Www.minerva-portals.de1 Personalized Recommendation of Related Content Based on Automatic Metadata Extraction Andreas Nauerz 1, Fedor Bakalov 2, Birgitta.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 OOA-HR Workshop, 11 October 2006 Semantic Metadata Extraction using GATE Diana Maynard Natural Language Processing Group University of Sheffield, UK.
Advertisements

Improving Learning Object Description Mechanisms to Support an Integrated Framework for Ubiquitous Learning Scenarios María Felisa Verdejo Carlos Celorrio.
Intelligent Technologies Module: Ontologies and their use in Information Systems Revision lecture Alex Poulovassilis November/December 2009.
AVATAR: Advanced Telematic Search of Audivisual Contents by Semantic Reasoning Yolanda Blanco Fernández Department of Telematic Engineering University.
A Stepwise Modeling Approach for Individual Media Semantics Annett Mitschick, Klaus Meißner TU Dresden, Department of Computer Science, Multimedia Technology.
Haystack: Per-User Information Environment 1999 Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Eytan Adar et al Presented by Xiao Hu CS491CXZ.
Innovation in Search? Tom Reamy Chief Knowledge Architect KAPS Group Knowledge Architecture Professional Services
Xyleme A Dynamic Warehouse for XML Data of the Web.
Semantic Search Jiawei Rong Authors Semantic Search, in Proc. Of WWW Author R. Guhua (IBM) Rob McCool (Stanford University) Eric Miller.
Integrating data sources on the World-Wide Web Ramon Lawrence and Ken Barker U. of Manitoba, U. of Calgary
UvA, Amsterdam June 2007WS-VLAM Introduction presentation WS-VLAM Requirements list known as the WS-VLAM wishlist System and Network Engineering group.
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
Information Retrieval and Extraction 資訊檢索與擷取 Chia-Hui Chang National Central University
1 Case Study: Starting the Student Registration System Chapter 3.
Knowledge Portals and Knowledge Management Tools
Course Instructor: Aisha Azeem
Ontology-based Information Extraction for Business Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence Research Centre Program Systems Institute Russian Academy of Science Pereslavl-Zalessky Russia.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Enterprise Information Management SOA Brown Bag #2 Sam Ceccola – SOA Architect November 17, 2010.
Erasmus University Rotterdam Introduction Nowadays, emerging news on economic events such as acquisitions has a substantial impact on the financial markets.
Špindlerův Mlýn, Czech Republic, SOFSEM Semantically-aided Data-aware Service Workflow Composition Ondrej Habala, Marek Paralič,
CLARIN tools for workflows Overview. Objective of this document  Determine which are the responsibilities of the different components of CLARIN workflows.
FRE 2672 Urban Ontologies : the Towntology prototype towards case studies Chantal BERDIER (EDU), Catherine ROUSSEY (LIRIS)
Ontology-derived Activity Components for Composing Travel Web Services Matthias Flügge Diana Tourtchaninova
Text CONSEG 09 Domain Knowledge assisted Requirements Evolution (K-RE)
GEM/IRDR Social Vulnerability and Resilience Information System and Metadata Portal IRDR Scientific Board Meeting Chengdu 03/11/2012.
Social scope: Enabling Information Discovery On Social Content Sites
Knowledge based Learning Experience Management on the Semantic Web Feng (Barry) TAO, Hugh Davis Learning Society Lab University of Southampton.
The Semantic Web Service Shuying Wang Outline Semantic Web vision Core technologies XML, RDF, Ontology, Agent… Web services DAML-S.
Flexibility and user-friendliness of grid portals: the PROGRESS approach Michal Kosiedowski
Spoken dialog for e-learning supported by domain ontologies Dario Bianchi, Monica Mordonini and Agostino Poggi Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione.
Information Systems & Semantic Web University of Koblenz ▪ Landau, Germany Semantic Web - Multimedia Annotation – Steffen Staab
5 Quick ways to improve content value do cool stuff using Calais.
© Copyright 2008 STI INNSBRUCK NLP Interchange Format José M. García.
FI-CORE Data Context Media Management Chapter Release 4.1 & Sprint Review.
Košice, 10 February Experience Management based on Text Notes The EMBET System Michal Laclavik.
PLoS ONE Application Journal Publishing System (JPS) First application built on Topaz application framework Web 2.0 –Uses a template engine to display.
RCDL Conference, Petrozavodsk, Russia Context-Based Retrieval in Digital Libraries: Approach and Technological Framework Kurt Sandkuhl, Alexander Smirnov,
Dimitrios Skoutas Alkis Simitsis
Aquenergy Portal Elisabetta Zuanelli, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy E-Age 2014 Muscat december.
Semantic Network as Continuous System Technical University of Košice doc. Ing. Kristína Machová, PhD. Ing. Stanislav Dvorščák WIKT 2010.
Exploitation of Dynamic Information Relations in the Service-Oriented AFRL Information Management Systems Andrzej Uszok, Larry Bunch, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw.
Ocean Observatories Initiative Data Management (DM) Subsystem Overview Michael Meisinger September 29, 2009.
Department of computer science and engineering Two Layer Mapping from Database to RDF Martin Švihla Research Group Webing Department.
Knowledge Representation of Statistic Domain For CBR Application Supervisor : Dr. Aslina Saad Dr. Mashitoh Hashim PM Dr. Nor Hasbiah Ubaidullah.
Exploitation of Semantic Web Technology in ERP Systems Amin Andjomshoaa, Shuaib Karim Ferial Shayeganfar, A Min Tjoa (andjomshoaa, skarim, ferial,
11 CORE Architecture Mauro Bruno, Monica Scannapieco, Carlo Vaccari, Giulia Vaste Antonino Virgillito, Diego Zardetto (Istat)
The Semantic Logger: Supporting Service Building from Personal Context Mischa M Tuffield et al. Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia Group University of Southampton.
David Smiley SOA Technology Evangelist Software AG Lead, follow or get out of the way Here Comes SOA.
Extending the MDR for Semantic Web November 20, 2008 SC32/WG32 Interim Meeting Vilamoura, Portugal - Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology -
Service discovery with semantic alignment Alberto Fernández AT COST WG1 meeting, Cyprus, Dec, 2009.
1 Proposal on MFI-5: Process model registration based on ontology (MFI4Process) He Keqing Wang Chong 2006/08/29.
THE SEMANTIC WEB By Conrad Williams. Contents  What is the Semantic Web?  Technologies  XML  RDF  OWL  Implementations  Social Networking  Scholarly.
Jens Hartmann York Sure Raphael Volz Rudi Studer The OntoWeb Portal.
An Ontological Approach to Financial Analysis and Monitoring.
Supporting Collaborative Ontology Development in Protégé International Semantic Web Conference 2008 Tania Tudorache, Natalya F. Noy, Mark A. Musen Stanford.
Developing GRID Applications GRACE Project
September 2003, 7 th EDG Conference, Heidelberg – Roberta Faggian, CERN/IT CERN – European Organization for Nuclear Research The GRACE Project GRid enabled.
© Tata Consultancy Services ltd.12 June Metadata and Data Standards Levels of Metadata C. Anantaram Innovation Lab.
Semantic metadata in the Catalogue Frédéric Houbie.
GUILLOU Frederic. Outline Introduction Motivations The basic recommendation system First phase : semantic similarities Second phase : communities Application.
A Semi-Automated Digital Preservation System based on Semantic Web Services Jane Hunter Sharmin Choudhury DSTC PTY LTD, Brisbane, Australia Slides by Ananta.
Working meeting of WP4 Task WP4.1
Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham
THE TOWL ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE
Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S)
Service-enabling in Financial Domain
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Semantic Markup for Semantic Web Tools:
Presentation transcript:

Personalized Recommendation of Related Content Based on Automatic Metadata Extraction Andreas Nauerz 1, Fedor Bakalov 2, Birgitta König-Ries 2, Martin Welsch 1 1 IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH, Germany 2 Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Germany

Outline  Motivation and aims  Basic recommender system  Architectural extensions  Domain model  Task model  User model  Personalization model  Service registry  Calais service integration  Conclusion

Motivation  In order to take right decisions, users need access to additional sources of background information and related content.  The required additional information might be stored in various places, e.g. wikies, financial databases, company directories, etc. Company Profile Stock Quotes Experts  In order to access these different pieces of information, the user has to launch new browser windows and direct them to appropriate resources.

Aims  Automatically augment portal documents with recommendations to background information and related content Stock Quotes Company X Company Y Stock Market Technology Company Profile Experts

Basic Recommender System Portal Layer – aggregation of portlets using filter chains

Basic Recommender System Analysis Layer – named entity extraction using UIMA framework

Basic Recommender System Semantic Tagging Layer – wrapping the extracted entities into semantic tags

Basic Recommender System Recommendation Layer – generating a list of references to the similarly annotated information pieces

Basic Recommender System Service Integration Layer – mapping the tagged entities to the corresponding external service

Basic Recommender System Presentation Layer – invocation of the selected external services

Limitations  Large number of irrelevant recommendations  Hardcoded binding of information types to sources of related content  Huge amount of work required to develop analysis engines

Architectural Extensions  Generation of user-specific recommendations  Mechanism for flexible mapping of information types to information sources  Harnessing external unstructured information analysis engines

Extended Architecture

Finance Domain Model  Defines general and finance- related concepts  Reuses concepts from LSDIS Finance Ontology and XBRL Ontology  Grounded on the Proton Upper Level Module  Defines fine-grained categorization of industry sectors (partially based on the Yahoo Taxonomy)  Represented as an OWL ontology

Task Model  Defines information- gathering actions that users might want to take on the portal  Two types of actions:  generic actions – can be used across different domains, e.g. GetEncyclopediaArticle  domain-specific actions – applicable only in a specific domain, e.g. GetStockQuotes  Actions are represented as ontological concepts and described by their input and output parameters

User Model  Reflects various user features  Static part:  Date of birth  Gender  Mother tongue  Dynamic part:  Interests  Expertise  Represented as an overlay model Domain Model Overlay User Model

Representation of User Interests and Expertise  Numerator – number of occurrences of concept i for user j  Denominator – total number of occurrences of all concepts registered for user j

Personalization Model  Specifies personalization rules that govern what content is provided to the user  Personalization rule is represented in the ECA form: on (event) if (condition) then (actions)  Event denotes a situation when the user encounters a certain concept in the text  Condition is a combination of user features and context descriptors  Actions define the information gathering actions that should be delivered to the user if the event occurs

Multidimensional Representation of the Personalization Model User Interests Document Concepts User Expertise

Intersection of Dimensions GetEncyclopediaArticleGetCompanyWebsiteGetNews Bank Banking: interested Banking: novice Document Concepts User Interests User Expertise

Service Registry  Central database for storing information about internal and external services  The registry maps each action from the Task Model to the service that “does” the action  e.g. getEncyclopdediaArticle -> Wikipedia  Services are provided with WSDL description

Calais Service  Ingests unstructured text and returns semantically annotated document in RDF format  Supports extraction of business entities, events, and facts  Entities (total: 38)  Currency  Industry term  Organization  Person  …  Events and facts (total: 38)  Acquisition  Alliance  Bankruptcy  Merger  …

Conclusion  Augmenting portal documents with automatically generated recommendations to background information and related content  Extension of our previous recommender system:  User-specific recommendations  Flexible mapping of information types to services  Leveraging external analysis engines for tagging  The extensions are currently being incorporated in the existing recommender system prototypically implemented in IBM’s WebSphere Portal

Q uestions & A nswers