M. Pilar Casado 1 Optimization of Tau Menus: L1 & L2 Trigger & Physics week (19-22 March 2007) M. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) on behalf of the Tau Trigger.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.

Advertisements

Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.

J. Nielsen1 Measuring Trigger Efficiency Important component of cross section measurement: it is NOT in general 1.0! Need to measure this from data because.

H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.

Eric TorrenceJanuary Oregon Tau Activities Tau Trigger Efficiency Z→ττ Dijet Fakes Tau Spin Analysis Tau Trigger Activities Validation HLT Monitoring.

Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern SM Higgs Discovery Channels ATLAS High Level Trigger Trigger & Physics Selection Higgs Channels: Physics Performance.

1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.

The ATLAS B physics trigger

1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.

Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.

Clustering: Algorithm development and analysis R. Cassell, G. Bower.

July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.

Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.

The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.

14-sep-2004 Midwest Physics Group University of Indiana Triggering and Luminosity Scenarios Maris Abolins Michigan State University.

Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)

1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.

H  FTK update Catalin, Tony FTK meeting, 9/7/2006.

Update on H  studies Catalin and Tony FTK meeting, July 13, 2006.

1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.

General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.

Jet Reconstruction and Calibration in Athena US ATLAS Software Workshop BNL, 27/08/03 Ambreesh Gupta, for the JetRec Group University of Chicago Outline:

Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.

Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.

Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.

H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.

L. Bellagamba, Excited fermions and other searches at HERA 1 International Conference on High Energy Physics Amsterdam July 2002 Excited fermions.

Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -

Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May

IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –

Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.

News from Jet/Etmiss Monica. Jet/Etmiss meeting yesterday (25/5) at P&P week – Mostly review of conf notes for ICHEP10 – Good review to check where we.

25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.

Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.

1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 

FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,

Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.

/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.

Trigger validation for Many thanks to Long Zhao, Chihiro Omachi, Julie Kirk, Giovanni Siragusa, Patricia Conde Muiño, Andreas Reinsch, Olya Igonkina,

1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.

M. Gilchriese Basic Trigger Rates December 3, 2004.

Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.

Tau06, 9 th Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics Pisa, Italy September 2006 Reconstruction and Identification of hadronic  -decays in ATLAS Fabien Tarrade.

CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.

Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.

ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.

Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.

10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.

Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.

Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.

Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.

ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.

1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.

Fixing Tau HLT (Part 1.5/2) ‏ M.Bachtis. 2 L1 Seeding Fix L1: Seeding with High Et Jet paths to increase efficiency with High Et Still using corrected.

Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.

BEACH 04J. Piedra1 SiSA Tracking Silicon stand alone (SiSA) tracking optimization SiSA validation Matthew Herndon University of Wisconsin Joint Physics.

Electron and Photon HLT alley M. Witek K. Senderowska, A. Żurański.

PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.

ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.

Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.

Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies

NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam

Physics Studies Update

Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger

Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

J/Y Simulations for Trigger

Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago

Presentation transcript:

M. Pilar Casado 1 Optimization of Tau Menus: L1 & L2 Trigger & Physics week (19-22 March 2007) M. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) on behalf of the Tau Trigger Group

M. Pilar Casado 2 Outline Introduction LVL1 cluster LVL1 calibration Study on LVL1 EM & Had Isolation L2 optimization Summary and outlook

M. Pilar Casado 3 Introduction misal1_csc J0_pythia_jetjet.digit.RDO.v (8 GeV < pT < 17 GeV) events. Cross section = mbarns. misal1_csc J1_pythia_jetjet.digit.RDO.v (17 GeV < pT < 35 GeV) events. Cross section = 1.38 mbarns. misal1_csc J2_pythia_jetjet.recon.AOD.v (35 GeV < pT < 70 GeV) 9000 events. Cross section = 9.33x10 -2 mbarns. misal1_csc J3_pythia_jetjet.digit.RDO.v (70 GeV < pT < 140 GeV) 6150 events. Cross section = 5.88x10 -3 mbarns. trig1_misal1_csc pythia_Wtauhad.recon.AOD.v (W → tau nu) 8400 events. trig1_misal1_csc A3_Ztautau_filter.recon.AOD.v (Z → tau tau) events.

