1 Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Umar Kalim SEECS,NUST/SLAC IHY-Africa/SCINDA 2009, Livingstone, Zambia, 7-12 June 2009 www.slac.stanford.edu/grp/scs/net/talk09/ihyjun09.ppt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EC workshop on Support to RENs in SE-Africa Session 2 Chair: W. von Rüden, CERN.
Advertisements

Telecoms Business and the EU – An Operators Perspective John Munnery.
Enhancing Research and Education Connectivity in Africa The findings of the African Tertiary Institution Connectivity Study (ATICS) and information on.
African Internet Performance, Fibres & the Soccer World Cup
1 Quantifying the Worldwide Digital Divide: The Emergence of Africa Prepared by: R. Les Cottrell SLAC, Presented at the American Physical Society annual.
1 PingER End to End Internet measurements: what we learn Les Cottrell SLAC, Presented at the OARC/TechDay for the ICANN San Francisco March 7 th, 2011.
1 African Internet Performance, Fibres & the Soccer World Cup Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Presented by Charles Barton at eGYAfrica, Africa November.
Quantifying the Digital Divide: Latin America, S. Asia, Africa Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Shahryar Khan NIIT/SLAC, Jared Greeno SLAC ICFA Workshop.
1 Quantifying the Digital Divide from Within and Without Les Cottrell, SLAC Internet2 Members Meeting SIG on Hard to Reach Network Places, Washington,
1 Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Umar Kalim SEECS,NUST/SLAC International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy, 24 April
Quantifying the need for Improved Network Performance for S. Asia Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC & Shahryar Khan NIIT For the Internet2 Special Interest.
1 Effects of Mediterranean Fibre Cuts seen by PingER, Jan Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Qasim Lone NIIT/SLAC
1 Network Monitoring for SCIC Les Cottrell, SLAC For ICFA meeting September, 2005 Initially funded by DoE Field Work proposal. Currently partially funded.
© 2007 Verizon. All Rights Reserved. PTE /07 FCC Workshop Global Broadband Connects the World Jacquelynn Ruff Vice President, International Public.
1 African Internet Performance, Fibres & the Soccer World Cup Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Umar.
1 New E. Coast of Africa Fibre Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Umar Kalim SEECS,NUST/SLAC Presented.
1 Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Umar Kalim SEECS,NUST/SLAC European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2009 session on African Cyberinfrastructures,
Session 9b, 9 May 2008 IST-Africa 2008 Copyright 2008 Insert Org Logo in Master slide Digital Divide in Sub-Saharan Africa Universities: recommendations.
1 Internet Connectivity in Africa Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Shahryar Khan NIIT/SLAC, Jared Greeno SLAC Internet & Grids in Africa: An Asset for African.
The Digital Divide Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC Shahryar Khan NIIT, Akbar Mehdi NIIT
1 ICFA/SCIC Network Monitoring Prepared by Les Cottrell, SLAC, for ICFA
African Economic Outlook 2003/2004 Paris, 7 July 2004.
LANDLOCKED DEVELOPING COUNTRIES HARNESSING ICT OPPORTUNITIES
Vivien Foster & Cecilia Briceño-Garmendia, World Bank.
‘Etuate Cocker Dr. Ulrich Speidel Department of Computer Science, Tamaki Campus, The University of Auckland.
1 Monitoring Internet connectivity of Research and Educational Institutions Les Cottrell – SLAC/Stanford University Prepared for the workshop on “Developing.
Scott Featherston 17 November, 2010 Lowy Institute, Sydney, Australia
PingER: Research Opportunities and Trends R. Les Cottrell, SLAC University of Malaya.
International Telecommunication Union Committed to Connecting the World The World in 2009: ICT Facts and Figures Jaroslaw K. PONDER Strategy and Policy.
Internet View of the Digital Divide, especially for Sub- Saharan Africa Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Shahryar Khan NIIT/SLAC, Jared Greeno SLAC 2 nd.
Chapter 4. After completion of this chapter, you should be able to: Explain “what is the Internet? And how we connect to the Internet using an ISP. Explain.
The ICT Sector in Zambia Presented by: Ministry of Communications and Transport Overview & Investment Perspective.
Quantitative Measurement of the Digital Divide Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC with Shahryar Khan NIIT
