Requirements for Single-Dish Holography Parameter Specification Goal Measurement error <10  m rms <5  m rms Transverse resolution <0.1 m <0.1 m Measurement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BigAnt * Engineering and Experimental Results * Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground Stations Dmitry Tatarnikov 1, Gerald L Mader 2, Andria.
Advertisements

Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Arecibo Observatory, 2009 Jan. 12.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Calibration Ron Maddalena NRAO – Green Bank November 2012.
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
HIGH-RESOLUTION MILLIMETRE-WAVE HOLOGRAPHY ON THE JAMES CLERK MAXWELL TELESCOPE Richard Hills (1), Youri Dabrowski (1), Hugh Gibson (1), John Richer (1),
3mm amplitude test by Cheng-Jiun Ma. Observation Source : Orion SiO Frequency: GHz 256 channels within 64MHz bandwidth Ant 3 & Ant 4 no Tsys correction.
SIW 2003 The antenna element Ravi ATNF, Narrabri 1.The role of the antenna in a Fourier synthesis radio telescope 2.The Compact array antenna.
Institute for Software Integrated Systems Vanderbilt University Node Density Independent Localization Presented by: Brano Kusy B.Kusy, M.Maroti, G.Balogh,
1 EE 542 Antennas and Propagation for Wireless Communications Array Antennas.
08/16/01. Link Budgets for Cellular Networks Presented by Eric Johnson.
Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy Lyle Hoffman, Lafayette College ALFALFA Undergraduate Workshop Union College, 2005 July 06.
08/16/01.
Solar corona observations at decameter wavelengths Artem Koval Institute of Radio Astronomy Kharkov, Ukraine.
Helical Antennas Supervisor: Dr. Omar Saraereh Written By:
Spring 2006 EE 548 Ultra Wideband Radio: Ranging Spring 2006.
Ron Milione Ph.D. W2TAP W2TAP InformationModulatorAmplifier Ant Feedline Transmitter InformationDemodulatorPre-Amplifier Ant Feedline Receiver Filter.
ElectroScience Lab IGARSS 2011 Vancouver Jul 26th, 2011 Chun-Sik Chae and Joel T. Johnson ElectroScience Laboratory Department of Electrical and Computer.
Radar equation review 1/19/10. Radar eq (Rayleigh scatter) The only variable is h, the pulse length Most radars have a range of h values. Rewrite the.
FAA/NASA Joint University Program for Air Transportation Research Jeff Dickman Chris Bartone June 20, 2003 A New Anechoic Chamber for Nearfield Antenna.
Antennas The primary elements of a synthesis array M. Kesteven ATNF 25/September/2001.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
Efficient design of a C-band aperture-coupled stacked microstrip array using Nexxim and Designer Alberto Di Maria German Aerospace Centre (DLR) – Microwaves.
1 Techniques to control noise and fading l Noise and fading are the primary sources of distortion in communication channels l Techniques to reduce noise.
Survey Quality Jim Condon NRAO, Charlottesville. Survey Qualities Leiden 2011 Feb 25 Point-source detection limit S lim Resolution Ω s Brightness sensitivity.
P.Napier, Synthesis Summer School, 18 June Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier Interferometer block diagram Antenna fundamentals Types of antennas.
25 Sept. 2006ERAD2006 Crossbeam Wind Measurements with Phased-Array Doppler Weather Radar Richard J. Doviak National Severe Storms Laboratory Guifu Zhang.
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
Network Computing Laboratory Radio Interferometric Geolocation Miklos Maroti, Peter Volgesi, Sebestyen Dora Branislav Kusy, Gyorgy Balogh, Andras Nadas.
Making MOPRA go! Lucyna Kedziora-Chudczer Friend of the telescope (UNSW)
