Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 2013 – September 2014 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 23 October 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Guy Duchossois, Work Plan Manager Report on 2006 Work Plan.
Advertisements

Master Plan. Citizens’ Health Care Working Group Master Plan November 2005.
CUC Oct 2013 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 15 Peer Review  June 2013, Hilton Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 15  13 topical panels,
Financial Accountability: Audit Committees & Internal Audit Update Financial Analysis & Accountability Branch Finance Committee Workshop March 2010.
CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period Oct 05 – Mar 06 Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Roger Brissenden 5 April 2006.
CXC Response to June 04 Report 1.Bakeout Status: Paul Plucinsky 2.CIAO upgrade information: Jonathan McDowell 3.DS9 and visualization scripts: Jonathan.
25 Jan 2005CUC Meeting CXC-Sponsored Workshops & Symposia Paul Green For the Chandra Directors Office.
19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 06 – March 07 Edward Mattison CXC Deputy Manager 25 April 2007.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 08 – March 09 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 06 April 2008.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period April 08 – September 08 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 15 October 2008.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Apr 2007 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed.
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Roger J. Brissenden 12 January 2004.
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Roger J. Brissenden 25 January 2005.
Cxc CHANDRA X-RAY OBSERVATORY Press Events 39 Press Events 3 Space Science Updates - Perseus Cluster: Chandra "Hears" a Black Hole - RXJ : Star Being.
CHANDRA X-RAY OBSERVATORY cxc 20 PRESS EVENTS -Press Conference 1 press conference at Jan. AAS -12 Press Releases -7 Image Releases PRESS EVENTS AND RESULTS.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11 Peer Review Proposal Numbers:  668 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period April 06 – September 06 Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Roger Brissenden 17 October 2006.
Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2006 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 8  725 submitted proposals  *6.4 oversubscribed.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period April 09 – October 09 Edward Mattison CXC Deputy Manager 29 October 2009.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period April 07 – September 07 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 19 September 2007.
Users' Committee, 25 Oct 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12 Peer Review  June 2010, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 12 
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Edward M. Mattison 19 October 2005.
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra User Committee Meeting Roger J. Brissenden 25 June 2002.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
CXC Chandra Users' Committee Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle proposals *6.4 oversubscribed (based on time) GTO for review: due 3 rd April.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Edward M. Mattison 29 June 2004.
CHANDRA X-RAY OBSERVATORY Chandra Education & Public Outreach Update -Kathy Lestition Chandra Users Committee Presentation Wednesday,
CXC Education & Public Outreach (Jan June 2002) CXC CXC EPO Scope EPO Program Scope:  Public Affairs: Space Science Updates, press releases, press.
CHUCK YOUNG MANAGING DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE to AGA BOSTON CHAPTER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE MARCH.
CXC Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center Recommended Best Practices Roger Brissenden and Belinda Wilkes 25 April 2012.
Program Status Physics of the Cosmos Program (PCOS) Cosmic Origins Program (COR) M. Ahmed Briefing to the PhysPAG January 8, 2012 AAS Meeting, Austin Texas.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting March 3, 2010 Overview of the DOE Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program Julie Carruthers, Ph.D.
SWE Strategic Plan and FY14 Operational Goals
Special Evening Session: The Business of NASA Research August 22, 2006 Evening Session.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration USDOT – PHMSA HMEP Grants Major Audit Findings NASTTPO April 25,
2010 W EST V IRGINIA GIS C ONFERENCE Wednesday, June 9, 2010.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 2010 – September 2011 Edward Mattison CXC Deputy Manager 13 October 2011.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 2011 – September 2012 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 10 October 2012.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
April , 2006 HEASARC Users Group Steve Drake RXTE Archive at HEASARC Status and Plans Steve Drake.
WLE Operations Team Planning Meeting 2 nd February 2015, Water’s Edge.
Continuing the work of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Presented by: Jeff Stauffer WebJunction Service Manager Date: 3 February 2005.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 2009 – April 2010 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 27 April 2009.
Chandra Education & Public Outreach CXC 1.What Are the Goals of Your Mission's E/PO? Chandra E/PO Goals Increase public engagement with the Space Science.
CUC Oct 2012 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 14 Peer Review   June 2012, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 14  13 topical.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Users’ Committee Meeting GSSC USER SUPPORT David Band – GSSC.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period May 2010 – October 2010 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 25 October 2010.
Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office July 30, 2009.
Toward the Senior Review Rob Petre. Senior Review proposal details Due March 12, 2008 Competing against: XMM, INTEGRAL, RXTE, Swift, Galex, WMAP, Spitzer.
S. Ritz 1 GLAST Science Policy Document Outline Action Item GUC Meeting June 2005 R. Brissenden S. Ritz Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1 Douglas Hudgins Exoplanet Exploration Program Scientist Presentation to ExoPAG#8, Denver Colorado October 5, 2013.
Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness Grant Multi – Year Award Process Matthew R. Jones Sr. Grants Management Specialist Grants and Registration Branch.
GLAST Science Support Center June 21, 2007 Getting Involved with GLAST GLAST Guest Investigator Program David Band, GSSC CRESST/GSFC/UMBC.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Beamline Development John Hill NSLS-II Experimental Facilities Division Director PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 2014 – September 2015 Edward Mattison CXC Deputy Manager 29 September 2015.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update August NSDI Strategic Plan – Purpose/Scope Purpose: Develop a concise, updated strategic plan to guide the Federal government’s.
1 SUZAKU HUG 12-13April, 2006 Suzaku archive Lorella Angelini/HEASARC.
Publishing Services Bureau Web Communications Services Tips for managing the publication process Communications Workshop October 23, 2003.
Office of Research and Development Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo.
BOD1 HQ Update 8/19/11. Website Audiences Collegiate Members Professional Members Collegiate Non-Members Professional Non-Members Academic Community (Higher.
Heliophysics MO&DA Program - November 13, Page 1 Notes from the Heliophysics MO&DA Program STEREO SWG Meeting Chuck Holmes “Director, Heliophysics.
Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 22 October 2013
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report
EagleSat 2 – Mission and Development Overview
Chandra Users Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 2013 – September 2014 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 23 October 2014

