DRI THE DEVELOPMENT OF DITCHING and WATER IMPACT DESIGN LIMITS PRESENTED AT INT’L CABIN SAFETY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 17, 2004 LISBON, PORTUGAL DYNAMIC RESPONSE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUROCAE WG 73: UAS integration Elements for the European Commission UAS panel Presentation at Workshop 2 UAS insertion into airspace Gérard Mardiné (SAFRAN-Sagem)
Advertisements

Recovery Boiler Modeling
August 2007 LS-DYNA Cargo Net Simulation 1 of 10 Industry standard cargo nets. The nets are made from 1.75” wide nylon or polyester webbing with nominal.
R.G.W. Cherry & Associates Limited International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Slide 1 – Lisbon November 2004 International Aircraft.
The Evolution Of Energy Absorption Systems For Crashworthy Helicopter Seats S. P. Desjardins Safe, Inc The Fourth Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Conference.
Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research – Lisbon, Portugal In-Flight Fuel Tank Flammability Testing The 4th Triennial Int’l Aircraft Fire and.
VERRES VLTA Emergency Requirement Research Evaluation Study Crew Co-operation in VLTA The Fourth Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety.
Modeling of Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
DRI THE DEVELOPMENT OF DITCHING and WATER IMPACT DESIGN LIMITS PRESENTED AT INT’L CABIN SAFETY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 15-17, 2004 LISBON, PORTUGAL DYNAMIC.
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #10 TOPICS TO BE STUDIED Take-off and Landing Performance There is considerable variations due to –pilot technique –ground conditions.
William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.
DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS
Aircraft Dynamic Response
An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling
Computing Trust in Social Networks
Parametric Design Design phase info flow Parametric design of a bolt Parametric design of belt and pulley Systematic parametric design Summary.
Auditing A Risk-Based Approach To Conducting A Quality Audit
Cost Implications of Architectural Design Variables Ahmed S. Al Zahrani December 2005 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Department of Construction.
Modeling of Single Bay Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
What are MRLs ? Alfred W. Clark Dawnbreaker, Inc.
Challenges in developing a Safety Case WG5. How to Develop a Safety Case SC can be a tool for providing information to stakeholders other than regulators.
D’Appolonia S.p.A. all rights reserved Advanced technologies for bomb- proof cargo containers and blast containment units for the retrofitting of passenger.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
«Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process» DAGKINIS IOANNIS, Dr. NIKITAKOS NIKITAS University of.
Fire and Cabin Safety Research … a Perspective Maher Khouzam Chief, Regulatory Standards Aircraft Certification Transport Canada The Fourth Triennial International.
Maintenance Malfunction Information Report (MMIR) & Event Reporting Ed DiCampli Helicopter Association International.
Development of Verification and Validation Procedures for Computer Simulation use in Roadside Safety Applications NCHRP FUTURE WORK FOR TASK 8 Worcester.
A. Byar, J. Awerbuch, A. Lau and T. Tan Drexel University
1 Report of the Controller and Auditor-General Civil Aviation Authority: Certification and Surveillance Functions CAA Progress Report To Select Committee.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability April 2-3, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation C.E. Polymeropoulos Robert Ochs Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.
Recommended Actions for Statements of Interest Prioritized by School Districts Board of Directors Meeting November 28, 2007 Treasurer Tim Cahill, Chair.
IMPACT Phase II – 9/13/00 Activity Report Slide 1/20 University of Louisville IMPACT Architecture Team Glen Prater, Jr., Associate Professor Ellen G. Brehob,
Structural Design Considerations and Airspeeds
June 2009 | U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010 Overview and Oversize/Overweight.
PRIVÉ ET CONFIDENTIEL © Bombardier Inc. ou ses filiales. Tous droits réservés. SMART TESTING BOMBARDIER THOUGHTS FAA Bombardier Workshop Montreal
Presented to: Transport Airplane Metallic and Composite Structures Working Group and Airworthiness Authorities By: Walt Sippel and Mike Gruber Date: Sept.
THE OPTIMUM SPEED IN HIGH SPEED RAILWAYS WARSAW, NOVEMBER 2011 Eduardo Romo Julián Sastre Workshop on High Speed FUNDACIÓN CAMINOS DE HIERRO.
Outras Cargas Cargas em Aviões ITA – Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica.
The Sixth NASA Langley Formal Methods Workshop (LFM 2008) 1/15.
International Civil Aviation Organization RSOOs and the new ICAO Strategies and Programmes Simon Clegg General Manager Government & Strategy Civil Aviation.
CAP 1145 The Norwegian Perspective. CAP 1145 My perception of The Norwegian Perspective + Positive to have safety review of Offshore helicopter operations!
VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE Crash Simulation of a Vertical Drop Test of a B737 Fuselage Section with Overhead Bins Karen E. Jackson and Edwin L. Fasanella.
EPT 221 PARAMETRIC DESIGN. Objectives of Lecture Describe the parametric design phase. Describe and apply the steps involve in the parametric design phase.
Managing Rotorcraft Safety During Frequently Performed Unique Missions September 28, 2005 AHS International Helicopter Safety Symposium 2005 Philip G.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. DEFINITION FINANCIAL STATEMENT :- “AN ORGANISED COLLECTION OF DATA ACCORDING TO LOGICAL AND CONSISTENT ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES”
ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
FAA CRASHWORTHINESS RESEARCH PROGRAM
Chapter 27 The Engineering Design Process. Learning Objectives Describe the various factors that are changing the design process Discuss the steps in.
00/2015 Public Information Centre Addendum to the Environmental Study Report: Millbrook Dam Tuesday, October 20, 2015.
Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B
Inland Waterways Navigation Conference PIs: Robert Ebeling and
Crashworthy Design of Military Rotorcraft Presented by:
Direction Générale Aviation Civile Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference - October 22-25, Atlantic City DGAC France Grégory Caudy, SFACT, DGAC.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Full-Scale Testing of Leather.
University of Illinois Contribution Amr S. Elnashai Sung Jig Kim Curtis Holub Narutoshi Nakata Oh Sung Kwon Seismic Simulation and Design of Bridge Columns.
1 Use or disclosure of this information is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. Flight Symbology to Aid in Approach and Landing.
©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Overall Audit Plan and Audit Program Chapter 13.
RELIABILITY-BASED CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF WATER STORAGE SYSTEM
Panel Discussion: Discussion on Trends in Multi-Physics Simulation
Developing the Overall Audit Plan and Audit Program
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Turbine Over-speed Aerodynamics
Modern Auditing: Assurance Services and the Integrity of Financial Reporting, 8th Edition William C. Boynton California Polytechnic State University at.
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
Presentation transcript:

DRI THE DEVELOPMENT OF DITCHING and WATER IMPACT DESIGN LIMITS PRESENTED AT INT’L CABIN SAFETY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 17, 2004 LISBON, PORTUGAL DYNAMIC RESPONSE INC. (DRI) FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA-TC)

DRI SBIR WATER IMPACT PROGRAM PHASE I Feasibility of Hybrid and FEM Methodology PHASE II Perform Full Scale Tests, Model and Correlate (KRASH and MSC/DYTRAN) KRASH Model For Existing Scale Model Ditching test Evaluate FAR27/29 Water/impact/Ditching Regulations & Compliance Develop Preliminary Water impact Design Limits With KRASH PHASE III Develop Military and Civil Helicopter KRASH Models Evaluate Correlation Techniques/Procedures Develop Design Criteria & Design Envelopes (DLE) & Procedures- Using KRASH --- Ditching and Water Impact --- Civil helicopters --- Military helicopters Recommend Ditching and Water Impact Design Criteria

DRI IMPACT ENVELOPES

DRI SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS 1.Can modeling simulate /represent the significant aspects of full-scale impact and scale model ditching tests? 2.Can analytical modeling be an effective tool in the development of crash design criteria?

DRI ASPECTS OF WATER IMPACT AND DITCHING Kinematics BehaviorKinematics Behavior Overall responseOverall response Discrete location responseDiscrete location response FailuresFailures Design parametersDesign parameters Seat-occupant performance/toleranceSeat-occupant performance/tolerance Trends & relationshipsTrends & relationships

DRI FULL SCALE WATER IMPACT TESTS Tests of UH-1H Test S1 26 fps vertical Test S2 28 fps vertical 39 fps longitudinal

DRI OVERALL RESPONSES & KINEMATIC BEHAVIOR

DRI FLOOR ACCELERATION

DRI PRESSURE RESPONSE

DRI FLOOR PULSE

DRI FLOOR VERTCAL PULSES – GROUND, WATER, REGULATIONS

DRI SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS 1.Can modeling simulate /represent the significant aspects of full-scale impact and scale model ditching tests? 2.Can analytical modeling be an effective tool in the development of crash design criteria?

DRI DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS- SEAT LOAD LIMIT 26 FPS VERTICAL WATER IMPACT NO SEAT LOAD LIMIT 14.5G SEAT LOAD LIMIT

DRI TRENDS – SEA STATE VS. CALM SEA

DRI S2/S1 Pressure Trend Comparison; Analysis Vs. Test Resultant Velocity S1 Test = 26 FPS S2 Test = 48 FPS S2/S1 Velocity Ratio 1.85 S2/S1 KE Ratio

DRI TRENDS Correlation Sea State Levels S2/S1 Test Levels -Pressure -Acceleration -Transfer Function (Accel. to Pressure) -Filter Levels Design Envelopes Panel Failure Floor Acceleration Mass Item Response Occupant-Seat Response VS. -Panel Strength -Pitch Attitude -Seat Load Limit -Velocity Profile -Sea State

DRI DITCHING COMPLIANCE

DRI DITCHING COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES Scale Model Testing - rigid, deficient, misleading, costly Similarity to Existing Designs - questionable basis Pressure Calculations - static flotation analysis Vertical Load Factor Calculations - stall speed, no sink velocity Procedures - under-estimate pressure & acceleration

DRI What Exists – Relative to Ditching Assessment Capability Inadequate evaluation and compliance procedures KRASH modeling features that address significant issues, i.e. trends, sea state, nose-over, failures Analysis predictable within a level of acceptance Analysis simulation time efficient

DRI CURRENT DLE CONSIDERATIONS; TAKE INTO ACCOUNT

DRI CURRENT WATER IMPACT DLE CONCEPT

DRI DLE-DITCHING APPLICATION

DRI KRASH/SOMR-HIC RESULTS

DRI APPLICABILITY TO FAR 25; TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRCRAFT FAR 25, FAR 27 and FAR 29 HAVE MANY SIMILARITIES: Ditching Envelope Seat Dynamic Test Requirements Mass Item Retention Acceptance Criteria Compliance Procedures

DRI SUMMARY Balanced Test, Analysis, Design SBIR - F/S WI and Scaled Ditching Tests - Civil and Military Rotorcraft Models/Correlation - FAR 27/29 and Military Design Specifications/Compliance Development of Ditching Criteria and Design Limit Envelopes Based On; - Occupant –Seat-Restraint System Integrity - Structural and Mass Retention Integrity - In Excess of 300 Simulations Performed Applicability of DLE to Evaluate Design Strength, Operational Conditions, Acceptance Criteria, New Designs, FAR 25, 27, 29 End Product Goal- Recommended Ditching and WI Design Criteria, DLE and Procedures

DRI