Sub-Saharan Africa is a Dark Zone for World Internet: Sounding an Alarm Les Cottrell SLAC, Aziz Rehmatullah NIIT, Jerrod Williams SLAC, Akbar Khan NIIT.
Quantifying the Digital Divide: A scientific overview of the connectivity of South Asian and African Countries Les Cottrell SLAC, Aziz Rehmatullah NIIT,
ICT Meeting, Brussels 31 January 2008Robert Klapisch 1 Highlights of the Internet for Africa meeting, Montpellier Dec 2007.
1 Quantifying the Digital Divide from Within and Without Les Cottrell, SLAC International ICFA Workshop on HEP Networking, Grid and Digital Divide Issues.
Sub-Saharan Africa is a Dark Zone for World Internet: Sounding an Alarm Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, presented by Warren Matthews GATech Presented at.
EGY-Africa reducing the digital divide for science in Africa Alem Mebrahtu, Mekelle University, Ethiopia Victor Chukwuma, Olabisi Olabanjo Univ., Nigeria.
1 New E. Coast of Africa Fibre Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Umar Kalim SEECS,NUST/SLAC Presented.
1 1 Measuring the Digital Divide Les Cottrell – SLAC Lecture # 4 presented at the Workshop on Scientific Information in the Digital Age: Access and Dissemination.
1 connect communicate collaborate FEAST Feasibility Study for African – European Research and Education Network 27th October 2009 Michael Nowlan, DANTE.
1 The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide PingER Presented by Les Cottrell, SLAC At the SIS Show Palexpo/Geneva December 2003.
State of the Regions Presentation by: Dr Peter Brain National Economics 416 Queens Parade, Clifton Hill, Victoria, 3068 Phone: (03) ;
1 Quantifying the Digital Divide Les Cottrell – SLAC Prepared for the ICFA-SCIC video meeting, May 2003
1 Measurements of Internet performance for NIIT, Pakistan Jan – Feb 2004 PingER From Les Cottrell, SLAC For presentation by Prof. Arshad Ali, NIIT.
Introduce the project Africa IXP (Team 4). Introduce team members.
1 Measuring The Digital Divide Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Shahryar Khan NIIT/SLAC, Jared Greeno SLAC, Qasim Lone NIIT/SLAC Presentation to Princess.
1 Quantifying the Digital Divide: focus Africa Prepared by Les Cottrell, SLAC for the NSF IRNC meeting, March 11,
BUILDING THE INFORMATION SOCIETY 2 June From measurement to policy-making: The DOI From measurement to policy-making: The DOI as a policy tool “Digital.
Quantifying the need for Improved Network Performance for S. Asia Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC & Shahryar Khan NIIT For the Internet2 Special Interest.
Providing Seamless Connectivity in E-commerce
Cyberinfrastructure in Africa, Survey on Internet capability Monique Petitdidier IPSL, Paris, France.
Computer Class – Summer 20091/8/ :32 PM African Countries Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African.
ICFA Standing Committee on Interregional Connectivity (SCIC) ICFA Standing Committee on Interregional Connectivity (SCIC) Harvey B. Newman Harvey B. Newman.
Internet Connectivity and Performance for the HEP Community. Presented at HEPNT-HEPiX, October 6, 1999 by Warren Matthews Funded by DOE/MICS Internet End-to-end.
IHY Questionaire on Internet Connectivity Les Cottrell SLAC & Monique Petitdidier CNRS 2 nd IHY-Africa Workshop November 2007, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
1 PingER performance to Bangladesh Prepared by Les Cottrell, SLAC for Prof. Hilda Cerdeira May 27, 2004 Partially funded by DOE/MICS Field Work Proposal.
1 IEPM / PingER project & PPDG Les Cottrell – SLAC Presented at the NGI workshop, Berkeley, 7/21/99 Partially funded by DOE/MICS Field Work Proposal on.
1 Quantifying the Digital Divide Prepared by Les Cottrell, SLAC for the Internet2/World Bank meeting, Feb 7,
Implementing National Research and Education Networks (NRENs) in land locked African countries: critical success factors 1 D. Kunda, Director ICT B. Khunga,
Africa: Regional Insights Ripe Over a billion people - of which 40% are reachable by fibre Mobile users set to double in the next 5 Years reaching.
ITU CoE/ARB IP Application and Digital Divide Workshop Tunis/Tunisia 17 – 19 June 2003 Internet Digital Divide Abdelfattah ABUQAYYAS Coordinator Arab Centre.
VSAT Services: Ready for Business
The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide
PingER: An Effort to Quantify the Digital Divide
Connecting Africa to leverage ICT for Economic Development
IP connectivity in the Least Developed Countries
Quantifying the Global Digital Divide
The PingER Project: Measuring the Digital Divide
Presentation transcript:

