Developing Fire Safety Assessments Future Considerations Fire and Materials Working Group March 4 – 5, 2009 Daniel Slaton, Boeing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Introduction A central issue in supporting interoperability is achieving type compatibility. Type compatibility allows (a) entities developed by various.
Advertisements

Green and Safe Materials: Compatibility or Conflict? José L. Torero BRE Centre for Fire Safety Engineering The University of Edinburgh.
Marcelo M. Hirschler GBH International
Risk Assessment for Cultural Institutions: Fire Testing vs Computer Modeling Frederick W. Mowrer, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Fire Protection Engineering.
LITHIUM BATTERY FIRE TESTS Harry Webster FAA William J Hughes Technical Center
Draft Deliberative Document1 of 15 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Safety Research to Support Rulemaking/GTR Objectives September 2008 SGS
IMPLICATIONS OF NATURAL GAS INTERCHANGABILITY FOR CALIFORNIA GAS CUSTOMERS Industrial and Commercial Burners – GTI lead Appliances – LBNL lead David Rue,
Computational modelling as an alternative to full-scale testing for tunnel fixed fire fighting systems Kenneth J. Harris & Bobby J. Melvin Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Toshio Mogi, Woo-Kyung Kim, Ritsu Dobashi The University of Tokyo
STANDARDIZATION OF PROTECH  J.K.GUPTA, SCIENTIST ’C’, BIS.
Ensuring fire safety in buses Michael Försth, Asbjørn Hagerupsen, Jan Petzäll Informal document No. GRSG (95th GRSG, 21 – 24 October 2008 agenda.
Fire Triangle FuelHeat Fire! Oxygen 1 st Stage: Incipient 1 st stage No visible flame Little smoke Is not yet self-sustaining According to the National.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
Task 3.4. Validation of horizontal solutions Fire and mechanical characterization.
Enclosure Fire Dynamics Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Qualitative description of enclosure fires Chapter 3: Energy release rates Chapter 4: Plumes.
Orientation to the Science K to 7 IRP Part 1: What Is Science K to 7?  How was Science K to 7 developed?  How has Science K to 7 changed since.
Partner Universities.
Modeling Train Fires in Fire Dynamic Simulator Melbourne, Australia Tara Barden Jason Brown Todd Hetrick.
Enclosure Fire Dynamics
Pipeline Qra Seminar Title slide Title slide.
Fire.
Concept Equipment design and manufacture fire testing instruments according to international test methods. Our range of products are used to test the fire.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE BIOMASS SYSTEMS David Palmer BSc MSc CEnv MIEMA, Lead Author of CIBSE AM15: Biomass Heating.
Drill of the Month Safety Officer’s Role March 2010 Maryland Fire and Rescue Institute.
FIREPROOF AND FIRE RESISTANT MATERIALS Federal Aviation Administration Project Manager: J. Reinhardt William J. Hughes Technical Center Airport and Aircraft.
Orientation to the Civic Studies 11 Integrated Resource Package (IRP) 2005.
RANKING FLAMMABILITY OF AIRCRAFT MATERIALS USING MICROSCALE COMBUSTION CALORIMETRY Richard E. Lyon and Richard N. Walters* Fire Safety Branch AAR-440 FAA.
The University of Waterloo Fire Research Facility Institute for the Advancement of Fire Safety E. Weckman, C. Devaud, A. Strong and D. Johnson Mechanical.
Parameters for the thermal decomposition of epoxy resin/carbon fiber composites in cone calorimeter 4 th ICHS Conference, September 14, 2011 D. Quang Dao.
Combustion Processes (con’t from Unit 4)
Sandwich Panels: UK Insurance industry attitudes and guidance on IPN core panels. Mark Harris -Divisional Building Technology Director. Nordbygg – March.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City, NJ By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Center for Firefighter Safety Research and Development.
PRIVÉ ET CONFIDENTIEL © Bombardier Inc. ou ses filiales. Tous droits réservés. SMART TESTING BOMBARDIER THOUGHTS FAA Bombardier Workshop Montreal
Estimate Evapotranspiration from Remote Sensing Data -- An ANN Approach Feihua Yang ECE539 Final Project Fall 2003.
EVALUATION OF THERMAL RADIATION MODELS FOR FIRE SPREAD BETWEEN OBJECTS
Toulouse Aeronautical Test Centre (CEAT)
Setting Fire to CIS - or- Small Scale Combustion Chamber and Instrumentation Dave Pogorzala Bob Kremens, PhD, Advisor Center For Imaging Science Rochester.
John Barton and Patrick van Hees
“Mapping the current and future risk of overheating in UK homes” London-Loughborough (LoLo) CDT By Argyris Oraiopoulos 1.
“Mapping the current and future risk of overheating in UK homes” First Year Progress Report London-Loughborough CDT By Argyris Oraiopoulos 1.
Portfolio of creative skills… Unit 1 – Product Investigation Unit 2 – Product Design Unit 3 – Product Manufacture The Portfolio is split into three separate.
Materials Integration by Fission Reactor Irradiation and Essential Basic Studies for Overall Evaluation Presented by N.Yoshida and K.Abe At the J-US Meeting,
Modeling Smoke Transport in Aircraft Cargo Compartments Jill Suo-Anttila ‡, Stefan Domino †, Walt Gill ‡, Paul DesJardin ‡, and Lou Gritzo ‡ ‡ Fire Science.
Tim Marker FAA Technical Center Development of a Lab-Scale Test For Evaluating Toxic Gas Decomposition Products Generated Inside a Fuselage During a Postcrash.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Full-Scale Testing of Leather.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Test Cell Airflow Study For Cargo.
Tim Marker Discussion of Burner Heat Flux Mapping for Proposed Insulation Burnthrough Test Standard FAA Technical Center.
CERN Cryolab CO 2 cooling for pixel detectors Investigation of heat transfer Christopher Franke, Torsten Köttig, Jihao Wu, Friedrich Haug TE-CRG-CI.
NASP 2008 Annual Conference Subro Goes Hollywood! SUBRO GOES HOLLYWOOD NASP 2008 Annual Conference.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group By: Robert Ochs Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration COMPOSITE MATERIAL FIRE FIGHTING Presented to:International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Köln, Germany Presented.
Shanghai Research Institute of Building Sciences
Science-Based Standards
M. Z. Bezas, Th. N. Nikolaidis, C. C. Baniotopoulos
The Fire Service and its Understanding of Fire Dynamics.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
International Conference on Hydrogen Safety
Anubhav Sinha, Vendra Chandra and Jennifer X. Wen
ICHS - October 2015 Jérôme Daubech
Tips To Choose Best Fire Retardant Doors | Ideal
FIRE BEHAVIOR.
Enclosure Fire Dynamics
CIRRUS IN LEM & LARGE-SCALE MODELS
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS
- Strictly Confidential -
APP-3 CHAMBER Insulation DESIGN PROBLEM
- Strictly Confidential -
Presentation transcript:

