SLA/SLS Fundamental concepts SLAs/SLSs are the essential mechanisms for agreeing, configuring, delivering, guaranteeing and evaluating the obtained QoS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
Advertisements

Japan Telecom Information & Communication Labs
Halina Tarasiuk, Robert Janowski and Wojciech Burakowski Warsaw University of Technology, Poland Admissible Traffic Load of Real Time Class of Service.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE : Premium IP and LBE transparency on GEANT QoS on GÉANT Premium IP and Less than Best Effort.
ETSI Workshop on Quality Issues for IP Telephony 8-9 June 1999, Sophia Antipolis, France ETSI PROJECT TIPHON overview of QoS activities ETSI Workshop on.
Tiziana Ferrari Differentiated Services Test: Report1 Differentiated Service Test REPORT TF-TANT Tiziana Ferrari Frankfurt, 1 Oct.
RSVP/Diffserv Yoram Bernet - Microsoft Raj Yavatkar - Intel.
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 – QoS.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate NTUA/GRNET Interdomain SLAs Enforcement Framework in Real QoS-Enabled Networks C. Marinos, A. Polyrakis, V. Pouli, M.
Management of IT Environment (5) LS 2012/ Martin Sarnovský Department of Cybernetics and AI, FEI TU Košice ITIL:Service Design IT Services Management.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model Lesson 4.10: Deploying End-to-End QoS.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model.
1 June 2015 Validating Inter-Domain SLAs with a Programmable Traffic Control System Elisa Boschi
Differentiated Services. Service Differentiation in the Internet Different applications have varying bandwidth, delay, and reliability requirements How.
ACN: IntServ and DiffServ1 Integrated Service (IntServ) versus Differentiated Service (Diffserv) Information taken from Kurose and Ross textbook “ Computer.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 8. CS Summer 2003 Populating LFIB with LDP Assigned/Learned Labels Changes in the LFIB may be triggered routing or.
CS 268: Differentiated Services Ion Stoica February 25, 2003.
1 Network Architecture and Design Internet QoS Differentiated Services (DiffServ) Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Reference Zheng Wang, Internet QoS,
Internet QoS Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE CS/ECE 438: Communication Networks.
Efficient agent-based selection of DiffServ SLAs over MPLS networks Thanasis G. Papaioannou a,b, Stelios Sartzetakis a, and George D. Stamoulis a,b presented.
An Architecture for Differentiated Services
CS 268: Lecture 11 (Differentiated Services) Ion Stoica March 6, 2001.
Traffic Management & QoS. Quality of Service (QoS) J The collective effect of service performances which determine the degree of satisfaction of a user.
1 Network Architecture and Design Internet QoS Differentiated Services (DiffServ) Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Reference Zheng Wang, Internet QoS,
IP Networking & MEDIACOM 2004 Workshop April 2001 Geneva End to End Quality of Service Control in H.323 Networks End to End Quality of Service.
Mobile IP: Quality-of-Service Reference: “Domain based approach for QoS provisioning in mobile IP”; Ki-Il Kim; Sang-Ha Kim; Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications.
Bell Labs Advanced Technologies EMEAAT Proprietary Information © 2004 Lucent Technologies1 Overview contributions for D27 Lucent Netherlands Richa Malhotra.
EQ-BGP: an efficient inter- domain QoS routing protocol Andrzej Bęben Institute of Telecommunications Warsaw University of Technology,
{vp, sra, Security in Differentiated Services Networks Venkatesh Prabhakar Srinivas R.
Computer Networking Quality-of-Service (QoS) Dr Sandra I. Woolley.
Integrated Services (RFC 1633) r Architecture for providing QoS guarantees to individual application sessions r Call setup: a session requiring QoS guarantees.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
An Analytical Approach for the Two-Tier Resource Management Model IPS-MOME March 2004 Y. Rebahi.
Nicolas Simar – DANTE - Sequin: Premium IP SEQUIN Premium IP.