1 Prepared by: Les Cottrell SLAC, Umar Kalim SEECS,NUST/SLAC IHY-Africa/SCINDA 2009, Livingstone, Zambia, 7-12 June African Internet Performance: How bad is it; what can be done? eGY

2 Summary African Infrastructure Methodology of measuring Internet performance Overall world Internet performance & where does Africa stand Africa directions –Wireless/fibre, Routing, Costs, Difficulties, Conclusions & further information

Africa is Huge Hard to get coverage (e.g. fibre) everywhere 3 India 10% area, but > population

…and diverse (e.g. languages) Resources, religions, geography … More than 1,000 indigenous African languages including several spoken by tens of millions such as Igbo, Swahili, Hausa, Amharic, and Yoruba;African languagesIgboSwahiliHausa AmharicYoruba Plus Arabic, English, French, Portuguese, Afrikaans, Spanish, Indian languages, othersArabicEnglish FrenchPortuguese AfrikaansSpanishIndian languages 4

5 African World Status Internet city connections Fibres Light at night Capacity From Telegeography

Sub-Saharan broadband costs off-scale 6 Source ITU 1 yr of Internet access > average annual income of most Africans, Survey by Paul Budde Communications

7 Why Make Internet Measurements? In the Information Age Information Technology (IT) is the major productivity and development driver., particularly science & education Travel & the Internet have made a global viewpoint critical One Laptop Per Child (“$100” computer) –New thin client paradigm, servers do work, requires networking (Google: “Negroponte $100 computer”), driving Intel & AMD cheap net-books, –Internet enabled Smart phones (e.g. iPhone) –Enables “Internet Kiosk & Cafe” can make big difference So we need to understand and set expectations on the accessibility, performance, costs etc. of the Internet

8 PingER Methodology extremely Simple Internet 10 ping request packets each 30 mins Remote Host (typically a server) Monitoring host > ping remhost Ping response packets Measure Round Trip Time & Loss Data SLAC Once a Day Uses ubiquitous ping ICTP

9 PingER Deployment PingER project originally (1995) for measuring network performance for US, Europe and Japanese HEP community - now mainly R&E sites Extended this century to measure Digital Divide: –Collaboration with ICTP Science Dissemination Unit –ICFA/SCIC Most extensive E2E Active Internet Measurement –Monitors (>40 in 23 countries – 3 Africa) –Beacons ~ 90 –Remote sites (~740) >165 countries (98% world’s population, >99% world’s connected population) –>45 countries in Africa

10 World Measurements: Min RTT from US Min RTT indicates best possible, i.e. no queuing >400ms probably geo-stationary satellite (red & magenta) Maps show increased coverage by fibre (less GEOS) Only a few places still using satellite for international access, mainly Africa & Central Asia

Loss 11 With TCP (>80% Internet traffic) recovery from loss can take several seconds, such delays make interactive use annoying to impossible. For non TCP multi-media traffic loss causes poor voice/video (VoIP/H323) above 1.5%,loss > 0.5% unacceptable for IPTV Africa by far worst region, times worse than developed regions

