Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1 and Michał Ziemiański 1 1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Warsaw Podleśna, 61

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What’s quasi-equilibrium all about?
Advertisements

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION Chin-Hoh Moeng NCAR.
A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Discretizing the Sphere for Multi-Scale Air Quality Simulations using Variable-Resolution Finite-Volume Techniques Martin J. Otte U.S. EPA Robert Walko.
An Intercomparison of Surface Observations and High-Resolution Forecasting Model Output for the Lake Okeechobee Region By Kathryn Shontz July 19, 2006.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007 High-resolution modelling in support of T-REX observations Simon Vosper and Peter Sheridan Met Office, UK T-REX Workshop,
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION K. Lagouvardos-V. Kotroni Institute of Environmental Research National Observatory of Athens NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Parametrization of Subgrid-Scale Orographic Drag in the.
EGU General Assembly C. Cassardo 1, M. Galli 1, N. Vela 1 and S. K. Park 2,3 1 Department of General Physics, University of Torino, Italy 2 Department.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss News from COSMO COSMO User Workshop 2010.
Comparison of convective boundary layer velocity spectra calculated from large eddy simulation and WRF model data Jeremy A. Gibbs and Evgeni Fedorovich.
Michał Ziemiański, Marcin Kurowski, Zbigniew Piotrowski, Bogdan Rosa and Oliver Fuhrer Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), MeteoSwiss.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Atmosphere at rest experiments with the latest COSMO version.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High resolution COSMO runs for dispersion applications.
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Introduction 2) The methodology of the inter-comparison 3) Phase 1 : cases study Inter-comparison of numerical models.
Budgets of second order moments for cloudy boundary layers 1 Systematische Untersuchung höherer statistischer Momente und ihrer Bilanzen 1 LES der atmosphärischen.
An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.
João Paulo Martins (IPMA/IDL) & Rita Cardoso Pedro M. M. Soares Isabel Trigo Margarida Belo Pereira Nuno Moreira Ricardo Tomé The diurnal cycle of coastal.
Numerical simulations of inertia-gravity waves and hydrostatic mountain waves using EULAG model Bogdan Rosa, Marcin Kurowski, Zbigniew Piotrowski and Michał.
Toward all-scale simulation of moist atmospheric flows with soundproof equations Wojciech W. Grabowski 1, Marcin J. Kurowski 2, Zbigniew P. Piotrowski.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
10/05/041 Satellite Data in the Verification of Model cloud forecasts Christoph Zingerle Tartu, 24. – 26. Jan HiRLAM mini workshop on clouds and.
CITES 2005, Novosibirsk Modeling and Simulation of Global Structure of Urban Boundary Layer Kurbatskiy A. F. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.
Implementation of Grid Adaptation in CAM: Comparison of Dynamic Cores Babatunde J. Abiodun 1,2 William J. Gutowski 1, and Joseph M. Prusa 1,3 1 Iowa State.
Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1, Damian Wójcik 1, and Michał Ziemiański 1 Acknowledgements: Oliver Fuhrer 2, Zbigniew Piotrowski 1,3 1. Institute of Meteorology.
1 The Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral (NIM) Model: Description and Potential Use in Climate Prediction Alexander E. MacDonald Earth System Research Lab Climate.
10-13 Sept. 2012M. Baldauf (DWD)1 Michael Baldauf Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany Priority Project "Conservative Dynamical Core" Final report.
Mixing and Entrainment in the Orkney Passage Judy Twedt University of Washington Dept. of Physics NOAA, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Lab Dr. Sonya Legg Dr.
Simulation of boundary layer clouds with double-moment microphysics and microphysics-oriented subgrid-scale modeling Dorota Jarecka 1, W. W. Grabowski.
Standardized Test Set for Nonhydrostatic Dynamical Cores of NWP Models
Mass Coordinate WRF Dynamical Core - Eulerian geometric height coordinate (z) core (in framework, parallel, tested in idealized, NWP applications) - Eulerian.
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Component testing of the COSMO model’s turbulent diffusion.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
MODELING OF SUBGRID-SCALE MIXING IN LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF SHALLOW CONVECTION Dorota Jarecka 1 Wojciech W. Grabowski 2 Hanna Pawlowska 1 Sylwester Arabas.
A Case Study of Decoupling in Stratocumulus Xue Zheng MPO, RSMAS 03/26/2008.
Orographic Banner Clouds 2. EULAG Workshop Björn Brötz, Daniel Reinert, Volkmar Wirth Institute for Atmospheric Physics/ University of Mainz 2 nd EULAG.
Performance of a Semi-Implicit, Semi-Lagrangian Dynamical Core for High Resolution NWP over Complex Terrain L.Bonaventura D.Cesari.
COSMO model simulations for COPS IOP 8b, 15 July 2007 Jörg Trentmann, Björn Brötz, Heini Wernli Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University.
Implementation of an improved horizontal diffusion scheme into the Méso-NH Günther Zängl Laboratoire d’Aérologie / University of Munich 7 March 2005.
INSTYTUT METEOROLOGII I GOSPODARKI WODNEJ INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT TITLE: IMGW in COSMO AUTHOR: Michał Ziemiański DATA:
Development of the two-equation second-order turbulence-convection model (dry version): analytical formulation, single-column numerical results, and.
Development of nonhydrostatic models at the JMA
MM5- and WRF-Simulated Cloud and Moisture Fields
Overview of Downscaling
Conservative Dynamical Core (CDC)
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
Water Budget of Typhoon Nari(2001)
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
Multiscale aspects of cloud-resolving simulations over complex terrain
Bogdan Rosa, Damian K. Wójcik, Michał Z. Ziemiański
GIJS DE BOER(1), GREGORY J. TRIPOLI(1), EDWIN W. ELORANTA(2)
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Outlines of NICAM NICAM (Nonhydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model)
Cathy Hohenegger 1,2 Linda Schlemmer 1,2 Bjorn Stevens 1
A. Topographic radiation correction in COSMO: gridscale or subgridscale? B. COSMO-2: convection resolving or convection inhibiting model? Matteo Buzzi.
Radiation fogs: WRF and LES numerical experiments
Results of semi realistic and realistic simulations performed
Dorota Jarecka1 Wojciech W. Grabowski2 Hanna Pawlowska1
Bogdan Rosa1, Marcin Kurowski1, Damian Wójcik1,
NWP Strategy of DWD after 2006 GF XY DWD Feb-19.
Poster Session: Numerical Weather Prediction at MeteoSwiss
Conservative Dynamical Core (CDC)
The Impact of Moist Singular Vectors and Horizontal Resolution on Short-Range Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasts for Extreme Weather Events A. Walser1) M.
Presentation transcript:

Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1 and Michał Ziemiański 1 1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Warsaw Podleśna, 61 High resolution modeling of the Alpine convective flows using anelastic model EULAG Acknowledgements: Oliver Fuhrer 2, Piotr Smolarkiewicz 3, Andrzej Wyszogrodzki 3, Zbigniew Piotrowski 3 and Damian Wójcik 1 2. Meteo Swiss 3. National Center for Atmospheric Research COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

CONTENT 1. Introduction and motivation 2. Experiment setup 3. Meteorological situation 4. Simulation results 5. Summary and conclusions COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Motivations and objectives We are interested in development of new generation dynamical core, for future NWP models for very high resolutions, (as a part of research- development work of the COSMO consortium, COSMO: Consortium of Small Scale Modeling, grouping some of European national weather services) Model requirements: - numerically robust, allowing for representation of effects of very steep, irregular orographies of high (eg. Alpine-type) mountain ridges - convection resolving, allowing for explicit simulation of ‘basic‘ deep convection events Practical test: assessment of performance of dynamical core for high resolution for high mountain and deep moist convection Scientific question: what is, ‘convection resolving model resolution’ for deep convection over high-mountains. COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Scientific tools EULAG (EULarian semi-LAGrangian) nonhydrostatic anelastic model developed as a research tool at NCAR by P. Smolarkiewicz, J. Prusa, W. Grabowski and A. Wyszogrodzki see (Prusa and Smolarkiewicz, 2003; Smolarkiewicz and Prusa, 2005; Grabowski and Smolarkiewicz, 2002) The characteristic features of the EULAG model: - Conservative flux form of the governing equations - Semi-implicit time integration scheme - Finite volume discretization - Terrain following coordinates transformation - Capability of modeling flows over steep terrain. COSMO (Consortium of Small Scale Modeling) – operational nonhydrostatic compressible model, base on flow equations in advection form The characteristic features of COSMO model: - Explicit time integration scheme - Finite difference approximation in terrain following coordinates COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Experiment description To perform a case study of simulation of the Alpine summer convection we used: - EULAG dynamical core with horizontal resolutions of 2.2, 1.1 and 0.55 km - simple representations of boundary layer processes: a) TKE turbulent kinetic energy b) ILES (no subgrid-scale model) + attenuation of heat surface fluxes in boundary layer - simple representation of moist processes (warm rain Kessler scheme) - initial and boundary conditions from operation run of COSMO2 model for Switzerland, with resolution of 2.2 km. For higher resolution 1.1km and 0.55km boundary condition are interpolated from the COSMO model (run 2.2 km). - orography: MeteoSwiss 2.2 km dataset or derived from 90m SRTM data for 1.1 and 0.55 km resolutions - compare the results with observations, especially satellite data COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