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 2 Topics Program Management Mission Operations –Spacecraft –Science Instruments and Calibration –Mission Planning –Operations Control Center Science Operations –CXC Data Systems –Calibration –Data Processing Chandra Director’s Office –GO Program –Einstein Program Education and Public Outreach

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 3 Top Level Summary Management –Harvey Tananbaum retired as CXC Director after 23 years –Belinda Wilkes was appointed CXC Director in April Spacecraft and instruments are performing superbly –There are no known spacecraft limitations due to degradation, aging or consumables that would prevent our meeting Level 1 requirements over the course of a 25-year mission

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 4 Top Level Summary 2014 NASA Senior Review –Submitted proposal 31 Jan; SR committee visited March –Received committee report and letter from Paul Hertz on 15 May. Letter provided direction for the continued operations of Chandra and the planning budget for FY15-FY19. –Committee report was extremely positive: “Chandra is the most powerful facility for X-Ray astrophysics, and its unique capabilities have no likely successor in the foreseeable future.... The prospects for further compelling science return in the future are excellent. This panel enthusiastically endorses the extension of the Chandra mission.” –Developed action plan for responding to recommendations; responses in work. Budget Plan ($k) FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 55,780 55,440 55,580 55,610 55,610

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 5 Top Level Summary Response to Senior Review Committee Recommendations RecommendationResponse SR Develop major, focused scientific projects building upon recent scientific successes. Solicit community input for such key projects. Arranged session on future Chandra science in 15 Years symposium (11/14). Invited chairs of last Decadal Survey as panelists for open session. Will use recommendations in CXC planning. Completion: 2/15/15 SR Maintain funding of General Observer program at least at the current level. Confirmed PPBE plan retains current levels of GO funding, subject to continued funding level from HQ. Completed: 8/15/14 SR Engage younger researchers in long- range planning. Will utilize opportunities through the 15 Years, CUC, peer review, Einstein Fellows program and development of subsequent senior review proposals to actively involve early career scientists. Completion: 2/15/15 SR Ensure orderly transfer to HEASARC of data reduction and analysis software and science data. Develop plan for final calibration, processing and transfer to the HEASARC. Plan to include identification of software. Close action with description of plan and schedule. Completion: 2/15/14; Plan outline 10/15/14

