Revised Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn Carrie Laboski, Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski UW-Madison, Soil Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manure is a Resource Ron Wiederholt Nutrient Management Specialist NDSU Extension Livestock Manure Nutrient Management Series March, 2006.
Advertisements

Current Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Corn in Nebraska Richard Ferguson Bob Caldwell.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
EFISIENSI PUPUK DAN PEMUPUKAN NITROGEN Bahan kajian MK Pemupukan Dosen: Prof Dr Ir Soemarno MS Jur Tanah FP UB, 2011.
Nutrient Management Workbook 2009 Jon Rausch, Amanda Meddles & Robert Mullen Ohio State University Extension.
Nutrient Management Workbook 2009 Jon Rausch, Amanda Meddles & Robert Mullen Ohio State University Extension.
Managing Crop Margins Craig A. Chase Farm Management Field Specialist.
Nutrient Management Workbook 2009
Crop Costs & Returns in a High Input Strategy versus Common Practices Kent Olson, Bruce Potter, Steve Quiring, Jeff Vetch, Tom Hoverstad, Seth Naeve, Dale.
Lauer © University of Wisconsin – Agronomy Establish Realistic Yield Goals Yield Potential of Soil Growing Season.
Soil Nitrogen Cycling & Budgeting
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
ISU Agronomy Extension Fertilizer Price Effect on Optimum Corn N Rate Recommendations John Sawyer Department of Agronomy Iowa State University.
Corn Seeding Densities and Transgenic Traits: Economics and Farmer Behavior Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Wisconsin Crop Management.
UW MADISON AGRONOMY Rotation Effect on Brown Stem Rot and Soybean Yield P. Pedersen, C.R. Grau, and J.G. Lauer UW-Madison September 14, 2000.
Insuring Forage Crops for SURE Eligibility and for Winter Cover Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison (608)
Secondary and Micronutrient Management
Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo,
Crop Insurance and Processing Vegetables: Farmer Practices and Net Returns Paul D. Mitchell Ag and Applied Economics, UW-Madison
The “New” Economics of Crop Production in 2008 Paul D. Mitchell Assistant Professor Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Cover crop economics: estimating a return on investment Liz Juchems and Jamie Benning.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Sensor-based Nitrogen Application – Converting Research to Practicality Brent Rendel Rendel Farms Miami, Oklahoma.
Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines John Sawyer Department of Agronomy Iowa State University.
Farming a Flat Function AAE 320. Overview of Talk “Farming a Flat Function” What is it? (Give Examples) What does it mean? (Implications) In my opinion,
Current N Fertilization
Using Manure as Fertilizer Saves $ On this 120 acre farm with 40 cows the manure is worth $5000 It is fertilizer already on the farm, as is the nitrogen.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
G RAIN M ARKETS AND C OST OF P RODUCTION Paul D. Mitchell Associate Professor of Agricultural & Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison
Highway 56 West Adams, MN Lynn Lagerstedt.
Current N Fertilization Strategy for Corn in Missouri Newell Kitchen Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri USDA-ARS.
New Minnesota Nitrogen Rate Guidelines.
Grain Profitability Outlook Cash Rents Land Values Greg Halich Univ. of Kentucky
Nutrient content of dairy slurry Slurry nutrient variability and nutrient prices Slurry data from UW soils lab (Marshfield, WI) First year available 715.
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Early and late fungicide applications in corn: What have we learned?
The Wisconsin Soil Test Recommendation Program UWEX Publication A2809: Nutrient Application Guidelines for Field, Vegetable, and Fruit Crops in Wisconsin.
Areawide Suppression of European Corn Borer with Bt Corn Reaps Benefits for Non- Bt Growers Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Central.
Economics of Crop Production. The Three Components of Profit Crop Yield Production Cost Selling Price Received.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – RATE TABLES Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Categorizing Nitrogen Availability for Corn Fields Using Field History and Cornstalk Nitrate Test Haiying Tao 1, Thomas Morris 1, Suzy Friedman 2, Richard.
IRRIGATED CORN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION IN THE COLORADO ARKANSAS VALLEY Ardell Halvorson 1, Frank Schweissing 2, Michael Bartolo 2, and Curtis.
Comparison of NUE and Nitrogen Needs of Corn Hybrids with and without Transgenic Corn Rootworm Resistance Carrie Laboski and Todd Andraski, Dept. Soil.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – MMP NBS Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Figure 1. Rodale Farming Systems Trial with rotations. Note the presence of cover crops and amendment in organic systems. Synthetic fertilizer herbicide.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Bob Woods Area Extension Agronomy Specialist
Grain Markets and Cost of Production
Corn Plant Population Research – Water-Limited Sites
Economics of Crop Production
Fertility Strategies for Lean Times
Manure management plan summary – MMP NBs
Economics of Cover Crops
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
Think Break #3 N lbs/A Yield bu/A MP VMP
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
COVER CROP NITROGEN AVAILABILITY CALCULATOR
Responsible Nitrogen Management in 2018: Rates, Treatments and Timing IFCA Webinar February 9, 2018 Emerson Nafziger Crop Sciences University of Illinois.
Soil test results and how to use them
Farming a Flat Function
Manure management plan summary – Rate tables
The More-On Principle: Why farmer use inputs like they do
Current KSU N recommendations for corn & wheat
Manure’s Fertility Value
Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota 2007 NUE Workshop Monmouth, IL
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Biomass Yield and Nutrient Accumulation by Four Small Grain Species
Presentation transcript:

Revised Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn Carrie Laboski, Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski UW-Madison, Soil Science

What Do Other States Recommend Previous Crop:CornSoybean Yield Goal (bu/A): ─────── lb N/A ─────── IL MI/IN/OH MN IA WI Soil with 3.1% OM, considered high yield potential

Basics of MRTN 1 st Compile data sets for corn yield response to N for various crop rotations and soil yield potentials –C-C, S-C –high/very high, medium/low yield potential soils; irrigated sands

Basics of MRTN 2 nd Calculate the response model for each site Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 N rate (lb/a) Yield (bu/a)

Basics of MRTN 3 rd Calculate return to N for each site in data set –For every 1 lb N/a applied, calculate the yield increase over the yield obtained when 0 lb N/a is applied –Multiply yield increase by price of corn and subtract the cost of N –Do this for N rates of 0 through 240 lb N/a

Basics of MRTN 4 th Calculate the average return to N at each N rate, using all of the data for a given crop rotation Site─────── Return to N at various N rates (lb/a) ─────── ──────────────── $/acre ──────────────── Average

Basics of MRTN 5 th Find the N rate with the greatest average return to N, this is the MRTN Site─────── Return to N at various N rates (lb/a) ─────── ───────────────── $/acre ───────────────── Average MRTN

Basics of MRTN 6 th Find the N rates with returns to N within $1/a of MRTN –This provides a range in N profitable N rates Site─────── Return to N at various N rates (lb/a) ─────── ───────────────── $/acre ───────────────── Average MRTN Low High

N Rate Guidelines from MRTN Provides a range of N rates that should come close to maximizing return Guidance needs to be provided on when a producer should be in which part of the range

Use of MRTN in Wisconsin

N Rate Guidelines High/Very High Yield Potential Soils N:Corn Price Ratio Previous Crop = CornPrev. Crop = Soybean low MRTN highlow MRTN high $/lb:$/bu ──── lb N/a ──── Current Rec. = Includes starter N

N Rate Guidelines Medium/Low Yield Potential Soils N:Corn Price Ratio Previous Crop = CornPrev. Crop = Soybean low MRTN highlow MRTN high $/lb:$/bu ──── lb N/a ──── Current Rec. = Includes starter N

N Rate Guidelines Irrigated Sands N:Corn Price Ratio PC = All crops except forage legumes & green manures low MRTN high $/lb:$/bu ────── lb N/a ────── Current Rec. = Includes starter N

What are current price ratios? Price of NPrice of Corn ($/bu corn) $/lb N

Profitable N Rates A range of N rates can produce profitable yields Economics clearly drives the profitable N rate

Guidelines on determining which part of the MRTN range to use SituationPortion of Range to Use lowmidhigh > 50 % residue cover at planting Corn follows a small grain Use previous crop = soybean on your soil type Non-irrigated sands, regardless of previous crop Use previous crop = corn for med/low yield potential soils

Guidelines on determining which part of the MRTN range to use SituationPortion of Range to Use lowmidhigh Irrigated sands with > 2.0 % organic matter Non-sandy soils with < 2.0 % organic matter Non-sandy soils with > 10.0 % organic matter

Guidelines on determining which part of the MRTN range to use SituationPortion of Range to Use lowmidhigh If you think there may be carry over (residual) N OR & use PPNT When corn follows a forage legume, green manure, or leguminous vegetable, use the table for corn following corn and take N credit NOTE: Starter N counts towards total N applied Consider using the lower end of the range to improve environmental quality

N credits There is no longer a N credit for soybean –Use values listed in the tables Forage legume, leguminous vegetable, and green manure N credits remain the same Manure N credits remain the same

N credits PSNT is used as a N credit –First determine target N rate, then subtract PSNT credit from the target N rate –Previously, PSNT values provided different target sidedress N rates PPNT is unchanged Yield Potential HighMed. PSNTN credit ppm― lb N/a ― ≥ 21** ≤ 1000 * No additional N is needed

How much yield will be lost by reducing N rates?

Summary Based on field data Solidly based on economics –MRTN can be calculated for various corn and N prices to show the range in profitable N application Helps growers easily adjust N rates for varying price climates or management level –Provides grower flexibility

Summary MRTN approach analyzes research data a little differently than previous method –But confirms our previous guidelines Provides ability to adjust for environmental costs and show profit losses when certain environmental quality criteria must be met Provide consistency in approaches to determining N rates across state borders