General meteorological situation in the Alpine region - 12 July 2006 MSG (Meteosat Second Genertion) 12:00 UTC Synoptic situation in the area: slow-moving cold front in a shallow surface trough of low pressure Synoptic map – 2:00 UTC, 12 July 2006 This is representative case study for summer (convective) situations. COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Time evolution of convection in sequence of MSG satellite images ( visible and infrared in false colors) - 12 July 2006 MSG 9:00 UTCMSG 6:00 UTC MSG 12:00 UTC MSG 18:00 UTC MSG 15:00 UTC Onset of deep convection in the SW Alpine area occurs shortly before 12UTC, strong development between 12 and 15 UTC COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Satellite images from NOAA. The view from low, polar orbit. High resolution sattelite images from 12 July 2006 NOAA 15:00 UTC NOAA 9:00 UTC COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

SETUP OF THE MODEL COSMO: 24 hour operational run of COSMO2 version of MeteoSwiss, for all parameterizations of subscale processes „on” EULAG: Start at 6:00 UTC Grid points, topography, model levels, horizontal domain as for COSMO2, terrain following coordinates up to top of the boundary domain. (COSMO has hybrid coordinates in Z) Moist processes represented by model developed by Grabowski and Smolarkiewicz see (Grabowski and Smolarkiewicz 2002) Drag at the boundary layer from COSMO. For higher resolution constant drag coefficient Initial and boundary conditions from COSMO2 No radiation COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

1. MOTIVATION Numerical complexity of EULAG simulations Horizontal resolution Domain size in grid points # processsors and machine ForecastWall clock time 2.2km520 x 350 x CRAY XT412 hours1h 10 min 1.1km1020 x 680 x CRAY XT47 hours~6 h 0.55km1020 x 1020 x CRAY XT5m12 hours~18 hours Number of levels is fixed and equal 61 in EULAG and 60 in COSMO. Vertical resolution changes from 10m at the bottom to several hundred meters at the tropopause. COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Time evolution of cloud formation at resolution 2.2 km. Comparison between COSMO and EULAG. EULAG (TKE) - anelastic COSMO - compressible 6:00 UTC 9:00 UTC 15:00 UTC Resolution 2.2 km does not allow a development of the Alpine convection COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Time evolution of specific humidity – vertical cross-section. Comparison of COSMO and EULAG simulations at resolution 2.2km EULAG (TKE) - anelastic COSMO - compressible The humid towers produced by EULAG are not observed in COSMO simulation COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Time evolution of velocity flow field and specific humidity at =625m EULAG (TKE) - anelastic COSMO - compressible COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Vertical component of velocity in EULAG simulations. Subgrid-scale model - TKE Resolution 2.2 kmResolution 1.1 km Higher resolution leads to incease of vertical velocity COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Vertical velocity in EULAG simulation. Subgrid-scale model - TKE Resolution 2.2 kmResolution 1.1 km 0.5 COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010 =2  U/N ≈9km

Cloud cover and stream lines from EULAG simulation at three different resolutions. 15:00 UTC Resolution 2.2km 13:00 UTC Resolution 1.1km 15:00 UTC Resolution 0.55km At resolution 0.55 km model starts to resolve the Alpine convection COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Time evolution of cloud formation at resolution 0.55km. Results from EULAG model. 6:00 UTC 9:00 UTC 12:00 UTC 15:00 UTC 18:00 UTC Process of cloud formation starts shortly before 12 UTC COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

Verification of the EULAG simulation at resolution 0.55km. Situation at 18:00 UTC MSG 18:00 UTC 18:00 UTC COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010

1. MOTIVATION CONCLUSIONS EULAG is robust for Alpine orography and with simple physics The model starts to resolve the convection over SW Alps at resolution of 0.55 km Even at resolution 0.55km the model is still far from representation of organization of deep convection Further experiments needed with more realistic representation of physics (PBL, possibly radiation) COSMO General Meeting, Moscow September 2010