Minnesota Department of Education National, State, and School District Technology Plans TIES Conference November 2003 Mary Mehsikomer, Project Planner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mt. Diablo Unified Technology Plan What and Why? The Technology Plan is required by the CA Department of Education for technology funding.
Advertisements

1 Mt. Diablo Unified Technology Plan What and Why? The Technology Plan is required by the CA Department of Education for technology funding.
The Nuts and Bolts of Aligning Service-Learning with Content Standards Presented by Lisa Guilfoile Education Commission of the States Lori Gonzalez and.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
IASB District Meetings June 2009 State Policy and ISBF Research on State Standards, Assessments and the Iowa Core Curriculum (ICC)
Campus Improvement Plans
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
ARIZONA PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR TITLE I - D, Part 2 SUBGRANTEES Barbara J. Presler, Arizona Department of Education Title I, Part D Coordinator Orlenda.
District Team Training Seminar Opening Plenary Session.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction The CA Department of Education, Professional Learning Support.
STaR Chart Summary for Bryan ISD By Jenna Springfield.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
LEARNING FOR THE 21st CENTURY
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
Educational Technology Plan Del Mar Union School District.
NH Department of Education NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan April 15, 2011 Referencing requirements for Schools in Need.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Maude Saunders Elementary School. Title I is a federal program designed to offer supplemental services and supplies (above and beyond what other district.
Parent Involvement in the Title I Law Title I State Parent Advisory Council (SPAC) PAFPC Conference April 3-6, 2011.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Oregon State Board of Education January 19, 2012.
STaR Chart Summary Harlingen CISD (Travis Elementary) By: Elvia Villafranca.
March 25, 2009 NHSTE Event at SERESC in Bedford, NH Dr. Cathy Higgins March 25, 2009 Spring Update from NH Department of Education Office of Educational.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting West Hialeah Gardens Elementary September 8, 2015 Sharon Gonzalez, Principal.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
SMSU University Mission Southwest Minnesota State University prepares students to meet the complex challenges of this century as engaged citizens in their.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
©2007 Dr. Karl Squier 1 The RISCA Toolkits Approach to Implementing Comprehensive School Counseling Programs.
12-13 Task Force Meeting- May 12, 2010 Preparing 21st century Ohio learners for success Helping today’s students & tomorrow’s teachers.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Bardmoor Elementary.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
1 Revising the Content Standards for K-12 Social Sciences A Progress Report State Board of Education December 3, 2009.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction School Library Standards for California.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
West DeFuniak Elementary School September 22 & 24, 2015.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: March 18, 2014 Presented by: National Office of.
LOCAL CONTROL ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN (LCAP) GONZALES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Presentation: Joint City Council & GUSD Board March 28, 2016.
West DeFuniak Elementary Title I is a federal program designed to offer supplemental services and supplies (above and beyond what other district.
Stephanie Graff, Chief Accountability Officer
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Working Together to Prepare Illinois School Leaders Initiative
Freeport Elementary School September 6, 2018
Collaborative Leadership
Presented To: College Planning Council
UPRM Self-Study for MSCHE
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Presented To: College Planning Council
Maude Saunders Elementary School August 30, 2018
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Building Positive Relationships Between Home and School
Presentation transcript:

Minnesota Department of Education National, State, and School District Technology Plans TIES Conference November 2003 Mary Mehsikomer, Project Planner Senior Minnesota Department of Education

National Education Technology Plan NCLB charges the U.S. Department of Education with developing a National Technology Plan. The National Education Technology Plan is being developed to establish long-range national strategy and guide for using technology effectively to improve academic achievement.

National Education Technology Plan Will be student-focused and based on the need to prepare students for the 21 st century. Will reflect on national progress relating to technology investment in schools. Participation is welcome. Web site is established for public feedback. MDE has provided feedback through CoSN and SETDA meetings.

National Education Technology Plan Visit web site at to learn more. Feedback can be provided by writing to

Reports Two important national-level reports have been produced that are worth reviewing: –“A Retrospective of Twenty Years of Education Technology Policy” available at –Learning for the 21 st Century and MILE Self Assessment. More information available at

State Plan for Technology in Pre- K – 12 Education Effort began in Summer State Task Force (45 members) was formed. Chaired by Dr. Barbara Devlin, Superintendent, Richfield. Four Focus Groups were created focusing on Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Staff Development,

State Plan for Technology in Pre- K – 12 Education Technology Infrastructure, and School Administration. Each Focus Group produced a report focusing on foundational concepts and recommendations in these areas. These Focus Group reports, along with additional input from the Expert Work Groups from the Digital Learning Plan project, provide the basis for the plan.

State Plan for Technology in Pre- K – 12 Education What are some of the issues that have arisen since we started work on a state plan? –Digital Learning Plan –21 st Century Skills Partnership –No Child Left Behind –National Technology Plan –Administration Change

State Plan for Technology in Pre- K – 12 Education –Budget reductions and staffing cuts at school districts and MDE. –Increased awareness of issues facing school media centers. –Passage of the On-Line Learning Act. What happens next? Draft plan will be completed and shared with original Task Force members and others for comment.

State Plan for Technology in Pre- K-12 Education 21 st Century Skills Report, Digital Learning Plan, and other documents will be reviewed and components reflected within the State Technology Plan as appropriate. The plan will not be “final” but will be an evolving document. The State Technology Plan will serve as a guide for developing technology initiatives. Are you interested in offering feedback on the State Plan for Technology in Pre-K12 Education?

Digital Learning Plan Partnership between Minnesota Department of Administration (Office of Technology), University of Minnesota, MNSCU, and Department of Education. Broader scope than State Plan for Technology in Pre-K – 12 Education. Digital Learning Plan and State Plan for Technology in Pre-K – 12 Education are separate, but complementary planning efforts.

Digital Learning Plan Represents a collaborative effort to review current status of technology enhanced education and outline a direction that will best leverage resources and improve learning to serve the citizens of the state. Encompasses higher education, pre-K – 12 education and libraries. Attend Cathy DeMoll’s session on the Digital Learning Plan to learn more.

School District Technology Plans Three-year technology plans encompassing criteria identified by the federal government are required for eligibility for E-rates and Title II Part D (Enhancing Education Through Technology Program) of NCLB. Current plan approvals for plans submitted in 2001 are good through July 1, New three-year plans need to be submitted for the period of July 1, 2004 – June 30, 2007.

School District Technology Plans The Technology Planning Guide is under revision and will be released shortly. The new guide will streamline the criteria, emphasize the policy requirements for CIPA, NCLB, and other federal requirements. The new guide will contain a section relating to the role of media centers in student achievement. New plans will be accepted for review from school districts, nonpublic schools, and public libraries beginning March 1, 2004.