Multi-Mission Cross Calibration – results with upgraded altimeter data Wolfgang Bosch Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI), München Email:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Ocean Tide Models – Assesment of Errors and their Impact on GRACE gravity fields Roman Savcenko and Wolfgang Bosch Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut.
Advertisements

OVERVIEW OF THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE ON THE EMPIRICAL DETERMINATION OF THE SEA STATE BIAS CORRECTION S. Labroue, P. Gaspar, J. Dorandeu, F. Mertz, N. Tran,
TOPEX & Jason Retracking OSTST ‘07 Retracking and SSB Splinter TOPEX and Jason Retracking Ernesto Rodriguez, Phil Callahan, Ted Lungu March 13, 2007 Jet.
Altimeter sea surface height bias calibration with in situ network G. Jan 1, P. Bonnefond 2, Y. Ménard 3, O. Laurain 2 1 NOVELTIS, Toulouse, France 2 OCA,
Retracking & SSB Splinter OSTST ‘07 Retracking and SSB Splinter Report Juliette Lambin and Phil Callahan March 14, 2007 Hobart, Tasmania.
26/11/2012 – Observatoire de Paris Analysis of wind speed evolution over ocean derived from altimeter missions and models M. Ablain (CLS)
POD/Geoid splinter March 14, 2007 J.P. Berthias Ocean Topography Science Team Meeting - Hobart, Australia – March 2007.
From TOPEX-POSEIDON to JASON Science Working Team Meeting GRACE Mission Status Arles, France November 18-21, 2003 Byron D. Tapley (Principal Investigator)
Christopher Watson 1 Neil White 2,3 Richard Coleman 1,2,3 John Church 2,3 1 University of Tasmania 2 CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research 3 Antarctic.
Coastal Altimetry Workshop February 5-7, 2008 Organized by: Laury Miller, Walter Smith: NOAA/NESDIS Ted Strub, Amy Vandehey: CIOSS/COAS/OSU With help from.
- 1- Quality of real time altimeter products OSTST, Hobart, March 2007 Quality of real time altimeter products impact of the delay G.Larnicol, G. Dibarboure,
POD/Geoid Splinter Summary OSTS Meeting, Hobart 2007.
MR P.Durkee 5/20/2015 MR3522Winter 1999 MR Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Winter 1999 Active Microwave Radar.
Evaluation of the ground retracking algorithms on Jason-1 data P.Thibaut, S. Labroue Collecte Localisation Satellite : Toulouse, France.
Xiaochun Wang Influence of Stratification on Semidiurnal Tides in Monterey Bay, California & Coastal Barotropic Tide Solutions Contributions from: JPL.
Spatial-Temporal Parametric Model with Covariance Structure based on Multiple Satellite Altimetry for Predicting and Interpolating Sea Surface Heights.
ASIC**3 Workshop -- May 2006 Measuring Global Sea Level Rise With Satellite Radar Altimetry ASIC**3 Workshop -- May 2006 Laury Miller NOAA/NESDIS Lab for.
Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission (SWOT)
Sea Level Change Observation Status on the elements of the puzzle Christian Le Provost LEGOS / CNRS Toulouse, France.
Monitoring Jason-1 and TOPEX/POSEIDON from a California Offshore Platform: Latest Results from the Harvest Experiment Bruce Haines and Shailen Desai Jet.
Principles of Sea Level Measurement Long-term tide gauge records  What is a tide station?  How is sea level measured relative to the land?  What types.
Monitoring the Global Sea Level Rise Budget with Jason, Argo and GRACE Observations Eric Leuliette and Laury Miller NOAA/Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry.
OSTST, Hobart, March Future altimeter systems : is mesoscale observability guaranteed for operational oceanography? Future altimeter systems.
OSTST Hobart 2007 – SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX data SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon data M.Ablain, S.Philipps,
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Active Microwave Radar.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications.
Satellite Altimetry - possibilities and limitations
IRI Workshop 2005 TEC Measurements with Dual-Frequency Space Techniques and Comparisons with IRI T. Hobiger, H. Schuh Advanced Geodesy, Institute of Geodesy.
Sea Level Change Measurements: Estimates from Altimeters Understanding Sea Level Rise and Variability June 6-9, 2006 Paris, France R. S. Nerem, University.
Towards improved GRACE de-aliasing - first results from dynamical and residual ocean tide analysis Wolfgang Bosch 1), Detlef Stammer 2), Frank Flechtner.
Monitoring of altimeter measurements against a global tide gauge network F. Lefèvre, G. Valladeau, E. Sénant, J. Dorandeu F. Lefèvre, G. Valladeau, E.
Is sea level rise larger near the coast? Remko Scharroo Altimetrics LLC, Cornish, New Hampshire Eric Leuliette and Laury Miller NOAA / Laboratory for Satellite.
Philip Moore Jiasong Wang School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences University of Newcastle upon Tyne Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