12 World Throughput Trends Behind Europe 5 Yrs: Russia, Latin America, Mid East 6 Yrs: SE Asia 9 Yrs: South Asia 12 Yrs: Cent. Asia 16 Yrs: Africa In 10 years at the current rate Africa will be 1000 times worse than Europe Derived throughput ~ 8 * 1460 /(RTT * sqrt(loss)) Mathis et. al 1993

13 Some Other World Views Voice & video (de-jitter) Network & Host Fragility Data Transfer Capacity

14 Mediterranean. & Africa vs HDI There is a good correlation between the 2 measures N. Africa has 10 times poorer performance than Europe N. Africa several times better than say E. Africa E. Africa poor, limited by satellite access W. Africa big differences, some (Senegal) can afford SAT3 fibre others use satellite Great diversity between & within regions HDI related to GDP, life expectancy, tertiary education etc.

15 Opportunities: Routing Seen from TENET Cape Town ZA Only Botswana & Zimbabwe are direct Most go via Europe or USA Wastes costly international bandwidth, subsidizes international carriers Need IXPs in Africa

Opportunities: Fibre, satellite, mobiles Satellite is extremely effective in reaching places where the volume of traffic would not justify a fibre connection. But GEOS satellite $/Mbps x Fibre, severely bandwidth-constrained and high latency So fibre international and to major cities –Scramble to provide international fibre for World Cup 2010 –then wireless (cell phone, wimax, …) –cell phone growth leads Internet growth by 4.5 years 16 LEOS (reduce latency) - Sep 2008 Google signed up with Liberty Global and HSBC in a bid to launch 16 LEOS satellites, to bring high-speed internet access to Africa by end 2010 –ABUJA Africa's first communications satellite suffered an energy failure just 18 months after its launch - reported Nov. 2008ABUJA 16

17 African International Fibres 2010 Current: SAT-3-WASC run by a consortium of state monopolies that has opted for elite rather than mass market. Prices tend to align to satellite in the absence of competition! “Black” Fibres installed along roads, pylons etc. remain unused because of monopoly regulation! Near Future: driven by World Cup in 2010

18 What else is driving it Huge growth ~ 3x lower penetration than any other region huge potential market Many systemic factors: Electricity, import duties, skills, disease, protectionist policies, conflict, corruption.

19 Conclusions: The bad Poor performance affects data transfer, multi-media, VoIP, IT development & country performance / development DD exists between regions & countries, rural vs cities, poor vs rich, old vs young… Decreasing use of satellites, expensive, but still needed for many remote countries in Africa and C. Asia Last mile problems, and network fragility Current providers (cable and satellite) have a lot to loose –Many of these have close links to regulators and governments (e.g. over 50% of ISPs in Africa are government controlled) Africa worst by all measures (throughput, loss, jitter, DOI, international bandwidth, users, costs …) and falling further behind.

Conclusions: There is Hope World cup: international fibre access + competition LEOS Leapfrog last mile fixed wire with wireless Cheaper end points: OLTP, netbook, smart-phones Banding together of universities => leverage influence & get deals => NRENs => IXPs Users –E.g. Ubuntunet, Bandwidth Initiative Standards: –Harmonization of regulations country to country –Cheaper cell phone, can’t afford multiple technologies & frequencies Regulatory regimes becoming: – more open/transparent, less resistant to change 20 “The way we develop here in Africa will be different from the way the big nations developed. They grew up with computers. We are growing up with mobile phones. - Fritz Ekwoge”

Conclusions: PingER Quantitatively Measures Internet performance –non subjective, –relatively easy/quick to measure (c.f. ITU etc methods) So monthly, daily updates –correlates strongly with economic/technical/development indices –Increase coverage of monitoring to understand Internet performance –Lots of granularity: within countries, monthly, daily Gives baselines, trends, effect of improvements Relative comparisons countries, regions, sites Good coverage for Africa –Need: Chad, Comoros, Eq. Guinea, Sao Tome, Somalia 21

22 More Information Thanks: –Incentive: ICFA/SCIC, Monique Petitdidier, ICTP, ITU –Funding: DoE/SLAC/HEP, Pakistan HEC –Effort: SLAC, NUST, ICTP (Trieste), FNAL, Georgia Tech, administrators at over 40 monitoring sites in 23 countries ITU/WIS Report 2006 & 2007 ( or Google: “WSIS Report 2007”) – – Higher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa – PingER –www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/pinger, sdu.ictp.it/pinger/africa.htmlwww-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/pinger sdu.ictp.it/pinger/africa.html – Global Information watch: Need network contacts in Africa:

23 Extra Slides

24 Trends:Losses N. America, Europe, E. Asia, Oceania < 0.1% Underdeveloped % loss, Africa worst. Mainly distance independent Big impact on performance, time outs etc. Losses > 2.5 % have big impact on interactivity, VoIP etc.

25 ~ Distance independent Calculated as Inter Packet Delay Variation (IPDV) –IPDV = Dr i = R i – R i-1 Measures congestion Little impact on web, Decides length of VoIP codec buffers, impacts streaming Impacts (with RTT and loss) the quality of VoIP Trendlines for IPDV from SLAC to World Regions N. America E. Asia Europe Australasia S. Asia Africa Russia L. America SE Asia C Asia M East Usual division into Developed vs Developing Jitter

26 VoIP & MOS Telecom uses Mean Opinion Score (MOS) for quality –1=bad, 2=poor, 3=fair, 4=good, 5=excellent –With VoIP codecs best can get is 4.2 to 4.4 –Typical usable range 3.5 to 4.2 –Calc. MOS from PingER: RTT, Loss, Jitter ( –Africa & C. Asia not possible, S. Asia with patience OK MOS of Various Regions from SLAC Improvements very clear, often due to move from satellite to land line. Similar results from CERN (less coverage) Usable

27 Leading African Countries Country Population [Sort] Int'l BW Mbps Int'l BW / capita (bps) Internet Users Internet users/ 1000 capita BW (bps)/ Internet User Digital Oppor tunity Rank Egypt82,073, South Africa43,743, Senegal12,938, Cameroon18,569, Nigeria139,070, Kenya38,213, Uganda31,621, Burkina Faso14,866, Cote d'Ivoire18,465, Benin8,349, Niger13,364, Mozambique21,379, Ethiopia78,697, Namibia2,067,

28 Unreachability All pings of a set fail ≡ unreachable Shows fragility, ~ distance independent Developed regions US, Canada, Europe, Oceania, E Asia lead –Factor of 10 improvement in 8 years Africa, S. Asia followed by M East & L. America worst off Africa NOT improving US & Canada Europe E Asia C Asia SE Europe SE Asia S Asia Oceania Africa L AmericaM East Russia Developed Regions Developing Regions

29 Throughput Derive from: Thru ~ 8 * 1460 _____________ (RTT * sqrt(loss))

30 African Situation Access to the internet is so desirable to students in Africa that they spend considerable time and money to get it. Many students surveyed, with no internet connection at their universities, resorted to private, fee-charging internet cafes to study and learn. Internet Café in Ghana School in a secondary town in an East Coast country with networked computer lab spends 2/3rds of its annual budget to pay for the dial-up connection. –Disconnects Heloise Emdon, Acacia Southern Africa 1 yr of Internet access > average annual income of most Africans, Survey by Paul Budde Communications Survey (IHY meeting Ethiopia in November ’07) of leading Universities in 17 countries (will repeat with more clarity): –Each had tens of 1000’s of students, 1000 or so staff –Best had 2 Mbits, worst dial up 56kbps –Often access restricted to faculty

PingER: African coverage Host monitored in 50 of ~60 countries (98.7% pop) 131 hosts monitored in Africa Cannot find hosts in Chad, Comoros, Eq. Guinea, Sao Tome, Somalia Yellow only 1 host (so could be anomalous, e.g. Libya) Need help for contacts: 31

PingER Sites vs IHY sites 32 Magnetometer PingER sites SID/GPS IHY sites with good Internet access nearby may be able to use it to transfer data or even control IHY Coordinates from Monique Petitdidier (CNRS), Deborah Scherrer (Stanford), Barbara Thompson (NASA)