1 1 International Collaboration on Industrialization of Editing: Business Case (Part 1, WP38) Li-Chun Zhang Statistics Norway.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 5 Themes in this session Building and managing the data warehouse Data extraction and transformation Technical issues.
Advertisements

GSBPM and GSIM as the basis for the Common Statistical Production Architecture Steven Vale UNECE
Experiences from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)
Common Statistical Production Architecture An statistical industry architecture will make it easier for each organisation to standardise and combine the.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Applying the GSBPM to Business Register Management Steven Vale UNECE
Vienna, 23 April 2008 UNECE Work Session on SDE Topic (v) Editing on results (post-editing) 1 Topic (v): Editing based on results Discussants: Maria M.
WP.5 - DDI-SDMX Integration
Good Digital Records Don’t Just ‘Happen’ Embedding Digital Recordkeeping as an Organic Component of Business Processes and Systems Adrian Cunningham, National.
WP.5 - DDI-SDMX Integration E.S.S. cross-cutting project on Information Models and Standards Marco Pellegrino, Denis Grofils Eurostat METIS Work Session6-8.
NSI 1 Collect Process AnalyseDisseminate Survey A Survey B Historically statistical organisations have produced specialised business processes and IT.
SDMX and DDI Working Together Technical Workshop 5-7 June 2013
Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology Software Engineering Project – I Clone of Rally GROUP NO : WD-SEP-002 | PROJECT NO :25 PROJECT : CLONE OF.
The Approach and ideas of the HLG-BAS: Modernizing Official Statistics.
1 Air Quality Bureau Kaizen Event Report Out By: Modeling Meddlers October 6, 2006.
Development of metadata in the National Statistical Institute of Spain Work Session on Statistical Metadata Genève, 6-8 May-2013 Ana Isabel Sánchez-Luengo.
On Tap: Developments in Statistical Data Editing at Statistics New Zealand Paper by Allyson Seyb, Felibel Zabala and Les Cochran Presented by Felibel Zabala.
Current and Future Applications of the Generic Statistical Business Process Model at Statistics Canada Laurie Reedman and Claude Julien May 5, 2010.
Sander Scholtus and Leon Willenborg Editing and Imputation in the Memobust Handbook.
Innovations in Data Dissemination Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Jr. Acting Director U.S. Census Bureau United Nations Seminar on Innovations in Official Statistics.
Direction and system changes impacting on data editing and imputation at Statistics New Zealand Paper by Emma Bentley and Felibel Zabala, presented by.
SmartNets Results Overview SmartNets SmartNets Methods.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Introduction to Steven Vale UNECE
1 1 (Statistical Network) Opportunity: Industrialization of Editing Li-Chun Zhang Statistics Norway
CBS-SSB STATISTICS NETHERLANDS – STATISTICS NORWAY Work Session on Statistical Data Editing Oslo, Norway, September 2012 Jeroen Pannekoek and Li-Chun.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division High-Level Group Achievements and Plans Steven Vale UNECE
1 1 Developing a framework for standardisation High-Level Seminar on Streamlining Statistical production Zlatibor, Serbia 6-7 July 2011 Rune Gløersen IT.
Topic (iii): Macro Editing Methods Paula Mason and Maria Garcia (USA) UNECE Work Session on Statistical Data Editing Ljubljana, Slovenia, 9-11 May 2011.
Outlining a Process Model for Editing With Quality Indicators Pauli Ollila (part 1) Outi Ahti-Miettinen (part 2) Statistics Finland.
Developing and applying business process models in practice Statistics Norway Jenny Linnerud and Anne Gro Hustoft.
Topic (i): Selective editing / macro editing Discussants Orietta Luzi - Italian National Statistical Institute Rudi Seljak - Statistical Office of Slovenia.
Michelle Simard, Thérèse Lalor Statistics Canada CSPA Project Manager UNECE Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality Helsinki, October 2015 Confidentialized.
SDMX IT Tools Introduction
Modernisation Activities DIME-ITDG – February 2015 Item 7.
Aim: “to support the enhancement and implementation of the standards needed for the modernisation of statistical production and services”
Compilation of Meta Data Presentation to OG6 Canberra, Australia May 2011.
Generic Statistical Data Editing Models (GSDEMs) Workshop on the Modernisation of Official Statistics The Hague, 24 November 2015.
GSIM, DDI & Standards- based Modernisation of Official Statistics Workshop – DDI Lifecycle: Looking Forward October 2012.
Satisfying Requirements BPF for DRA shall address: –DAQ Environment (Eclipse RCP): Gumtree ISEE workbench integration; –Design Composing and Configurability,
The future of Statistical Production CSPA. This webinar on CSPA (common statistical production architecture) is part of a series of lectures on the main.
The development of a data editing and imputation tool set UN/ECE Work Session on Statistical Data Editing Topic (ii): Global solutions to editing Claude.
Wesley Yung and Claude Poirier 2015 World Statistics Congress CSPA from a Methodologist’s Point of View.
The business process models and quality issues at the Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO) Mr. Csaba Ábry, HCSO, Methodological Department Geneva,
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division GSBPM and Other Standards Steven Vale UNECE
The future of Statistical Production CSPA. We need to modernise We have a burning platform with: rigid processes and methods; inflexible ageing technology;
Review of the UNECE Glossary of Terms on Statistical Data Editing Paper by Statistics New Zealand’s Editing and Imputation Methodology Network Presented.
TRITON - An event driven SOA architecture MSIS Jakob Engdahl, Statistic Sweden
Statistical process model Workshop in Ukraine October 2015 Karin Blix Quality coordinator
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division GSBPM in Documentation, Metadata and Quality Management Steven Vale UNECE
ROMA 23 GIUGNO 2016 MODERNISATION LAB - FOCUSSING ON MODERNISATION STRATEGIES IN EUROPE: SOME NSIS’ EXPERIENCES Insert the presentation title Modernisation.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division CSPA: The Future of Statistical Production Steven Vale UNECE
Li-Chun Zhang Statistics Norway
Europe’s Environment Assessment of Assessments EE-AoA 2011
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE CONFERENCE OF EUROPEAN STATISTICIANS Work Session on Statistical Data Editing April 2017 The Hague,
Country use cases: Cambodia, and Tunisia
Guidelines on the use of estimation methods for the integration of administrative sources DIME/ITDG meeting 2018/02/22.
Logical information model LIM Geneva june
Tomaž Špeh, Rudi Seljak Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia
SISAI STATISTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND INTEGRATION
Modernization of Statistical data processes
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
Johan Erikson Statistics Sweden Luxemburg, March 2012
The problem we are trying to solve
Metadata The metadata contains
GSBPM and Data Life Cycle
CSPA: The Future of Statistical Production
Introducing the GSBPM Steven Vale UNECE
Reportnet 3.0 Database Feasibility Study – Approach
SOA initiatives at Istat
Étienne Saint-Pierre, Statistics Canada
Presentation transcript:

1 1 International Collaboration on Industrialization of Editing: Business Case (Part 1, WP38) Li-Chun Zhang Statistics Norway

2 Industrialization of Editing: Some issues to be dealt with Overall objective, principles and guidelines (e.g. the “new” paradigm of editing) Conceptual reference framework with regard to GSBPM Conceptual reference framework with regard to GSIM to-be Design of generic functionality Minimum set of standard methods IT tools and platforms

3 Objectives & principles Example: Objectives (the “new” paradigm) –Error-source identification and error prevention –Collect information about quality –Identification and adjustment of critical errors in data Example: Objectives (SNZ proposal) –Efficiency as quality against cost –Continuous quality improvement –Provide quality information Example: Principles –Original data as much as possible (“old” Felligi-Holt paradigm) –Maximum automated processing –Analysis of (editing) process efficiency –Training, documentation –…

4 Generic Statistical Data Editing Process (GSDEP) GSBPM ≠ Flow Chart An example from EDIMBUS Mapping GSDEP with GSBPM –Micro vs. macro editing –“Editing & Imputation” (E&I) vs. “Editing & Estimation” (E&E) Connections to GSIM to-be

5 Common Statistical Data Reference (CSDR): Interface btw. SDE and GSIM to-be Statistical production as transformations of data => steady / major states of data Common Micro Data Format for database management Common Functional Data Format for method library

6 Design of generic functionality Databases –Micro database of CMDF data files (M-Base) –Functional database of functional data files and alignment tables (F-Base) –Function library (F-Lib) contains all available standardized generic (program) tools. Builders –Functional data builder (D-Build) transforms relevant CMDF data files into the required functional data files, and updates the relevant alignment tables. –Function builder (F-Build) takes functional data files as the input data and tools from the F-Lib, and configures the necessary parameters according to a given specification for machine-based or automated data processing. –Screen builder (S-Build) takes fnctional and/or CMDF data files as the input data, and configures an environment for manual inspection/editing of individual records/questionnaires according to a given specification. Runners: –Batch processor is the environment for executing automated/machined-based SDE processes, chiefly relying on functions that are configured in the F-Build. –Manual processor is the environment for manually executing SDE processes, chiefly relying on the interface provided through the S-Build. –Selection and Drilling are the dedicated environments for carrying out selective editing and drilling up-and-down among hierarchically structured aggregations. –Data processor supports the necessary administration of data and metadata. Managers: –ANOPE is the environment for quality assessment of the editing processes. –Response manager provides the interface for re-contact with the data providers, and other generally related production processes (such as Process 4 Collect).

Claude Poirier Statistics Canada Next steps Objectives, guidelines and principles –Finalize user requirements –Identify existing methods –React to functional gaps –Set up the framework –Develop the toolset –Deliver training 7

Finalizing user requirements Prioritizing edit and imputation requirements –Micro-editing methods Automated E&I on numerical and categorical data –Macro-editing methods Selective editing; Macro editing; Editing of macro data –On-line editing Collection edits and self-administered edits –Data confrontation and certification Methods using multiple data sources –Standardized platform Common architecture 8

Existing tools and Platforms Identifying and analysing existing products –SigEE (Australia) –BANFF, CANCEIS (Canada) –BEST, POSS (New Zealand) –ISEE, DYNAREV (Norway) –TRITON, SELEKT (Sweden) 9

Reacting to functional gaps Not all requirements will be satisfied Brainstorming sessions are being organised Development priorities will be discussed Developing the tool set Consolidate preferred tools –Adapt existing tools to the environment –Develop pre/post processors to fit the environment Develop missing functions 10

Delivering training material User guide Methodology documentation System documentation Comments / Questions It’s your turn 11

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) Q1:What governance model drives the project? Q2:When do we expect the suite of editing functions to be delivered? Q3:As a member of the collaboration network, will my agency have to pay any fees for accessing and using released functions? Q4:My statistical agency is not part of the network. Are there any fees that are planned to let me use the products? Q5:My agency would like join the network. Is this possible? How? 12

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) Q6:I understand from your presentation that a common environment is being planned? Would I be able to use the functions in another environment? Q7:My agency is willing to share a system but its foundation software is not compliant with the proposed environment. What will happen? Q8:My agency is willing to offer a system or a module for the network. Who will own the module? Q9:Will the resulting products become open-source? 13