TOPIC G: CLIENTS’ RIGHTS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LEGAL 101 – Two Favourite Concepts: 1.Without Prejudice and 2.Client Legal Privilege THINK.CHANGE.DO.
Advertisements

Wayne County Pro Bono Conference August 15, 2012 Ethics and Assisted Pro Se Representation.
Ethics in Mediation Sandy Garrett, Chief Disciplinary Council, TBPR Richard Murrell, Moderator.
Law 20 Conflicts of Interest. o Based on duties of o Loyalty o Confidentiality o Rules cover: o Concurrent representation of adverse clients o Representation.
Contracts and Communication John G. Huisman Fleissner Davis and Johnson
YOUTH ATTORNEY. GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 1:  The primary change in the general provisions article is the establishment of an attorney for children.
John Steele, Attorney at Law
Daniel R. Medd Barrister & Solicitor Privacy and Communication.
Two Hats, One Lawyer: Demystifying Privilege & Confidentiality Stuart I. Teicher, Esq.
Legal Ethics for Social Services Attorneys Institute of Government 2006.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
N ORTHERN M ARIANA I SLANDS R ULES FOR M ANDATORY A LTERNATIVE D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION.
Chapter Seven Competence In this chapter, you will learn about: Definitions of lawyer and paralegal competence Key components of competence for paralegals.
1 Consent for treatment A summary guide for health practitioners about obtaining consent for treatment Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care.
Mediation The goal of mediation is not to determine who is write or wrong Purpose is to explore solutions The mediator makes the final decision If no agreement.
Outsourcing: The Ethical Issues Steven M. Richman November 2014.
Mediation Information Role Play Case Study. Goals Studying mediation helps you understand that disputes can be resolved successfully without courts or.
LAWYERS ETHICS Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl. APPLICABLE PROFESSIONAL RULES  Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct 
Civil Law Resolutions to disputes between people..
The Ethics of Internal Investigations SELECTED ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND COMMENTS By: Cecil E. Morris, Jr. Pendleton, Wilson, Hennessey.
Ethical Pitfalls of Representing Multiple Clients in a Transaction Presented by Suzanne Raggio Westerheim, Attorney, Mediator, and Counselor to the Legal.
Primarily, the law governing lawyers in their professional roles  ordinary laws applicable to lawyers in specific disputes, such as  contract law, including.
Agency Law. “If you want something done right, do it yourself.” “Many hands make light work.” Anonymous folk sayings.
Goals: The students will 1. Continue with their study of case briefing. 2. Learn about legal ethics and the Model Rules.
Avoiding Traps in Internal Investigations H. Lee Barfield II Bass, Berry and Sims PLC November 5, 2010.
Law 20 Competence. Legal Education o Attorneys o Law school: 3-4 years o Bar Examination o Moral Character o Continuing Education requirements o Paralegals.
Do You Have One?. “I represent the city as an organization and I do not represent you and I cannot guarantee the confidentiality of what you tell me.”
Unit 5 Midterm Review. What are some of the components of the ABA?
John Steele, Attorney at Law
John Steele, Attorney at Law. 2 Confidentiality 3 Topics 1. Definitions 2. Comparison 3. ABA Approach 1. Rule; Exceptions; Other rules 4. California.
Session 8 Confidentiality and disclosure. 1 Contents Part 1: Introduction Part 2: The duty of confidentiality Part 3: The duty of disclosure Part 4: Confidentiality.
Carlsmith Ball LLP Confidentiality Issues and Outside Counsel Deborah Bjes October 22 nd, 2015.
FRCP & Ethics Money & Ethics Technology & Ethics USPTO & Ethics Advertising Ethics
Easy Read Summary Mental Capacity Act Mental Capacity Act A Summary The Mental Capacity Act 2005 will help people to make their own decisions.
A Response to SEC Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami’s June 1, 2011 Speech Barry J. Mandel Foley & Lardner LLP November 2, 2011 Chair of Foley & Lardner’s.
TOPIC A: REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION P.R Prof. Janicke.
TOPIC O: REPRESENTING CORPORATIONS AND GOVERNMENTS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
TOPIC B: CONFIDENTIALITY 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
TOPIC E: FEE ARRANGEMENTS AND FEE-SPLITTING P.R Prof. Janicke.
TOPIC F: TRUST ACCOUNTS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke. CLIENTS’ FUNDS IN LAWYER’S CUSTODY MUST BE PROTECTED LAWYERS OFTEN HAVE CLIENT FUNDS –ADVANCES ON FEES.
TOPIC K: JUDICIAL ETHICS P.R Prof. Janicke.
TOPIC J: DUTIES TO FORMER CLIENTS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
Attorney is another name for a Lawyer. There are more than 1 million lawyers in the United States –More than 70% have their own private practice –10%
TOPIC I: CONFLICTS BETWEEN CURRENT CLIENTS R. 1.7, 1.8 P.R Prof. Janicke.
TOPIC A: REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION P.R Prof. Janicke.
By Paramita Khisa.  VCAT and court use a range of methods to resolve criminal and civil disputes.  Criminal cases are solved by the judge in courts.
Title of Presentation Technology and the Attorney-Client Relationship: Risks and Opportunities Jay Glunt, Ogletree DeakinsJohn Unice, Covestro LLC Jennifer.
The Paralegal Professional ESSENTIALS, 2/e By Cheeseman and Goldman PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ PA 101: Unit.
TOPIC H: CLIENT-LAWYER CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
Chapter 4 – Settling Disputes.  Effective community advocates work to solve problems in the community by proposing and lobbying for better laws and public.
TOPIC Q: (1) RELATIONSHIP WITH A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT (2) TERMINATING EXISTING CLIENT RELATIONSHIPS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
Privilege, Privacy, Waiver & Ethical Considerations.
TOPIC H: CLIENT-LAWYER CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
Understanding Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule 20:1.14.
Risk Management Seminar Bar Association of Erie County April 15, 2016.
Charles University – Law Faculty October 2012 © Peter Kolker 2012 Class III
Beginning and Ending the Lawyer-Client Relationship.
Competence, Diligence, and Unauthorized Practice.
Midterm Review 1.  Lawyers have ethical obligations that are required by the organizations to which they belong.  Lawyers are “members of the bar”,
1 Ethical Lawyering Fall, 2006 Class 4. 2 MODELS OF THE RELATIONSHIP Traditional Model Participatory Model Hired Gun Model.
Recognizing the Client
CHAPTER 6: PART 2 Advertisements and Professional Responsibility
CIPA Visit to ASPA 5 October 2016
What are the rules that apply? What are duties of the lawyer?
TOPIC J: DUTIES TO FORMER CLIENTS
Limited Scope Representation
Ethics for Lawyers – and how that impacts your child’s case
Legal Ethics of Information Governance Presented by Sean Monahan
BIAS Fundamentals of Law Practice
Presentation transcript:

TOPIC G: CLIENTS’ RIGHTS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke

MAIN RIGHTS CORROLARY OF LAWYER’S DUTIES THE #1 TOPIC ON MPRE 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS2

THE EASY ONES (TO UNDERSTAND) COMPETENCE TO DEAL WITH THE PARTICULAR MATTER AT HAND R. 1.1 THE SKILL CAN BE EITHER EXISTING OR TO-BE-ACQUIRED SHORTLY C4 [DILEMMA: DEDUCING WHAT SKILLS YOU WILL NEED] 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS3

CAN YOU ENGAGE AN OUTSIDE-THE-FIRM HELPER-LAWYER? YES. R. 1.1 C6 BUT CLIENT’S “INFORMED CONSENT” IS NEEDED C6 –DEFINITION: LAWYER MUST EXPLAIN THE RISKS AND ALTERNATIVES R. 1.0(e) 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS4

THIS PARTICULAR INFORMED CONSENT MUST DEAL WITH: ALLOCATION OF AUTHORITY R. 1.1 C7 FEE-SHARING R. 1.5(e) ETC. 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS5

DILIGENCE R. 1.3 THE #1 OR #2 CAUSE OF GRIEVANCES, BAR SANCTIONS, and MALPRACTICE CLAIMS THESE ARE EASY QUESTIONS TO DEAL WITH ON MPRE –NOT SO EASY IN PRACTICE – PROCRASTINATION RULES 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS6

INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO THE RELATIONSHIP ESP. WHERE 3 RD PARTY IS TO PAY THE FEES –CLIENT MUST APPROVE R. 1.8(f) 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS7