US SKA TDP DVA-1 June 28-29, 2012Dish Verification Antenna No. 1 Critical Design Review, Penticton, BC Overview Of DVA-1 Optics Lynn Baker Bill Imbriale.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission April 2008 Joel Johnson, IEEE GRSSSlide 1 Coexistence Issues for Passive Earth Sensing from GHz Notice: This.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
SWOT Near Nadir Ka-band SAR Interferometry: SWOT Airborne Experiment Xiaoqing Wu, JPL, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Hensley, JPL, California.
AST 443: Submm & Radio Astronomy November 18, 2003.
Propagation Models Large scale models predict behavior averaged over distances >>  Function of distance & significant environmental features, roughly.
LOGO A Multi Unsymmetrical Beam Tapered Slot Ya-gi Antenna with λ/4 for PMMW Imaging  Presenter: Ya Chung Yu.
RF Propagation No. 1  Seattle Pacific University Basic RF Transmission Concepts.
Joint HIFI-ALMA Calibration Discussion, Leiden, December, 19 th, 2002 C. Kramer, KOSMA Beam properties of HIFI/Herschel Contribution to the framework document.
April 8/9, 2003 Green Bank GBT PTCS Conceptual Design Review Out of Focus (OOF) Holography for the GBT Claire Chandler.
From you host … Dr. H. Introduction Communications design requires us to think about the following issues: Communications design requires us to think.
SPIE – June 25, The Details….. SPIE – June 25, Previous Focus Tracking Curves.
1 A conical scan type spaceborne precipitation radar K. Okamoto 1),S. Shige 2), T. Manabe 3) 1: Tottori University of Environmental Studies, 2: Kyoto University.
1) A binary transmission system uses a 8-bit word encoding system. Find the Bandwidth and the SNR dB of the system if the channel capacity is bps.
January 6, 2005 URSI Nation Radio Science Meeting, Boulder, CO. Pointing and Focusing the GBT K. T. Constantikes NRAO Green Bank.
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster, Arne Theil.
 This chapter describes how the link- power budget calculations are made.  In this text [square] bracket are used to denote decibel quantities using.
A Concept for Spaceborne Imaging of the Base of Terrestrial Ice Sheets and Icy Bodies in the Solar System Ken Jezek, Byrd Polar Research Center E. Rodriguez,
Small-Scale Fading Prof. Michael Tsai 2016/04/15.
Accuracy of the orbit measurement by KEKB BPM system for the study of ILC damping ring H. Fukuma (KEK) Requirement for the accuracy of BPM data.
Information Warfare Technologies Inc. Calibration Techniques for Amplitude DF Systems AOC SYMPOSIUM OCTOBER 2005 Mr. Al Evans President Information Warfare.
SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 WIDAR Correlator Overview Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR & Software.
Accuracy of Wind Fields in Convective
SARA Conference Meter Dish Demo
ELEC4600 Radar and Navigation Engineering
CT-474: Satellite Communications
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster,
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
Introduction to Using Radio Telescopes
Developed by Eastwood Im Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Prototype Correlator Testing
Helical Antennas Supervisor: Dr. Omar Saraereh Written By:
Feed & Front End PDR—Sys. Reqts
CT-474: Satellite Communications
MAMBO PRE-LAUNCH CALIBRATION CONSIDERATIONS
DVA-1 Baseline Optical Design
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
KFPA CDR R. Norrod Feb 27, 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Requirements for Single-Dish Holography Parameter Specification Goal Measurement error <10  m rms <5  m rms Transverse resolution <0.1 m <0.1 m Measurement time 60 min 30 min (per observing frequency) Primary frequency, f GHz Secondary freq, f2 f2/f1>1.2 or <0.8 (at least 20% separation) Tuning about f1 and f2 Minimum step size <5 MHz <1 MHz Range >130 MHz >200 MHz Settling time <60 sec <1 sec

