FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
FTKSim Status: Ghost Busting part. II The Hit Warrior F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, P. Gianetti G. Punzi, G. Volpi FTK Meeting 10/19/2006.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
First results on 6M training sample and Bs->mumu analisys F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, P. Giannetti, G. Punzi, G. Volpi.
MICE TPG RECONSTRUCTION Tracking efficiency Olena Voloshyn Geneva University.
Track quality - impact on hardware of different strategies Paola FTK meeting Performances on WH and Bs   2.Now we use all the layers.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Athena Issues and B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford continuing the work of Meena Narain.
SCT Offline Monitor Measuring Module Hit Efficiencies Helen Hayward University of Liverpool.
1 First look at new MC files First look at reconstruction output from the newly- generated “mock-data” MC files. –These contain the following improvements:
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Current plans FTK meeting 2/23/06 F. Crescioli, P.Giannetti, M. Dell’Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, + Cheng-Ju Lin.
Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
Status of FTK simulation June 16,2005 G. Punzi, Pisa.
Simulation Tasks  Understanding Tracking  Understanding Hardware 1.Two types of tasks: a.Implementing known functions in ATLAS framework b.Understanding.
José E. García b -tagging performance with xKalman and iPatRec With the help of: S. Correard, I. Gavrilenko, S. González, A. Poppleton, E. Ros, A. Rozanov,
Framework for track reconstruction and it’s implementation for the CMS tracker A.Khanov,T.Todorov,P.Vanlaer.
10/2/2015C.Kourkoumelis,UoA1 WP3 Educational and Outreach Portal C. Kourkoumelis, UoA.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
Alexander Richards, UCL 1 Atlfast and RTT (plus DCube) Christmas Meeting 18/12/2007.
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
Vertex finding and B-Tagging for the ATLAS Inner Detector A.H. Wildauer Universität Innsbruck CERN ATLAS Computing Group on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
G. Volpi - INFN Frascati ANIMMA Search for rare SM or predicted BSM processes push the colliders intensity to new frontiers Rare processes are overwhelmed.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
Tracking Software Status Tracking Software Status Norman A. Graf for the tracking group ( prime architect: David Adams ) Software and Data Analysis Workshop.
ATLAS Trigger Development
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
1 Detector Performance and Physics talks at Bern (very selective!) Pete Watkins.
G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
The “Comparator” Atlfast vs. Full Reco Automated Comparison Chris Collins-Tooth 19 th February 2006.
“MultiRing Almagest with GPU” Gianluca Lamanna (CERN) Mainz Collaboration meeting TDAQ WG.
+ GE2/1 Case Considerations Alexei Safonov. + CMS Muon Upgrades CMS Technical Proposal in its part related to muon systems lists following: MEX/1 electronics.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
FTK high level simulation & the physics case The FTK simulation problem G. Volpi Laboratori Nazionali Frascati, CERN Associate FP07 MC Fellow.
Muon Reconstruction and Vertex Constraint Giovanni Abbiendi Bologna CMS meeting, 20 November 2007.
FNAL Software School Day 4 Matt Herndon, University of Wisconsin – Madison.
AOD Analysis of the DC2 Coannihilation Model Sample Davide Costanzo Nov 5 th 2004 V. 3.0.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
More technical description:
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi
Monica Dunford April 24th, 2007
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
Presentation transcript:

FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti

FTKSim performance control chain Our method to monitor the FTK performances use truth and offline tracks. This method eliminate problems due to the ghost. Recipes: iPatRec customized version FTKSimWrapper FTKSim ATHENA: Generation, Simulation, Digitization iPatRec (custom) FTKSimWrapper Training data format: Hits Truth tracks Offline tracks FTK data format Hits FTKSim ftksim_comp FTK tracks ROOT Histograms

Bs->mumu Efficiency is greater than 80% in this sample Efficiency for pions and kaons is > 75% In curvature there are effects due to the different particle types in different curvature ranges.

Bs->mumu (2) No particular problem in FTK, but also in iPatRec, to reconstruct trakcs with large impact parameter.

WH->munuuu We make same standard checks over this sample to validate FTKSim. FTK efficiency is lesser than Bs->mumu sample. Especially for pion and kaon. Plot of efficency as function of curvature is due to the various particle composition at differtents Pt

WH->munuuu (2) Impact parameter spectrum seems well reconstructed Not particular effects on efficiency as function of impact parameter of tracks

WH->munubb Same effect on global efficiency and in particular on pions and kaons efficiency.

WH->munubb (2) For the impact parameter we have a large inneficiency for large impact parameters, but also offline seems to have such problem.

Checks: WH->munuuu WH->munubb In a previous meeting was reported results of FTK over these control samples. The distrubutions appear quite similar.

Checks: WH->munuuu WH->munubb (2) Using only tracks that have matched with the truth the two distribution appear very differents.

Partial conclusions Bs->mumu and WH samples probably have some differences:  Pile-up?  Physics ineraction in ID?  Misalignments? FTK, with an offline match with truth, have good performances. Need to implement a method to remove ghosts without using other informations. Some tools to validate the FTKSim performances will be uploaded in my FNAL web pages.

Suggestions for the FTKsim user 1.Before starting to use a set of new files with FTKsim, please look at files using the offline tools (an offline track reconstruction algorithm like ipatrec). 1.Guido’s tools to compare FTKsim performances with Ipatrec performances. Please use them to check track quality. 1.When track quality is guarantee everything else is easier Possible residual motivation of problems: Ghosts tracks produced by FTKsim require now a particular use of simulated tracks: Guido tools are a good example of this use

Next: Ghost handling Plan Duplicated roads/tracks due to: 1.Deletion of 5/6 by RW when a 6/6 is available produces small inefficiencies if the 5/6 was the real track  reject all 5/6 and do 7 fits in parallel (6/6 and all 5/6 combination) to choose the best  2 1.Deletion of 5/6 by RW not possible if the empty strips belong to different sectors 1.Training tracks going through the overlap region NOW produce many Ghost patterns not identified by the RW because of type 2. Reduce the ghosts of type 2 due to overlap regions, generating a single pattern

Changes to FTKsim 1.Generate again the pattern bank deleting ghosts due to overlap regions (Francesco). 1.Modify the Track fitter to perform 7 fits when a 6/6 hit combination is found (Guido).

MUON Trigger: WHAT WE HAVE UNDERSTOOD FROM ATLAS TALK 1.Single 6 GeV  trigger in the ATLAS trigger plan for Instant Lum = nd  searched using jet ROIs or  ROIs below 6 GeV 1.We suggest to look for 2 nd  using the list of FTK tracks above 3 GeV, ordered for decreasing Pt. 2.Muons are measured by the detector down to 3 GeV. 3.Muons are triggered in the barrel with a minimum threshold of 5 GeV

Muon Selection

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2- Mu-comb LEVEL 2-  fast ~2ms 68% efficient for 270 Hz

TO do list for the Bs->  1.Scan the track list to find matches with the external . How many times they are the 2 most energetic tracks above 3 GeV? 1.How much the  /k background is reduced by this match FTK-track-MU? THIS WORK IS STOPPED TO IMPLEMENT A GOOD GHOST HANDLING