SLO + Assessment: Guiding Principles, Roles & Processes David Morse, Long Beach City College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Joseph Bielanski, Peralta / Berkeley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
Accreditation Update Preparation for the Site Visit Wednesday, October 2, 2013 Jennifer Hughes, Sandra Comerford, Laura Demsetz.
Reinventing Program and Services Review at Chaffey College Marie Boyd Giovanni Sosa Tom Vitzelio.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
MARCH 26, 2014 TASKSTREAM TASKFORCE UPDATE. WORKGROUP OUTCOMES Workgroup training summary What the workgroup learned regarding template and workspace.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Information Competency: an overview Prepared by: Erlinda Estrada Judie Smith Mission College Library Santa Clara, CA.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Student Learning Objectives A Guiding Framework for Selecting Student Assessments to Inform Educator Evaluation Student Learning Objectives Training Series.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Program Review: Curriculum & Institutional Culture Julie Bruno, Sierra College David.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges The Basis for Faculty Power: Title 5 Regulations and Education Code Mark Lieu, Vice President Jane Patton,
Adapted from a presentation by Mark Lieu Academic Senate for California Community Colleges - Leadership Institute 2006 Academic Senate for California Community.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Goldstein & Associates IT Assessment Liaison Orientation October 2010.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.
How Do We Know What’s Working? A Guided Dialogue on SLOs and Assessment Lesley Kawaguchi Santa Monica College Chair, Committee on Student Learning Outcomes.
Duke Ellington “A problem is a chance for you to do your best.”
Academic Assessment Accountability: Are we what we say we are? Program Improvement: How can we be even better? External audiences: SACS.
2007 Strengthening Student Success Conference, San Jose Dr. Jack Friedlander Executive Vice President, Educational Programs Santa Barbara City College.
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
Julie Adams David Morse Developing a Senate Tool Kit.
Emphasizing the Dialog at Monterey Peninsula College Fred Hochstaedter Academic Senate President SLO Coordinator Monterey Peninsula College What we do,
ASCCC Accreditation InstituteFebruary 10, APPLYING ACCJC GUIDELINES TO SLO/ASSESSMENT: 2012 PROFICIENCY INTO PRACTICE Marcy Alancraig,
1 BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE A statewide effort to bring focus and funding to foster student success in a student’s path from developmental education to college-level.
Universal Design for Learning: Curriculum Design in BCPS VERLETTA WHITE CHIEF ACADEMIC OFFICER.
Jane Patton, President, ASCCC Lisa Legohn, LA Trade Tech.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Fall 2015 Professional Development Days C. Cruz-Johnson & R. Gamez August 28, Walking with Integrity Towards Student Success.
ACCREDITATION, SELF-STUDIES, AND FACULTY ROLES
Accreditation Kevin Bontenbol Julie Bruno Michelle Grimes-Hillman 1.
Creating a Process to Rapidly Respond to Urgent Issues Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator Kale Braden, Cosumnes River College Debbie Klein, Gavilan.
Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.
Articulation with the Universities: What Curriculum Committees Need to Know Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator Nancy Purcille, UC Office of the President.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Beth Smith, Grossmont College, Chair Julie Adams, Academic Senate, Executive Director Dianna Chiabotti, Napa Valley College Joseph Bielanski, Berkeley.
1 Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment Norma Ambriz * February 14, 2008 Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment Norma Ambriz * February 14, 2008 A.
2010 Fall SLO Regional November 5, 2010 Sierra College.
Jeff Linton and Mary Kate McNulty. Mission Statement  Student Access  Acquisition of Technology  High Quality Training.
Curriculum Efficiency: From Idea to Approval Rich Cameron, Cerritos College, Facilitator Julie Bruno, Vice President, ASCCC, Sierra College Grant Goold,
Welcome! Friday, April 29 9:30am.  Reason for meeting ◦ Provide an initial dialogue that crosses all areas of the College ◦ Determine how we view our.
Effectiveness and Perceptions of a Peer Teaching Evaluation Program Lorin Sheppard, PhD Mary Kiersma, PhD, PharmD Manchester University College of Pharmacy.
Navigating the PCAH and the Curriculum Reference Guide Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator Marie Boyd, Chaffey College Erik Shearer, Napa Valley College.
Keeping your Senate Involved, Engaged and On Course Grant Goold Professor & Chair, Emergency Medical Services, American River College Area A, Academic.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Accreditation Update August 24, 2016 Susan Mills, Accreditation Liaison Officer.
Where the CBA Meets Curriculum
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
Local Senates and Boards
Navigating the PCAH and the Curriculum Reference Guide
Curriculum and Emotions – Solving Problems and Managing Conflict
Regional Coordination
Curriculum Institute, July 13, 2018, 3:45 – 5:00
Bakersfield College Annual Program Review Work Session 2013
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Faculty Leadership and the Role of the ASCCC
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Developing a Senate Tool Kit
Navigating the College Culture
Inquiry into Effective Practices of SLO Assessment AScCC Educational policies committee Anna Bruzzese ASCCC South Representative; ASCCC Educational Policies.
Presentation transcript:

SLO + Assessment: Guiding Principles, Roles & Processes David Morse, Long Beach City College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Joseph Bielanski, Peralta / Berkeley City College Marie Boyd, Chaffey College David Grossman, Barstow College Cheryl O’Donnell, Hartnell College David Morse, Long Beach City College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Joseph Bielanski, Peralta / Berkeley City College Marie Boyd, Chaffey College David Grossman, Barstow College Cheryl O’Donnell, Hartnell College

SLO Assessment Paper Overview  Eleven guiding principles  Definitions of key concepts  Recommendations based on the principles  Eleven guiding principles  Definitions of key concepts  Recommendations based on the principles

Context: Principle #1 Faculty have the primary responsibility for developing assessment tools and determining the uses of data that are collected, and therefore faculty engagement and active involvement in SLO assessment is essential.

Faculty Involvement At All Levels  Department/Discipline Faculty  Curriculum Committee  Academic Senate  Include adjunct faculty whenever possible  Department/Discipline Faculty  Curriculum Committee  Academic Senate  Include adjunct faculty whenever possible

Working with others  Engage assistance from research  Include college staff and administrators as appropriate  Engage assistance from research  Include college staff and administrators as appropriate

Who does what?  Faculty  Researchers  Administrators  Staff  Faculty  Researchers  Administrators  Staff

Incorporating SLO Assessment into College Processes  Connect SLOs to the college culture  Ensure research support  Garner administrative support – personnel, resources, and time  Connect SLOs to the college culture  Ensure research support  Garner administrative support – personnel, resources, and time

SLO Assessment in  Program Review  Planning  Budgeting  Program Review  Planning  Budgeting

Other Recommendations  Offer training on all aspects  Avoid SLO assessment results in faculty evaluations  Make SLO assessment ongoing rather than periodic  Offer training on all aspects  Avoid SLO assessment results in faculty evaluations  Make SLO assessment ongoing rather than periodic

Helpful Links  Examples of SLOs in College Processes: Sierra College Program Review Templates  Examples of SLOs in College Processes: Sierra College Program Review Templates