Migration Velocity Analysis 01. Outline  Motivation Estimate a more accurate velocity model for migration Tomographic migration velocity analysis 02.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Warping for Trim Statics
Advertisements

Introduction to GeoProbe
Computational Challenges for Finding Big Oil by Seismic Inversion.
Multi-source Least Squares Migration and Waveform Inversion
3-D crustal structure using seismic waves P and S (SimulpPS) CNRST – MARWAN Morocco Youssef Timoulali CNRST EUMEDGRID-Support / CHAIN/
Sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency signals: Applications in migration velocity updating and tomography Xiao-Bi Xie University of California at Santa.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis beyond the Born approximation Paul Sava* Stanford University Sergey Fomel UT Austin (UC.
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
Specular-Ray Parameter Extraction and Stationary Phase Migration Jing Chen University of Utah.
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Salt Boundary Delineation by Transmitted PS Waves David Sheley.
Wave-equation MVA by inversion of differential image perturbations Paul Sava & Biondo Biondi Stanford University SEP.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis Paul Sava* Stanford University Biondo Biondi Stanford University Sergey Fomel UT Austin.
TARGET-ORIENTED LEAST SQUARES MIGRATION Zhiyong Jiang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
MULTIPLE PREDICTION & ATTENUATION Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb Feb
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Arbitrary Parameter Extraction, Stationary Phase Migration, and Tomographic Velocity Analysis Jing Chen University of Utah.
Analytical image perturbations for wave-equation migration velocity analysis Paul Sava & Biondo Biondi Stanford University.
FAST VELOCITY ANALYSIS BY PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 Quality Factor Inversion from Prestack CMP data using EPIF Matching Jing Zhao, Jinghuai Gao Institute of Wave and Information,
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Applications of Time-Domain Multiscale Waveform Tomography to Marine and Land Data C. Boonyasiriwat 1, J. Sheng 3, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, B. Macy 2,
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: P-to-S Converted Wave Case Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis Paul Sava* Stanford University Biondo Biondi Stanford University.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution in Common Offset Domain Jianxing Hu University of Utah.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
1 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. VSP modeling, velocity analysis, and imaging in complex structures Yue Du With Mark Willis, Robert Stewart May.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
V.2 Wavepath Migration Overview Overview Kirchhoff migration smears a reflection along a fat ellipsoid, so that most of the reflection energy is placed.
Automatic Wave Equation Migration Velocity Analysis Peng Shen, William. W. Symes HGRG, Total E&P CAAM, Rice University This work supervised by Dr. Henri.
Angle-domain Wave-equation Reflection Traveltime Inversion
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Prestack Migration Intuitive Least Squares Migration Green’s Theorem.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
The Experimental Comparison of Conventional and Differential Semblance on several data sets Jintan Li Rice University.
Multiples Waveform Inversion
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis Biondo Biondi Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University Paul Sava.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001.
Non-local Means (NLM) Filter for Trim Statics Yunsong Huang, Xin Wang, Yunsong Huang, Xin Wang, Gerard T. Schuster KAUST Kirchhoff Migration Kirchhoff+Trim.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Fast 3D Least-squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Wei Dai.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 10 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d Dix Equations for multiple layers:
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
LSM Theory: Overdetermined vs Underdetermined
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method
Steepest Descent Optimization
4D Interferometric Traveltime Tomography
Skeletonized Wave-Equation Surface Wave Dispersion (WD) Inversion
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Non-local Means (NLM) Filter for Trim Statics
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
PS, SSP, PSPI, FFD KM SSP PSPI FFD.
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Some remarks on the leading order imaging series
Non-local Means (NLM) Filter for Trim Statics
Inverse Crimes d=Lm m=L-1 d Red Sea Synthetics
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Migration Velocity Analysis 01

Outline  Motivation Estimate a more accurate velocity model for migration Tomographic migration velocity analysis 02  Theory  Numerical Results  Conclusions

Motivation 03 d = L m m mig = L T d Forward modeling Kirchhoff Migration Function of velocity:L T (s) Inaccurate velocity model m mig = L T d

Motivation 04 True velocity model Kirchhoff Migration Image Inaccurate velocity model Kirchhoff Migration Image Goal of MVA: To get a more accurate velocity model Structure error Position error

Outline  Motivation Estimate a more accurate velocity model for migration Tomographic Migration Velocity Analysis 05  Theory  Numerical Results  Conclusions

Theory 06 The fundamental principle underlying MVA is that the migration image of the same reflector should be the same for different source, when using the correct velocity, so pre-stack common image gather (CIG) provides the information of whether the migration velocity is correct and how far away it is from the true velocity.

