CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
Lepton ID Working Group - Summary u A. Andronic - High-Rate TRD Developments at GSI u ongoing developments of thin symmetric MWPCs with pad readout u to.
High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.
Agnes Lundborg Open Seminar 9 th of April 2003 in Uppsala on the SweGrid project PANDA computing “a tiny specification”
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Topological D-meson Reconstruction with STAR Using the Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University SVT review, BNL, July 7 th /8.
Feasibility Studies of Low-mass Mesons Identification for the CBM Project Radosław Karabowicz Hot Matter Physics Department, Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian.
Open Charm Everard CORDIER (Heidelberg) Grako meeting HD, April 28, 2006Everard Cordier.
D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Vector meson study for the CBM experiment at FAIR/GSI Anna Kiseleva GSI Germany, PNPI Russia   Motivation   The muon detection system of CBM   Vector.
Simulation activities in India: students working on various topics.. Partha(VECC), Hemen (GU) : Trigger, SIS100, physics simulation Bipasha (CU): dynamic.
C B M Di-electron background studies and first results using compact RICH CBM Collaboration Meeting, 27 September 2007, Dresden Di-electron background.
1 J.M. Heuser et al. CBM Silicon Tracker Requirements for the Silicon Tracking System of CBM Johann M. Heuser, M. Deveaux (GSI) C. Müntz, J. Stroth (University.
Di-electron pair reconstruction CBM Collaboration Meeting, 28 February 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Di-electron pair reconstruction Tetyana Galatyuk GSI-Darmstadt.
CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
The High-Level Trigger of the ALICE Experiment Heinz Tilsner Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik Universität Heidelberg International Europhysics Conference.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
FAIR Simulation & Analysis Framework FairRoot M. Al-Turany, D. Bertini, F. Uhlig GSI-IT.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Fast track reconstruction in the muon system and transition radiation detector of the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 3 Ivan Kisel.
PPR meeting Marcello Lunardon 1 Semi-electronic beauty detection: status and perspectives THE COLLABORATION Rosario Turrisi and Marcello Lunardon.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Status of Reconstruction in CBM
Muon simulation for p+A system Preliminary studies with HSD Partha Pratim Bhaduri Subhasis Chattopadhyay VECC, Kolkata.
A Silicon vertex tracker prototype for CBM Material for the FP6 Design application.
Simulations for CBM CBM-India Meeting, Jammu, 12 February 2008 V. Friese
Status of CBM muon studies I.Vassiliev, S.Gorbunov, I. Kisel and A.Kiseleva 16-Oct-06 Motivation Simulation tools cbmroot2 v06 Signal and background simulations.
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
Simulations and Software CBM Collaboration Meeting, GSI, 17 October 2008 Volker Friese Simulations Software Computing.
V0 analytical selection Marian Ivanov, Alexander Kalweit.
Results from first beam tests for the development of a RICH detector for CBM J. Eschke 1*, C. Höhne 1 for the CBM collaboration 1 GSI, Darmstadt, Germany.
Ring Recognition and Electron Identification in the RICH detector of the CBM Experiment at FAIR Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt, Germany and LIT JINR, Dubna,
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
– Self-Triggered Front- End Electronics and Challenges for Data Acquisition and Event Selection CBM  Study of Super-Dense Baryonic Matter with.
1 EvtGen and  b Spin Studies in ATLAS First North American ATLAS Physics Workshop December 19-21, 2004 Michela Biglietti, Jacob Bourjaily, Homer A. Neal,
Feasibility of J/ψ studies by MPD detector Alla Maevskaya, Alexei Kurepin INR RAS Moscow NICA Roundtable Workshop 11 September 2009.
J/psi trigger status Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009 CBM Collaboration meeting.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
Muon detection in the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Anna Kiseleva 3 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für.
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 The model: Input Charge generation The charge of the cluster is taken by random sampling of the experimental distribution.
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
Monday, January 24 TimeTitleSpeaker 10:00 – 10:30The CBM experimentV. Friese (GSI) 10:30 – 11:00CBM Silicon Pixel Vertex DetectorM. Deveaux (GSI/IReS)
CA+KF Track Reconstruction in the STS S. Gorbunov and I. Kisel GSI/KIP/LIT CBM Collaboration Meeting Dresden, September 26, 2007.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Open and Hidden Charm production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions Presented by Marko Starič for the Hera-B collaboration The.
1 PP Minimum Bias Triggering Simulations Alan Dion Stony Brook University.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
Principle Simulations for Detector Concepts at HESR Goals Methods Current Status Application to p + p   ´(3686) GSI Workshop on its Future Facility
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Monday, April 27, Feasibility of J/ψ measurement in p+A 25GeV Partha Pratim Bhaduri (VECC) Anand Kumar Dubey (VECC) S. Chattopadhyay.
Parallel Implementation of the KFParticle Vertexing Package for the CBM and ALICE Experiments Ivan Kisel 1,2,3, Igor Kulakov 1,4, Maksym Zyzak 1,4 1 –
LIT participation LIT participation Ivanov V.V. Laboratory of Information Technologies Meeting on proposal of the setup preparation for external beams.
KFParticle Ivan Kisel 1,2, Igor Kulakov 1,3, Iourii Vassiliev 1,2, Maksym Zyzak 1,3 1 – Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany 2 – GSI.
Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis
A heavy-ion experiment at the future facility at GSI
Perspectives on strangeness physics with the CBM experiment at FAIR
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Reconstruction and calibration strategies for the LHCb RICH detector
Presentation transcript:

CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 2 CBM Signals Menu Open Charm D 0 - D ± Hidden Charm J/Ψ Multi-strange Baryons Ξ - Ω Vector Mesons ρ - ω K π K π π K e ν K π e ν e + e - μ + μ - hadronic semi- leptonic e + e - charged hadrons tracking vertexing h PID tracking vertexing h PID e PID tracking e PID tracking μ PID tracking vertexing h PID tracking e PID 'plug''kink' full luminosity (10 7 int/sec) neededreduced luminosity sufficient Trigger performance essential dedicated setup variant Analysis speed essential Trigger min. bias This meant D 0 → K - π + See also D 0 → K 0 s π + π -

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 3 Design Iterations Detector Design Signal Performance S/N ratio Trigger Performance Rejection ratio Physics Performance It is essential to start and coordinate these design iteration loops ! Many geometries...

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 4 Design Iterations (cont.) Detector Design Signal Performance S/N ratio Trigger Performance Rejection ratio Use subset of detectors Assume reduced performance Use full capability of the setup Simulate signal+background Simulate min. bias Simulate signal+background Simulate background Efficiency Rejection ratio Efficiency / Purity S/B ratio

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 5 CBM Signals: D – hadronic Open Charm D 0 - D ± Hidden Charm J/Ψ Multi-strange Baryons Ξ - Ω Vector Mesons ρ - ω K π K π π K e ν K π e ν e + e - μ + μ - e + e - charged hadrons tracking vertexing h PID tracking μ vertexing h PID e PID tracking e PID tracking μ PID tracking vertexing h PID tracking e PID 'plug''kink' dedicated setup variant Trigger: STS RPC (+TRD) ? Reconstruction: STS RPC (+TRD) RICH 2 Is h pid needed in trigger ? Is RICH2 needed for good y coverage ? Is h pid needed at all ? TRD needed for global tracking if h PID is needed

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 6 CBM Signals: D – semi-leptonic Open Charm D 0 - D ± Hidden Charm J/Ψ Multi-strange Baryons Ξ - Ω Vector Mesons ρ - ω K π K π π K e ν K π e ν e + e - μ + μ - e + e - charged hadrons tracking vertexing h PID tracking vertexing h PID e PID tracking e PID tracking μ PID tracking vertexing h PID tracking e PID 'plug''kink' dedicated setup variant Trigger: STS RICH or TRD Reconstruction: STS RICH RPC RICH or TRD for e PID Is h pid needed here ?

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 7 CBM Signals: J/Ψ – e ± channel Open Charm D 0 - D ± Hidden Charm J/Ψ Multi-strange Baryons Ξ - Ω Vector Mesons ρ - ω K π K π π K e ν K π e ν e + e - μ + μ - e + e - charged hadrons tracking vertexing h PID tracking vertexing h PID e PID tracking e PID tracking μ PID tracking vertexing h PID tracking e PID 'plug''kink' dedicated setup variant Trigger: TRD or STS + RICH or ECAL Reconstruction: STS RICH TRD ECAL TRD for e PID and momentum Is double/tripple e pid needed ? Is ECAL trigger possible ?

