IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 1IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 TIFF-FX Interop Testing Robert Buckley Co-author, TIFF-FX.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0227r0 Submission March 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Adrian Stephens nominee statement for Working Group.
Advertisements

January 9, 2013 BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response Update for Texas RE RSC.
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) BoF IETF 91 Monday Afternoon Session II, Coral 1.
1 Improved DNS Server Selection for Multi-Homed Nodes draft-savolainen-mif-dns-server-selection-04 Teemu Savolainen (Nokia) Jun-ya Kato (NTT) MIF WG meeting.
Technical Communication and Your Career C H A P T E R 1.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
2.01 Understand Digital Raster Graphics
Image Compression CSC CSC Computing with Images2 How do we use fewer bytes to encode the same or similar information? Reduce redundancy Take.
Manipulating Images Image A visual representation of something that is seen in real life. It can be two-dimensional or three-dimensional A visual representation.
VDA Security Services Freeware Libraries Update IETF S/MIME WG 29 March 2000 John Pawling J.G. Van Dyke & Associates (VDA), Inc;
PPSP Working Group IETF-89 London, UK 16:10-18:40, Tuesday, Webex: participation.html.
MPEG-4 & Windows Media Dr. Jordi Ribas-Corbera Lead Program Manager, Codecs Digital Media Division Microsoft Corp
05 December, 2002HDF & HDF-EOS Workshop VI1 SEEDS Standards Process Richard Ullman SEEDS Standards Formulation Team Lead
A tech spec requirements draft IETF 64 TECHSPEC BOF.
TST WG Progress Report at TP 17 Group Name: TST WG Source: TST WG Chair, JaeSeung Song (KETI) Meeting Date: to , Sapporo, Japan Agenda.
Digital Images Chapter 8, Exploring the Digital Domain.
Profiling Metadata Specifications David Massart, EUN Budapest, Hungary – Nov. 2, 2009.
Tutorial 2 Drawing Text, Adding Shapes, and Creating Symbols.
XML Publisher Business Applications Government Forms.
Bobby Bodenheimer CS 258 Introduction to Graphics Fall 2003 The Tiff Image Specification.
Versus JEDEC STAPL Comparison Toolkit Frank Toth February 20, 2000.
Submission February 2014 Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AR 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Submission February 2014 Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AR 19 February 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
IETF Trade WG Adelaide, South Australia 29 March 2000 Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
EXPLORATORY / COMPARISON TEST. What types of written information will be required? – Prerequisite – Theoretical or conceptual – Procedural – Examples.
JEM for 3GPP2 Vision, San Diego, July 12-13, Long-term All IP Conference and IP 2 Ad-Hoc group ARIB/TTC IP 2 Ad-hoc Group Joint Experts Meeting for.
Ajh January 2007 CCSDS “Books” Adrian J. Hooke CMC Meeting, Colorado Springs 26 January 2007.
File Formats Different applications (programs) store data in different formats. Applications support some file formats and not others. Open…, Save…, Save.
 JPEG is a standardized image compression mechanism.  JPEG stands for Joint Photographic Experts Group.  JPEG is designed for compressing either full-
BFD Working Group Document Status – IETF 78 Jeffrey Haas, Dave Ward,
RTP Interoperability Testing Colin Perkins University College London.
Timber legality verification system. Process The formulation process was undertaken under UK-Indonesia MoU: “legal timber” definition was agreed, draft.
Standards in Telecommunications n Origin of standards – Standard setting bodies – Governments n Rationale – Market-driven and voluntary – Government-regulated.
1 Requirements for IPv6 prefix delegation for IETF-55 th at Atlanta, Nov.2002 Shin Miyakawa NTT Communications / WIDE Project
Graphics Concepts Presentation
File: /ram/wgchairs.sxi Date: 7 January, 2016 Slide 1 Process and Tools (PROTO) Team General Area Meeting IETF59, Seoul, Korea -- March 2004
Proposals for a New IETF Standards Track draft-ietf-newtrk-proposals-00.txt David Black Brian Carpenter IETF 60.
1 MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile ITU-T - IETF Joint Working Team Dave Ward, Malcolm Betts, ed. April 16, 2008.
File: /ram/wgchairs.sxi Date: 10 February, 2016 Slide 1 Margaret Wasserman WG Chairs Training.
IETF55 Internet FAX and VPIM WG IETF 55 Internet FAX and Voice Profile for Internet Mail WG joint meeting Atlanta, November 20th 2002 Agenda.
RObust Header Compression WG (ROHC) 66 th IETF Montreal, Canada, July 11, 2006 Meeting Chair: Carsten Bormann WG Chair: Lars-Erik Jonsson.
T-MPLS Update IETF71 March 2008 Stewart Bryant
SIMPLE Working Group IETF 59 Chairs Hisham Khartabil Robert Sparks.
68th IETF Prague March 2007 Agenda and WG Status On-line Agenda and Slides at:
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AB 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Slide 1 IETF TRADE WG 18 November 2002, Atlanta, Georgia Chair: Donald E.Eastlake 3rd.
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG documents status MIF WG IETF 80, Prague Problem statement and current practices documents.
IETF #85 - NETCONF WG session 1 NETCONF WG IETF 85, Atlanta, USA WEDNESDAY, November 7, Bert Wijnen Mehmet Ersue.
1 Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses Jung-Soo Park, Myung-Ki Shin ETRI 54th IETF – Yokohama, Japan draft-ietf-ipv6-link-scoped-mcast-01.txt.
56 th IETF Internet Fax WG Claudio Allocchio Hiroshi Tamura Mar 18 th 2003.
Submitted To-: Submitted By-: Mrs.Sushma Rani (HOD) Aashish Kr. Goyal (IT-7th) Deepak Soni (IT-8 th )
ITU Liaison on T-MPLS Stewart Bryant
Standards in Telecommunications
2.01 Understand Digital Raster Graphics
2.01 Understand Digital Raster Graphics
2.01 Understand Digital Raster Graphics
Requirements for IPv6 prefix delegation for IETF-55th at Atlanta, Nov.2002 Shin Miyakawa NTT Communications.
Graphics Basic Concepts.
File Formats V
2.01 Understand Digital Raster Graphics
ADVANCE DRAFT TO SPONSOR BALLOT
Juan Carlos Zuniga, InterDigital Labs (EC SG Chair)
COMS 161 Introduction to Computing
2.01 Understand Digital Raster Graphics
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 March 2012
Jeffrey Haas Reshad Rahman
IETF 103 pim wg meeting.
Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University
Presentation transcript:

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 1IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 TIFF-FX Interop Testing Robert Buckley Co-author, TIFF-FX

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 2IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Internet Standards Process - RFC 2026 l Goals l Technical excellence; l Prior implementation and testing; l Clear, concise, and easily understood documentation; l Openness and fairness; and l Timeliness. l Procedures l Fair, open, and objective; l Reflect existing (proven) practice; and l Flexible.

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 3IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Internet Standards - RFC 2026 l Draft Standard “Elevation to Draft Standard is a major advance in status, indicating a strong belief that the specification is mature and will be useful.” l Internet Standard “In general, an Internet Standard is a specification that is stable and well-understood, is technically competent, has multiple, independent, and interoperable implementations with substantial operational experience, enjoys significant public support, and is recognizably useful in some or all parts of the Internet.”

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 4IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Original TIFF-FX Interoperability Report l Submitted to WG Chair and AD on March 9, 1999 l Participants l Japan Color Document Committee - All profiles –Matsushita Graphic Communication Systems –Toshiba TEC –Sharp –NTT Printec –Mitsubishi –Fuji Xerox –Waseda University l Genoa Technology - All profiles –now Quality Logic l Xerox - All profiles l Intel - All profiles, except L l Image Power - All profiles, except L and M

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 5IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Interoperability Testing l “The interoperability results are based on testing between at least 2 independent implementations. Fields and features listed as implemented by the Reader were verified with TIFF-FX files created by an independent writer. Fields and features implemented in the Writer were verified by an independent reader, using visual checks (view and print) and, in the case of lossless compression, by pixel comparisons of the original and decompressed source images.”

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 6IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Profile S Implementations Other Feature/Values l Fixed l Byte Order (II), BitsPerSample (1), Compression (3), FillOrder (2), ImageWidth (1728), NewSubFileType (2), PhotometricInterpretation (0), ResolutionUnit (2), SamplesPerPixel (1), XResolution (200/204) l Derivative l ImageLength, PageNumber, RowsPerStrip, StripByteCounts, StripOffsets

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 7IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Profiles F and J Implementations l Fixed Feature/Values l BitsPerSample (1), NewSubFileType (2), SamplesPerPixel (1) l Derivative Feature/Values l ImageLength, ImageWidth, PageNumber, StripByteCounts, StripOffsets

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 8IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Profile C Implementations l Fixed Feature/Values l ChromaPositioning (1), Compression (7), NewSubFileType (2), PhotometricInterpretation (10), ResolutionUnit (2) l Derivative Feature/Values l ImageLength, ImageWidth, PageNumber, RowsPerStrip, StripByteCounts, StripOffset

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 9IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Profile L Implementations l Fixed Feature/Values l Compression (10), NewSubFileType (2), ResolutionUnit (2) l Derivative Feature/Values l ImageLength, ImageWidth, PageNumber, RowsPerStrip, StripByteCounts, StripOffset

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 10IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Profile M Implementations l Fixed Feature/Values l Mask-PhotometricInterpetatiopn (0), ResolutionUnit (2) l Derivative Feature/Values l Image Layer, ImageLength, ImageWidth, PageNumber, RowsPerStrip, StripByteCounts, StripOffset

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 11IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 Interoperability Results l At least two independent and interoperable implementations for all features l Exceptions: l 12-bit JPEG compression l CMY(K) Foreground/Background l Update TIFF-FX accordingly

IETF 55th Meeting, Atlanta, GA 12IFax WG, 20 Nov 2002 TIFF-FX Products l Interop Testing l March 1999: 11 participants l September 2000: 12 participants l Altogether, 19 different companies –backed up by products l TIFF-FX based products appearing by 1999 l ITU-T Rec. T.37 references TIFF-FX l All profiles now in products (except L?) l Profile M: 2 licenses have been issued l Profile J: 3 licenses have been issued l TIFF-FX enjoys significant public support