Evaluation of Teaching Recommendations of the Teaching Effectiveness Committee University Senate Meeting May 1, 2007.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Building the Foundation of an Information Literacy Program

Advertisements

Culture of Collaboration Cultivating a Campus Environment for Assessment.

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.

Faculty Senate Report March 12, 2008 Student Evaluation Committee Teaching Academy.

Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.

Graduate Student Orientation Kara Oswood Graduate Academic Affairs September 2014.

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,

Supporting Faculty Use of IDEA David Starrett Dean, School of University Studies and Academic Information Services and Director, Center for Scholarship.

Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring

Academic Program Review Committee Report AU Senate January 17, 2006.

Institutional Course Evaluation Solution Faculty Senate Executive Committee September 12, 2012 Carol VanZile-Tamsen, Ph.D.; Associate Director, Office.

Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:

New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.

Teaching Effectiveness Committee & CoursEval Implementation Committee Status Update to University Senate October 4, 2011 October 4, 20111TEC/CIC University.

Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.

Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.

Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.

Review of SUNY Oneonta Course Evaluation Form Report and Recommendations from The Committee on Instruction: Part II October 4, 2010.

EXCELLENCE AT CAROLINA SACS REAFFIRMATION PROCESS APRIL 2008 Making Critical Connections Quality Enhancement Plan Annual Report #2 Faculty Council April.

1 Faculty Activity and Assessment Reporting Report to FAAR Advisory Group November 29, 2007.

Survey of Current Teaching Evaluation Forms Teaching Effectiveness Committee.

November 9,  Proving that students are learning  Reaction to challenges in public education  Rising potential, stagnant performance  Regional.

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Company LOGO Teaching Effectiveness Committee Faculty Senate Presentation June 16, 2015 Donald Mulvaney, TEC Chair.

Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.

FACULTY SENATE Summer Research Fellowship Recipients for Summer 2006  Ginette Aley, Assistant Prof - History  Adrian Gentle, Assistant Prof.

Core Curriculum Oversight Committee Committee Update University Senate Linda S. Glaze Associate Provost for Undergraduate Studies.

NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University

Welcome to UCR Kara Oswood Graduate Academic Affairs Graduate Division.

Recommendations on Professional Improvement Leave.

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Recommendations on Teaching Evaluation Forms.

End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,

San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.

SETE ABOR POLICY ON STUDENT EVALUATIONS 6-221B. General Policy It is the policy of the Arizona Board of Regents that faculty shall be evaluated on their.

Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.

Office of Academic Programs Orientation for Academic Program Reviews.

Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.

Susan Blum, Ph.D. Manager, Ethics Office, University of Saskatchewan RESEARCH ETHICS EDUCATION.

POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,

Connecting Course Goals, Assignments, and Assessment Faculty Development for Student Success at Prince George’s Community College William Peirce

 Office of Student Affairs › All about students › Admission, tracking progression, and graduation › Facilitate student success › Administer the curricular.

PRESENTATION TO ASSOCIATION OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND PLANNING OFFICERS BUFFALO, NEW YORK JUNE 11, 2009 How Campuses are Closing the GE Assessment.

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Status Report. Teaching Effectiveness Committee Members in Gisela Buschle-Diller (Polymer & Fiber.

Concerns, Data, Next Steps.  New Administration Software from Scantron  New Academic Senate Policy  New Items/Survey Form (ACE, Iowa Item Pool)  New.

Teaching Council Recommendations to the Faculty Senate DRAFT 2/9/09 & 3rd DRAFT Feb 13, 2009 for use by the FS Exec Committee, March 4, 2009.

Faculty Handbook Review Committee Proposed revision to and

SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.

Core Curriculum and General Education Committee January 18, 2011 Senate Report Pam Ulrich and Michelle Sidler Co-Chairs.

IDEA Ad Hoc Committee Report Submitted by: Andreas Veh, Diane Erickson, Nelta Edwards, Kerri Morris UAA Faculty Senate, Dec. 7, 2007.

Assessing Information Literacy with SAILS Juliet Rumble Reference & Instruction Librarian Auburn University.

Patty Francis Associate Provost Institutional Assessment & Effectiveness.

Administrator Evaluation Guidelines and Survey. Committee Charter The committee shall oversee and/or conduct a periodic evaluation of University administrators.

Presentation to the Faculty Senate on General Education Beth Rosenberg, Dir. of Gen. Ed. – Jeff Jablonski, Asst. Dir.

Administrator Evaluation A quick update. Committee Charter The committee shall oversee and/or conduct a periodic evaluation of University administrators.

University of Southern Mississippi Hattiesburg, MS NCAT Course Redesign Introduction to Psychology David J Echevarria

P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.

Deborah Lee James Nail Gail Peyton Mississippi State University Libraries Supporting Graduate Education: A Library – Wide Approach.

Academic integrity at UB: Report & recommendations

Course Evaluation System (CES)

Motivation to Examine Grading at Rice

of Teaching: Challenges

Course Evaluation Committee

Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations

Faculty Workshop on Promotion and Tenure

Administrative Review Committee

Institutional Course Evaluation Solution

Administrative Review Committee

Extension Title Series

Faculty Governance at NU

Planning and Budget Policies Committee

COURSE EVALUATION Spring 2019 Pilot August 27, 2019.

Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Teaching Recommendations of the Teaching Effectiveness Committee University Senate Meeting May 1, 2007

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Members in Gisela Buschle-Diller (Polymer & Fiber Eng., Chair) John Heilman (Provost) Howard Clayton (Management) Al Fromhold (Physics) Sareen Gropper (Human Sciences) Raymond Kessler (Horticulture) Marcus Kieltyka (Library) David LaBand (Forestry) Jill Salisbury-Glennon (Educational FLT) Saralyn Smith-Carr (Vet. Medicine) Carole Johnson (Communication Disorders) Kem Krueger (Pharmacy) Scott Kramer (Building Science) Hakan Balci (graduate student) Marianne Clancy (undergraduate student) James Groccia (Biggio Center) New members in Peter Livant (Chemistry) Juliet Rumble (Library) David Weaver (Agronomy & Soils) William Boulton (Management) Kristen Helms (Pharmacy) Mert Serkan (graduate student) Virginia Planz (undergrad. student) New members in Linda Ruth (Building Science) Peggy Shippen (Rehab. Spec. Ed.) Jan Kavookjian (Pharmacy) Selda Tarkin (grad. student) Amanda Cummings (undergrad. student)

TE Committee charge 1. Design an instrument for the end-of-semester evaluation of teaching with proven validity and reliability 2. Develop standardized administration procedures to insure that all departments/schools/colleges follow these procedures to increase reliability and validity of comparisons 3. Develop suggested guidelines and procedures to assist with the interpretation and formative & summative use of evaluation results by individual faculty members, department chairs, deans and T&P committees

Approach  General recommended guidelines  Selection of suitable forms  Implementation guidelines

Recommended guidelines  Standard procedures for administering teaching evaluations will be applied campus wide  Student evaluations of teaching will be conducted for every class and section assigned  Teaching evaluations will not be administered by the instructor of the course  Student identities must remain anonymous  Results of the evaluations will not be provided to instructors until after grades are submitted

Instructional Assessment System of the University of Washington Main features:  13 standardized forms for faculty to select the form that fits their instructional needs  Accommodation of additional questions, created by the instructor or department to assess unique course components or support program accreditation  Individual course reports  Summary reports for departments, divisions, or instructors

Specifics of UW TE forms  Items 1-4: general course assessment (all forms)  Items 5-15: specific to form selected  Items 16-22: perception of course requirements  Items 23-30: student perception of intellectual challenge, workload and expected grade (all forms)  Back of form: additional scannable items (optional)

Recommendations of the TE Committee  Auburn University will adopt the teaching evaluation forms and processing supplied by the University of Washington  The Provost’s Office will provide funding of TE forms, processing, and reports  The University Senate will review TE policies and procedures every 3 years  Implementation will begin as soon as possible (Fall 2007?)

Supplementary procedural guidelines  Biggio Center to develop a campus handbook for TE use by colleges/schools in establishing and implementing procedures  Annual workshops on teaching evaluation for administrators and faculty organized by the Biggio Center  Biggio Center to provide an annual report on workshops and implementation issues to the Senate, including feedback from administrators and instructors