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 8 CBM Signals: J/Ψ – μ ± channel Open Charm D 0 - D ± Hidden Charm J/Ψ Multi-strange Baryons Ξ - Ω Vector Mesons ρ - ω K π K π π K e ν K π e ν e + e - μ + μ - e + e - charged hadrons tracking vertexing h PID tracking vertexing h PID e PID tracking e PID tracking μ PID tracking vertexing h PID tracking e PID 'plug''kink' dedicated setup variant NA60 like setup Can be part of CBM of setup is modular...

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 9 CBM Signals: J/Ψ – μ ± channel Open Charm D 0 - D ± Hidden Charm J/Ψ Multi-strange Baryons Ξ - Ω Vector Mesons ρ - ω K π K π π K e ν K π e ν e + e - μ + μ - e + e - charged hadrons tracking vertexing h PID tracking vertexing h PID e PID tracking e PID tracking μ PID tracking vertexing h PID tracking e PID 'plug''kink' dedicated setup variant Trigger: μ Filter STS + TRD Reconstruction: STS + TRD ECAL μ Filter Is π decay rejection needed ?

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 10 CBM Signals: Multi-strange Baryons Open Charm D 0 - D ± Hidden Charm J/Ψ Multi-strange Baryons Ξ - Ω Vector Mesons ρ - ω K π K π π K e ν K π e ν e + e - μ + μ - e + e - charged hadrons tracking vertexing h PID tracking vertexing h PID e PID tracking e PID tracking μ PID tracking vertexing h PID tracking e PID 'plug''kink' dedicated setup variant Are 7 STS planes enough for an acceptable efficiency ? Reconstruction: STS (RPC+TRD)

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 11 CBM Signals: low m Vector Mesons Open Charm D 0 - D ± Hidden Charm J/Ψ Multi-strange Baryons Ξ - Ω Vector Mesons ρ - ω K π K π π K e ν K π e ν e + e - μ + μ - e + e - charged hadrons tracking vertexing h PID tracking vertexing h PID e PID tracking e PID tracking μ PID tracking vertexing h PID tracking e PID 'plug''kink' dedicated setup variant Rejection of conversions Reconstruction: (target) STS RICH TRD ECAL How much e PID redundancy is really needed ? Segmented target

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 12 Full Simulation-Analysis Chain Event Generator Transport Digitizer Hit Finder Reconstruction Physics Analysis Simulation Analysis Determine particle properties at target vertex Transport particles through the detector material Determine detector response and FEE output values Determine physical space point parameters from detector hits Determine momentum vector and PID for all tracks Calculate physics observables Storage Levels SIM RAW EDS

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 13 Embedding Signal in "Background" Event Generator 1 Transport Digitizer Hit Finder Reconstruction Physics Analysis Simulation Analysis Linear Event Generator 2 Transport Merger Non-linear Storage Levels Pluto UrQMD SIM RAW Storage at SIM level is the most efficient strategy when digitizer are fast compared to transport EDS

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 14 Embedding Signal in "Background" Event Generator 1 Transport Digitizer Hit Finder Reconstruction Physics Analysis Simulation Analysis Linear Event Generator 2 Transport Merger Non-linear Storage Levels Pluto UrQMD SIM RAW Storage at SIM level is the most efficient strategy when digitizer are fast compared to transport Simulation Analysis EDS

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 15 Implementation – Concept Digitizer Hit Finder Reconstruction Merger POINT SIM RAW POINT DIGI HIT TRACK EDS Storage Levels Data Objects Tasks Input of a task is from storage or other task depending on storage strategy

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 16 Full FEE-Simulation Digitizer Hit Finder Reconstruction Merger POINT SIM RAW POINT DIGI HIT TRACK EDS Storage Levels FEE response FEE-RAW Event Association DIGI RAW DIGI

May 11, 2004 CBM Simulation - Tasks and Concepts, Walter F.J. Müller, GSI 17 Implementation – Current Practice Digitizer Reconstruction Merger POINT SIM POINT HIT TRACK Data Objects: provide standard interface between processing stages Tasks: Implement algorithms use standard interfaces Physics Analysis User - DST TRACK Input: some files from transport Output: your results tree