Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 1 Aquinas on the existence of God zAquinas’s arguments for God âAquinas’s famous 5 arguments appear in both the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent versions of the Design Argument So far we have considered the classical arguments of Aquinas and Paley. However, the design argument has attracted.
Advertisements

Is Religion Reasonable? Are religious beliefs (about the universe’s relation to the supernatural) reasonable? Faith seeking understanding: ontological,
Chapter 12: Is There a God?.
PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD Arguments for the Justification of Theism: Cosmological, Moral, Design (Teleological) and Ontological.
Philosophy and the proof of God's existence
How do the following products show design?
Aquinas’s First Way – highlights It’s impossible for something to put itself into motion. Therefore, anything in motion is put into motion by something.
The argument from design: Paley v. Hume Michael Lacewing
Cosmological arguments for God’s existence.  Derived from the Greek terms cosmos (world or universe) and logos (reason or rational account).  First.
Design/Teleological Argument
The Cosmological Argument. Also known as ‘The First Cause Argument’ Unlike the Ontological Argument, it derives the conclusion from a posteriori premise.
The Cosmological Argument The idea that there is a first cause behind the existence of the universe.
The Teleological Argument: Argument from Design/Purpose u The order and intricacy of things in the universe make sense only if an ordering and purposive.
Polkinghorne on science & theology - 1 John Polkinghorne on science & theology FIntroduction GIan Barbour’s 4 ways of relating science & religion [Religion.
Design Arguments. Arguments for theism Ontological arguments Cosmological arguments Design arguments.
The Teleological Argument
The Teleological Argument The idea that there is evidence of design in the universe which suggests a designer.
L ECTURE 17: T HE T ELEOLOGICAL A RGUMENT AND C AUSALITY.
And what do these phrases from Aquinas’ argument mean? Things lacking cognition The governance of things Tend toward a goal The way things are controlled,
A Questions AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding – one side. Explain in lots of detail 20 mins Approx 2 sides Link back to the question Make links between.
PHIL/RS 335 Arguments for God’s Existence Pt. 1: The Cosmological Argument.
The Teleological Argument October 7 th The Teleological Argument Learning Objective: To analyse the argument from Design, considering its strengths.
The Teleological Argument also known as “ the argument from design ”
Teleological Argument Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Recent versions of the Design Argument. Describe the teleological argument for the existence of God. 4KU An argument for the existence of God or a creator.
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways.
Faith & Reason Arguments for God’s Existence. The Two Ways of ‘Knowing’ God  Pure Reason: Many philosophers have created proofs using logic to prove.
EXISTENCE OF GOD. Does God Exist?  Philosophical Question: whether God exists or not (reason alone)  The answer is not self-evident, that is, not known.
The Teleological Proof A Posteriori Argument: A argument in which a key premise can only be known through experience of the actual world. Principle of.
Teleological Argument Also Known As The Argument From Design.
Evidently the Cosmological argument as proposed by Aquinas is open to both interpretation and criticism. The Cosmological argument demands an explanation.
Emerton & Polkinghorne on the continuing value of natural theology ~ slide 1 Emerton on arguments for God from nature & science zNorma Emerton. “Arguments.
Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 1 Aquinas on the existence of God zAquinas’s arguments for God âAquinas’s famous 5 arguments appear in both the.
Teleological arguments for God’s existence
Evolution Jeopardy Vocab EvolvingCommon TiesDarwin 101Hodge PodgeSeen It Once, Seen It Twice!
Aquinas's 2nd & 5th arguments for God - 1 Aquinas’s arguments for the existence of God zAquinas’s famous 5 argument appear in both the Summa Theologica.
Darwin’s View on the Teleological Argument Versions of the Teleological Argument.
Argument from Design. Review: Leibniz and PSR Something “created” is something contingent on its creator—i.e. the created thing depends on a creator for.
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
HUME ON THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (Part 1 of 2) Text source: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, parts 2-5.
LECTURE 23 MANY COSMOI HYPOTHESIS & PURPOSIVE DESIGN (SUMMARY AND GLIMPSES BEYOND)
Notes - Proofs for God’s Existence
St. Thomas AquinasSt. Thomas Aquinas  CE  Naples, Italy  Benedictine then Dominican monk  Primary Works:  Summa contra Gentiles  Summa.
Exam Questions practice 1. “The Scientific method is no more reliable than revelation”. How far would Christians agree with this statement? 6AE 2. In what.
Inductive Argument Premise = The world appears to have order and purpose. The world is complex, which is evidence that it has been designed. If the world.
Anselm & Aquinas. Anselm of Canterbury ( AD) The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God (Text, pp )
The Cosmological argument attempts to infer the existence of God from the existence of the cosmos (universe) or from the phenomena within it. The claim.
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
The Design or Teleological Argument for the Existence of God.
Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Mr M Banner 2016 Grade 12 th May 2016 Starter: What does Cosmology mean to you? Title:
Lesson Aim To recall and explore other forms of the Cosmological Argument.
The Cosmological Argument
Key Words Key Quotations
Starter: Mix-Pair-Share
Arguments based on observation Arguments based on reason
Responses to the Design argument
c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:
AO1 Comparison questions
Paley’s design argument
The Cosmological Argument
The analogy of the Arrow
The Anthropic Principle
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
The Teleological Argument
Teleological Argument
The Cosmological Argument
‘Assess how credible evolution is as alternatives to the design argument for the existence of God’ (12 marks) Intro – order and purpose Design qua purpose.
What conclusions could we draw from each of these photos
The Teleological Argument
Presentation transcript:

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 1 Aquinas on the existence of God zAquinas’s arguments for God âAquinas’s famous 5 arguments appear in both the Summa Theologica & the Summa Contra Gentiles âWill examine arguments 2 & 5 only âAquinas’s approach in all of the arguments

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 2 Aquinas on the existence of God yGod’s existence can be known through God’s effects, i.e, the created world (SCG, chapter 12) âThe 2nd argument y1. We experience causality. y2. Nothing is the cause of itself; causes are other than their effects.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 3 Aquinas on the existence of God y3. There cannot be an infinite regress of caused causes. åIf there were an infinite regress, the effects we experience here & now would not exist. y4. Therefore, there must be some first cause and this we call “God.”

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 4 Aquinas on the existence of God âCritique yClarification: a temporal series of causes vs a dependent series. Aquinas is talking about a dependent series. yCan’t we take the observed causality in the world as a brute fact which requires no explanation?

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 5 Aquinas on the existence of God yPossible response: If we accept the Principle of Sufficient Reason, then causality must have an explanation. äWhy should we accept the P. of SR? äBecause it is a necessary condition for rationality?

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 6 Aquinas on the existence of God yRichard Swinburne (The Existence of God, 2nd ed. rev., Oxford UP, 1991) proposes redoing Aquinas’s 2nd argument äGod is necessary to account for the existence of & the sustaining of the laws of nature which in turn govern the causality we experience.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 7 Aquinas on the existence of God åGod ålaws åcausal events

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 8 Aquinas on the existence of God zThe 5th argument â1. The experiential datum: things which lack knowledge act toward ends (goals). äNature displays goal-directedness; it is purpose-filled. â2. Things which move toward ends must be guided by an intelligence. äAnalogy to an arrow shot by an archer.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 9 Aquinas on the existence of God â3. Therefore, there must exist an intelligent being who directs all non- cognitive natural things toward their goals. “And this we call God.”

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 10 Paley’s version of the design argument zIn the 19th century, William Paley ( ) in his Natural Theology; or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity (1802), redid Aquinas’s argument. âObserving a stone & finding a watch âI find that it has a purpose & all of its parts have a purpose. âThe watch must have a watchmaker, a intelligent designer.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 11 Paley’s version of the design argument yIt does not matter if somehow the watch was made by a previous watch & that by a previous, etc. This would only increase our admiration for the watch. yAnd it does not matter that we have never seen a watch made. Cf. finding a piece of ancient art.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 12 Paley’s version of the design argument yConcludes that there must be a “designing mind” behind the watch, or watches.  Now the design we observe in the watch exists in nature, but to an even greater degree.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 13 Paley’s version of the design argument  “The contrivances of nature surpass the contrivances of art, in the complexity, subtlety, and curiosity of the mechanism.” “And still more... do they go beyond them in number and variety.” âConclusion: Nature must have a designer and this is God.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 14 Aquinas on the existence of God zCritique of the design argument âThe challenge of Darwin’s theory to all design arguments based on the design of living things yThe theory of natural selection ä(1) Overproduction of pollen, seeds, eggs, & sperm; yet populations remain relatively constant.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 15 Aquinas on the existence of God ä(2) There is a high mortality ä(3) Individuals within a species are not identical; there are some variations. ä(4) Some of these variations are inheritable. ä(5) Some individuals are better adapted than others to the conditions of life and to ecological niches.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 16 Aquinas on the existence of God ä(6) Because of (5), there is natural selection & differential survival. ä(7) Over the long run, (6) results in the rise of divergent stocks issuing from common ancestors. yDarwin’s theory offers a natural explanation for the design of living things. Hence there is no need to appeal to God for this design.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 17 Aquinas on the existence of God yResponses: äCan reconcile God with the natural evolution of the design of living things by stating that God uses evolution to bring about this design. åBut note that this is not an argument for God’s existence; it is a statement of the compatibility of God the designer and evolution.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 18 Aquinas on the existence of God yResponses (cont’d) äSwinburne: God is required to explain the existence and sustaining of the laws governing the evolutionary process.

Aquinas on the existence of God ~ slide 19 Aquinas on the existence of God äDarwin’s theory is restricted to the realm of life. Some claim we need God to explain the evolution of the cosmos from the Big Bang. åThe cosmos displays remarkable fine-tuning directed toward the creation of life and mind. This can only be explained by the existence of an intelligent designer.