Reproducing the Observed Universe with Simulations Qi Guo Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics MPE April 8th, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a Mock Universe Cosmological nbody dark matter simulations + Galaxy surveys (SDSS, UKIDSS, 2dF) Access to mock catalogues through VO Provide analysis.
Advertisements

Astro1010-lee.com UVU Survey of Astronomy Chapter 21 Our Milky Way.
An Experience of Aladin Usage for the RC Catalog Radio Source Investigation Zhelenkova Olga, SAO RAS.
18 July Monte Carlo Markov Chain Parameter Estimation in Semi-Analytic Models Bruno Henriques Peter Thomas Sussex Survey Science Centre.
Dark energy workshop Copenhagen Aug Why the SNLS ? Questions to be addressed: -Can the intrinsic scatter in the Hubble diagram be further reduced?
Galaxy merging in the Millennium simulation Serena Bertone - UC Santa Cruz Chris Conselice - U. Nottingham arXiv: MNRAS, in press Cosmoclub, April.
Markov-Chain Monte Carlo
Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution Springel et al., 2005 Presented by Eve LoCastro October 1, 2009.
Observational tests of an inhomogeneous cosmology by Christoph Saulder in collaboration with Steffen Mieske & Werner Zeilinger.
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Why Environment Matters more massive halos. However, it is usually assumed in, for example, semianalytic modelling that the merger history of a dark matter.
Luminosity Density of Star- Forming Galaxies Giavalisco et al Presented by Brandon Patel.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
Primeval Starbursting Galaxies: Presentation of “Lyman-Break Galaxies” by Mauro Giavalisco Jean P. Walker Rutgers University.
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
The STAGES Supercluster: A challenge for semi-analytical models? Rhys Rhodes The University of Nottingham 25 th June 2008 Meghan Gray and Frazer Pearce.
High Redshift Galaxies (Ever Increasing Numbers).
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
Modeling the 3-point correlation function Felipe Marin Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics University of Chicago arXiv: Felipe Marin Department.
Angular clustering and halo occupation properties of COSMOS galaxies Cristiano Porciani.
Luminosity & color of galaxies in clusters sarah m. hansen university of chicago with erin s. sheldon (nyu) risa h. wechsler (stanford)
PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY
Cosmological constraints from models of galaxy clustering Abstract Given a dark matter distribution, the halo occupation distribution (HOD) provides a.
Type Ia Supernovae on a glass: The bread and butter of peculiar velocities Lunch meeting Aarhus, March 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute.
박창범 ( 고등과학원 ) & 김주한 ( 경희대학교 ), J. R. Gott (Princeton, USA), J. Dubinski (CITA, Canada) 한국계산과학공학회 창립학술대회 Cosmological N-Body Simulation of Cosmic.
GIANT TO DWARF RATIO OF RED-SEQUENCE GALAXY CLUSTERS Abhishesh N Adhikari Mentor-Jim Annis Fermilab IPM / SDSS August 8, 2007.
Cool white dwarfs in the Sloan & SuperCOSMOS Sky Surveys Nigel Hambly, Wide Field Astronomy Unit, IfA, University of Edinburgh.
Millennium Data Dissemination MPA institute seminar1 possible extensions how ambitious can/should we be?
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Toledo, MPA access methods and plans With contributions from JHU : Alex Szalay, Jan Vanderberg MPA: Jeremy Blaizot,
TIG session 3+Millennium database Millennium Database Overview and some first usage experiences Gerard Lemson and the Virgo Consortium astro-ph/
Theory in the German Astrophysical VO Summary: We show results of efforts done within the German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory (GAVO). GAVO has paid.
What can we learn from the luminosity function and color studies? THE SDSS GALAXIES AT REDSHIFT 0.1.