Design Parameters Primary frequency104.0 GHz Secondary frequency 78.9 GHz Tuning about each frequency >130 MHz range, <1 MHz steps Range300 m Transmitter height above ground 50 m Transmitter height above elevation axis 43 m Nominal polarization (xmtr and rcvrs)vertical Receiver processing bandwidth10 kHz Integrating time per measurement msec (nominally 48 msec) Derived: Scan angle for 0.1 m resolution 2.18 deg at 78.9 GHz (  1.09) 1.65 deg at GHz (  0.83) Minimum scan angle 2.29 deg due to near field geometry Transmitter beamwidth at ‑ 3 dB4.6 deg (twice antenna Transmitter antenna gain33 dB Transmitter EIRP >20  W Transmitter power to antenna >10 nW Reference antenna beamwidth, -3 dB4.6 deg (twice scan range) Main antenna feed beamwidth, -3 dB128 deg (-3 dB edge taper)

Error Budget Thermal noise <5  m rms (xmtr pwr, integ time) Feed phase pattern knowledge <5  m pk (critical) Reference antenna pattern knowledge <10  m (insensitive) Multipath interference 0.4  m (-20 dB, random phase) Frequency error 0 Near field correction error unknown RSS (except near field correction)7.2 microns

Transmitter Power Calculation, inputs Assumed hardware parameters: Receiver pre ‑ correlation bandwidthB10 kHz System temperature, each receiverT3200 K Frequency f92 GHz ( =3.26mm) Antenna diameterD12 m  3dB = o RangeR300 m Transmitter EIRPPTBD Measurement requirements: Transverse resolution  0.1 m Surface displacement accuracy  z 5  m Total measuring time (OTF scanning)t<30 min Derived Paramters: Scan angle  o (+ ‑ o )  = (l/D)(D/D) Number of measurementsK180 2 K = (sD/D) 2, oversampling factor s=1.5 Integrating time per measurementt27.8 msec t = tK + overhead, allowing 100% overhead. Reference antenna diameter d50 mm ‑ 3dB beam = 2q = l/d

Transmitter Power Calculation, outputs Reference antenna power rcvdP r (1.736e ‑ 9 P) P r = (1/16)(d/R) 2 P Main antenna power rcvd on boresight P s (0)(1.000e ‑ 4 P) P s = (1/16)(D/R) 2 P Receiver noise powerkTB4.42e ‑ 16 W On ‑ boresight noise  0 [(1.59e ‑ 22W)(P)] {1/2} Off ‑ boresight noise (P r term)  1 [(2.76e ‑ 27W)(P)] {1/2} Generally,  2 = [kTB + P r + P s (  )] kT/  P s (  ) = P s (0)[J 1 (  D/ )/(  D/2 )] 2 where  is scan angle, ‑  /2 < a <  /2. Can neglect kTB term for any P>1  W. Noise dominated by P s term until power is down by 50 dB. That happens when J 1 (2x)/x > 3e ‑ 3 => x > 31.7 =>  > 20.2l/D. Outside there, the P r term dominates.

Average Noise Over Map Very conservative estimate: With sampling every 0.75l/D (s=1.5), there are about p 27 2 = 2270 samples where the P s term dominates. Thus, there are ‑ 2270 = 30,130 samples where the P r term dominates. Of those where P s dominates, take the inner 4 to be s 0, the next 25 to be 10x lower, and the rest to be 100x lower, in accordance with the envelope of J 1 (x)/x.  avg 2 = [(4+25/ /100)        = 9.084e ‑ 4  0 2 = (1.444e ‑ 25W) P This is actually the noise from a single, real correlator. For complex correlation, we need to increase this by 2 times. From D’Addario (1982) eqn (30):  z =.044 ( /sD) 2 D 2 K {1/2}  avg / ( M 0 ) =.044 /s 2 K {1/2} (  avg / M 0 ) =.044(3.26mm)/ {2(1.444e ‑ 25W)/P} (1/2) /4.167e ‑ 7 = (2.754e4 m) {(2.888e ‑ 25W) / P} (1/2) For  z = 5  m, this implies P = 8.76  W.

Observing Strategy Ground-based single-dish holography –Transmitter on tower –OTF raster scanning max 0.5d/sec ~12 min minimum scan time –Multiple frequencies for multipath mitigation: repeat raster at each Ground-based interferometric holography –Transmitter on tower –Astronomy receivers –Test correlator Astronomical interferometric holography –Astronomy receivers, test correlator –Natural sources, primarily SiO masers