UsRAP Pilot Studies Douglas W. Harwood Midwest Research Institute TRB January 22, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Vision, Mission and Goal presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Susan Herbel, Cambridge.
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Institutional and Cultural Barriers in Road Safety Peter Daly Chief Engineer Traffic and Roads.
Strategic Highway Safety Plan/Developing Local Road Safety Plans Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety.
Thematic evaluation on the contribution of UN Women to increasing women’s leadership and participation in Peace and Security and in Humanitarian Response.
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
All Roads Transportation Safety Roadway Departure Crash (Formerly Jurisdictionally Blind Safety)
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
Project Selection (Ch 4)
Strengthen and expand OCE as a statewide institution, which will provide educational services, information resources, exhibits and public programs and.
SafetyAnalyst Michael S. Griffith FHWA July 2003.
DRAFT.  Its Mandated for funding › Strategy, activity or project  It is a Guide › How to  It is a story › History (where we were) › Possible look.
Federal Traffic Safety Program History HES (Hazard Elimination Set aside) TEA
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
Planning and Safety: A Comprehensive and Collaborative Process Michael D. Meyer, P.E., Professor School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia.
Road Network Risk Assessment and Index Zhang Tiejun
Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Moving Research into Practice.  Implementation is the routine use of a SHRP 2 product by users in their regular way of doing business.  Users can include.
Multnomah County Health Department ►Essential Services ►FDA Food Standards ►PACE Tools for Food Program Excellence Lila Wickham March 17, 2004 ♣
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity SHRP 2 Outreach and Implementation AASHTO Technology Implementation Group.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
NCHRP Synthesis 458: Roadway Safety Data Interoperability Between Local and State Agencies Presented to ATSIP TRF 2014 Presented by Nancy Lefler Vanasse.
1 SHRP 2 Implementation Outcomes and Products July 28, 2010 Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity.
ROAD ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS: A New Approach to Highway Safety Management and Communications.
AASHTO and the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) A Strategic Approach to Implementation Priscilla Tobias, PE State Safety Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation.
Network Screening 1 Module 3 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho.
May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
1 Toward Zero Deaths: A National Strategy for Highway Safety Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration United States.
October 25, 2015 Funding Your Program October 20, 2008 ATSSA Sign Maintenance and Management Workshop Addison, Texas.
PLANNING WORKBOOK TUTORIAL MODULE 3 STEPS FOR DEVELOPING ROADWAY USER AWARENESS AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS FHWA Highway Safety Marketing, Communications, and.
SMSA 2012 Annual Motorcycle Safety Conference A Comprehensive Approach to Motorcycle Safety Presenters: Andy Krajewski, SMSA Chairperson Brett Robinson,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Redesigning FSIS Outreach to Meet Current Needs of Small and Very Small Plants.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Weather Information for Surface Transportation: AASHTO Activities June 13, 2006 WIST Workshop Presented by Leland D. Smithson AASHTO SICOP Coordinator.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
1 Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee Meeting State Lead Agency Presentation Chuck Andrews, Chair AAPCO Worker Protection Committee California Department.
Update on United States Road Assessment Program (usRAP) SCOHTS Meeting May 1, 2009.
Methodologies and Tools for Technology Needs Assessment: an Overview Zou Ji Dept. of environmental Economics and Management, Renmin University of China.
UsRAP United States Road Assessment Program Risk Mapping + Star Ratings January 29, 2009.
Integrating State and Local Safety Data 1 Roadway Safety Data Program.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
Module 2-1 The Foundation For Road Safety Management Policy History and Institutional Structures of Road Safety Management Think about it …
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Challenges Facing the Department of Transportation and the Office of Inspector General’s Strategy for.
South Dakota Transportation Safety Conference February 21-22, 2007 John G. Rohlf, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Pierre, South Dakota.
Summary of Session 6 Long Term Operation 1 Christopher Miller NRC, United States of America IAEA International Conference on Operational Safety Vienna.
Conference or Meeting Name 1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith June 12, 2003.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
IRAP: Eliminating High Risk Roads Speaker: Rob McInerney Economy: Australia.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
Roadway Data Extraction Technical Assistance Program (RDETAP) Robert Pollack October 25,
SESSION 356 Road Assessment Programs: New Approaches to Highway Safety Programs January 22, 2007.
Greta Smith, P.E. Associate Program Director, Project Delivery AASHTO Subcommittee on Design June 5, 2013.
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
UsRAP: An Innovation in Data-Driven Safety Analysis Presented by: Bruce Hamilton, Roadway Safety Foundation Doug Harwood, MRIGlobal Est. Dec
Australian Road Assessment Program (AusRAP) John Metcalfe Director, Policy and Research Australian Automobile Association October 2005 Rating roads for.
David M. Murray, Ph.D. Associate Director for Prevention Director, Office of Disease Prevention Multilevel Intervention Research Methodology September.
AASHTO SCOP Linking Planning to Programming P2P Link
Comparing Systemic Approaches: A Kentucky Example
Update on United States Road Assessment Program (usRAP)
UNICEF Plan for Global Evaluations
U.S. Road Assessment Program (usRAP) Overview
Evaluation use in practice
Presentation transcript:

usRAP Pilot Studies Douglas W. Harwood Midwest Research Institute TRB January 22, 2007

usRAP Objectives Help cut death and serious injury rates through systematic risk assessment which identify major safety shortcomings amenable to practical remedy Ensure that strategic decisions are linked to risk assessment Forge partnerships among those responsible for a safe road system

usRAP Pilot Studies Phase I Initiated in 2004 Pilot studies in Iowa & Michigan First public release of findings in Spring 2006 Phase II pilot studies currently underway

Risk Mapping maps of death and serious injury risk for road users Road Protection Score star rating based on inspecting road features that protect users from serious injury or death Performance Tracking comparisons of safety performance for roadway sections over time usRAP Protocols

Scope of Phase I Pilot Project Technical feasibility Political feasibility Pilot tests in Michigan and Iowa Advisory panel meetings Recommendations for implementation

Risk Maps Focus on rural road system State primary routes County primary roads Homogeneous road segments Segment length sufficient to provide meaningful results

Types of Risk Maps Map 1 – crash density (crashes/mi) Map 2 – crash rate (crashes per 100 million veh-mi) Map 3 – crash rate ratio Map 4 – potential savings

Types of Risk Maps Other risk maps Economic losses due to crashes Intersection risk maps

Applications for Risk Maps Effective safety management by highway agencies Better public understanding of highway safety needs Influence motorist route choice Influence motorist behavior on higher risk routes

Applications for Risk Maps Assist highway agencies in implementing new SAFETEA-LU programs: 5% criterion high-risk rural roads program statewide safety planning

Star Ratings based on Road Protection Score Identify differences in road design features related to crash protection features of the roadway Provide star ratings based on inventories More research needed to adapt EuroRAP and AusRAP tools to U.S. conditions

Scope of Phase II Pilot Program Expand pilot studies into additional states – Florida and New Jersey Additional work in Michigan and Iowa – performance tracking Coordinate with international efforts Seek collaborators Explore most appropriate communication strategies Meet with usRAP advisory panel

Performance Tracking Track changes in risk maps over time Demonstrate applications of risk maps Highlight improvements in safety Highlight recent safety improvement projects Call attention to safety improvement needs

Plans for Phase III Additional pilot studies in three to five states Further work with previous pilot study states Further development of star rating/RPS methodology Recommendation about national implementation

Questions?

For more information, please go to: