C. Milsténe1 Muon Purity and Detection Efficiency Variation With Depth in an SiD Type Detector C. Milstene- Fermilab SiD Workshop- SLAC- October-2006 In.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Detecting Particles Martin Gallacher – University of Birmingham.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
The Design of a Detector for the Electron Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Anders Ingo Kirleis 1, William Foreman 1, Elke-Caroline Aschenauer 2, and Matthew.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG Introduction The Detector Choices Simulation The structure and detector design The Expected performance Schedule.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
August, 7ILC1 Kudzanayi Munetsi-Mugomba supervised by Dr. Caroline Milstene Software Infrastructure for the Charged Particles Reconstruction at the International.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility (CEBAF) at JLab in Newport News, Virginia, is used to study the properties of quark matter. CEBAF.
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia Goal: To generate electron fiducial.
Muon/Special Detector Studies Update St. Malo Muon ID - Single muons, single pion rejection. TESLA TDR (M. Piccolo) 2. Muon ID events:  ID efficiency,
1 ILC/SiD Muon System Progress Colorado State – D. Warner, R. Wilson Fermilab – G. Fisk, C. Milstene UC Davis – J. Lizarazo, M. Tripathi Indiana University.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
Individual Particle Reconstruction The PFA Approach to Detector Development for the ILC Steve Magill (ANL) Norman Graf, Ron Cassell (SLAC)
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia INTRODUCTION The purpose of.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
PFA Study with Jupiter Contents : 1. Introduction 2. GLD-PFA
Summary of Muon Studies Yoke Discussion
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
A Driutti, A Para, G. Pauletta, N. Rodriguez Briones & H. Wenzel
MINERVA Z Mass Exercise
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG 16 September 2002.
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Argonne National Laboratory
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
Particles going through matter
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Presentation transcript:

C. Milsténe1 Muon Purity and Detection Efficiency Variation With Depth in an SiD Type Detector C. Milstene- Fermilab SiD Workshop- SLAC- October-2006 In collaboration with: G. Fisk and A. Para (Fermilab) JINST C. Milstene, G. Fisk, A. Para

C. Milsténe2 The Detector ECal (30Layer) HCal (34Layer) CoilMudet (32Layer) X Λ dE/dx - 190MeV Segmentation: ΔΦ =Δθ= 3.7 mr X Λ dE/dx - 800MeV Segmentation: ΔΦ =Δθ= 5.23 mr X Λ - 2 dE/dx - 362MeV X Λ dE/dx MeV Segmentation: ΔΦ =Δθ= 21 mr Mu Detector: 230cm thick for the magnet flux return: 5 cm Fe plates 32 instrumented gaps.(1.5cm Sc) (Not quite SiD)

C. Milsténe3 The Detector Display Tracker Ecal λ HCal λ Coil - 2λ Mudet λ Non-Instrumented Fe230cm Fe Magnet Flux Return 100cm

C. Milsténe4 Quadrant SiD

C. Milsténe5 The Stepper The Stepper software simultaneously includes dE/dx and q v x B effects, We study the effect on single mono- energetique particles The effect on bbar-b jets

C. Milsténe6 Stepper-Analytical Form arXiv:physics.inst.det/ C. Milstene, G. Fisk, A. Para Mixed units are used, px, py, pz are in GeV/c, E(n) in GeV, clight =3x108 m/s, δt in seconds, Bz in Tesla The point ( x(n+1),y(n+1),z(n+1) ) is the position at step n+1, after the momentum change to px,y,z(n+1) at step n. q is the charge, Bz the magnetic field, dt(n) the time spent and ds the path length in one step

C. Milsténe7 Single Muons-Reconstructed by the Stepper B=5 Tesla Magnetic Field EMCAL -2 RED Rings HDCAL -2 BLACK Rings COIL -2 GREEN Rings MUDET -2 BLUE Rings x(cm) y(cm) 3 GeV Muons curling by the high B field In the tracker, Ecal, HCal 50GeV Muons straight

C. Milsténe8 2GeV Muon Curling Back in HCal Reconstructed And Simulated -Details Reconstructed-YellowSimulated- Green and blue

C. Milsténe9 Muon Reconstruction Efficiency The Stepper has been improved further by a Runge-Kutta method and A Kalman-filter stepper has been developped. arXiv: physics.inst-det/ C.Milstene,G.Fisk,A.Para

C. Milsténe10 Runge-Kutta Correction We now focuses mostly on lower momenta, ~30% of the data reaching the muon detector (3GeV≤ p <5GeV). The approximation is insufficient here, at least at the end of their path.. Here ΔpT (GeV/c) is the variation in pT of a particle going through a field B (Tesla) for a timeΔt(s). Is the Field dependant change In Momentum E is the particle energy in GeV, q its charge in electron units, clight (m/s ). In a 5 Tesla magnetic field, for low momenta, one has to calculate the integral in order to obtain the finite difference equation of motion

