1 IV European Conference of Computational Mechanics Hrvoje Gotovac, Veljko Srzić, Tonći Radelja, Vedrana Kozulić Hrvoje Gotovac, Veljko Srzić, Tonći Radelja,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finite Difference Discretization of Hyperbolic Equations: Linear Problems Lectures 8, 9 and 10.
Advertisements

2ª aula Evolution Equation. The Finite Volume Method.
1 A new iterative technique for solving nonlinear coupled equations arising from nuclear waste transport processes H. HOTEIT 1,2, Ph. ACKERER 2, R. MOSE.
By Paul Delgado. Motivation Flow-Deformation Equations Discretization Operator Splitting Multiphysics Coupling Fixed State Splitting Other Splitting Conclusions.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2013 – 12269: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2014 – 35148: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
Algorithm Development for the Full Two-Fluid Plasma System
Manipulator Dynamics Amirkabir University of Technology Computer Engineering & Information Technology Department.
MUTAC Review April 6-7, 2009, FNAL, Batavia, IL Mercury Jet Target Simulations Roman Samulyak, Wurigen Bo Applied Mathematics Department, Stony Brook University.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 3163 – Signals and Systems Objectives: Review Resources: Wiki: State Variables YMZ: State Variable Technique Wiki: Controllability.
Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
Coupled Fluid-Structural Solver CFD incompressible flow solver has been coupled with a FEA code to analyze dynamic fluid-structure coupling phenomena CFD.
Total Recall Math, Part 2 Ordinary diff. equations First order ODE, one boundary/initial condition: Second order ODE.
Peyman Mostaghimi, Martin Blunt, Branko Bijeljic 11 th January 2010, Pore-scale project meeting Direct Numerical Simulation of Transport Phenomena on Pore-space.
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
INTRODUCTION: Biological systems are characterized by significant heterogeneity at multiple scales. The fine scale (local scale) heterogeneity often has.
Mech300 Numerical Methods, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. 1 Part Seven Ordinary Differential Equations.
High-Order Adaptive and Parallel Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws J. E. Flaherty, L. Krivodonova, J. F. Remacle, and M.
Multi-Scale Finite-Volume (MSFV) method for elliptic problems Subsurface flow simulation Mark van Kraaij, CASA Seminar Wednesday 13 April 2005.
Network and Grid Computing –Modeling, Algorithms, and Software Mo Mu Joint work with Xiao Hong Zhu, Falcon Siu.
Lecture 34 - Ordinary Differential Equations - BVP CVEN 302 November 28, 2001.
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Numerical Analysis ECIV 3306 Introduction.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
A finite volume solution method for thermal convection in a spherical shell with strong temperature- und pressure-dependent viscosity CIG Workshop 2005.
Modeling and simulation of deformable porous media Jan Martin Nordbotten Department of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Norway Department of Civil and.
1 Finite-Volume Formulation. 2 Review of the Integral Equation The integral equation for the conservation statement is: Equation applies for a control.
Density-Dependent Flows Primary source: User’s Guide to SEAWAT: A Computer Program for Simulation of Three-Dimensional Variable-Density Ground- Water Flow.
Solute (and Suspension) Transport in Porous Media
P. Ackerer, IMFS, Barcelona About Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Elements P. Ackerer, A. Younès Institut de Mécanique des Fluides et des Solides,
Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
S.S. Yang and J.K. Lee FEMLAB and its applications POSTEC H Plasma Application Modeling Lab. Oct. 25, 2005.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
RFP Workshop Oct 2008 – J Scheffel 1 A generalized weighted residual method for RFP plasma simulation Jan Scheffel Fusion Plasma Physics Alfvén Laboratory,
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
MA5251: Spectral Methods & Applications
Environmental Modelling, Security Measures and Decision Making Zahari Zlatev National Environmental Research Institute Frederiksborgvej 399, P. O. Box.
1 Discretization of Fluid Models (Navier Stokes) Dr. Farzad Ismail School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Universiti Sains Malaysia Nibong Tebal.
IMEX Methods for Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Equations Eindhoven 2008 Speaker : Volha Shchetnikava Adviser: dr.ir.J.H.M. ten Thije Boonkkamp.
Efficient Integration of Large Stiff Systems of ODEs Using Exponential Integrators M. Tokman, M. Tokman, University of California, Merced 2 hrs 1.5 hrs.
Mathematical Equations of CFD
59th Annual Meeting Division of Fluid Dynamics Initial-value problem for the two-dimensional growing wake S. Scarsoglio #, D.Tordella # and W. O. Criminale*
Mass Transfer Coefficient
7. Introduction to the numerical integration of PDE. As an example, we consider the following PDE with one variable; Finite difference method is one of.
1 Finite Elements. 2 Finite elements Formally identical to spectral technique Dependent variables expanded as linear combinations of basis local, non.
Motivation Thus far we have dealt primarily with the input/output characteristics of linear systems. State variable, or state space, representations describe.
CIS/ME 794Y A Case Study in Computational Science & Engineering 2-D Conservation of Mass uu dx dy vv (x,y)
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Cracow Grid Workshop, November 5-6, 2001 Concepts for implementing adaptive finite element codes for grid computing Krzysztof Banaś, Joanna Płażek Cracow.
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (AE 2402) Presented by IRISH ANGELIN S AP/AERO.
CIS/ME 794Y A Case Study in Computational Science & Engineering 2-D conservation of momentum (contd.) Or, in cartesian tensor notation, Where repeated.
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
Discretization for PDEs Chunfang Chen,Danny Thorne Adam Zornes, Deng Li CS 521 Feb., 9,2006.
Generalized Finite Element Methods
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department EENV 5326 Groundwater Modeling.
1 LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 7 (ME EN ) Prof. Rob Stoll Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Utah Fall 2014.
AMS 691 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 3
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,
MA354 Math Modeling Introduction. Outline A. Three Course Objectives 1. Model literacy: understanding a typical model description 2. Model Analysis 3.
MTH 253 Calculus (Other Topics) Chapter 9 – Mathematical Modeling with Differential Equations Section 9.4 – Second-Order Linear Homogeneous Differential.
M. Khalili1, M. Larsson2, B. Müller1
Computational Fluid Dynamics Lecture II Numerical Methods and Criteria for CFD Dr. Ugur GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering.
Multiphase Porous Media Transport in Apple Tissue During Drying
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC
ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის
Guido Ala, Elisa Francomano, Antonino Spagnuolo
FTCS Explicit Finite Difference Method for Evaluating European Options
CI2 – Inviscid Strong Vortex-Shock Wave Interaction
Comparison of CFEM and DG methods
Presentation transcript:

1 IV European Conference of Computational Mechanics Hrvoje Gotovac, Veljko Srzić, Tonći Radelja, Vedrana Kozulić Hrvoje Gotovac, Veljko Srzić, Tonći Radelja, Vedrana Kozulić University of Split, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Croatia University of Split, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Croatia Explicit Adaptive Fup Collocation Method (EAFCM) for solving the parabolic problems Explicit Adaptive Fup Collocation Method (EAFCM) for solving the parabolic problemsPresentation ECCM, 21 May 2010, Paris, France.

2 Presentation outline 1. General concept 2. Fup basis functions 3. Fup collocation transform (FCT) - space approximation 4. Explicit time integration for parabolic stiff problems 5. Numerical examples 6. Conclusions 7. Future directions

3 1. General concept  Developing adaptive numerical method which can deal with parabolic flow and transport stiff problems having wide range of space and temporal scales  Ability to handle multiple heterogeneity scales  Application target: unsaturated and multiphase flow, reactive transport and density driven flow in porous media, as well as structural mechanics problems

4 Saturated – unsaturated flow

5 Interaction between surface and subsurface flow

6 Geothermal convective processes in porous media

7 Typical physical and numerical problems  Description of wide range of space and temporal scales  Sharp gradients, fronts and narrow transition zones (‘fingering‘ and ‘layering’)  Artificial oscillations and numerical dispersion – advection dominated problems  Description of heterogeneity structure  Strong nonlinear and coupled system of equations

8 Motivation for EAFCM  Multi-resolution and meshless approach  Continuous representation of variables and all its derivatives (fluxes)  Adaptive strategy  Method of lines (MOL)  Explicit formulation (no system of equations!!!)  Perfectly suited for parallel processing

9 Flow chart of EAFCM

10

11 2. Fup basis functions  Atomic or R bf class of functions  Function up(x)  Fourier transform of up(x) function  Function Fup n (x)

12 Function Fup 2 (x)

13 Function Fup 2 (x,y)

14 Function Fup n (x)  Compact support  Linear combination of n+2 functions Fup n (x) exactly presents polynomial of order n  Good approximation properties  Universal vector space UP(x)  Vertexes of basis functions are suitable for collocation points  Fup n (x,y) is Cartesian product of Fup n (x) and Fup n (y)

15  Any function u(x) is presented by linear combination of Fup basis functions: j - level (from zero to maximum level J) j - level (from zero to maximum level J) j min - resolution at the zero level j min - resolution at the zero level k - location index in the current level k - location index in the current level - Fup coefficients - Fup coefficients - Fup basis functions - Fup basis functions n - order of the Fup basis function n - order of the Fup basis function 3. Fup collocation transform (FCT)

16

17 Spatial derivatives

18 4. Time numerical integration  Reduces to system of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE) for adaptive grid and every time step (t – t+dt):  With appropriate initial conditions:

19 Stabilized second-order Explicit Runge-Kutta method (SERK2)  Recently developed by Vaquero and Janssen (2009)  Extended stability domains along the negative real axis  Suitable for very large stiff parabolic ODE  Second – order method up to 320 stages  Public domain Fortran routine SERK2

20 5. Numerical examples  1-D density driven flow problem  2-D Henry salwater intrusion problem

21 Mathematical model  Pressure-concentration formulation  Fluid mass balance:  Salt mass balance:

22

23

24

25 Number of collocation points and compression coefficient

26 6. Conclusions  Development of mesh-free adaptive collocation algorithm that enables efficient modeling of all space and time scales  Main feature of the method is the space adaptation strategy and explicit time integration  No discretization and solving of huge system of equations  Continuous approximation of fluxes

27 7. Future directions  Multiresolution description of heterogeneity  Development of 3-D parallel EAFCM  Time subdomain integration  Description of complex domain with using other families of atomic basis functions  Further application to mentioned processes in porous media and other (multiphysics) problems