Spoken Dialog Systems Diane J. Litman Professor, Computer Science Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 white – main ideas  purple – vocabulary  pink – supplemental/review information.
Advertisements

Mihai Rotaru Diane J. Litman DoD Group Meeting Presentation
Acceleration Due to Gravity: Free Fall By: Rosa Marie Kinder and Kenisha Marshall SC441 Honors Class, Fall 2002, Dr. Roman Kezerashvili.
Falling Balls 1 Falling Balls. Falling Balls 2 Introductory Question Suppose I throw a ball upward into the air. After the ball leaves my hand, is there.
1.2 Falling Balls ball 1. Ideas for today: Weight Acceleration due to gravity Falling objects Horizontal and vertical motion 2.
5/10/20151 Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Systems Julia Hirschberg CS 4706.
Principles of 2D Motion & An Introduction to Projectiles.
Uncertainty Corpus: Resource to Study User Affect in Complex Spoken Dialogue Systems Kate Forbes-Riley, Diane Litman, Scott Silliman, Amruta Purandare.
Kinematics Motion Equations 1 Constant Acceleration Constant Acceleration Problem Solving Equations of Motion Centripetal and Tangential Acceleration Free-Fall.
ILMDA: Intelligent Learning Materials Delivery Agents Goal The ILMDA project is aimed at building an intelligent agent with machine learning capabilities.
Predicting Student Emotions in Computer-Human Tutoring Dialogues Diane J. Litman and Kate Forbes-Riley University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA USA.
Track: Speech Technology Kishore Prahallad Assistant Professor, IIIT-Hyderabad 1Winter School, 2010, IIIT-H.
VoiceXML Builder Arturo Ramirez ACS 494 Master’s Graduate Project May 04, 2001.
Do Now Monday, 4/2 Take our your notebook and answer the following question: What is the difference between weight and mass? You have 4 minutes. I will.
Modeling User Satisfaction and Student Learning in a Spoken Dialogue Tutoring System with Generic, Tutoring, and User Affect Parameters Kate Forbes-Riley.
Real-Time Speech Recognition Subtitling in Education Respeaking 2009 Dr Mike Wald University of Southampton.
Interactive Dialogue Systems Professor Diane Litman Computer Science Department & Learning Research and Development Center University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh,
circle A Comparison of Tutor and Student Behavior in Speech Versus Text Based Tutoring Carolyn P. Rosé, Diane Litman, Dumisizwe Bhembe, Kate Forbes, Scott.
Spoken Dialogue for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Opportunities and Challenges Diane Litman Computer Science Department & Learning Research & Development.
circle Adding Spoken Dialogue to a Text-Based Tutorial Dialogue System Diane J. Litman Learning Research and Development Center & Computer Science Department.
Comparing Synthesized versus Pre-Recorded Tutor Speech in an Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System Kate Forbes-Riley and Diane Litman and Scott Silliman.
Adaptive Spoken Dialogue Systems & Computational Linguistics Diane J. Litman Dept. of Computer Science & Learning Research and Development Center University.
Correlations with Learning in Spoken Tutoring Dialogues Diane Litman Learning Research and Development Center and Computer Science Department University.
Spoken Dialog Systems and Voice XML Lecturer: Prof. Esther Levin.
Experiments with ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System Dr. Diane Litman Associate Professor, Computer Science Department and Research.
Projectile Motion Notes and Practice Vocabulary Projectile Trajectory Gravity Acceleration due to gravity (g) Terminal Velocity Horizontal Component.
Dept. of Computer Science University of Rochester Rochester, NY By: James F. Allen, Donna K. Byron, Myroslava Dzikovska George Ferguson, Lucian Galescu,
April 9 th, 2014 Homework: Read pgs : Define Centripetal force, answer section assessment questions (pg. 67) 2 a, 2 b.- on pg. 18 in your notebook.
1 Natural Language Processing Lecture Notes 14 Chapter 19.
Introduction to Computational Linguistics
Predicting Student Emotions in Computer-Human Tutoring Dialogues Diane J. Litman&Kate Forbes-Riley University of Pittsburgh Department of Computer Science.
Why predict emotions? Feature granularity levels [1] uses pitch features computed at the word-level Offers a better approximation of the pitch contour.
Using Word-level Features to Better Predict Student Emotions during Spoken Tutoring Dialogues Mihai Rotaru Diane J. Litman Graduate Research Competition.