FREEDOM FROM CONFLICTS WITH OTHER CLIENTS’ INTERESTS TOPICS I and J WITH THE LAWYER’S OWN FINANCIAL OR PERSONAL INTERESTS TOPIC H PURPOSE: TO PRESERVE INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS8

OTHER RIGHTS TO KNOW THE ENGAGEMENT TERMS R. 1.5(b) –FEES, EXPENSES, LIMITATIONS, ETC. 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS9

RIGHT TO COMMUNICATION R. 1.4 MUST KEEP CLIENT REASONABLY AND PROMPTLY INFORMED A BIG PROBLEM IN PRACTICE WE ALWAYS “MEAN TO” COMMUNICATE, BUT WE PUT IT OFF TO ATTEND TO OTHER THINGS 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS10

AN EASY SOLUTION FOR COMMUNICATION DUTY FRANK’S RULE: NOTIFY CLIENT OF ALL HAPPENINGS, SAME DAY; ATTACH PERTINENT PAPERS EVEN IF YOU HAVE NOTHING YET TO RECOMMEND 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS11

MALPRACTICE CLAIMS: NO QUIET SETTLEMENTS SETTLING CLIENT CLAIM AGAINST LAWYER REQUIRES ELABORATE ADVICE AND CONSENT R. 1.8(h)(2) –CANNOT BE DONE QUIETLY C 15 –EVEN POTENTIAL CLAIMS FALL UNDER THIS RULE R. 1.8(h)(2) 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS12

WHAT YOU CAN DO MAKE AMENDS (W/O SETTLING) –WORKS BEST IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROMPT CONFESSION OF FAULT –SURPRISE TRIGGERS MANY MALPRACTICE CLAIMS 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS13

DECISIONS DURING THE RELATIONSHIP HOW TO HANDLE THE CASE

CLIENT HAS THE FINAL SAY ON CERTAIN DECISIONS R. 1.2 (BUT CAN AUTHORIZE THE LAWYER TO DECIDE) SETTLEMENT TERMS WHAT PLEA IN A CRIMINAL CASE WHETHER TO TESTIFY IN A CRIMINAL CASE LAWYER ROLE IS USUALLY AS CONSULTANT 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS15

OTHER DECISIONS MAINLY TACTICS R. 1.2 C 2, 3 LAWYER DECIDES, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH CLIENT BUT → 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS16

CLIENT HAS THE POWER TO TERMINATE THE RELATIONSHIP AT ANY TIME FOR ANY REASON OR NO REASON R C4 FEES MAY BE DUE – DON’T TRY TO COLLECT THEM 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS17

LAWYER CAN WITHDRAW SOMETIMES R BY PROVISION IN THE ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT or 2.FOR CLIENT FRAUD OR ILLEGALITY R. 1.16(b)(3) or 3.“UNREASONABLY DIFFICULT” CLIENT R. 1.16(b)(6) or 4.ANY REASON, IF NO HARM TO CLIENT R. 1.16(b)(1) 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS18

LAWYER MUST WITHDRAW IF LAWYER NO LONGER HAS PHYSICAL OR MENTAL CAPABILITY TO CONTINUE WITHOUT IMPAIRING THE REPRESENTATION R. 1.16(a) 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS19

CAVEAT: WITHDRAWAL FROM A COURT CASE DEPENDS ON LOCAL LAW R. 1.16(c) USUALLY NEED THE JUDGE’S PERMISSION –IN ADDITION TO A RULE 1.16 GROUND 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS20

RIGHT TO CONFIDENTIALITY R. 1.6 ADDRESSED IN TOPIC B RULES APPLY DURING AND AFTER 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS21

RIGHT TO LAWYER’S FREEDOM FROM CONFLICTS –TOPIC H: LAWYER’S OWN INTEREST CONFLICT –TOPIC I: CONFLICT WITH OTHER CURRENT CLIENT’S INTEREST –TOPIC J: CONFLICT WITH FORMER CLIENT’S INTEREST 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS22

SOME RIGHTS EVEN FOR PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS R TOPIC Q PRE-SYNOPSIS HERE: –NO USING OR REVEALING INFO, EXCEPT: WHEN INFO BECOMES GENERALLY KNOWN –NO TAKING ON ADVERSE FUTURE CLIENT, IN A RELATED MATTER, WHERE THE INFO COULD BE HARMFUL TO THE PROSPECTIVE PERSON 2016TOPIC H -- CLIENTS' RIGHTS23