MHD in weakly-ionised media Mark Wardle Macquarie University Sydney, Australia
Outline Molecular clouds and star formation MHD in weakly ionised media A comment on the hall effect Conductivity in molecular clouds Shock waves Conductivity in protostellar discs Implications for MRI and jets
Introduction
Magnetic fields in molecular clouds Magnetic fields play an important role during star formation –P mag is 30–100 times P gas in molecular clouds –energy density of magnetic field, fluid motions and self-gravity are similar –field removes angular momentum from cloud cores –field diffusion is required to avoid magnetic flux problem
MHD with finite conductivity
Conductivity
The Hall parameter relative strength of magnetic and drag forces in determining drift velocity particles tied to field particles tied to neutral fluid
For ions, For electrons,
The conductivity tensor solving for : current density: – field-parallel conductivity – Hall conductivity – Pedersen conductivity
Magnetic diffusion
If the only charged species are ions and electrons, Three distinct diffusion regimes: – Ohmic (resistive) – Hall – Ambipolar log n log B ohmic hall ambipolar
Hall effect in fully vs weakly ionised plasma Hall effect arises through asymmetry in tying of charged particles to magnetic field lines Fully ionised plasma: high frequencies, short wavelengths –difference between ion and electron cyclotron frequencies –ions can no longer keep up with changes to field –short lengthscales often irrelevant at the scales of interest –hall MHD etc Partially ionised plasma: low frequencies, long wavelengths –difference between ion and electron collision frequencies –neutral collisions decouple ions before electrons –length/time scale may be comparable to system size/evolutionary time scale –conductivity tensor in generalised Ohm’s law How does one reconcile these approaches? –in partially ionised case, ions become attached to the neutrals –effective ion mass is increased by ratio of neutral to ion densities –effective cyclotron frequency is reduced by same factor Be careful when estimating relevance of Hall effect!!!
Umebayashi & Nakano 1990
Nishi, Nakano & Umebayashi 1991
0.1 m log (10 15 cm kms -1 ) log n H (cm -3 )
MRN log (10 15 cm kms -1 ) log n H (cm -3 )
log (10 15 cm kms -1 ) log n H (cm -3 ) MRNi
log (10 15 cm kms -1 ) log n H (cm -3 ) MRNx
J-type shock waves
C-type shock waves
Instability
Shock waves - Hall effect
Wardle 1998
Chapman & Wardle MNRAS in press
Stars, protostellar disks and planets
The minimum-mass solar nebula Simple model for surface density based on the solar system (Hayashi 1981) –add H,He etc to each planet to recover standard interstellar abundances –spread matter smoothly Resulting surface density: Disk mass: Useful reference standard
Temperature is estimated by considering thermal balance for a black solid particle –assume spherical, radius a, distance r from the sun: Then: – disk is thick beyond 30 AU – self-gravity negligible
Protostellar disks
Bachiller 1996 ARA&A
Kitamura et al 2002 ApJ
Protostellar disks Role of magnetic field in final stages of formation and subsequent evolution of protoplanetary discs is unclear –MHD turbulence (magnetorotational instability)? –disc-driven MHD winds? –disc corona? –dynamo activity? How strong is the magnetic field? Is the field coupled to the material in the disc? –disc is weakly ionised
Protostellar disks are poorly conducting high density implies low conductivity –recombinations relatively rapid –drag on charged particles deeper layers shielded from ionising radiation for r < 5 AU –x-ray attenuation column ~10 g/cm 2 –cosmic ray attenuation column ~100 g/cm 2
Igea & Glassgold 1999 cosmic rays x-ray ionisation rate
How strong is the magnetic field? Expect B > 10 mG given the strength in cloud cores Compression during formation of disk and star Shear in disc may wind up field or drive MRI Equipartition field in the minimum solar nebula Evidence for 0.1 – 1 G fields in the solar nebula at 1AU
Sano & Stone 2002a
Magnetic field diffusion in protostellar disks Is the magnetic field coupled to the matter? – < h c s ? Which diffusion components dominate? –ohmic, hall or ambipolar? What are the consequences of different diffusion regimes? –vector evolution of B shows fundamental differences –hall diffusion reverses sign under global field reversal (yikes) Diffusion and magnetocentrifugal jet launching –loading of mass onto field lines –constrains bending of field lines within disk –radial drift of field Diffusivity depends on location –vertical stratification of ionisation rate and density –inconvenient radial variations of microphysics
Resistivity calculations minimum solar nebula –assume isothermal in z-direction ionisation by cosmic rays and x-rays from central star simple reaction scheme following Nishi, Nakano & Umebayashi (1993) –H +,H 3 +,He +,C +,molecular (M + ) and metal ions (M + ), e -, and charged grains –extended to allow high grain charge (T larger than in molecular clouds) adopt model for grains –none, single size grains, MRN size distribution, MRN+ice mantles, extended MRN, etc –results for “no grains” or 0.1 m grains presented here evaluate resistivity components –when can the field couple to the shear in the disc? –which form of diffusion is dominant?
Ionisation products
Reaction scheme
log n / n H (s -1 ) M+M+ C+C+ m+m+ e He + H+H+ H3H3 + Abundances: 1AU, no grains z / h
Criterion for coupling
z / h log n / n H (s -1 ) M+M C+C+ m+m+ e He + H+H+ H3H3 + Abundances: 1AU, 0.1 m grains
5 AU
Magnetorotational instability (MRI) magnetic field couples different radii in disc tension transfers angular momentum outwards kh > 1 required to fit in disc, i.e. v A /c s < 1 resulting turbulence transports angular momentum outwards
MRI in non-ideal MHD Ambipolar or ohmic diffusion Hall diffusion Wardle 1999
Salmeron & Wardle 2005
Salmeron PhD thesis
Stone & Fleming 2003 MRI with dead zone
Sano & Stone 2002b MRI with hall diffusion
Sano & Stone 2002b log B 2 / 8πP 0
Protostellar jets
HH 30
Wardle 1997 IAU Coll. 163 (astro-ph)
Wardle 1997 IAU Coll. 163 (astro-ph)
Salmeron, Wardle & Königl