2007 OSTST meeting Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) F. Lefevre (CLS) Long period errors observed at Envisat crossovers and possible impact of tides.
Copyright © 2014, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Chapter 19 Linear Patterns.
Bosch & Shum -- Need for an IAS? GE8, Paris, 10/20031 A Call to Study Rationale, Feasibility and Scope of an International Altimeter Service (IAS) Do we.
OSTST Hobart 2007 – Performance assessment Jason-1 data M.Ablain, S.Philipps, J.Dorandeu, - CLS N.Picot - CNES Jason-1 GDR data Performance assessment.
SLR in the age of GPS Frank G. Lemoine, Scott B. Luthcke, Nikita P Zelensky Brian D. Beckley Code 697, Space Geodesy Laboratory NASA Goddard Space Flight.
Some Remaining Issues in Satellite Altimetry Lee-Lueng Fu Jet Propulsion Laboratory NASA Sea Level Workshop November 2-4, 2009, Austin, Texas.
Radar Altimeter Data Base System (RADS) -- producing a consistent set of climate-grade observations spanning multiple satellite missions Altimeter/Tide.
Intercomparison of GlobVapour total column water vapour (TCWV) and Envisat RA2-MWR measurements (preliminary results) Bruno Picard (CLS), Jean-Rémi Deboer.
Improved Satellite Altimeter data dedicated to coastal areas :
Recent Results from the Corsica Calibration Site P. Bonnefond (1), P. Exertier (1), O. Laurain (1), Y. Ménard (2), F. Boldo (3), E. Jeansou (4), G. Jan.
Hobart Australia March 2007Willy Bertiger Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting GPS-Based Precise Orbit Determination: Jason-1 Status Willy Bertiger,
Ocean Surface Topography Science Team, Reston, VA, USA, October, 2015 References Feng et al., Splin based nonparametric estimation of the altimeter.
Jason-1/Envisat cross-calibration Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) N. Picot (CNES) P. Femenias (ESA) Jason-1 / Envisat Cross-calibration.
Local and global calibration/validation P. Bonnefond, S. Desai, B. Haines, S. Nerem and N. Picot Jason-1 - T/P Sea Surface Height Formation Flying Phase.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Closing the Global Sea Level.
Value of Node Closest to HARVEST = 150 mm Value of Node Closest to SENETOSA = 117 mm Value of Node Closest to BURNIE = 154 mm SOUTH Mean = mm  =
Orbit comparison for Jason-2 mission between GFZ and CNES (POE-D) The GFZ orbit is referred to as GFZ in the following study The CNES orbit is referred.
Validation of the TMR and JMR Wet Path delay Measurements using GPS, SSM/I, and TMI Shailen Desai Shannon Brown Bruce Haines Wenwen Lu Victor Zlotnicki.
Orbit comparison for ERS-2 mission between GFZ and REAPER The GFZ orbit is referred to as GFZ in the following study The REAPER orbit is referred to as.
OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 On the use of temporal gravity field models derived from GRACE for altimeter satellite orbit determination.
Wet tropospheric correction comparison for Jason-1 mission between GPD V2.0 (FCUP) and GPD V1.1 corrections The GPD V2.0 correction is referred to as GPD_V2.0.
ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.
Jason-1 POD reprocessing at CNES Current status and further developments L. Cerri, S. Houry, P. Perrachon, F. Mercier. J.P. Berthias with entries from.
Orbit Selection for the WATER HM Mission R. S. Nerem CCAR, CIRES, University of Colorado D. P. Chambers Center for Space Research, University of Texas.
1 July 20, 2000 Geosat Follow-On An examination from an operational point of view Impact on operational products Overall system performance (from sensor.
Satellite Altimetry. The range R from satellite to mean sea level is estimated by.
C. Shum, C. Zhao, Y. Yi, and P. Luk The Ohio State University GFO Calibration/Validation Meeting NOAA Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry Silver Spring,
Validation strategy MARCDAT-III meeting - Frascati, Italy - May 2011 The validation phase to compare all the algorithms together and to select the best.
ESA Climate Change Initiative Sea-level-CCI project A.Cazenave (Science Leader), G.Larnicol /Y.Faugere(Project Leader), M.Ablain (EO) MARCDAT-III meeting.
Wet tropospheric correction comparison GPD V2.0 (FCUP) and GPD V1.1 corrections for ERS-1, ERS-2, Envisat, Jason-1, Jason- 2, TOPEX/Poseidon Synthesis.
(2) Norut, Tromsø, Norway Improved measurement of sea surface velocity from synthetic aperture radar Morten Wergeland Hansen.
Validation Activities for Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon Precise Orbits
Coastal Altimetry Challenges
Recent Activities of Ocean Surface Topography Virtual Constellation (OST-VC) Remko Scharroo (EUMETSAT)
Geology 491 Spectral Analysis
The next 3 figures are from the Ocean Pathfinder Project at NASA/GSFC The next 3 figures are from the Ocean Pathfinder Project at NASA/GSFC. Compliments.
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Mission Cross Calibration – results with upgraded altimeter data Wolfgang Bosch Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI), München