Top Level Summary Response to Senior Review Committee Recommendations CXC Status Report/CUCPage 6 RecommendationResponse SR To reduce cost, engage senior engineers from other NASA projects to review Chandra mission operations and ground systems, with aim of developing new ideas that may result in cost efficiencies. Convene a team with expertise in mission operations from other missions to discuss Chandra’s present mission operations cost model, and discuss lessons learned and approaches to maximize efficiency and minimize cost. Close action with an updated trade study for reducing operations costs. Completion: 4/15/15 SR Mitigate effects of flat budgets beyond FY16, which would present significant challenges. Work with HQ through the PPBE process to request inflation in FY17 budget and beyond. Completion: 5/1/15 Actions to be closed by submission of documents and information to MSFC and presentation at CXC Quarterly Review Following concurrence by MSFC and HQ, the CXC program manager will maintain for record and inclusion in the next Senior Review proposal

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 7 Program Management MSFC Space Systems Programs & Projects Office Baggett (Prog Mgr) Weisskopf (Proj Sci) Chandra X-ray Center Program Office Wilkes (Director) Canizares (MIT) Brissenden (Prog Mgr) Public Communication Lestition Grants Award Section Sozanski Director’s Office Wilkes Flight Operations Team Hurley OCC Operations Eagan Science Wilkes Science Data System Fabbiano Systems Engineering Holmes Online Operations Mission Planning Spacecraft Engineering Flight Software Factory Support Team Systems Team Integration & Ground S/W Maintenance Ground Ops Team Ops Science Support Calibration Mission Planning Instrument Teams Sci. Data Syst. Planning Hardware & Systems Software Development & Maintenance Archive Operations Data Processing Operations Operational Role Tech. Support Team Management & Facilities Juda (Flt Dir)

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 8 Program Management CXC Status Report/CUC Contract –Contract (Option 1) currently runs through 30 Sept 2016 –Option 2 is available through 30 Sept 2019 Budget and Staffing –The CXC’s budget and expenditures are in line with the PPBE-16 plan –Current staffing profile is consistent with PPBE-16 –CXC is funded through 12 Nov; Einstein program through 30 Apr 15 Other –Complying with NASA travel restrictions, which have increased administrative burden at CXC and MSFC –HQ assigned CXC to allocate FY14 EPO funding to PCOS missions; submitted plan, solicited requests from missions, arranged transfer mechanism with MSFC, completed transfers

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 9 Program Management CXC-organized Conferences and Reviews –Einstein Fellows Symposium (29-30 Oct 13) at CfA –Chandra Peer Review (23-27 June 14) Boston –Workshop: X-ray View of Galaxy Ecosystems (9-11 July 14) Boston –CXC Users’ Committee (23-24 Oct 14) at CfA –Einstein Fellows Symposium (28-29 Oct 14) at CfA –15 Years of Science with Chandra symposium (18-21 Nov 14) Boston

Spacecraft –Continues to operate extremely well –Nominal passages through eclipse seasons –EPHIN was removed from radiation sensing process; supplanted by HRC & ACIS Science Instruments –Instruments are operating extremely well –Installed ACIS software patch to eliminate occasionally occurring “trickle-bias” bug Operations Control Center –Smooth operations –Installed and tested virtual OCCDS upgrades at backup OCC Mission Planning –7 fast-turnaround (load interrupting) TOOs during this period –Observing efficiency is ~74%, near maximum but declining due to orbit evolution CXC Status Report/CUCPage 10 Mission Operations CXC Status Report/CUC

Page 11 Subsystem functioning perfectly Minor problem but subsystem meets all requirements Moderate problem but manageable Major problem with large impact Spacecraft Subsystem Status

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 12CXC Status Report/CUC Mission Operations – Observing Efficiency Observing time has increased due to evolving orbit

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 13 Mission Operations – Consumables Momentum Unloading & Propulsion System (MUPS) Fuel Usage CXC Status Report/CUC

Page 14 Mission Operations – Consumables MUPS Thruster Warm Starts CXC Status Report/CUC A-side thrusters not being used; in reserve B-side thrusters have plenty of margin