TERENA Networking Conference 2002, Limerick, Ireland, June SEQUIN: Results on QoS Afrodite Sevasti Greek Research and Technology Network (GRNET)
1 Tequila WS, Amsterdam, January 2001 Inter-Operator Interfaces for End-to-End IP QoS EQUIP Inter-Operator Interfaces for End-to-End IP QoS István.
1 Quality of Service (QoS) - DiffServ EE 122: Intro to Communication Networks Fall 2007 (WF 4-5:30 in Cory 277) Vern Paxson TAs: Lisa Fowler, Daniel Killebrew.
IP QoS for 3G. A Possible Solution The main focus of this network QoS mechanism is to provide one, real time, service in addition to the normal best effort.
Quality of Service (QoS)
QOS مظفر بگ محمدی دانشگاه ایلام. 2 Why a New Service Model? Best effort clearly insufficient –Some applications need more assurances from the network.
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE II - Network Service Level Agreement (SLA) Establishment EGEE’07 Mary Grammatikou.
Prof. N. P. Pathak - Dept. of I.T.1 Unit 4 Inventory Management Process OSS Essentials by Kornel Terplan.
GEANT Premium IP Overview Mauro Campanella INFN-GARR
Wolfgang EffelsbergUniversity of Mannheim1 Differentiated Services for the Internet Wolfgang Effelsberg University of Mannheim September 2001.
QoS on GÉANT - Aristote Seminar -- Nicolas Simar QoS on GÉANT Aristote Seminar, Paris (France), Nicolas Simar,
Monitoring and Measurement System in EuQoS project dr Andrzej Beben Telecommunication Network Technology Group Warsaw University.
Differentiated Services for the Internet Selma Yilmaz.
Applicazione del paradigma Diffserv per il controllo della QoS in reti IP: aspetti teorici e sperimentali Stefano Salsano Università di Roma “La Sapienza”
QoS monitoring -- Nicolas Simar Monitoring Infrastructure SEQUIN workshop, Amsterdam, 1 February 2002 Nicolas Simar DANTE.
Lecture#10 Quality of service The Bonch-Bruevich Saint-Petersburg State University of Telecommunications Series of lectures “Telecommunication networks”
Nicolas Simar – DANTE - Sequin: Monitoring Infrastructure Monitoring Premium IP.
Less than Best Effort -- Nicolas Simar Less than Best Effort QoS IP 2003, Milan (Italy), Nicolas Simar, Network Engineer.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate Stitching framework for AutoBAHN Victor Reijs, HEAnet TNC2007, May 23 rd, 2007
An end-to-end usage of the IPv6 flow label
Internet Service Models and their implications on SLA design. Panos Gevros University of Cambridge TAPAS Project Meeting Newcastle 5/9/02.
Sequin Technical Summary Mauro Campanella INFN-GARR
EGEE-II INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE End-to-End Service Level Agreement Provisioning and Monitoring for End-to-End QoS.
TEQUILA Traffic Engineering for Quality of Service in the Internet at Large Scale Kostas G. Anagnostakis TERENA Project partially funded by the EC under.
An End-to-End Service Architecture r Provide assured service, premium service, and best effort service (RFC 2638) Assured service: provide reliable service.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE NRENs & Grids Workshop Relations between EGEE & NRENs Mathieu Goutelle (CNRS UREC) EGEE-SA2.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Institution of SLAs TNLC Meeting ― Athens, Afrodite Sevasti (SA2, GRNET)
Data and Computer Communications Tenth Edition by William Stallings Data and Computer Communications, Tenth Edition by William Stallings, (c) Pearson Education.
An End-to-End Service Architecture r Provide assured service, premium service, and best effort service (RFC 2638) Assured service: provide reliable service.
Mar-16 1 Cairo University Faculty of Engineering Electronics &Communication dpt. 4th year Linux-based Implementation Of a Router (B.Sc Graduation project)
Quality of Service Frameworks Hamed Khanmirza Principles of Network University of Tehran.
QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS Experience on European Backbone TNC 2003, Zabgreb (Croatia),
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE TNC 2005 Networking activities in EGEE Mathieu Goutelle (CNRS UREC, France) EGEE-SA2 activity.
SLR, SLS and SLA issues Afrodite Sevasti SA2 participant
EE 122: Lecture 18 (Differentiated Services)
EE 122: Differentiated Services
Presentation transcript:

SLA/SLS Fundamental concepts SLAs/SLSs are the essential mechanisms for agreeing, configuring, delivering, guaranteeing and evaluating the obtained QoS The SLA specification requires extensive testing of the available infrastructure. Usually only upper bounds of QoS parameter ranges can be specified. SLA definition between two peers is the structural unit for the establishment of end-to-end services There are always two SLAs, one for each direction. The contracted values might be different.

Fundamental concepts (continued) The SLA/SLS is in reality a chain of SLA/SLS between neighbour domains and a final end-to-end one User 1 User 2 User 1 NREN1 GÉANT NREN2 User 2 + In the first phase the end-to-end SLS negotiation will be performed manually (no BB), specified as the worst case scenario.

The IP Premium service is aimed at providing end-to-end QoS. To fulfil this goal the establishment of a particular service instance must be made known to all domains involved. The service must be defined both as an end-to-end service level agreement and be accepted as a modification in the chain of service level agreements between all involved domains. Debugging can be assigned to a single specific entity. Fundamental concepts (continued)

Definition of SLAs between GEANT and NRENs Administrative/legal part SLS part: defining the set of parameters (SLS template) and their values, such as a Traffic Conditioning Specification (TCS) Matrix for NREN-to-NREN traffic IP Premium Current status

Define SLA between end-user and end-user domain Define the mechanisms for SLA negotiation Define the mechanisms for the establishment of end-to-end services based in the individual SLAs. Next steps

SLA templates & instantiations

Administrative and technical parties involved (scope) Duration in time (scope) Availability guarantees (scope, process, remedy) Monitoring (scope, process) Response times (scope) Fault handling-trouble ticket procedures (scope, process, remedy) Quality and performance of support and helpdesk (scope, process) Pricing of the contracted service Description of the service The administrative/legal part of the SLA

Scope This field, according to [RFC 2475], must specify where packets conforming to the SLS are entering and exiting a DiffServ domain (in our case GEANT). Recommended: (ingress interface, set of egress interfaces) Proposed Template for SLS Between an NREN and GEANT

Flow description A SLA can contain more than one SLSs (and consecutively SLOs) but each one of them has to concern one strictly specified flow in one direction. The flow description field will indicate which packets will receive the PHB treatment resulting in the QoS guarantees of the SLS. Recommended: (QoS tag attribute, source attribute, destination attribute) Proposed Template for SLS Between an NREN and GEANT

Performance guarantees Depict the guarantees that the network offers to the customer for the packet stream described by the flow descriptor over the topological extent given by the scope value. Delay IPDV Packet loss Rate MTU Proposed Template for SLS Between an NREN and GEANT

Traffic Envelope and Traffic Conformance Describes how the stream of traffic from the NREN towards GEANT should look like The conformance parameters for IP Premium are conformance to a shape and a limit of throughput/capacity: (b,r) token bucket Proposed: –Conformance parameters = (b, r) –Conformance algorithm = the (b,r) token bucket b = f(number of router interfaces on the same router that are part of the service, distance from the source ) r = 1.5*th Proposed Template for SLS Between an NREN and GEANT

Excess treatment Specifies how excess traffic (or out-of-profile traffic, according to the profile described by the traffic envelope and traffic conformance field) is treated. -> dropping Service schedule Indicates the start time and end time of the period for which the service is provided Reliability –Allowed mean downtime per year (MDT) –Maximum allowed time to repair (TTR) in case of breakdown Proposed Template for SLS Between an NREN and GEANT