Speech and Language Processing for Educational Applications Professor Diane Litman Computer Science Department & Intelligent Systems Program & Learning.
Physical Science Mr. Barry.  Projectile motion refers to objects that are flying through the air  Ex: thrown football, golf ball hit from tee  These.
Diane Litman Learning Research & Development Center
Spoken Dialogue in Human and Computer Tutoring Diane Litman Learning Research and Development Center and Computer Science Department University of Pittsburgh.
Listener-Control Navigation of VoiceXML. Nuance Speech Analysis 92% of customer service is through phone. 84% of industrialists believe speech better.
Free Fall All objects moving under the influence of only gravity are said to be in free fall All objects moving under the influence of only gravity are.
Speech and Language Processing for Adaptive Training Diane Litman Professor, Computer Science Department Senior Scientist, Learning Research & Development.
Falling Balls.
Learning Target 5 → Free Fall: I can use the acceleration of gravity to describe and calculate an object's motion 5.1 I can describe how and why the rate.
Experiences with Undergraduate Research (Natural Language Processing for Educational Applications) Professor Diane Litman University of Pittsburgh.
Using Prosody to Recognize Student Emotions and Attitudes in Spoken Tutoring Dialogues Diane Litman Department of Computer Science and Learning Research.
SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
Applications of Spoken Language Technology and Systems Mike Phillips.
(Speech and Affect in Intelligent Tutoring) Spoken Dialogue Systems Diane Litman Computer Science Department and Learning Research and Development Center.
Metacognition and Learning in Spoken Dialogue Computer Tutoring Kate Forbes-Riley and Diane Litman Learning Research and Development Center University.
circle Spoken Dialogue for the Why2 Intelligent Tutoring System Diane J. Litman Learning Research and Development Center & Computer Science Department.
Immersive Virtual Characters for Educating Medical Communication Skills J. Hernendez, A. Stevens, D. S. Lind Department of Surgery (College of Medicine)
Gravity Chapter Gravity Law of Universal Gravitation- all objects in the universe attract each other through gravitational force Law of Universal.
circle Towards Spoken Dialogue Systems for Tutorial Applications Diane Litman Reprise of LRDC Board of Visitors Meeting, April 2003.
Spoken Dialogue for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Opportunities and Challenges Diane Litman Computer Science Department Learning Research & Development.
Improving (Meta)cognitive Tutoring by Detecting and Responding to Uncertainty Diane Litman & Kate Forbes-Riley University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA.
Experiments with ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System Diane Litman Computer Science Department and Learning Research and Development.
User Simulation for Spoken Dialogue Systems Diane Litman Computer Science Department & Learning Research and Development Center University of Pittsburgh.
Using Natural Language Processing to Analyze Tutorial Dialogue Corpora Across Domains and Modalities Diane Litman, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh,
Detecting and Adapting to Student Uncertainty in a Spoken Tutorial Dialogue System Diane Litman Computer Science Department & Learning Research & Development.
Prosodic Cues to Disengagement and Uncertainty in Physics Tutorial Dialogues Diane Litman, Heather Friedberg, Kate Forbes-Riley University of Pittsburgh.
Gravity is a force that pulls objects toward each other. Legend says that Isaac Newton discovered gravity when he saw an apple fall from a tree Sir Isaac.
Predicting and Adapting to Poor Speech Recognition in a Spoken Dialogue System Diane J. Litman AT&T Labs -- Research
Today: (Ch. 2 & 3) HDevelop the equations to describe motion  Look at some situations where we can apply them.
Gravitational Force  Gravity= a force of attraction between objects, “pulls” objects toward each other  Law of universal gravitation= all objects in.
Predicting Emotion in Spoken Dialogue from Multiple Knowledge Sources Kate Forbes-Riley and Diane Litman Learning Research and Development Center and Computer.
Gravity and Projectile Motion
Towards Emotion Prediction in Spoken Tutoring Dialogues
Dialogue-Learning Correlations in Spoken Dialogue Tutoring
Mass vs Weight.
Sci. 2-1 Gravity and Motion Pages
Gravity & Free-Fall.
Presentation transcript:

Spoken Dialog Systems Diane J. Litman Professor, Computer Science Department

2 Spoken Dialog Systems Systems that interact with users via speech Provide automated telephone or microphone access to a back-end Advantages: naturalness, efficiency, eyes and hands free user Speech Recognition TTS or recording DB, web, system Spoken Dialog System

3 Challenges in Spoken Dialog Systems Automated speech recognition  Sphinx, Microsoft Speech, Dragon Naturally Speaking Natural language understanding Dialog Management  How to keep the conversation going? Best strategy?  How to detect errors in communication?  How to recover from errors? Spoken language generation

4 Application areas I have worked on AT&T  Phone-based Information Access  Call Centers  Social Networking Systems Pitt  (Physics) Tutoring  Backup for Port Authority human operators Other Interests  Training, Troublesheeting, PDA’s

5 Speech-based Computer Tutors What are they? Example  Tutor: Well, if an object has non zero constant velocity, is it moving or staying still?  Student: Moving  Tutor: Yep. If it’s moving, then its position is changing. So then what will happen to the packet’s horizontal displacement from the point of its release?  Student: It will change Intersection of two fields:  Spoken Dialog Systems  Intelligent Tutoring Systems

6 Intelligent Tutoring Systems Education  Classroom instruction [most frequent form]  Human (one-on-one) tutoring [most effective form] Computer tutors – Intelligent Tutoring Systems  Not as good as human tutors  Ways to address the performance gap (Spoken) dialog systems Affective (dialog) systems

7 Back-end is Why2-Atlas system [VanLehn, Jordan, Rose et al. 2002] Sphinx2 speech recognition and Cepstral text-to-speech

8 Back-end is Why2-Atlas system [VanLehn, Jordan, Rose et al. 2002] Sphinx2 speech recognition and Cepstral text-to-speech

9 Back-end is Why2-Atlas system [VanLehn, Jordan, Rose et al. 2002] Sphinx2 speech recognition and Cepstral text-to-speech

10 Current Research Directions Automatic System Optimization  Can a system learn to optimize behavior based on prior data? Evaluation  How can we tell if we are improving a system? Speech vs keyboard, TTS vs recordings, graphics vs. transcripts  Can systems be tested with simulated rather than real users? Affective Computing  How can user emotions be predicted in real-time?  How can the system exploit such information? Prosodic and Linguistic Analysis  Respond to both what a user says, and how it is said

Human-Computer Excerpt Tutor26: Let me ask my question in a more general way. What happens to the velocity of a body when there is no force acting on it? Student27:dammit (ASR: it is) Tutor28 :Could you please repeat that? Student29 :same (ASR: i same) Tutor30 :Right. And what happens to the HORIZONTAL velocity of a body when there is no HORIZONTAL force acting on it? Student31:zero (ASR: the zero) Tutor32 :Well... OK, let's consider how forces in the vertical direction affect the motion of a body in a horizontal direction in a different scenario Student33:oh gravity you already said this (ASR: beats gravity you're exert less) Tutor34:Fine. Are there any other forces acting on the apple as it falls? Student35:no why are you doing this again (ASR: no y and to it yes) Tutor36:Correct. The only force acting on the apple as it falls to the earth is the earth's gravitational force. In which direction does gravitational force act? Student37:downward you computer (ASR: downward you computer)

12 Thank You! Questions? Further Information