Child Rights & Remedies Fall 2012 Class 17. Review of Class # 16  Child Victim /Witness Confidentiality  Delinquency Basics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Expression Opinion of the Court The wearing of armbands was "closely akin to 'pure speech'" and protected by the First Amendment.
Advertisements

SEARCH AND SEIZURE The 4 th. Disclaimer Mr Koepping is NOT an attorney. This discussion is for the purpose of explaining general constitutional principles.
CJ PREP REVIEW FOR FINAL. The authority of the court to hear a case. The Supreme Court has original and appellate ________.
1) When an institution receives notice of sexual harassment, the institution has an obligation to (check all that apply):  End the harassment  Abide.
RANDOM STUDENT DRUG TESTING. What is Random Student Drug Testing? A Powerful Prevention Program It gives students a credible reason to resist pressure.
Student Drug Use: Ethical & Legal Perspectives Amanda Davis & Vickie Kummer 2004.
Poverty Law 2 CHIPS. 2 Court System  District Court  Trial Court  Some “specialty” courts including  Family Court  Drug Court  Juvenile Court 
Presumption of Innocence Reasonable Doubt Burden of Proof Guilty -Proven Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Not Guilty -Probably Guilty -Possibly Guilty -Maybe.
The Dual Court System Chapter 2.1 Federal & State Court Systems.
Civil LawCriminal Law Federal Courts State Courts $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Adjudication hearing More than a million cases of alleged delinquency brought before the juvenile court each year More than half are petitioned to court.
Search & Seizure in Schools: Drug Testing in Public Schools.
Getting Fired Up Can Get You Fired & Kicked off the Team A Study of Cases Impacting Drug Testing Policies.
SEARCH AND SEIZURE INSTRUCTOR: OFFICER COLE LANGSTON CARROLLTON POLICE DEPARTMENT.
Illegal Juveniles facing our Criminal Justice Systems Adjudication, Custodial, Detention, Diversion Adjudication-Legal process where the judge review evidence.
Supreme Court Cases Aim: Are we really protected by the Bill of Rights? Do Now: Which case is most important to you? HW: Complete Review Sheet.
Bill of Rights #2. #1 What guideline did the Supreme Court give us to help determine if a type of punishment, other than execution, is cruel or unusual.
Juvenile Justice Chapter 17. Philosophic basis for juvenile courts in America at the turn of the century It meant that the state was to act on behalf.
Analyzing a Court Decision An overview of Student Searches presented by Bart Fennemore.
Bill of Rights #1. #1The ___ says that illegally obtained evidence can't be used in court. Reasonable suspicion rule Search rule Warrant Rule Exclusionary.
Juvenile Courts Chapter Nineteen.
Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 2 Delinquency Overview.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Delinquency Coun 150 – Laws Relating to Children Richard M. Cartier Class 13.
SECTION 1 Intro to Juvenile Justice
Legal System. Purpose of Laws Bring order to our lives, provide penalties, help settle disagreements, protect our rights, and promote welfare in society.
Supreme Court Cases Every Teen Should Know
Beyond Newtown: How to Ensure Safe Schools and Communities April 29, 2013 Jenee’ Littrell Director of Guidance and Wellness Grossmont Union High School.
Chapter 15 The Juvenile System. CHILD SAVERS Child Savers: Wealthy, civic minded citizens who were concerned with the welfare of disadvantaged children.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice. Failure of family a cause of delinquent behavior. Families had failed to teach proper values and respect for authority.
THE 4 TH AMENDMENT The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall.
Juvenile Crimes. North Carolina In North Carolina, you are considered an adult at the age of 18, however you can still be charged as an adult at 16 and.
Child Rights & Remedies Fall 2012 Class 27. Review 7) Child Care Demographics Miller v. Carlson.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System Part 14 Juvenile Justice.
Juvenile Delinquency CJ 150 Tom Woods We will begin at the top of the hour.
Status, Rights & Obligations of Children ~ the evolving conception of children’s rights Coun 150 – Laws Relating to Children Richard M. Cartier Class 3.
What does it all mean?! The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. This means that law enforcement.
Chapter Eight Juvenile Justice. Juvenile Justice System The juvenile justice system is designed to deal with the problems of delinquent acts committed.
BY: GRACE JENKINS Court Cases. Desegregation Brown vs. BOE (1954) Court struck down on “separate but equal” which was determined in Plessy vs. Ferguson.
Unit 1: Constitutional Interpretation and the Bill of Rights.
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Challenging the Criminal Investigation ODOM & DAVIS Criminal Defense Attorneys Wendell A. Odom, Jr. Neal Davis, III Brian T.
 The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
Child Rights & Remedies Fall 2012 Class 16. Review of Class # 15  Review and Critique of Child Welfare.
Unit 4 Experimental Research Designs. Four Part to the Classical Experiment (What works best, flea collar or flea drops?) Independent and Dependent Variables.
Search & Seizure in Schools: Drug Testing in Public Schools.
The Juvenile Court System. Juveniles in the Courts Usually, anyone under the age of 18 + is classified as a juvenile Delinquents: young people who commit.
Review Standards of Proof Mere suspicion Standards of Proof Reasonable suspicion.
Juvenile Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) on the nature of youthful offenders Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency.
IMPORTANT TERMS America’s Courts. Important Terms Defense/Defendant: The accused party Prosecution: In a criminal trial, the accuser. Usually the state.
Vernonia School District V Acton Oregon-Late 1980’s school officials recognized higher rate of drug use among athletes Oregon-Late 1980’s school officials.
Juvenile Justice Chapter 16. History Mid 19 th century- argued that the failure of the family was the cause of delinquent behaviorMid 19 th century- argued.
Aim: How does the Juvenile Justice System operate in the United States.
Virginia RULES Teens Learn & Live the Law Legal Rights of Juveniles.
Virginia RULES Teens Learn & Live the Law Legal Rights of Juveniles.
Drug Detection in Schools Class 14. Searches in Schools Generally New Jersey v T.L.O. gave broad discretion to school officials to search students –Diminished.
Jeffrey miller Marist school Emory national debate institute
Jen Polin and Allison Kodroff.   The School District adopted the Student Activities Drug Testing Policy  Requires all students who participate in after.
TRIALS IN JUVENILE COURT
Safe Harbor Laws and Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors
Public Trials For Juvenile Offenders
Public Trials For Juvenile Offenders
Legal Rights of Juveniles
Legal System.
Review for the Regents The Bill of Rights Review Book page 9
The Supreme Court Report
Juvenile Justice.
What is a Crime?? Definition: Examples:.
Vocabulary Activity Define the following terms in your notes
Presentation transcript:

Child Rights & Remedies Fall 2012 Class 17

Review of Class # 16  Child Victim /Witness Confidentiality  Delinquency Basics

Special Problem of Sexually Exploited Minors Prostitution Arrests and Disposition

The Leading Case In Re Gault U.S. (1966)

Children and the 4 th Amendment  New Jersey v. T.L.O. U.S. (1985)  Vernonia School Dist.47J v. Acton U.S. (1995)

Children and the 4 th Amendment  Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls U.S. (2002) -- Drug Testing  New Case: Safford v. Redding U.S. (2009)

Children and the 4 th Amendment  U.S. v. Frederick Doe (E.D. Tex. 1992) -- Traffic Stop / Juvenile Court

Delinquency and Burden of Proof  In Re Winship U.S. (1970) -- Preponderance, Clear and Convincing, or Beyond Reasonable Doubt?