Goal Setting and Localized Accountability Presentation for SAISD Board September 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation and Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview for Parents and Guardians Fall 2010
Advertisements

SAISD Gold Performance Acknowledgements SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation November 2005.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Pre-K Through 8 Initiative SAISD Board Update April 14, 2003.
JSA Client Success Data Getting Results with Continuous Improvement.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Writing Action Plans A quick “how to.”. Each objective needs an action plan Action plans are things we are going to accomplish in order to meet our objectives.
October 9 th, 2013 Curriculum Presentation: State Assessments Grades 3-8.
SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation
Values (How must we behave to reach our vision?) Mission ( Why do we exist?) Vision (What must our school become ?)
Merit Award Program The School District of Lee County Merit Award Program Training November 2007.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
Forsyth County Schools Overview of the Proposed IE 2 Partnership Contract.
Consistency of Assessment
SAISD Gold Performance Acknowledgements SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation.
Region 7 September 16, Region 7 State TEKS PD June 1 to August 31, 2010 Copyright 2009 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
1 SAISD Vision 2009: Fulfilling the Promise SAISD Board Presentation October – 2006 District Improvement Plan: District Performance Objectives.
State Accountability and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress.
RECOGNIZED 2009 Accountability Rating. Basic Indicators EXEMPLARY: for every subject, at least 90% of the tested students pass the test RECOGNIZED**:
The Austin Blueprint After One Year A report to the AISD Board of Trustees The Austin Blueprint Initiative Dr. Darlene Westbrook, Chief Academic Officer.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
House Bill 5 Community and Student Engagement Mathis ISD Presented at Regular Board Meeting, July 22, 2014.
Public Hearing & Presentation of MISD Annual Accountability Report 2011 MILLSAP ISD Prepared in compliance with Texas Education Code January 2012.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Longview Independent School District Summary Report
AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.
Texas Public School Accountability Presented at Midwinter by the Texas Education Agency.
Ysleta Independent School District 2004 Accountability State and AYP.
Lovejoy ISD Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) AEIS Summary Public Hearing Dec. 18, 2007.
10/19/2015 Academic Excellence Indicator System Woden ISD.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report January 20, 2009 Dr. Joan Bowman Assistant Superintendent Sheldon ISD.
Texas Educator Excellence Grant (TEEG) Frank Borman Elementary Denton ISD.
Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2004 Office of Research, Evaluation,
Annual Report and Public Hearing January 19, 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Presentation of Mission Academy Community Meeting at Foster Elementary August 2, 2005.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
The Pike County School Corporation “The Role of the School Administrator In School Improvement” The Learning Conference Indianapolis, IN January 30, 2006.
Draft...proposals may change1 Proposed Changes to the Texas Accountability System Adapted from “Accountability System for 2006 and Beyond- Standard Procedures”
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation,
– 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results Data by Student Groups.
ALCOVA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A DECADE OF EXCELLENCE.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
District Assessments Entered into eduphoria! by Department of Assessment and Accountability Tests and answer sheets printed by campus, answer sheets scanned.
Comprehensive Planning 9 February Welcome! Thank you for your interest in helping to shape the future direction of the Ridley School District. Please.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
A System of Instructional Effectiveness: Connecting the Dots The District Accountability Plan (DAP) Bloomfield Public Schools Every Student,
Excellence by Design Middle States Accreditation Self Study Point Pleasant Beach School District November 17, 2015.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Apollo 20 Initiative Houston Independent School District Paula Harris Board of Education President Alicia Thomas, Ph.D. Deputy Chief Academic Officer.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
The Implementation of House Bill 22
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
AdvancED Accreditation Timeline for Huntsville City Schools
Chapter 14: Evaluation of Instruction
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
The Implementation of House Bill 22
AEIS [Our School District]
District Accountability Report
A Parent Guide to Public Act 306 Morenci Area Schools November 7, 2018
The Union’s Role in School Transformation
Presentation transcript:

Goal Setting and Localized Accountability Presentation for SAISD Board September 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation and Assessment

2 Belief Base of Localized Accountability We believe that teachers and administrators do not work in isolation. Localized accountability means we work together to define goals, and make the goals become reality. People support what they help create. Change comes from within. The teacher is the program. The result will be fulfillment of these beliefs. Excellence and equity for all students. No child will be left behind.

3 Levels of Accountability by Organizational Unit District Area Campus Grade Level or Subject Area

4 What is new in our focus? Collaborative goal-setting will be a focus for the 2004 – 2005 school year. Current data to guide our goal-setting will allow for more precise diagnosis and assessment. (Called “Accountability Now”) Clearly defined roles, procedures, and processes will provide support to all levels of the organization. We will use operational campus and grade level goals early in our planning process, and through the collaboration step finalize these goals to include more “current state” information to all levels of the organization.

5 Examining Grade Level TAKS Performance for 2003 – 2004: How did we do? Ratings were assigned in the same fashion as overall accountability small numbers, required improvement and the exemption rule were used. Numbers indicate the number of schools at each rating. HS (8 schools X 3 grades = 24 total) MS ( 16 schools X 3 grades and 1 school X 2 grades = 50 total) Elem. (53 schools X 3 = 159 total) ExemplaryRecognizedAcceptableUnacceptable HS7152 MS12362 Aca Elem

6 AcademiesExemplaryRecognizedAcademically Acceptable Total Austin314 Baskin134 Briscoe134 Cameron314 Pfeiffer314 Carroll314 Miller314 Gates1 34 Hawthorne2215 Total Classes

7 SAISD Grade Level Accountability Analysis 53% of all grade levels in the District were at the Exemplary or Recognized Level.

8 How did grade levels perform by school level? 29% of grade levels at high school (9 – 11) were Recognized 24% of grade levels at middle school (6 – 8) were Recognized 76% of grade levels at academies (3 – 6 or 7) were either Recognized or Exemplary 60% of grade levels at elementaries (3 – 5) were either Recognized or Exemplary Percent of grade levels which were Exemplary or Recognized.

9 Current Status of Goals Setting Schools have set “operational” campus and grade level goals. During September and October, these goals will be modified using the “Accountability Now” – or current information. Grade or subject area groups will meet to collaborate on goals, individual teacher goal setting will occur, and collaboration by organizational unit will continue. Final campus goals will come to the Board in November, after enrollment has stabilized. Many schools will set very high goals. The District has also calculated “expected gain” for each campus and grade which represents a minimum expectation. Schools are encouraged to set high goals without undue risk. High expectations and large performance gains will be acknowledged and supported.