SYLLOGISTIC REASONING PART 2 Properties and Rules PART 2 Properties and Rules.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Advertisements

Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
Euler’s circles Some A are not B. All B are C. Some A are not C. Algorithm = a method of solution guaranteed to give the right answer.
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
Methods of Proof & Proof Strategies
Copyright © Curt Hill Rules of Inference What is a valid argument?

GLE Explore the concept of premises, including false premises. Intro to Logic.
Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.
How to do a Proof Using Uno!. What does it mean to prove something? PROOF (pruf) –noun 1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce.
Logical Arguments. Strength 1.A useless argument is one in which the truth of the premisses has no effect at all on the truth of the conclusion. 2.A weak.
Chapter 2 The Logic of Quantified Statements. Section 2.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements.
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
1 Sections 1.5 & 3.1 Methods of Proof / Proof Strategy.
The Science of Good Reasons
Arguments with Quantified Statements M Universal Instantiation If some property is true for everything in a domain, then it is true of any particular.
Night 2 Presented by Eric Douma
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Definition: “reasoning from known premises, or premises presumed to be true, to a certain conclusion.” In contrast, most everyday arguments involve inductive.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Chapter 15: Rules for Judging Validity. Distribution (p. 152) Several of the rules use the notion of distribution. A term is distributed if it refers.
Determining Validity and Invalidity in Deductive Arguments PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 6, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
A SYLLOGISTIC REASONING 2500 years of wisdom that help making a point.
Logic – Basic Terms Logic: the study of how to reason well. Validity: Valid thinking is thinking in conformity with the rules. If the premises are true.
LOGICAL REASONING FOR CAT 2009.
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
1 Introduction to Abstract Mathematics Chapter 2: The Logic of Quantified Statements. Predicate Calculus Instructor: Hayk Melikya 2.3.
The construction of a formal argument
Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms.
Deductive and induction reasoning
Predicates and Quantifiers Dr. Yasir Ali. 1.Predicates 2.Quantifiers a.Universal Quantifiers b.Existential Quantifiers 3.Negation of Quantifiers 4.Universal.
Chapter 17: Missing Premises and Conclusions. Enthymemes (p. 168) An enthymeme is an argument with an unstated premise or conclusion. There are systematic.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
Chapter 6 Evaluating Deductive Arguments 1: Categorical Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Chapter 14: Categorical Syllogisms. Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) Categorical syllogisms are deductive arguments. Categorical syllogisms.
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
Reason. Reason It rained last night. It rained last night. There are no sharks in Sun-Moon lake. There are no sharks in Sun-Moon lake. The sun will rise.
I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
2004/9/15fuzzy set theory chap02.ppt1 Classical Logic the forms of correct reasoning - formal logic.
Part 2. Grace is the help God gives us to respond to our vocation of becoming his adopted sons. It introduces us into the intimacy of the Trinitarian.
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
More About Syllogisms The quantifiers, causes, and validity of Syllogisms.
WOK : Reason.
Deductive Arguments.
What the Bible Says About Being Human
Disjunctive Syllogism
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
Rules and fallacies Formal fallacies.
Evaluating truth tables
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
Mathematics for Computer Science MIT 6.042J/18.062J
Hurley … Chapter 6.5 Indirect Truth Tables
Inference Rules: Tautologies
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (2/2).
Phil2303 intro to logic.
SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 The Syllogism
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

SYLLOGISTIC REASONING PART 2 Properties and Rules PART 2 Properties and Rules

SYLLOGISTIC REASONING The 4 types of quantifiers The 4 types of causes The proof by the effects The rules of syllogism The 4 types of quantifiers The 4 types of causes The proof by the effects The rules of syllogism

PROPERTIESPROPERTIES PROPERTIESPROPERTIES The 4 types of quantifiers 1. Universal affirmative: ALL S are P 2. Universal negative: NO S is P 3. Particular affirmative: SOME S are P 4. Particular negative: SOME S are NOT P

PROPERTIESPROPERTIES PROPERTIESPROPERTIES The 4 types of causes 1.Material cause: Because S is made of M Why can men breathe? Because everything with lungs can breathe And because all men have lungs Thus, all men can breathe

PROPERTIESPROPERTIES PROPERTIESPROPERTIES The 4 types of causes 2. Efficient cause: Because S is moved by M Why can men breath? Because everything that inhales & exhales can breathe And because all men can inhale & exhale Thus, all men can breathe

PROPERTIESPROPERTIES PROPERTIESPROPERTIES The 4 types of causes 3. Formal cause: Because S is an M Why can men breathe? Because all mammals can breathe And because all men are mammals Thus, all men can breathe

PROPERTIESPROPERTIES PROPERTIESPROPERTIES The 4 types of causes 4. Final cause: Because S is for M Why can men breathe? Because all that must live on earth can breathe And because all men are for life on earth Thus, all men can breathe

PROPERTIESPROPERTIES PROPERTIESPROPERTIES The 4 types of causes Some Practice The 4 types of causes Some Practice Why can humans be religious? Because all spiritual souls can be religious material 1. Proof by the material cause: Because all that God attracts can be religious efficient 2. Proof by the efficient cause: Because all that is in God’s image can be religious formal 3. Proof by the formal cause: Because all that is for God can be religious final 4. Proof by the final cause:

PROPERTIESPROPERTIES PROPERTIESPROPERTIES The proof by the effects Because the effect of S is M Why can men breathe? Because what rejects water & CO2 can breathe And because all men rejects water & CO2 Thus, all men can breathe

RULESRULES RULESRULES  2 premises Major: M is P – Minor: S is M # 1: The BARBARA formula  1 conclusion S is P  3 terms twice S twice subject (minor & conclusion)  … in good order M is P ► S is M ► S is P M once subject of the major and once predicate of the minor P twice predicate (major & conclusion)

RULESRULES RULESRULES negative  No valid conclusion with 2 negative premises # 2: The quantifiers Because no human is an angel And because no seraphim is human Thus, no seraphim is an angel

RULESRULES RULESRULES  No valid conclusion with 2 negative premises # 2: The quantifiers Because some Americans are saints And because some humans are American Thus, some humans are saints  No valid conclusion with 2 particular premises

RULESRULES RULESRULES  No valid conclusion with 2 negative premises # 2: The quantifiers Because no human is from the moon And because all saints are human Thus, no saints are from the moon  No valid conclusion with 2 particular premises  1 negative premise = a negative conclusion

RULESRULES RULESRULES  No valid conclusion with 2 negative premises # 2: The quantifiers Because some rational creatures are happy And because all humans are rational creatures Thus, some humans are happy  No valid conclusion with 2 particular premises  1 negative premise = a negative conclusion  1 particular premise = a particular conclusion

RULESRULES RULESRULES  A valid syllogism can be false if a premise is false # 3: Validity & Truth Because all saints are humans And because all angels are saints Thus, all angels are humans VALID

RULESRULES RULESRULES  A valid syllogism can be false if a premise is false # 3: Validity & Truth Because all saints are humans And because some saints are Christians Thus, all Christians are humans TRUE  A true conclusion can follow an invalid syllogism