M. Pilar Casado 4 LVL1 definitions –TauClus: Energy in 2x1 EM + 2x2 Had. -EmIsol: Energy between 2x2 and 4x4 (EM). -HdIsol: Energy between 2x2 and 4x4 (Had). -EmCore: Energy in 2x2 EM + 2x2 Had. -E4X4: Energy in 4x4 EM+Had. Standard LVL1 cluster

M. Pilar Casado 5 Study of tau cluster Different tau clusters for a rate of 2 kHz. Steeper curve for E4x4.

M. Pilar Casado 6 Study of tau cluster MC true norm. Norm. Offline tau (No cut on pTVis) (Include offline MET>40 GeV) Cut on TauClus 13 GeV -> Rate: 2 kHz, Eff: 55%, 77 (85)% Cut on E4X4 13 GeV -> Rate: 5 kHz, Eff: 70%, 90 (94)% Cut on E4x4 20 GeV -> Rate: 2 kHz, Eff: 43%, 62 (75)% Cut on E4x4 13 GeV + MET16 -> Rate: 2 kHz, Eff: 55%, 69 (92)% Specific study for W → tau nu. Conclusion on the study of the tau cluster: For the same rate the use of E4X4 with Missing ET gives somewhat better rates than TauClus standalone. TAU15

M. Pilar Casado 7 Study LVL1 calibration for TauClus (1) Determine hadronic weights which minimize RMS for different eta intervals > Min ~ > Min ~ > Min ~ > Min ~ > Min ~ > Min ~ 0.9

M. Pilar Casado 8 Study LVL1 calibration for TauClus (2) Check resolution with standard and optimal weights. - RMS improves by %.

M. Pilar Casado 9 Study LVL1 calibration for TauClus (3) Check the effect of the weights in the efficiency as a function of Vis PT and eta. - The efficiency improves by ~3 %. TAU25i, W → 

M. Pilar Casado 10 Study LVL1 calibration for TauClus (4) Check the effect of the weights in the rates.. Conclusion: An adjustment of the calibration results in a slight increase of the efficiency for the signal and more uniformity across eta. The total background is unchanged but is also more uniform across eta. TAU25i

M. Pilar Casado 11 Em Isolation Rate -20%, Efficiency -5% For EmIsol < 5: Rate -15%, Efficiency -5% Rate -40%, Efficiency -5% More efficient at high energy

M. Pilar Casado 12 Had Isolation Rate -20%, Efficiency -10% For HdIsol < 3: Rate -10%, Efficiency -10% Rate -40%, Efficiency -10% Not as efficient as EmIsol

M. Pilar Casado 13 An example of LVL 2 calorimeter optimization Tau15iTau25iTau35i EMRadius isoFrac stripWidth Energy W→  signal Efficiency 95% 85% -10% 95% 85% -10% 97% 85% -10% Background rate (10 31 ) 775 Hz 566 Hz -30% 146 Hz 116 Hz -30% 40 Hz 29 Hz -30% EMRadius Strip Width M. Bosman, E. Pérez

M. Pilar Casado 14 Ongoing LVL2 optimization List of issues to be addressed in the near future: –Calorimeter (T2CaloTau): optimization of cuts & cluster seed definition optimize tau LVL2 calorimeter calibration. –Tracking (T2IDTau): optimization of cuts for each menu investigation of pt-balance or candidate mass cut –“EFlow” à la tau1P3P (algorithm exists, needs testing). simpler approach. M. Bosman, O. Igonkina, E. Pérez

M. Pilar Casado 15 Technical status Migration to new steering and new python configuration is completed. L2 runs in nightly and gives output simular to EF is under tests Migration to configurables has not progressed very far due to delays with ToolHandleArray and due to delays of migration of offline code (not only tauRec, but also cluster and track reconstruction) All algorithms are migrated to new way of monitoring/validation as will be described by Meng O. Igonkina, S. Xella

M. Pilar Casado 16 Summary and outlook For the study of the LVL1 tau cluster: For the same rate the use E4X4 with Missing ET gives somewhat better rates than TauClus standalone (normalizing with respect to offline and using offline MET). For the study on the LVL1 calibration: An adjustment of the calibration results in a slight increase of the efficiency for the signal and more uniformity across eta. The total background is unchanged but is also more uniform across eta. From LVL2: many ongoing optimizations that will help in the overall performance. Documentation on Tau Hypothesis algorithms (including cuts for ): For the future: –Include new LVL1 calibration when available. –Extend studies to and 900 GeV. –Continue LVL2 optimization.