31, 2007 Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB) Derek Posselt (Room 2517D, SRB)
Parameters : Temperature profile Bulk iron and olivine weight fraction Pressure gradient. Modeling of the Martian mantle Recently taken into account :
The outer solar system: some points of physics A few points of physics I didn’t deal with earlier.
Application of Perturbation Theory in Classical Mechanics
Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.
ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 2: Basics of Orbit Propagation.
12.201/ Essentials of Geophysics Geodesy and Earth Rotation Prof. Thomas Herring
4.Results (1)Potential coefficients comparisons Fig.3 FIR filtering(Passband:0.005~0.1HZ) Fig.4 Comparison with ESA’s models (filter passband:0.015~0.1HZ)
Astronomical Institute University of Bern Astronomical Institute, University of Bern Swarm Gravity Field Results with the CMA Adrian Jäggi, Daniel Arnold,
Celestial Mechanics VI The N-body Problem: Equations of motion and general integrals The Virial Theorem Planetary motion: The perturbing function Numerical.
1 Validation of Swarm ACC preliminary dataset Swarm 5th Data Quality Workshop, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, France, 7 – 10 September 2015 Aleš.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.
Celestial Mechanics VII
CHAMP’s TRIPLE PASSAGE THROUGH 31 st /62 nd -ORDER ORBIT RESONANCE R.H. Gooding, C.A. Wagner, J. Klokočník, J. Kostelecký.
The Science of Orbits (Power Point 04) Image Credit: NASA.
L. Carrère, F. Lyard, M. Cancet, L. Roblou, A. Guillot
Lunar Trajectories.
VIRTIS flyby of Steins M-IR Spectral analysis
The Earth-Moon System Moon Mass x 1022 kg
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Circular Motion.
Orbits…the celestial paths of planets
The Earth-Moon System Moon Mass x 1022 kg
Monitoring Saturn's Upper Atmosphere Density Variations Using
Methods of Orbit Propagation
Future Opportunities in Geomagnetism and Electromagnetism:
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14
Accelerator Physics Statistical Effects
Presentation transcript:

RESONANCES AND GRAVITY FIELD OF THE EARTH J. Klokočník, J. Kostelecký LECTURE AT NRIAG HELWAN EGYPT November 2005

NASA about 1970 unexplained orbit oscillations RAE Farnborough, pioneer works of R.H.Gooding and R.R.Allan, case of Ariel 3 at the 15 th -order resonance RAE Farnborough, group of D.G. King-Hele, many analysis of inclination and eccentricity for orbits at 15/1, 14/1, 29/2, and 31/2 resonances for diverse inclinations, application in gravity field models accuracy tests for the particular orders of the harmonic geopotential coefficients USA NASA GSFC, later NOAA Carl Wagner, Steve Klosko, mostly shallow resonance France and Germany: G. Balmino and Ch. Reigber an their groups, shallow resonances Czechoslovakia, Czech republic: Klokocnik and Kostelecky, Ondrejov Observatory

Lagrange Planetary Equation for Orbital Inclination in terms of Lumped Geopotential Coefficients (LC)

DEFINITIONS Resonant angle Lumped coefficients

CHAMP, GRACE A, B and RESONANCES comments on theory location of resonances in their orbits simulation of resonances in inclination preparation for analysis of individual resonances analysis of inclination variations at 46/3 and 31/2 resonances of CHAMP, preparation for 61/4 of GRACE

Comparison of approaches to analyse CHAMP resonances: long-arc vs short-arc general geopotential recovery from tracking data is to analyse full spectrum of effects in many short-arcs [e.g. 1.5 day for CHAMP] traditional “resonant analyses” work with long-arc approach and concentrate on few “resonant frequencies” (31/2, 46/3….etc)

CHAMP GFZ 2000

numbers on the figure are the number  of nodal revolutions per of  synodic days

Eigen 3p- generated

numbers on the figure are the number  of nodal revolutions per of  synodic days

DEFINITIONS Resonant angle Lumped coefficients

Data NASA or GFZ two line elements – mean Kozai type elements POME – state vectors for CHAMP and GRACE A/B, transformation from CTS to TDS and the to osculating elements, subsequent averaging to mean elements, subtracting all non-resonant perturbations (lunisolar, tidal, due to rotation of the upper atmosphere) or additional empirical parameters in the LSE

Resonance 46/3

Resonance 31/2

numbers on the figure are the number  of nodal revolutions per of  synodic days

Eigen 3p- generated

first exact. Res.: 23 May 02, day 143

CHAMP: Location, estimation of expected orbit effects and analysis of particular high-order resonances in CHAMP orbit Comparison of computed lumped geopotential coefficients from resonances with those from comprehensive Earth models Interpretation of existing discrepancies (due mainly to insufficient modelling of tides and non- gravitational effects in our resonant software), and a possibility to calibrate the Earth models by results from resonances

Values of the best fitting lumped coefficients from analysis of POME Gooding, THROE CAW 31st order: 10 9 C(31, 0, 2) = ± ± S(31, 0, 2) = ± ± nd order: 10 9 C(62, 0, 4) = 2.62 ± ± S(62, 0, 4) = 0.41 ± ± 0.05

Champ 78/5 resonance

Champ 47/3 resonance will occur in winter 2005/6

Expected 47/3 resonance in orbit of CHAMP under different assumptions on atmospheric drag Expected 47/3 resonance in orbit of CHAMP under different assumptions on atmospheric drag

Grace A and B, 2002

GRACE at 61/4 is the next

Resonant inclination changes Eigen 3p-generated

Bezdek 2005

Conclusions CHAMP orbit was raised twice and so CHAMP passed through the 31/2 resonance three times – this gives unprecedented opportunity for determining the values of lumped coefficients of orders 31 and 62, via recently revived technique that capitalizes on the resonant variation of orbit inclination (in particular) Resonant analysis is based on TLE and POME of CHAMP Lumped coefficients of the 31 st and 62 nd order compare well with relevant values computed from recent comprehensive gravity field models (like EIGEN 2, 3p etc). Resonant analysis still useful to check/calibrate selected gravity information. Possibilities and capabilities to improve the procedure…doors open for Yehia AbdelAziz and others Forthcoming: 47/3 resonance of CHAMP (winter 2005/6), study of 61/4, 46/3, 77/5, 31/2, 47/3 of GRACE Unexpected applications in solving a problem of accuracy of determination of geopotential time variations (case of 61/4 of GRACE A/B) in 2004

To get a copy Anonymous ftp: sunkl.asu.cas.cz pub/jklokocn file: PPT_RESON_EGYPT05.ppt For more information: Web:

The End