Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Advertisements

Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Value Engineering How DOT’s uses this valuable tool in project development What is it When is it used How do we use it.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
BI-NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP STUDY Canada-U.S.-Ontario-Michigan Partnership Border Study.
NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Engineering Public Scoping Meeting Tuesday, November 15, 2011,
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
1 | US DOE Geothermal Programeere.energy.gov Public Service of Colorado Ponnequin Wind Farm Geothermal Technologies Office Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap.
Friends of the Fox River November 9, 2014 Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
Demonstration Using the GIS Inventory for Environmental Professionals John Jediny Deputy Associate Director for NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental.
Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor
Transportation Planning CE 573 Course Introduction and Four-Step Travel Demand Moding (FSTDM)
Lec 17, Supply Analysis Part 1: Role of supply analysis (ch7.1) and Analysis of system performance (ch7.2) The role of performance analysis in transportation.
An Introduction to Marketing Research
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
© 2003 TranSystems Corporation Advisory Committee Meeting January 19, 2010.
Analysing News Articles. Questions for Analyzing Social Issues 1. What are the social issues associated with a particular IT development? 2. How did.
BY DANNY BEER INTRO INTO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Anacostia Streetcar Phase 2 Environmental Assessment & Section 106 Evaluation: Community Workshop January 12, 2011.
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
What is a Business Analyst? A Business Analyst is someone who works as a liaison among stakeholders in order to elicit, analyze, communicate and validate.
Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs:
May 5, 2007 AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
PROJECT WORK System Development Cycle. OVERVIEW Project work for the HSC course follows five stages of the traditional system development cycle. The SDC.
Local Agency Programs An Overview Gonzalo Puente, PE Shaun Bates, PE Development Engineer Project Manager.
Fern Valley Interchange Project Development Team Meeting February 3, :00 – 11:00 p.m.
USA Parkway Project Welcome Public Information Meeting to the
Public Involvement. Why? Who Cares? –What we do matters to the public –Effective PI enables proactive input and enhances the decision- making process.
Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
State Route 109 (Portland Bypass) Robertson & Sumner County, TN NEPA Public Hearing November 12, 2015.
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
In the ideal world… Transportation planning addresses NEPA principles. Collaboration/involvement starts in transportation planning. Planning leads to early.
CEQ’s Proposed NEPA Guidance Listening Session _________________________ Welcome Please Sign In Horst Greczmiel Council on Environmental Quality April.
The Role of NEPA Leasing and Mineral Rights Sales Subject to Environmental Use and Planning Provisions –The National Environmetal Policy Act of 1969 requires.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.
Project Briefing for BROOKS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY and SANTA ROSA SOUND ALTERNATE CROSSING STUDY April 2015 SPEAKER: BOB.
Moving Ahead The American Public Speaks on Roadways and Transportation in Communities Federal Highway Administration Industry Briefing March 20, 2001.
Highlights of the “Procedural Guidance” Results of transportation planning process “inform” the NEPA process. Format of planning products for inclusion.
PURPOSE & NEED Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study F ROM M ANDY L ANE TO T HOMAS D RIVE I NTERSECTION B AY C.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
Iron Range Tourism Bureau April 25, 2013 Hwy 53 Update.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
Alternative Alignments Public Meeting
I-66 OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY Shrevecrest HOA JUNE 21, Susan Shaw, P. E
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
Willow Meadows Civic Club Meeting September 13, 2011
PROJECT LOCATION Project begins at Garden Lane (East of I-4)
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
The Design Process.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Purpose & Need Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Presentation transcript:

Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval

Stages of Project Development at DOTD  Stage 0: Feasibility  Stage 1: Environmental  Stage 2: Funding  Stage 3: Design  Stage 4: Letting  Stage 5: Construction  Stage 6: Operations

Basic NEPA Process (Stage 1)  Identify the Problem and Needs  Develop Alternatives that solve the problem and meet the needs  Evaluate the effects of the alternatives on the natural and human environments with input from agencies and communities  Make a decision  Document the process

Traffic in Stage 1 How Traffic Data is used in NEPA Process

Four Basic Uses for Traffic Data in Stage 1 Environmental  1. Demonstrate the Need for the Project  2. Component for Technical Studies  3. Alternatives Analyses  4. Evaluation of Effects

Demonstrate the Need for the Project  Common Examples of Traffic related Needs  Congestion  Network Connectivity/System Linkage

Traffic Data as Component of Studies  Traffic data, existing and future projected, needed for other technical studies  Noise Studies  Air Studies  Safety Studies  Line and Grade  Toll Studies, sometimes done during NEPA

Alternatives Analyses  Demonstrate that Alternative Meets the Need  Traffic Studies are often used to show that a particular alternative meets the need for the project  Alternatives that do not meet or satisfy the need are not considered reasonable. They are eliminated from further review.

Evaluation of Effects  Traffic Studies and data are often useful to show the impacts associated with the project alternatives.  What are the impacts to traffic or travel patterns?  Are detours needed? If so, where?  What can be done to mitigate traffic impacts?

Traffic Simulations Can Tell the Story (Visual Tool)  Traffic Simulations are great tool for assisting the public in understanding the traffic issues and problems  Simulations can show existing problems  Simulations can show potential solutions -- how the project will function after it is built  Shown at public meetings and hearings or Posted on the Web