Theory 07 Common Image Gather ( CIG) different CSGs CSG #1 CSG #2 CSG #3 Point scatterer

Theory 08 Common Image Gather ( CIG) Prestack migration s KM of CSG #1 x z x0x0 x z KM of CSG #2 x0x0 x z KM of CSG #3 x0x0 CIG

Theory 09 Tomographic MVA xx0x0 z x x0x0 z s z CIG Flat x x0x0 z Correct Velocity x z 2000 m/s x0x0

Theory 10 Tomographic MVA Curved Incorrect Velocity 1500 m/s x z x0x0 xx0x0 z s z CIG x x0x0 z z x x0x0

Theory 11 Z (km) Offset (km)1 CIG Z (km) CIG Offset (km)1 Tomographic MVA Hyperbolic approximation Z h 2 = Z A h 2 picking depth, ZhZh ZhZh Z0Z0 zero-offset depth, Z0Z0 Depth residual reference depth Usually choose Z 0 as Z ref ΔZ = Z h - Z ref Z ref x0x0 h offset, h

Theory 12 Tomographic MVA Convert depth residual to time residual x0x0 xsxs xgxg Find the source-receiver pair by ray tracing to obey Snell’s law θ1θ1 θ2θ2 x0x0 xsxs xgxg R reflector with reference depth Z ref R’ reflector with picked depth Z h t’ = L SR’ s + L RG s t = L SR s + L RG s Δt = t’ - t

Theory 13 For a small slowness perturbation traveltime, raypath operator, background slowness. t = L s t L s Δs Δt = t’-t 0 = LΔs = L(s’-s 0 ) Parameterize the model as a grid of cells traveltime residual for the raypath, slowness purturbation in grid cell Δt i = Σ Δs j Δl ij n j=1 Δt i i Δs j j Update the slowness with a steepest descent method Back projectalong the raypaths to get Δt i Δs j s j (k+1) = s j (k+1) – α Δs j (k+1) Tomographic MVA Update the slowness

Theory 14 Misfit function Iteration will stop when all curved events in CIG are flatten. picked depth residual for offsetin CIGof the iteration Tomographic MVA F misfit = Σ Σ (Δz ij ) 2 i=1 j=1 m n (k) Δz ij j i k (k)

15 Migration velocity model s 0 Theory Predict travel time by eikonal solver Pre-stack KM, form CIGs Pick the reference depth residual (usually zero-offset) Find ray paths connecting the reflector to both S and R positionsConvert depth residual to travel time residualUpdate velocity model by back projecting the traveltime residuals along the raypaths. Work Flow: Migration velocity model s k Pick the depth residual automatically Observed data All events are flattened? Y MVA finished ! N

Outline  Motivation Estimate a more accurate velocity model for migration Tomographic migration velocity analysis 16  Theory  Numerical Results  Conclusions

Numerical Results 17 2D Synthetic Model KM image CIG True velocity model H. Sun. 1999

Numerical Results 18 2D Synthetic Model H. Sun Homogeneous velocity model KM image CIG

Numerical Results 19 2D Synthetic Model H. Sun Final updated velocity model KM image CIG

Initial Migration Velocity Horizontal Distance (km) Depth (km) (km /s) (km /s)

KM Image with Initial Velocity km 1.5 Depth (km) KMVA Velocity Changes in the 1st Iteration 50 0 (m /s) (m /s)

KM Image with Initial Velocity KM Image with Updated Velocity 9 km 1260 Depth (m) 2 km Depth (m) 1070

KMVA CIGs with Initial Velocity Depth (km) KMVA CIGs with Updated Velocity

km 1.5 Depth (km) KMVA Velocity Changes in the 1st Iteration (CPU=6) 50 0 (m /s) (m /s) WMVA Velocity Changes in the 1st Iteration (CPU=1) 50 0 (m /s) (m /s)

WM Image with Initial Velocity WM Image with Updated Velocity 9 km 1260 Depth (m) 2 km Depth (m) 1070

WMVA CIGs with Initial Velocity Depth (km) WMVA CIGs with Updated Velocity

KM Image with Initial Velocity 9 km 1260 Depth (m) 2 km 1070 KM Image with KMVA Updated Velocity 1260 Depth (m) 1070 KM Image with WMVA Updated Velocity 1260 Depth (m) 1070

Outline  Motivation Estimate a more accurate velocity model for migration Tomographic migration velocity analysis 26  Theory  Numerical Results  Conclusions

27 Pre-stack migration with inaccurate velocity can bring curved events in CIGs, which provides the opportunity for migration velocity analysis. Iterative tomographic MVA can estimate better migration velocity and improve the migration image. Conclusions Question: what are the advantages and disadvantages of migration velocity analysis compared to velocity estimation in data domain ?

Numerical Results 20 2D Field Data H. Sun Initial migration velocity from NMO Depth (km) (km /s) (km /s) Horizontal distance (km)

Numerical Results 21 2D Field Data H. Sun KM image with the initial velocity Depth (km) Horizontal distance (km)

Numerical Results 22 2D Field Data H. Sun KM CIGs with the initial velocity Depth (km) 1.2

Numerical Results 23 KM Image with Initial Velocity km 1.5 Depth (km) KM Image with Updated Velocity 18

Numerical Results 24 KM Image with Initial Velocity KM Image with Updated Velocity 9 km 1260 Depth (m) 2 km Depth (m) 1070

Numerical Results 25 KMVA CIGs with Initial Velocity Depth (km) KMVA CIGs with Updated Velocity