Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Invariant mass plot for different geometry schemes using HSD generator Hemen Kalita*,B Bhattacharjee*, P Bhaduri and S Chattopadhyay * Dept of Physics,
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
12 th CBM Collaboration Meeting October 13-18, 2008, JINR, Dubna A. Zinchenko 1 (L.Naumann 2, D.Peshekhonov 1, V.Peshekhonov 1 ) 1 VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna.
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Framework for track reconstruction and it’s implementation for the CMS tracker A.Khanov,T.Todorov,P.Vanlaer.
Vector meson study for the CBM experiment at FAIR/GSI Anna Kiseleva GSI Germany, PNPI Russia   Motivation   The muon detection system of CBM   Vector.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
KIP TRACKING IN MAGNETIC FIELD BASED ON THE CELLULAR AUTOMATON METHOD TRACKING IN MAGNETIC FIELD BASED ON THE CELLULAR AUTOMATON METHOD Ivan Kisel KIP,
Online Track Reconstruction in the CBM Experiment I. Kisel, I. Kulakov, I. Rostovtseva, M. Zyzak (for the CBM Collaboration) I. Kisel, I. Kulakov, I. Rostovtseva,
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
Elastic Neural Net for standalone RICH ring finding Sergey Gorbunov Ivan Kisel DESY, Zeuthen KIP, Uni-Heidelberg DESY, Zeuthen KIP, Uni-Heidelberg KIP.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Speed-up of the ring recognition algorithm Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt, Germany and LIT JINR, Dubna, Russia Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna, Russia.
STS track recognition by 3D track-following method Gennady Ososkov, A.Airiyan, A.Lebedev, S.Lebedev, E.Litvinenko Laboratory of Information Technologies.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Fast track reconstruction in the muon system and transition radiation detector of the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 3 Ivan Kisel.
TRD and Global tracking Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration meeting Dresden, 27 September.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
Wavelet analysis applications Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna.
Summary STS working group Design optimization STS (Strip) layout R&D (MAPS) Working packages.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Status of Reconstruction in CBM
Muon simulation for p+A system Preliminary studies with HSD Partha Pratim Bhaduri Subhasis Chattopadhyay VECC, Kolkata.
A.Ayriyan 1, V.Ivanov 1, S.Lebedev 1,2, G.Ososkov 1 in collaboration with N.Chernov 3 1 st CBM Collaboration Meeting, JINR Duba,19-22 May JINR-LIT,
Track reconstruction and pattern recognition V.V. Ivanov Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
Status of CBM muon studies I.Vassiliev, S.Gorbunov, I. Kisel and A.Kiseleva 16-Oct-06 Motivation Simulation tools cbmroot2 v06 Signal and background simulations.
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme.
Ring Recognition and Electron Identification in the RICH detector of the CBM Experiment at FAIR Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt, Germany and LIT JINR, Dubna,
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (SPbSPU) Vladimir Nikulin (PNPI) Detailed geometry of MUCH detector in cbmroot Outline Motivation Realistic module.
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
J/psi trigger status Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009 CBM Collaboration meeting.
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
Cellular Automaton Method for Track Finding (HERA-B, LHCb, CBM) Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Second FutureDAQ Workshop, GSI.
Muon detection in the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Anna Kiseleva 3 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für.
Monday, January 24 TimeTitleSpeaker 10:00 – 10:30The CBM experimentV. Friese (GSI) 10:30 – 11:00CBM Silicon Pixel Vertex DetectorM. Deveaux (GSI/IReS)
13-jan-2014 Some results for a GEM-based central detector A.Zinchenko, V.Vasendina, M.Kapishin VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna, Russia.
CA+KF Track Reconstruction in the STS S. Gorbunov and I. Kisel GSI/KIP/LIT CBM Collaboration Meeting Dresden, September 26, 2007.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Compact RICH detector Claudia Höhne, GSI Darmstadt.
Ring finding efficiencies and RICH event display Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Fast parallel tracking algorithm for the muon detector of the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Monday, April 27, Feasibility of J/ψ measurement in p+A 25GeV Partha Pratim Bhaduri (VECC) Anand Kumar Dubey (VECC) S. Chattopadhyay.
Parallel Implementation of the KFParticle Vertexing Package for the CBM and ALICE Experiments Ivan Kisel 1,2,3, Igor Kulakov 1,4, Maksym Zyzak 1,4 1 –
LIT participation LIT participation Ivanov V.V. Laboratory of Information Technologies Meeting on proposal of the setup preparation for external beams.
Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
Simulation / reconstruction with GEMs at DAC A.Zinchenko, A.Kapishin, V.Vasendina for the collaboration VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna,
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
Kalman filter tracking library
Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis
Tracking Pattern Recognition
Simulation results for the upgraded RICH detector in the HADES experiment. Semen Lebedev1,3, Jürgen Friese2, Claudia Höhne1, Tobias Kunz2, Jochen Markert4.
The LHC collider in Geneva
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Presentation transcript:

Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna

A.Lebedev, G.Ososkov Track reconstruction in TRD and MuCh CBM collaboration meeting, GSI, 26 February Contents General scheme of the tracking Tracking procedure Performance of the TRD tracking Performance of the MuCh tracking Outlook

A.Lebedev, G.Ososkov Track reconstruction in TRD and MuCh CBM collaboration meeting, GSI, 26 February General scheme for the tracking -The successful application of the TRD tracking algorithms leads to the idea to generalize and optimize those algorithms in a flexible way in order to make them applicable for other, similar detectors. -Since both tracking detector setups (TRD and MuCh) are analogous in many details, the same approach can be used for tracking in these detectors. -The idea is to apply a general algorithm of track finding to different detectors and to adapt it to a specific one by changing tracking routing parameters. -This helps to decrease code duplication, making significantly easier the software support.

A.Lebedev, G.Ososkov Track reconstruction in TRD and MuCh CBM collaboration meeting, GSI, 26 February Tracking procedure It is based on the Kalman Filter and track following methods where the next track hit is searched in the area surrounding a predicted point. Tracking is accomplished in an iterative way. In each iteration, tracking parameters have to be specified, and hits belonging to tracks found in the current iteration are deleted from the hit array. One can specify the number of tracking iterations, the max number of allowed missing hits in a detector station, start and end station for the tracking and other parameters. The search region can be determined in two different ways: (1) using the covariance matrix of the predicted track parameters and position errors of the hits; (2) using MC, calculate the deviations between the predicted position and a hit.

A.Lebedev, G.Ososkov Track reconstruction in TRD and MuCh CBM collaboration meeting, GSI, 26 February Application to MuCh and TRD detectors Presented tracking scheme has been applied for the track-finding in the TRD and MuCh detectors. – TRD Standalone - CbmLitTrdTrackFinderS class; Track seed based algorithm: – STS track based - CbmLitTrdTrackFinderSts class; – MuCh track based - CbmLitTrdTrackFinderMuch class; – MuCh STS track based - CbmLitMuchTrackFinder class

A.Lebedev, G.Ososkov Track reconstruction in TRD and MuCh CBM collaboration meeting, GSI, 26 February Performance of the TRD tracking STS basedStandalone Simulation parameters: 500 central Au-Au events at 25 GeV; standard TRD geometry with 12 layers; L1 tracking in STS. All96.0 (387/403)90.6 (559/617) Vertex96.2 (352/366)94.9 (415/437) Reference96.4 (318/330)95.0 (366/385) Secondary94.3 (35/38)80.2 (145/180) Ghost3.2 (13/403)5.7 (35/617) * Efficiency in %; in brackets are number of reconstructed/number of accepted tracks; acc. tracks have at least 12 MC points.

A.Lebedev, G.Ososkov Track reconstruction in TRD and MuCh CBM collaboration meeting, GSI, 26 February Performance of the MuCh tracking Central Au-Au events at 25 GeV; omega signal; compact MuCh geometry with 3 and 2 layers between the absorbers; Performance 3 layers, only signal 3 layers, signal + UrQMD 2 layers, only signal 2layers, signal + UrQMD Muon tracks87% (2046/2357) 55% (327/593) 80% (4744/5931) 60% (366/606) Signal pairs74% (172/232) 29% (19/64) 60% (387/641) 29% (18/63) Nof events4k1k10k1k 10 stations, only signal10 stations, signal + UrQMD * Efficiency in %; in brackets are number of reconstructed/number of accepted tracks; acc. track has number of MC points equal to number of stations in MuCh and have to be reconstructed in the STS; pid is taken from matching rec. MuCh track with MC.

A.Lebedev, G.Ososkov Track reconstruction in TRD and MuCh CBM collaboration meeting, GSI, 26 February Performance of the MuCh tracking Central Au-Au events at 25 GeV; omega signal; Compact MuCh geometry with 3 and 2 layers between the absorbers; Performance 3 layers, only signal 3 layers, signal + UrQMD 2 layers, only signal 2layers, signal + UrQMD Muon tracks 26%16%27%17% Signal pairs 4.4%1.9%3.9%1.4% * Efficiency includes detector acceptance and full track reconstruction

A.Lebedev, G.Ososkov Track reconstruction in TRD and MuCh CBM collaboration meeting, GSI, 26 February Summary and outlook Program has been redesigned, which lead to easier support and optimization of the software; Tracking for the MuCh detector has been implemented; TRD and MuCh tracking performances have shown good results; Outlook: – Algorithm improvements (we have to think about it); – Problems, limitations of the tracking; – Software design improvements.