Gas emergency cash-out Ofgem perspective Transmission Workstream - 3 July 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mod 0260 Post-Emergency Claims: Implementation Update Transmission Workstream - December 2009.
Advertisements

Review of NTS entry charge setting arrangements - IA 1 July 2010.
Force Majeure & payment of Exit Charges Jeff Chandler - 6 th October 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon 1.
Funding UKLink Process changes (User Pays). 2 Purpose of Presentation  Review of User Pays  Principles  Application to date  National Grid NTS observations.
Commercial Arrangements For Gas Quality Service – Process UNC Transmission Workstream 23 rd April 2007.
Information Transparency Proposal Transmission Workstream 2 nd November 2006 Presentation by Abid Sheikh, energywatch and Angela Love, Poyry Energy.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
A regulatory framework for gas quality treatment facilities: recap and update.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Gas & Power Coordination: Growing Pains in Time of Transition Mark Stultz, BP Natural Gas Supply Association OPSI Annual Meeting Chicago, Illinois October.
Principles of foreign exchange Chapter 4. Overview Trading one currency for another arises from the elements that make up a nation’s balance of payments:
Gas Emergency Cash Out – A Shipper Perspective Transmission Workstream 3/7/08 Steve Rose.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream, 4 th May 2006.
Capacity trade and transfer mechanism and the next AMSEC auction Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 9 May 2007.
20 September 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Introduction of Gas Reserve Arrangements Mark Bailey Gaz de France ESS.
“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
Further consultation on NTS entry baselines Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Compliance and Enforcement 14 August 2007.
How TSOs can further contribute to efficient competition GIE ANNUAL CONFERENCE ATHENS 2005.
Review of the UNC Post-emergency Arrangements Workshop 1 March 2009.
Changes to the Network Emergency Co-ordinator (NEC) Safety Case resulting from Exit Reform UNC Workgroup 0412 Meeting – 1 st March 2012.
Ofgem’s Gas SCR – Background on the DSR mechanism Stephen Jarvis 02/07/14.
Revision of the UNC Post-Emergency Arrangements draft proposal July 2009.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
XVI th Madrid Forum Madrid, 28 May 2009 Walter Boltz (Gas Working Group Chair) Transparency guidelines and GRI transparency work.
10 November 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Modification Proposal 0086 “Introduction of gas demand management reserve arrangements” 1 st June 2006 Phil Broom and.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Gas Emergency Arrangements Proposal Transmission Workstream 5 th April 2007.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
DN Interruption Reform Distribution Workstream 23 rd July 2009.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Open letter on Development of the regime ahead of winter 2007/8 Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 28 June 2007.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Initial Thoughts on the Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 3 rd April 2008.
Optimisation of Entry Capacity Strawman Transmission Workstream 4 th May 2006.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 25 October 2010.
EBCC Update SCR impacts Mark Cockayne 4 th November 2013.
© Energy UK April 2012 Modification 435 Workgroup Alternative approaches to NDM Compensation 19 February 2013
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Project Nexus : Funding Arrangements Joel Martin - 30 April 2009.
Safety Monitor modifications: Ofgem’s recent decisions Simon Bradbury.
Demand Side Management Andy Pace 6 October | Energy Networks Association - DCMF.
Modification Proposal 0435: Arrangements to better secure firm gas supplies for GB customers Initial Workgroup discussion 1 November 2012.
Ofgem’s decision on UNC modification proposal 044 Sonia Brown.
Development Modification Proposal: Introduction of an Inter-day Linepack Product Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Review of the UNC Post-emergency Claims Arrangements Strawman February 2009.
Transmission Workstream 7th Dec 2006 Chris Logue
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Review Group 291- Ofgem Update
Review of UNC Section Q “Emergencies”
UNC Modification Proposal 0373
UNC Trader User – Licence obligations
User Compensation for NEC Storage Curtailment – Draft Proposal
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Potential Alternative Proposal – Interaction with Electricity Capacity Market 23 January 2018.
Development of Entry Capacity Substitution
Review Group 291- Ofgem Update
DSR Workgroup 10 September
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Ofgem presentation to Gas Transmission Workstream
CAM: Next Steps UNC Transmission Workgroup Lisa Martin 9 January 2014.
195AV “Future work” – system flexibility
Presentation transcript:

Gas emergency cash-out Ofgem perspective Transmission Workstream - 3 July 2008

2 Decision on Modification 149/149A Mod UNC149A accepted on 19 October 2007 and implemented on 1 November 2007 In its decision letter, Ofgem stated preference in principle for dynamic cash-out approach (Mod UNC149) but expressed concerns with possible unintended consequences (and lack of analysis to allay these concerns) Our main concern was the possibility of price spiralling and resulting credit issues for shippers Decision letter flagged other possible approaches: –Expanded role for SO in a Gas Deficit Emergency (GDE): Ability to buy gas Arrangements with other SOs –Pricing curtailed firm volumes into cash-out to establish link between SO actions and cash-out price thus mitigating the risk of price spiralling (and gaming)

3 Ofgem perspective on Grid’s proposal: OCM Physical Ofgem is supportive in principle of the concept of dynamic pricing to create the correct signals during a GDE to attract non-UKCS gas and instigate interruption Restricting cash-out price calculation to OCM Physical only trades as proposed by Grid may partially address the risk of price spiralling However the question of whether prices could spiral beyond the economic value of the gas to end consumers still needs to be addressed

4 The heart of the issue Under a GDE the UK effectively becomes a single trading entity competing for gas in the global market How can it do that with a fixed ‘bid’ price? Continental markets Norwegian producers Global LNG market UK market 2 basic approaches Approach 1 A single entity acts on behalf of the entire market in securing gas supplies e.g. NGG Approach 2 Market arrangements signal the price that the UK is willing to pay for additional gas

5 Approach 1: NGG responsible for sourcing gas in an emergency This would require a very different role for the NEC/NGG Options available to it: –Placing bids on OCM –Bilateral agreements with other SOs Council Directive 2004/67/EC on gas security of supply: “Bilateral agreements between Member States could be one of the means to contribute to the achievement of the minimum security of supply standards” Would require new set of guidelines outlining at what price to continue buying versus shedding firm load from different categories of firm customers Recognise interaction with E3C Downstream Emergency Plan initiative

6 Approach 2: Dynamic cash-out pricing Would avoid major change to NEC’s role Provides the necessary price signals However, the solution needs to recognise that: –NEC is intervening on the demand side but with no price exposure once we hit Stage 3 of a GDE –Hence the fundamental market interaction between the supply and demand side changes

7 Supply/demand interaction under dynamic pricing P V Supply Demand Interruptibles Firm I&C Domestics/ SME Stage 2 Price set by interaction between supply side and interruptible demand P V Supply Demand Interruptibles Stage 3 NEC starts firm load shedding –> demand curve truncated -> prices could spiral?

8 Key questions that need to be addressed under dynamic pricing How does the demand and supply side interact during a GDE? How is gas that is made available through interruption of firm customers sold back to the market? And how does this influence the emergency cash-out price? –On the day the GDE is called –Subsequent days Could ‘NDM shippers’ profit from high cash-out prices by selling their domestic customers’ gas back to the market following public appeals to reduce demand or during Stage 4? Would the compensation arrangements provide the correct incentives on shippers to source gas to reconnect their firm customers following interruption? Are there arguments for freezing the price or adopting a ‘replacement’ price during Stage 4 of an emergency?

9 Which approach? Ofgem has an open mind as to which is the more appropriate approach However, we recognise the (increasing) seriousness of this issue and are hoping for a quick resolution For that reason, any proposal that is brought forward should contain as much information and analysis as possible to enable Ofgem to make an informed decision