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 15 Science Operations CXC Data System Releases CIAO Data Analysis Releases VersionDateMain contents DS Oct13 Archive server 64 bit migration DS Oct13 SOT aspect V&V parameter update DS Dec13 CfP16 proposal planning support DS 23Jan14Multimon/HEAD mail update DS Apr14WebReports DS May14 Peer Review GUI & Database DS Jun14 Operations Support DS 10.3 Oct 2014 Archive Server migration to Linux (major release) VersionDateMain contents CIAO 4.6 B218Oct13 CIAO 4.6 Beta 2 CIAO 4.612Dec13 CIAO 4.6 CIAO Feb14Sherpa Bugfix CIAO 4.7 B1 18Jul13 Internal Beta 1 Sherpa B1 29Sep14 Public stand-alone beta release

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 16 Science Operations Data Processing –Automatic processing is current; mean time from end of observation to delivery to user remains at about one day Calibration Products released since October 2013 –Quarterly ACIS detector gain maps –Updated ACIS contamination model –Annual HRC detector gain maps –Annual HRC-1 background image and spectrum Products to be released by December 2014 –Update to ACIS contamination model –Revised HRC-S quantum efficiency maps, one for each year since launch

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 17 Science Operations Data Delivery Avg delivery ~1 day from observation As of middle of following monthAs of 10/7/14 Month Number of Obs Days to Data Delivery Number Deliv Number Outstanding Number Deliv Number Outstanding Comments MinAvgMax Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 18 Chandra Director’s Office General Observer Program – Cycle 16 –Proposal deadline 13 Mar; peer review Jun –637 proposals received (476 U.S., 161 non-U.S.) > Include archive and theory proposals > Time oversubscription: 4.8x –Approved 169 observing proposals for 22 Msec > Include 3 X-ray Visionary Projects totaling 5.3 Msec >Allotted observing time includes some time in cycle 17 > 126 U.S.-based proposals, 43 non-U.S. Einstein Fellowship Program –2014 Call for Proposals released 2 Aug 13 (deadline 7 Nov 13) –185 applicants for 12 fellowships –New fellows start fall of 2014 –Fellows symposium Oct in Phillips auditorium CXC Status Report/CUC

Month of Data Delivery Federal Grants (1,3) SAO Grants (2) As of middle of following monthAs of 10/8/14 Non-Federal Grants (3) No. Grants Awarded No. Outstanding Avg days to award (4) No. Grants Awarded No. OutstandingOutstanding Awards Proposal no, Comments Oct Nov n/a10 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep (1) Grants awarded to scientists at Federal institutions as interagency transfers through MSFC. (2) Grants awarded to scientists at non-Federal institutions through SAO Contracts and Grants Department. (3) Number of grants eligible for award, for which data were delivered to the observer in the month. (4) Average days from data delivery to grant award to observer. CXC Status Report/CUCPage 19 Chandra Director’s Office Grant Awards Grants are typically awarded within ~2-3 weeks of observation CXC Status Report/CUC

Page 20 Education and Public Outreach Press –1 AAS press release;12 add’l science, 2 non-science releases; 1 press release posting, 15 image releases, resulting in > 4000 articles in print, web news and science web sites. Monthly estimated audience in tens of millions. Web, Digital, Social Media –Public web site attracts average of ~13 million hits per month –Award-winning podcasts remain the #1 download with ~half million hits/month –Social media platform continues to grow, with cumulative ~60k Twitter followers. ~200k Facebook likes, >1 million YouTube views, 28k Google+ followers –New initiatives include Google Hangout, iPhone app, improvements in image processing Public Outreach –Launched “Light: Behind the Bulb” for International Year of Light. SPIE- sponsored exhibits in US (AAS Seattle) and internationally. See

CXC Status Report/CUCPage 21 Education and Public Outreach (con’t) Education –23 events at National Science Teachers and 9 other presentations –National Science Olympiad; supported national competition events and coaches clinics reaching ~100,000 students on over 6000 teams –HQ designated the CXC as EPO “provider” for Physics of the Cosmos missions for FY14 and FY15; collected and prioritized education activities of PCOS missions, distributed approximately $800k in funding EPO guidelines –EPO guidelines for FY16 are in flux –There is a hard separation between public outreach and education, although definitions are not clear –Public Outreach is to be funded from within mission budgets. –Education is detached from specific mission programs, open to competition. Draft announcement of opportunity to be released soon.