Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration
Advertisements

Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Expanding the Potential of Tolling: A 21 st Century Look AASHTO November 18, Brian Peters Florida DOT, Assistant Secretary of Finance and Administration.
Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.
April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force March 18, 2004.
Congestion Management System The Mobility Management Process.
Applying DynusT to the I-10 Corridor Study, Tucson, AZ ITE Western District Meeting Santa Barbara June 26th, 2012 Jim Schoen, PE, Kittelson & Assoc. Khang.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Mario Fiorillo – Transportation – Civil Mario Fiorillo Present work experience Florida If you have any questions please me at
Versatile Applications of EMME/2 and ENIF: Seattle Experience Madhavi Sanakkayala Heather Purdy & Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff, Seattle.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
Transpo 2012 The Future of Traffic Incident Management, October 30, 2012 Javier Rodriguez, P.E., ITS Operations Engineer Joe Snyder, TMC Manager FDOT District.
Working Group Core Team Meeting II February 14, 2008.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Southeast Florida Model Users Group presented by Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Route 1 Project Study Report Overview. A report that describes the transportation problem and identifies the project scope, schedule and estimated cost.
Travel Demand Modeling Experience Bellevue-Kirkland-Redmond Travel Demand Modeling Experience Jin Ren, P.E. City of Bellevue, Washington, USA October 19,
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Dynamic Tolling Assignment Model for Managed Lanes presented to Advanced Traffic Assignment Sub-Committee presented by Jim Hicks, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Enhancement and Validation of a Managed-Lane Subarea Network Tolling Forecast Model May 19, 2005 Stephen Tuttle (RSG), Jeff Frkonja (Portland Metro), Jack.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
I-95 Managed Lanes CORSIM Analysis Status Meeting Presented by David Stroud, PE, AICP Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Modeling Various Tolling Schemes Using Emme: Seattle Experience Andrew Natzel, Parsons Brinckerhoff Bhanu Yerra, Parsons Brinckerhoff Craig Helmann, Puget.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
December 12, 2006 Florida Model Task Force CORRADINO 1 Treasure Coast Southeast Florida Regional Planning Models In Cube Voyager.
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
2004 Transportation M etropolitan A tlanta P erformance Report – Congestion Measures Presentation to ITS Georgia August 29, 2005.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Presentation to Transportation Planning Board October.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
TVTC Impact Fee Update Nexus Study January 30, 2008
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
SERPM 8 NPMRDS SPEED DATA
Attractiveness of HOT Lanes – Let the Data Talk
Slugging in the I-395 Corridor
Major Initiatives in Hampton Roads
Broward County Congestion Assessment
West Cervantes Traffic Feasibility Study Jill Lavender, Transportation Planner Cory Wilkinson, AICP CEP, Project Manager Mary Morgan, PE, Engineer.
Presentation transcript:

Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 2 Project Area

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 3 SERPM-6 Summary Most current and advanced SE FL model Time-of-day model with feedback (AM peak, PM peak and Off-peak) Mode choice for non-motorized, auto occupancy and all transit systems Includes HOV lanes, and toll model for Turnpike and other toll roads Base year is 2000, target year is 2030

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 4 SERPM-6 Enhancements for Managed Lanes Analysis Develop networks for 2010, 2018, and 2030 Add High-Occupancy-Toll (HOT) lanes capability Each Link Class has a time and cost function: –3+ Carpools use only time –DA and carpool 2 use cost, which includes toll

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 5 HOT Lanes Method Implemented with SERPM-6 framework Model seeks equilibrium of impedance (time and equivalent cost) HOV 3+ has no toll HOV 2 and drive alone are assessed tolls Value of time ($1.00 = 5.1 minutes) was calibrated in the toll model (mainly Turnpike) 24 hours, transponders, no toll collection delay

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 6 Toll Calculation Function of the V/C on the managed lanes Logit function Several toll ranges explored Final function ranged between $.00 and $0.25 per mile

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 7 Alternatives NO-Build Alternatives  2010 : Base year networks, 2010 interpolated zonal data  2018 : Base year networks, 2018 interpolated zonal data  2030 : 2030 networks, 2030 zonal data Build Alternatives  2 Managed lanes on each direction of I-95 in the study area  Replaced HOV lanes, removed HOV slip ramp methodology, included access points at designated locations only (See next slide)  Modified the I-95/I-195 interchange  No changes in zonal data, same as No-Build

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 8 Original Access Points (recommended)

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 9 Original Access Points Contd. Starting north going southbound: Park and ride location:  N of I-595 Griffin road location Miami/Broward county line location Golden Glades interchange location Between NW 95th St. and NW 103rd St. location SR 112 Location

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 10 New Access Points (not ) New Access Points (not recommended)

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 11 Tests Conducted Modeling HOT lanes is still in research No HOT lanes calibration data is available Schedule constraints – major model development usually takes more time Tests were conducted to meet the expected performance measures All tests were conducted on 2030 Build Alternative

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 12 Tests Conducted Contd. 1. Original access points, 13¢ minimum toll, linear toll function 2. Access points at each interchange N of GG, 13¢ minimum toll, linear toll function 3. New access points, 5¢ minimum toll, linear toll function 4. New access points, 0¢ minimum toll, linear toll function 5. Original access points and 5¢ minimum toll, linear toll function 6. Original access points and 0¢ minimum toll, linear toll function 7. Original access points, 5¢ minimum toll, logit toll function 8. Original access points and 0¢ minimum toll, logit toll function

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 13 Macro Model Results Entire corridor of interest was divided into 8 segments Segments 1,2,3,4 are general purpose (GP); segments 5,6,7,8 are HOT Weighted average performance measures were reported Average speeds, average volumes and toll revenues were used to compare alternatives

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 14 Macro Model Results Contd. Results Summary  Improved GP lane performance  Improved average speeds  Reduced volumes  Improved HOT lane performance  Significantly improved average speeds  Significantly increased volumes

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 15 Data Sources & Analysis Tools Southeast Regional Planning Model 6 (SERPM6) CORSIM Simulation Modeling System Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000)

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 16 Simulation and Analysis times 2010 AM peak hour 2010 PM peak hour 2018 AM peak hour 2018 PM peak hour 2030 AM peak hour 2030 PM peak hour

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 17 I-95 & SR 112 Interchange Distinctive Alternatives From I-195 to NB & SB I-95 One-lane ramp Two-lane ramp (Preferred alternative)

August 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation 18 Thank You Questions? Three-lane ramp (Existing alternative)