C. Milsténe11 The Jets Data arXiv:physics.inst.det/ C. Milstene, G. Fisk, A. Para bbar-b jets events generated with Geant4 -P>3GeV required in order for the Muon to reach the Muon Detector - A polar angle cut define the barrel. [ ]rd

C. Milsténe12 The Algorithm Rely on the 2 main characteristic properties of the muon 1.The muon creates a repetitive pattern of 1 to 2 hits per cell all the way 2.The muon travels deep without interacting whereas hadrons are filtered out For each Charged track with a good fit in the tracker hits are collected in a road in (ΔΦ,Δθ) in ECal, HCal and Mudet -Accounting for v&B and dE/dx effects -requiring no more than 2 hits/cell -requiring a given depth reached into the Muon detector

C. Milsténe13 Layers with One or Two Hits in HCal and Mudet (MIP-like) MuDet Coil HCal 0.87 λ 1.95λ 3.75 λ4.95 λ 6.95 λ 9.5 λ 10.7 λ 14.6 λ The regular Pattern of the Thriving Muon

C. Milsténe14 Filter to Hadrons-The Cuts Hadrons tend to interact  Irregular hit patterns They don’t reach out 1/ we cut on large energy deposit in the path 2/ we cut on void on 2-3 consecutive layers 3/ we require at least 1 hits on the last 4 layers of HCal and less than 4 hits/layer (still allows neutral from neighbor tracks)

C. Milsténe15 Layers with > 3 Hits (Typical of Hadron activity) In HCal & Mudet MUDet HCal 0.87 λ 1.95λ 3.75 λ4.95 λ 6.95 λ 9.5 λ 10.7 λ 14.6 λ

C. Milsténe16 b Interacting Hadron Content Red Tracks include a 35GeV & 37GeV . Depleted Region

C. Milsténe17 Purity versus Efficiency The Purity improves from 69% end of HCal (4.95λ) to 94% end of Mudet(15 λ) The Efficiency improves from 95% to 99.6%, Remark: Muons which do not enter the layer e.g. bending into the endcaps at a certain level of their path, are not included in the normalization.

C. Milsténe18 HCal & MuDet Barrel - Purity and Efficiency Cuts Conditions for 10,000 b-b_bar MuonsPionsK’sProtons Tracker Recons & Final Tracks Good Fit Tracker or 2 hits in each of the last 5 layers of Hcal. (No 0’s) MuDet ≥12hits,≥12layers Min Mudet Hits=1,2 Max Mudet Hits ≤

C. Milsténe19 Momentum distributions in b jets πkprotonμ Total Gen Gen > 3GeV Fract. >3GeV Recon>3GeV Good Fit % % % % Identified As μ Rejection Efficiency 1/2611/1041/ % In bbar-b jets events the muon is ~1.7% of the particle population

C. Milsténe20 Mu& Pions Background Generated/Detected By Mu Algorithm- Out Of b-b bar Jets P(GeV/c)- 2GeV/bin Signal: Generated Muons in Red Detected Muons in Magenta Background: Generated Pions in Blue Detected Pions by Mu Algorithm In Green Remark: Below 2.96 GeV the Particles do not reach The Muon Detector

C. Milsténe21 A study of Muon ID and Purity in the detector shows that in bbar-b events one is able to identify the muons (1.7% of the population) with an efficiency which can reach 99.6% and a purity of 95% We have also shown that we get a steady improvement of purity and muon efficiency with depth. The purity rises from 69% at the end of HCal to 94% at the end of Mudet and the efficiency from 95% to 99.6% It requires just the instrumentation of part of the return iron of the magnet. The code is being developed to take a better care of the muons at the end of their trajectory. Due to small losses of barrel muons to the endcap the muon efficiency will improve further with the inclusion of the endcap to the code in development. Conclusion

C. Milsténe22 The upper figure shows the layer number where the muon reaches z- max. All the muons that reach z- max in layer 11 or higher meet the  ID requirement. I.e. they are detected. The plot shows that most of the barrel muons above 3 GeV/c stay in the barrel and meet the muon penetration requirement for  ID. The lower figure is a blow-up of the upper histogram that shows the exit layer for those muons that do not meet the penetration requirement of 12 or more layers. 33 barrel muons exit the barrel before they reach z- max, so they are un-detected muons; they do not penetrate  12 layers. Last Layer With Activity

C. Milsténe23 Vertex Detector & 1 st Tracker Layer

C. Milsténe24 Extra Info -Ecal rmin=127cm,rout=142cm->15cm Z=210cm; 0.25W+0.05Si+0.2(air+G10)->d=0.5cm -Hcal rmin=154cm,rout=250cm->102cm Z=312cm;2cmFe+1cmSc -> d=3cm -Mudet rmin=348cm,rout=540cm->192cm Z=313cm; 5cmFe+1.5cmSc -> d=6.5cm