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 TOPEX as Reference? TOPEX orbits taken as „reference“ for other altimeters (Le Traon & Ogor 1998) See, however, the SSH differences TOPEX - Jason1 during the tandem phase

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Objectives Use single- and dual satellite crossover in all combinations of TOPEX, ERS-2, GFO, Jason1, ENVISAT, … Strongest possible network with high redundancy Don´t let TOPEX orbits fixed – let it also get radial corrections

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Altimeter data base is rather inhomogeneous Ocean tide corrections for all missions were based on FES2004 ERS1, Phase C and G processed with OPR, Version 6, DEOS orbits, pole tides, 1.5ms time bias ERS1, Phase E and F with OPR, version 5, DEOS orbits and corrections, pole tide, 1.5ms time bias ERS2 all Cycles with DEOS orbits, 1.3ms time bias ENVISAT as provided by GDR/ESA GFO with GDR NOAA TOPEX MGDR-C (CNES) still with JGM3 orbits, Chambers SSB correction, Jason1 Cycle GDR-A (JGM3 orbits), SBB+2cm Jason1 Cycle 1-21, 119 – 136 GDR-B (GRACE orbits) Tandem phase TOPEX/Jason1 analysed separately with both data sets re-tracked and with GRACE based orbits

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 „Discrete“ Crossover Analysis (DCA) No functional error model (polynomials, splines, …) Minimizing both, crossover and adjacent differences Rank defect =1 => constraint: sum of TOPEX errors to vanish; Huge but sparse Normals - solved by iteration (Conjugate Gradient)

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Segmentation of DCA Sequence of DCA’s for ten day periods (the TOPEX cycles) extended by 3 days overlap Crossover skipped if |  x| > 1m or   x > 0.1 m Crossovers taken only if time difference  t < 3 days Crossover weighted byσ(Δx), cosφ With – XO’s per analysis period

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Error estimates (m) for TOPEX(black), Jason1(blue), ERS2(red), and GFO(green) 4,3 cm 3,7 2,0 1,7

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Error Consistency in Overlapping Periods At most 1-2 mm differences

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Empirical Autocovariance Functions

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Relative range biases and center-of-origin shifts Systematic error pattern? For every 10 days the final error components of all altimeters were adjusted by the model

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Relative range biases  r cyc of altimeter missions The range biases are relative to TOPEX (later TOPEX-EM) because the sum of TOPEX (TOPEX-EM) errors was forced to zero. weak annual oscillations with similar phasing and amplitude for ENVISAT, Jason1, and GFO since late 2002 – an indication for systematic variations in the TOPEX-EM data.

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Centre-of-origin shifts (mm)

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Mean values of single satellite crossovers TOPEX/Poseidon (top) and ERS-2 (bottom panel with pronounced annual variation of SXO - unexplained)

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Mean and Variable Orbit Errors „Book-keeping“ allows to separate asc/desc errors Kaula first order theory (Rosborough 1986): „Mean“ and „variable“ error component Mean error not visible by single satellite crossovers

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Topex mean errors of ascending/descending passes

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Topex – geographically correlated/anticorrelated errors

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Geographic correlated errors (TOPEX versus Jason1)

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007

Conclusions discrete crossover analysis for up to five contemporary atimeter systems gives complete time series for radial errors of all satellites and allows estimating the error-covariance functions is able to sense relative range biases and centre-of-origin differences between the satellites involved Capable to assess the geographical correlated errors GCE of Topex & Jason1 below 2cm – with clear but slightly different geographical pattern Most pronounced GCE-patterns are found for GFO

OST ST Meeting, Hobart, March 12-15, 2007 Thank you!