, Tuorla Observatory 1 Galaxy groups in ΛCDM simulations and SDSS DR5 P. Nurmi, P. Heinämäki, S. Niemi, J. Holopainen Tuorla Observatory E. Saar,
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Cosmological studies with Weak Lensing Peak statistics Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
EÖTVÖS UNIVERSITY BUDAPEST Department of Physics of Complex Systems VO Spectroscopy Workshop, ESAC Spectrum Services 2007 László Dobos (ELTE)
1 VVDS: Towards a complete census of star formation at 1.4
Measuring dark energy from galaxy surveys Carlton Baugh Durham University London 21 st March 2012.
Sean Passmoor Supervised by Dr C. Cress Simulating the Radio Sky.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
The coordinated growth of stars, haloes and large-scale structure since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Millennium Data Dissemination databases and other services Millennium Workshop1.
9 ½ empirical Lyα relationships Jeff Cooke. 1. UV continuum reddening, β parameter 2. ISM absorption line width/strength 3. Outflows and HI column density/covering.
Refining Photometric Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations Alexia Schulz Institute for Advanced Study Collaborators: Martin White.
Large surveys and estimation of interstellar extinction Oleg Malkov Institute of Astronomy, Moscow Moscow, Apr 10-11, 2006.
Type Ia Supernovae and the Acceleration of the Universe: Results from the ESSENCE Supernova Survey Kevin Krisciunas, 5 April 2008.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
MNRAS, submitted. Galaxy evolution Evolution in global properties reasonably well established What drives this evolution? How does it depend on environment?
1 Galaxy Evolution in the SDSS Low-z Survey Huan Lin Experimental Astrophysics Group Fermilab.
E  L Comma galaxies. The Cosmic Runner (Park et al. 2005; Choi et al. 2010)
Xiaohu Yang (SJTU/SHAO) With: H. Wang, H.J. Mo, Y.P. Jing, F.C van den Bosch, W.P. Lin, D. Tweed… , KIAS Exploring the Local Universe with re-
The epoch of star formation for th e most massive galaxies Sarah Brough (AAO)
Web based spectrum databases and utilities László Dobos Tamás Budavári István Csabai MAGPOP kick-off meeting, January Cassis.
1 Analysing Cosmological Simulations in the Virtual Observatory: Designing and Mining the Millennium Simulation Database Gerard Lemson German Astrophysical.
Environmental Dependence of Brightest Cluster Galaxy Evolution Sarah Brough, Liverpool John Moores University Chris Collins, Liverpool John Moores University.
A Steep Faint-End Slope of the UV LF at z~2-3: Implications for the Missing Stellar Problem C. Steidel ( Caltech ) Naveen Reddy (Hubble Fellow, NOAO) Galaxies.
Semi-analytical model of galaxy formation Xi Kang Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS.
The XMM Cluster Survey: Project summary and Cosmology Forecasts Kathy Romer University of Sussex.
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
联 合 天 体 物 理 中 心 Joint Center for Astrophysics The half-light radius distribution of LBGs and their stellar mass function Chenggang Shu Joint Center for.
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
JENAM 2008 Theory Standards for the Virtual Observatory SimDB + SimDAP.
Lightcones for Munich Galaxies Bruno Henriques. Outline 1. Model to data - stellar populations and photometry 2. Model to data - from snapshots to lightcones.
A self consistent model of galaxy formation across cosmic time Bruno Henriques Simon White, Peter Thomas Raul Angulo, Qi Guo, Gerard Lemson, Volker Springel.
Percolation analysis for cosmic web with discrete points
A Survey of Starburst Galaxies An effort to help understand the starburst phenomenon and its importance to galaxy evolution Megan Sosey & Duilia deMello.
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
The mock galaxy catalogue for HI survey based on SAMs of galaxy formation 富坚 Guiyang, FRA2015 Shanghai Astronomical Observatory.
Presentation transcript:

Reproducing the Observed Universe with Simulations Qi Guo Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics MPE April 8th, 2008

Science problem: how well does the Millennium Run simulations + L-Galaxies semi-analytic model reproduce the properties of observed galaxies? An example: study of high redshift star forming galaxies General requirements to VO

Observations Keck survey in the filters U n GR, magnitude limit of R<25.5 with a field of view of a few hundred arcmin 2 colour-colour selection: LBG samples (star forming galaxies at z~3): (U n- G) > (G-R)+1.0 (G-R) < 1.2 BX systems (star forming galaxies at z~2) : (G-R) > -0.2 (U n- G) > (G-R)+0.2 (G-R) < 0.2(U n- G)+0.4 (U n- G) < (G-R)+1.0

Light Cone Survey to Mimic Observations N-body simulation (MR) Galaxy catalogues Mock catalogue SAM Lightcone code

precalculated lightcones in the desired filters? not available precalculated SAM galaxy catalogs with desired filters or spectra ? not available needed to rerun SAM to generate magnitudes in desired filters needed to recalculate light cones in the new filter systems Producing the right mock catalogs from the MR

How well can we reproduce the high redshift star forming galaxies? Compare: color-color diagram redshift distribution correlation function number density

Science analysis MR LBG sample selection identical to observed LBG samples Steidel et al Mock catalogue

Science analysis Basic analysis: redshift distribution Solid histograms: from mock catalogue (red: z~3 black: z~2) Dashed histograms: Steidel et al. 2004

Science analysis Basic analysis: correlation function iterations: Solid curves: from mock catalogue (red: z~3 black: z~2) Region within dashed curves: correlation function within 1 sigma deviation (Adelberger et al. 2005)

Science analysis Advanced analysis: Evolution (color-mass)

Science analysis Iterations: - adjust dust model, make lightcone, select new LBG sample Mock Mock literature BXs (n/arcmin^2) LBGs (n/arcmin^2)

Data and codes are available for local users: Through a combination of catalogs stored at MPA, running SAM code in C, C++ programs to generate light cones, IDL scripts for sample selection, plotting, analysis

What would be required for an outside user to perform the similar analysis using VO-like services? Data and codes are available for local users: Through a combination of catalogs stored at MPA, running SAM code in C, C++ programs to generate light cones, IDL scripts for sample selection, plotting, analysis

1 - Basic requirements main physical parameters in halo and galaxy catalogues from simulations main observables for a detailed comparison with observed samples of galaxies (e.g. magnitudes) merger trees both for halo and galaxies link between galaxies and their dark matter halo step-by-step overview of VO-requirements 1 For high-level comparison with observations, it is essential to transform from a simulation consisting of discrete, fixed-epoch “snapshots” to a simulation in which both the physical as well as the apparent properties of galaxies evolve along the “observed” lightcone.

2 - Making Realistic Lightcones geometry of light cone conversion of snapshot magnitudes to observed (apparent) magnitudes, taking into account the proper distance modulus, K-correction, peculiar motion and IGM attenuation towards each object along the light cone high flexibility of generating multiple lightcones to beat down cosmic variance (e.g. Blaizot et al. 2005, Kitzbichler & White 2007) step-by-step overview of VO-requirements 2

step-by-step overview of VO-requirements The simulated data must be available in the same filter system as the observed sample used for comparison freedom of choice of the output magnitudes of the SAM catalogs for any combination of telescope+instrument+filter. This can be achieved by making most common filters available in the VO, OR making spectral energy distributions available in the VO, OR allowing ``on-the-fly’’ creation of custom filtersets from the SAM

step-by-step overview of VO-requirements Data creation/transfer/storage all procedures performed through remote usage of VO The generated data need to be either stored and accessible (sql) on the VO site, or easily retrievable without running into server time-outs (within limits)

step-by-step overview of VO-requirements Sample Selection and Basic Analysis allowing remote filtering in order to only download data of interest (e.g. by applying magnitude and colour selection criteria to the generated mock light cone observations) and possibly, access to online data sets generated by large galaxy surveys (e.g. SDSS, UKIDS, PAN-STARRS, HST legacy archive) with the same filtering as applied to the simulated data ``on-the-fly’’ calculation of the main sample diagnostics (e.g. number counts, luminosity functions, redshift distributions, correlation functions) to assess basic quality of the SAM

step-by-step overview of VO-requirements Results and feedback into SAM And, Start Over ! report the agreement/disagreement between model galaxies and observed samples allowing ``on-the-fly’’ rerun the SAM ( e.g. parameters, models…)