Developing Fire Safety Assessments Future Considerations Fire and Materials Working Group March 4 – 5, 2009 Daniel Slaton, Boeing

Fire Safety Assessment Keys to full-scale to lab scale test correlation Establish equivalent fire scenarios  Well-ventilated versus Under-ventilated  Different heat fluxes Full scale configuration representative of actual compartment and it’s combustion environment  Heat flux and fire temperatures  Airflow/ventilation  Volumetric/mass ratios Understand fundamental material properties and their response to dynamic fire conditions  Heat release/Smoke  Flame propagation/Ignition temperatures  Toxicity

Fire Safety Assessment Toxicity Testing of Insulation (DOT/FAA/AR-TN07/15) : – A straightforward correlation has not resulted when comparing toxicity results from the “box” and full scale test configurations. – Steel “Box” test method is complex and difficult/costly to run. Future Proposal for Research: – Consider alternate lab-scale test methods to gain knowledge of material properties for composite and insulation systems – Investigate opportunities of using various material properties to control the full-scale fire dynamics that address the key safety aspect - FLASHOVER

Fire Safety Assessment Technical Resources: “Hazards of Combustion Products” Conference in November 2008, London “Bench-scale Assessment of combustion toxicity – analysis of current protocols” T. Richard Hull, February 2007, Fire Science Journal 42 (2007) 340 – y=%23TOC%235723%232007% % %23FLA%23 &_cdi=5723&_pubType=J&_auth=y&_acct=C &_version=1 &_urlVersion=0&_userid=615015&md5=7f4c995a4a46f d164db014 y=%23TOC%235723%232007% % %23FLA%23 &_cdi=5723&_pubType=J&_auth=y&_acct=C &_version=1 &_urlVersion=0&_userid=615015&md5=7f4c995a4a46f d164db014

Railway Smoke & Toxicity Test Method Overview EU has been working since the 1990’s to standardize Railway fire requirements CEN “Fire Protection of Railway Vehicles” 7 parts CEN

Railway Smoke & Toxicity Test Method Overview Similar size to NBS chamber Horizontal specimen orientation STANDARD SETUP: 25 kW kW/m2 With pilot flame 50 kW/m2 Without pilot flame SPECIALIZED SETUPS: 90 kW/m2 With and without pilot flame

Fire Safety Assessment Evaluate a variety of configurations at various fire conditions. Predict material behavior as a function of heat flux and piloted ignition for a range of material properties.