How did Idaho students perform in the NCLB years when compared with their peers nationwide? All Students – White Students - Hispanic Students NAEP Reading.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Social and Educational Factors Contributing to the Outcomes of Hispanics in Urban Schools.
Advertisements

Kalispell’s 4 th Grade Reading International Comparison On the th grade PIRLS international Reading assessment, Florida’s performance was compared.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.
Scale Score Distributions Reading, Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science ISAT, Spring 2009 State Department of Education Boise, Idaho.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education The Statistical Imagination Chapter 4. Measuring Averages.
1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.
NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics.
Measures of Central Tendency. Central Tendency “Values that describe the middle, or central, characteristics of a set of data” Terms used to describe.
Descriptive Statistics Chapter 3 Numerical Scales Nominal scale-Uses numbers for identification (student ID numbers) Ordinal scale- Uses numbers for.
Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Scale Score Distributions Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (ISAT) Reading, Language Usage, Mathematics, and Science Spring 2010 Idaho State Department.
SAT Highlights for Monroe School District: SAT Participation and Performance There was a 10.3% increase in the number of Hispanic.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
California State University, Long Beach Long Beach City College Cerritos College Collaboration Between the University and Community College to recruit.
Achieve Data Profile: Washington January AMERICAN DIPLOMA PROJECT NETWORK The Big Picture n To be successful in today’s economy, all students.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 8, 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP June 20, 2012 Science in Action: Understanding what students know and can do in the classroom, in the lab, and.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
ISAT Science Achievement Level Percentages (Below Basic, Basic, Proficient, Advanced) Grades 5, 7 and 10.
AP Psychology September What is “Statistics”?  A common language for describing, organizing, and interpreting data  Aspects:  Distribution 
Chapter 2 Means to an End: Computing and Understanding Averages Part II  igma Freud & Descriptive Statistics.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
35th Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment June 18, 2005 How to compare NAEP and State Assessment Results NAEP State Analysis Project Don.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
Reading Evaluation Results: A Brief Introduction PAG June 2 nd, 2009 Becca Sanders, Program Evaluator.
ESI: Education Statistics Investigations Sarah McKenzie PhD TOSA: Data and Assessment Fayetteville Public Schools.
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.
Academic Growth in Math High Poverty Students – WASL and MAP Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.
Summary Statistics: Measures of Location and Dispersion.
Effectiveness of Reading and Math Software Products Findings From the First Student Cohort Mark Dynarski May 2007.
Good things that are happening for kids. Texas Students Rank #1, #2, & #3 in the nation! When comparing students by subgroups, Texas 4 th and 8 th graders.
Review of Special Education in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Findings and Recommendations Dr. Thomas Hehir Silvana and Christopher Pascucci Professor.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 20, 2010.
The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
October 25, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Understanding ERB Scores
Oklahoma State University Can Mathematics State Test Scores Improve in Four Minutes a Day? Justine Celoni, M.S., Carrol Smith, M.S., and Katye Perry, Ph.D.
A Close Look at Don’t Fail Idaho’s Student Achievement Message June 25, 2013 Bert Stoneberg, Ph.D. K-12 Research Idaho
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Mount Olive Township Public Schools PARCC Results.
Understanding Growth and ACT Aspire Reports.
Access to Quality Teaching: Myths, Facts, and Potential Policy Solutions for the Future Dr. Michael Hansen Senior Fellow and Director, Brown Center on.
Can Ohio seize the future?
Focus on the Learner: Who are the students states serve?
IT’S ALL ABOUT GROWTH!. Hemet Unified School District’s Use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
What’s Driving Chicago’s Educational Progress?
Evergreen Elementary School
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
How did Idaho students perform in the Obama years when compared with their peers nationwide? All Students – White Students - Hispanic Students NAEP.
ISAT Effect Size Results for Idaho English Language Arts & Mathematics Grades 3-8 and Bert Stoneberg, Ph.D. K-12 Research Idaho
CAT 4 Reading Results 2011.
ISAT Effect Sizes Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (SBAC)
Presentation transcript:

How did Idaho students perform in the NCLB years when compared with their peers nationwide? All Students – White Students - Hispanic Students NAEP Reading and Mathematics Percentile Ranks, Grades 4 and 8

NOTES: [1] Percentile Rank. Idaho fourth graders, for example, had a percentile rank of 57 on the NAEP 2007 reading test. This means that the average Idaho fourth grade student in 2007 scored higher in reading than 57 percent of his peers in the national norm group. The fourth grade reading norm group included all of the fourth graders in the nation’s public schools participating in the NAEP 2003 reading test. [2] National Norms. In 2003, national norms were computed for three demographic groups: all students, White students and Hispanic students. The “norm group” in each of the demographic group’s subject/grade graphs is represented by the black diamond with a percentile rank of 50. [3] Apparent differences in percentile ranks may not be statistically significant. No statistical testing was performed. [4] Simpson’s Paradox suggests the whole does not necessarily look like the sum of its parts. When “all students” results are reported, Idaho typically scores near the middle of the nation or slightly above. When results from White or Hispanic students are reported, Idaho students typically trail their national peers. This paradox is clearly observed in Idaho’s NAEP results through the NCLB years.

Idaho vs. National Public NAEP ALL STUDENTS Percentile Ranks for All Students Grade 4 Reading Grade 8 Reading Grade 4 Mathematics Grade 8 Mathematics

Idaho vs. National Public NAEP WHITE STUDENTS Percentile Ranks for White Students Only Grade 4 Reading Grade 8 Reading Grade 4 Mathematics Grade 8 Mathematics

Idaho vs. National Public NAEP HISPANIC STUDENTS Percentile Ranks for Hispanic Students Only Grade 4 Reading Grade 8 Reading Grade 4 Mathematics Grade 8 Mathematics

This presentation prepared as a public service for the educators, parents and patrons who make public education a reality in Idaho. Bert Stoneberg, Ph.D. K-12 Research Idaho P.O. Box 5912 Boise, ID Visit: