S HIFTING F OCUS FROM U.S. T ECHNOLOGICAL D OMINANCE TO U.S. A LLIED D OMINANCE Elizabeth Royall Decisive Analytics Corporation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. David Mickler School of Social and Political Sciences Security Issues and Australian Foreign Policy.
Advertisements

Special Operations Command - Pacific
U.S.-China Relations Institutions Ideologies Interests.
PAPER PREPARATION GET OUT YOUR ANALYSIS CHART FROM YESTERDAY AS WELL AS A SHEET OF PAPER. TODAY WE ARE USING THE RARELY USED SIX PACK FOLD. 1. FOLD THE.
Managing Peace and Security: Deterrence and Diplomacy.
Asian Regionalism? ASEAN Northeast Asia. Outline Economic development –Flying geese, falling geese Economic interdependence ASEAN Northeast Asia.
Foreign Policy. After World War II America went from isolationism to internationali sm.
Foreign Aide & Defense Alliances. Foreign Aid A.Lend-Lease (1940’s): US gave $50 billion in food, munitions, & supplies to allies in WWII B.Marshall Plan.
Hungarian Defence and Security Policy Mr. György RÁBAI Counsellor HU MoD, Defence Policy Department.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION.
Trends and Evolution of Trade Patterns in East Asia Mona Haddad Regional Trade Coordinator East Asia Region, World Bank.
Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation By Shelby and LOLA THE DESTROYER.
Foreign Policy and National Defense
The Nonproliferation Treaty. Atoms for Peace December 8, 1953 President Eisenhower spoke to the UN suggesting that peaceful uses of the atom be promoted.
Defense and Foreign Policy. The U.S. vs. the Soviet Union Conventional conflicts include: –the Korean Conflict –Vietnam –Afghanistan Nuclear Arms Race.
The Cold War The Forces…. The Cold War was a bipolar war between the United States and Soviet Union The Cold War was a bipolar war between.
Persistent, Consistent, Credible Engagement
Chapter 17 Foreign Policy
© 2004 American International Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Global Risk Assessment Presented by: Gerald J. Komisar Vice President Global Risk Assessments.
Security Environment U.S. Japan China South Asia.
1 Technological Dominance Today, Marines and Sailors have at their disposal the world’s most sophisticated military technology Mobile Communications Laser-Guided.
Supply Risk Monitoring Supply Risk Monitoring (SRM) Draws on global operational network, and analytical engine –SRM website provides quick overview.
Dealing with North Korea America’s Options. Threats from North Korea Direct nuclear attack on US forces or allies Sale of nuclear and missile technologies.
BY XAVIER & TYSON. Historical background to the relationship Australia is Americas closest ally in the Asia-Pacific region Australia is the second most.
PEAP : L8 The Role of US in the Cold War Period Shunji Cui Department of Political Science School of Public Affairs Zhejiang University
Chapter 22 Foreign Policy
US AGGRESSION AND MILITARY INTERVENTION IN ASIA-PACIFIC Conference of Lawyers in Asia-Pacific Workshop on US Aggression and Military Intervention SMX Convention.
Agenda Command Structure Mission Operating Environment Conclusion.
Where is China? Sorry That Was the Wrong Answer.
CH. 27 GLOBAL INTERDEPENDENCE STANDARD. ECONOMIC INTERDEPENDENCE WE LIVE IN A WORLD OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC INTERDEPENDENCE COUNTRIES OFTEN DEPEND ON FOREIGN.
Energy Demand Outlook by Mohamed Ariff Based on Data from The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan.
0 ARF-ISG DOD Delhi, 9 November 2009 Takeshi ISHIKAWA Director for International Policy Ministry of Defense, Japan Promoting Effectiveness of Defense-Security.
1 SEADMC 2009 ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) Disaster Management & Emergency Response Efforts 2 December 2009.
7 th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs (23.3).
Word Bank Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan Cambodia China India Indonesia
Strategic Perspective on Solutions to Public Health Problems in the Asia- Pacific Region James R. Campbell, Ph.D., M.P.H. Asia-Pacific Center for Security.
National & International Political Divisions Francisci WG.10b.
Asian Paradox I35003 Suh Hee Jong. Table of Contents 1.Asian Paradox 2.The United States 3.China 4.Japan 5.North Korea 6.South Korea 7.Conclusion – Enduring.
The Capabilities-based Analysis of Divergence in Alliance Transformation Divergent Evolution of US Alliances in Asia and the Pacific: A Comparative Perspective.
What is foreign policy? Foreign Policy: everything a nation's government says and does in world affairs Location, desire for certain natural resources,
October, 2012 Tech Titan Limited Company Profile.
Foreign policy in Action. Long term goals of US foreign policy 1. National security Main goal of US foreign policy is to preserve the security of US.
Source: Image Credit: Ramachandra Babu/©Gulf News ( PIVOT OR RICOCHET:
Pete Verga Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Chief of Staff The Department of Defense (DoD) United States of America Policy as a Technology Partner.
US Policy in the Asia-Pacific Assessing the “Rebalance” Terence Roehrig Professor, National Security Affairs Director, Asia-Pacific Studies Group US Naval.
Demonstrated Values and Obstacles in Global Health Engagements USPACOM
“Interesting Times” Global Economy in 2017 Wisconsin ICE Chris Kuehl Managing Director – Armada Corporate Intelligence Economic Analyst – FMA, NACM.
Asia’s Transformation:
Globalization and BGS Relationships
7th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs (23.3)
How does America use alliances to meet its foreign policy goals?
Electrification Products
Citi Virtual Card Accounts – Continued Global Expansion
South China sea & East china sea
ASEAN Regional Forum Prof. Philip Yang National Taiwan University
FMA 601 Foreign Market Analysis
July 19, 2013 Expanding Foreign Sales of U.S. Military Equipment:  Industry Perspectives By Jon Barney Partner, Avascent Prepared for:
EOC Review Policies.
Directions: Identify the names of the labeled countries
U.S. Japan China South Asia
the indo-pacific: A Strategic Outlook
Warm-Up: Identify the following countries on your map.
Why Did Australia Fight In The Vietnam War?
7th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs (23.3)
IPO and Foreign Listing on Istanbul Stock Exchange Çağatay Duruk Director Foreign Securities Market.
What is Peace?.
Global Commercial Agriculture
ASEAN – Great Powers 15 June 2010.
World Regions Map Exam (9/20)
Electrification business
Presentation transcript:

S HIFTING F OCUS FROM U.S. T ECHNOLOGICAL D OMINANCE TO U.S. A LLIED D OMINANCE Elizabeth Royall Decisive Analytics Corporation

Is Next-Gen Tech the Only Savior of U.S. Military & Tech Dominance? “U.S. Military Worries About Losing Hi-Tech Edge”—AFP, 2015 “U.S. Military Readiness, for War, Competitive Edge Worsening” –Reuters, 2014

U.S. Military Dominance TechnologyManpowerAlliesTrainingStrategy Strengthening All the Tools in the Toolbox

Diversified, Complex Threats PACOM Aggressive China, contested East & South China Sea, North Korea CENTCOM Operations in Iraq & Afghanistan, terrorism, sectarian fighting EUCOM Revanchist Russia, energy security, terrorism AFRICOM Restive terrorism & insurgencies, poor governance SOUTHCOM Insurgencies and terrorist groups, organized crime & drug trade NORTHCOM Cyber threat, fly bys by Russia & China, terrorism

A Century of Coalition Operations Allied & Partner operations are common and growing

Partners vs. Allies Allies Have signed & ratified a Mutual Defense Treaty (e.g. NATO, Australia, Japan, Thailand, Peru) Partners May have varying levels of political and/or military relationships with the U.S., may contribute troops to U.S. operations, but the U.S. has no legal obligation to defend if attacked (e.g. Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan, Mexico, Egypt) The United States has 48 treaty allies mostly under NATO or the Rio Pact (the Americas)

Why Focus on U.S. Sole Dominance? Amid diversified, mutating threats and a constrained defense budget, the United States must prioritize allied over sole dominance, allies over partners, and technologies and mechanisms that support allied dominance over those that solely benefit the United States.

Where are the Vulnerabilities?

Patching the Holes: Prioritizing Fixing Vulnerabilities Exigent Low Capacity Allies High High Capacity Allies Medium Strategically Important Partners

PACOM Example of Prioritization Exigent Low Capacity Allies The Philippines & Thailand High High Capacity Treaty Allies Australia, Japan, South Korea Medium Strategically Important Partners Brunei, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam

Technologies to Empower Alliances Information-Sharing Platforms with High-Tech Security & Low Tech Usability Visibility for an Allied Common Operating Picture Foreign Comparative Testing

Targeted Foreign Military & Commercial Sales Engineer & Scientist Exchange Programs Logistics Cooperation &Planning Concentrated on Humanitarian Assistance/Disaster Relief (HA/DR) Non-Technology Areas to Build Capability

Enhancing DoD’s Partnership-Building Capacity Expanding International Armaments Cooperation Increasing R&D in Technologies to Strengthen Alliances

Strengthening Allied Defense to Protect U.S. Dominance Strengthening Allies, particularly weaker Allies, mitigates U.S. vulnerabilities while providing a greater deterrent value and protecting U.S. dominance

Questions?